Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 158
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 14 4月, 2016 7 次提交
  3. 13 4月, 2016 25 次提交
  5. 12 4月, 2016 8 次提交
    • T
      drm/i915: Only grab correct forcewake for the engine with execlists · 3756685a
      由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于 
      Rather than blindly waking up all forcewake domains on command
submission, we can teach each engine what is (or are) the correct
one to take.

On platforms with multiple forcewake domains like VLV, CHV, SKL
and BXT, this has the potential of lowering the GPU and CPU
power use and submission latency.

To implement it we add a function named
intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg whose purpose is to query which
forcewake domains need to be taken to read or write a specific
register with raw mmio accessors.

These enables the execlists engine setup  to query which
forcewake domains are relevant per engine on the currently
running platform.

v2:
  * Kerneldoc.
  * Split from intel_uncore.c macro extraction, WARN_ON,
    no warns on old platforms. (Chris Wilson)

v3:
  * Single domain per engine, mention all registers,
    bi-directional function and a new name, fix handling
    of gen6 and gen7 writes. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460468251-14069-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
      3756685a
    • T
      drm/i915: Remove forcewake request registers from the shadowed table · a70ecc16
      由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于 
      Chris Wilson points out that we can remove them from the array
since they are always written to with raw accessors.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      a70ecc16
    • T
      drm/i915: Extract knowledge of register forcewake domains · 6863b76c
      由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于 
      Knowledge of which register per platform belonds in which
forcewake domain was embedded in the MMIO accessors themselves.

Extract it into standalone macros so they can be used from
new code in the following patches.

This causes GCC to compile some of the MMIO accessors slightly
differently and grows the code a tiny amount. But none of the
growth is on the fast-path so it does not matter hugely.

Affected sizes before:

00000000000026f0 00000000000001a5 t gen6_read16
0000000000002390 00000000000001a5 t gen6_read32
00000000000028a0 00000000000001a5 t gen6_read64

00000000000061d0 000000000000019e t gen8_write16
0000000000006510 000000000000019d t gen8_write32
0000000000006370 000000000000019d t gen8_write64
00000000000021f0 000000000000019d t gen8_write8

Affected sizes after:

0000000000002840 00000000000001aa t gen6_read16
00000000000024e0 00000000000001a9 t gen6_read32
00000000000029f0 00000000000001a9 t gen6_read64

0000000000004f20 00000000000001b5 t gen8_write16
0000000000004ba0 00000000000001b4 t gen8_write32
00000000000050e0 00000000000001b4 t gen8_write64
0000000000004d60 00000000000001b4 t gen8_write8

Other MMIO accessors are not affected in size.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      6863b76c
    • T
      drm/i915: Do not serialize forcewake acquire across domains · 4e1176dd
      由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于 
      On platforms with multiple forcewake domains it seems more efficient
to request all desired ones and then to wait for acks to avoid
needlessly serializing on each domain.

v2: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460045074-1006-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
      4e1176dd
    • T
      drm/i915: Simplify for_each_fw_domain iterators · 33c582c1
      由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于 
      As the vast majority of users do not use the domain id variable,
we can eliminate it from the iterator and also change the latter
using the same principle as was recently done for for_each_engine.

For a couple of callers which do need the domain mask, store it
in the domain array (which already has the domain id), then both
can be retrieved thence.

Result is clearer code and smaller generated binary, especially
in the tight fw get/put loops. Also, relationship between domain
id and mask is no longer assumed in the macro.

v2: Improve grammar in the commit message and rename the
    iterator to for_each_fw_domain_masked for consistency.
    (Dave Gordon)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      33c582c1
    • T
      drm/i915: Use consistent forcewake auto-release timeout across kernel configs · a57a4a67
      由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于 
      Because it is based on jiffies, current implementation releases the
forcewake at any time between straight away and between 1ms and 10ms,
depending on the kernel configuration (CONFIG_HZ).

This is probably not what has been desired, since the dynamics of keeping
parts of the GPU awake should not be correlated with this kernel
configuration parameter.

Change the auto-release mechanism to use hrtimers and set the timeout to
1ms with a 1ms of slack. This should make the GPU power consistent
across kernel configs, and timer slack should enable some timer coalescing
where multiple force-wake domains exist, or with unrelated timers.

For GlBench/T-Rex this decreases the number of forcewake releases from
~480 to ~300 per second, and for a heavy combined OGL/OCL test from
~670 to ~360 (HZ=1000 kernel).

Even though this reduction can be attributed to the average release period
extending from 0-1ms to 1-2ms, as discussed above, it will make the
forcewake timeout consistent for different CONFIG_HZ values.

Real life measurements with the above workload has shown that, with this
patch, both manage to auto-release the forcewake between 2-4 times per
10ms, even though the number of forcewake gets is dramatically different.

T-Rex requests between 5-10 explicit gets and 5-10 implict gets in each
10ms period, while the OGL/OCL test requests 250 and 380 times in the same
period.

The two data points together suggest that the nature of the forwake
accesses is bursty and that further changes and potential timeout
extensions, or moving the start of timeout from the first to the last
automatic forcewake grab, should be carefully measured for power and
performance effects.

v2:
  * Commit spelling. (Dave Gordon)
  * More discussion on numbers in the commit. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      a57a4a67
    • V
      drm/i915: Get panel_type from OpRegion panel details · a0562819
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      We've had problems on several occasions with using the panel type
from the VBT block 40. Usually it seems to be 2, which often
doesn't give us the correct timings for the panel. After some
more digging I found a way to get a panel type via the OpRegion
SWSCI GBDA "Get Panel Details" method. Let's try to use it.

The spec has this to say about the output:
"Bits [15:8] - Panel Type
 Bits contain the panel type user setting from CMOS
 00h = Not Valid, use default Panel Type & Timings from VBT
 01h - 0Fh = Panel Number"

Another version of the spec lists the valid range as 1-16, which makes
more sense since VBT supports 16 panels. Based on actual results
from Rob's G45, 1-16 is what we need to accept.

The other bits in the output don't look relevant for the problem at
hand.

The input is specified as:
"Bits [31:4] - Reserved
 Reserved (must be zero)
 Bits [3:0] - Panel Number
 These bits contain the sequential index of Panel, starting at 0 and
 counting upwards from the first integrated Internal Flat-Panel Display
 Encoder present, and then from the first external Display Encoder
 (e.g., S/DVO-B then S/DVO-C) which supports Internal Flat-Panels.
 0h - 0Fh = Panel number"

For now I've just hardcoded the input panel number as 0. That would seem
like a decent choise for LVDS. Not so sure about eDP when port != A.

v2: Accept values 1-16
    Filter out bogus results in opregion code (Jani)
    Add debug logging for all the different branches (Jani)

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rob Kramer <rob@solution-space.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94825Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460359431-11003-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Tested-by: NRob Kramer <rob@solution-space.com>
      a0562819
    • V
      drm/i915: Replace the static panel_type variable with dev_priv->vbt.panel_type · 3e845c7a
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      Store the extracted panel_type under dev_priv.vbt instead of keeping
around a static variable for it.

Cc: Rob Kramer <rob@solution-space.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      3e845c7a