- 20 10月, 2011 24 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Since free space inodes now use normal checksumming we need to make sure to account for their metadata use. So reserve metadata space, and then if we fail to write out the metadata we can just release it, otherwise it will be freed up when the io completes. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
In moving some enospc stuff around I noticed that when we unmount we are often evicting the free space cache inodes before we do our last commit. This isn't bad, but it makes us constantly have to re-read the inodes back. So instead don't evict the cache until after we do our last commit, this will make things a little less crappy and makes a future enospc change work properly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
While debugging a different issue I noticed that we were always reserving space when we tried to use our truncate block rsv's. This is because they didn't have a ->size value, so use_block_rsv just assumes there is nothing reserved and it does a reserve_metadata_bytes. This is because btrfs_check_block_rsv() doesn't actually add to the size of the block rsv. That seems to be the right thing to do so set ->size to the minimum truncate size we need, since we will always only refill to that size anyway, and this way everything works out correctly. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we have to emergency reserve space we need to not increase the block_rsv size, otherwise we'll leak space. Take for instance delalloc, say we reserve 4k, and we use that 4k, and then we have to emergency allocate another 4k, we bump the size up to 8k, however we've only accounted for 4k in reservations in all of our supporting logic, so we'll go to free the 4k and end up having a size of 4k, which will cause us to later not free as much space. I saw this doing testing where I wasn't reserving enough space for something but was still leaking space, very frustrating. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When changing back to using a spin_lock to protect the extent counters I decided that since we would only be dropping our original extent, it was ok to just drop the extent and return. However since somebody else could have come in and done a reservation, we need to do the normal song and dance to clear the reservation out properly. So calculate how much space we need to free, and then subtract what we just attempted to reserve. If it's more then we know we need to drop those bytes from the delalloc block rsv. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We are setting ins_len to 1 even tho we are just modifying an item that should be there already. This may cause the search stuff to split nodes on the way down needelessly. Set this to 0 since we aren't inserting anything. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If you run xfstest 224 it you will get lots of messages about not being able to delete inodes and that they will be cleaned up next mount. This is because btrfs_block_rsv_check was not calling reserve_metadata_bytes with the ability to flush, so if there was not enough space, it simply failed. But in truncate and evict case we could easily flush space to try and get enough space to do our work, so make btrfs_block_rsv_check take a flush argument to pass down to reserve_metadata_bytes. Now xfstests 224 runs fine without all those complaints. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
With btrfs_truncate_inode_items we always return if we have to go to another leaf, which makes us do our reservation again. This means we will only ever modify one leaf at a time, so we only need 1 items worth of slack space. Also, since we are deleting we will not be creating nodes as we go down, if anything we'll be free'ing them as we merge them together, so make a different calculation for truncate which will only have the worst case useage of COW'ing the entire path down to the leaf. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Lukas found a problem where if he tries to fallocate over the same region twice and the first fallocate took up all the space we would fail with ENOSPC. This is because we reserve the total space we want to use for fallocate, regardless of wether or not we will have to actually preallocate. So instead move the check into the loop where we actually have to do the preallocate. Thanks, Tested-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Since we've optimized the truncate path, we no longer require this function. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently we're starting and stopping a transaction for no real reason, so kill that and just reserve enough space as if we can truncate all in one transaction. Also use btrfs_block_rsv_check() for our reserve to minimize the amount of space we may have to allocate for our slack space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We will try and reserve metadata bytes in btrfs_block_rsv_check and if we cannot because we have a transaction open it will return EAGAIN, so we do not need to try and commit the transaction again. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The priority and refill_used flags are not used anymore, and neither is the usage counter, so just remove them from btrfs_block_rsv. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported getting spammed when moving to 3.0 by this message. Since we switched to the normal checksumming infrastructure all old free space caches will be wrong and need to be regenerated so people are likely to see this message a lot, so ratelimit it so it doesn't fill up their logs and freak them out. Thanks, Reported-by: NAndrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I converted btrfs_truncate to do sane reservations for truncate, but didn't convert btrfs_evict_inode. Basically we need to save the orphan_rsv for deleting the orphan item, and do normal reservations for our truncate. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This is confusing code and isn't used by anything anymore, so delete it. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch kills off the calculation for the amount of space needed for the orphan operations during a snapshot. The thing is we only do snapshots on commit, so any space that is in the block_rsv->freed[] isn't going to be in the new snapshot anyway, so there isn't any reason to require that space to be reserved for the snapshot to occur. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have not been reserving enough space for checksums. We were just reserving bytes for the checksum items themselves, we were not taking into account having to cow the tree and such. This patch adds a csum_bytes counter to the inode for keeping track of the number of bytes outstanding we have for checksums. Then we calculate how many leaves would be required for the checksums we are given and use that to reserve space. This adds a significant amount of bytes to our reservations, but we will handle this later. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We always look for delalloc bytes in our io_tree so we can fill in delalloc. This is fine in most cases, but if we're writing out the btree_inode this is just a superfluous tree search on the io_tree, and if we have a lot of metadata dirty this could be an expensive check. So instead check to see if our io_tree has a ->fill_delalloc op, and if not don't even bother doing the lookup. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator. This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don't allocate a bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was actually in use by metadata. This passes Arne's enospc test and xfstests as well as my own enospc tests. Hopefully this will get us moving in the right direction. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We've only been able to mount with subvol=<whatever> where whatever was a subvol within whatever root we had as the default. This allows us to mount -o subvol=path/to/subvol/you/want relative from the normal fs_tree root. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently what we do is just wrong. We either 1) Alloc a new "root" dentry with sb->s_root as it's parent which is just wrong as we could walk into this subvol later on via another path and hilarity could ensue. Also we don't check the return value of d_splice_alias which isn't good either. or 2) Do a d_find_alias() which we could have lost our dentry from cache at this point and found nothing. So use d_obtain_alias(). In the case that we already have the inode/dentry in cache we will get the correct dentry. If not we will get a disconnected dentry tree so if we walk into it later on everything will be connected up properly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
reserved_bytes is not used for anything in the inode, remove it. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Moving things around to give us better packing in the btrfs_inode. This reduces the size of our inode by 8 bytes. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported a problem where ceph was getting into 100% cpu usage while doing some writing. It turns out it's because we were doing a short write on a not uptodate page, which means we'd fall back at one page at a time and fault the page in. The problem is our position is on the page boundary, so our fault in logic wasn't actually reading the page, so we'd just spin forever or until the page got read in by somebody else. This will force a readpage if we end up doing a short copy. Alexandre could reproduce this easily with ceph and reports it fixes his problem. I also wrote a reproducer that no longer hangs my box with this patch. Thanks, Reported-and-tested-by: NAlexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 21 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Fix a crash/BUG_ON in the clone ioctl due to insufficient reservation. We need to reserve space for: - adjusting the old extent (possibly splitting it) - adding the new extent - updating the inode Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We can race with readdir and the RCU path walking stuff. This is because we clear the need lookup flag before actually instantiating the inode. This will lead the RCU path walk stuff to find a dentry it thinks is valid without a d_inode attached. So instead unhash the dentry when we first start the lookup, and then clear the flag after we've instantiated the dentry so we're garunteed to either try the slow lookup, or have the d_inode set properly. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Jeff Liu 提交于
The recent reworking of btrfs' lseek lead to incorrect values being returned. This adds checks for seeking beyond EOF in SEEK_HOLE and makes sure the error values come back correct. Andi Kleen also sent in similar patches. Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Reported-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
The dst file will have the same inode flags with dst file after file clone, and I think it's unexpected. For example, the dst file will suddenly become immutable after getting some share of data with src file, if the src is immutable. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
To reproduce the bug: # mount /dev/sda7 /mnt # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/src bs=4K count=1 # umount /mnt # mount -o nodatasum /dev/sda7 /mnt # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/dst bs=4K count=1 # clone_range -s 4K -l 4K /mnt/src /mnt/dst # echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches # cat /mnt/dst # dmesg ... btrfs no csum found for inode 258 start 0 btrfs csum failed ino 258 off 0 csum 2566472073 private 0 It's because part of the file is checksummed and the other part is not, and then btrfs will complain checksum is not found when we read the file. Disallow file clone if src and dst file have different checksum flag, so we ensure a file is completely checksummed or unchecksummed. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
It's a bug in commit f81c9cdc (Btrfs: truncate pages from clone ioctl target range) We should pass the dest range to the truncate function, but not the src range. Also move the function before locking extent state. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Hidetoshi Seto 提交于
Since the d_off in the first dirent for "." (that originates from the 4th argument "offset" of filldir() for the 2nd dirent for "..") is wrongly assigned in btrfs_real_readdir(), telldir returns same offset for different locations. | # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1 | # mount /dev/sdb1 fs0 | # cd fs0 | # touch file0 file1 | # ../test | telldir: 0 | readdir: d_off = 2, d_name = "." | telldir: 2 | readdir: d_off = 2, d_name = ".." | telldir: 2 | readdir: d_off = 3, d_name = "file0" | telldir: 3 | readdir: d_off = 2147483647, d_name = "file1" | telldir: 2147483647 To fix this problem, pass filp->f_pos (which is loff_t) instead. | # ../test | telldir: 0 | readdir: d_off = 1, d_name = "." | telldir: 1 | readdir: d_off = 2, d_name = ".." | telldir: 2 | readdir: d_off = 3, d_name = "file0" : At the moment the "offset" for "." is unused because there is no preceding dirent, however it is better to pass filp->f_pos to follow grammatical usage. Signed-off-by: NHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2011 8 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
You can see there's no file extent with range [0, 4096]. Check this by btrfsck: # btrfsck /dev/sda7 root 5 inode 258 errors 100 ... Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
num_bytes should be 4096 not 12288. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
An attribute is not removed by 'setfattr -x attr file' and remains visible in attr list. This makes xfstests/062 pass again. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If we write some data into the data hole of the file(no preallocation for this hole), Btrfs will allocate some disk space, and update nbytes of the inode, but the other element--disk_i_size needn't be updated. At this condition, we must update inode metadata though disk_i_size is not changed(btrfs_ordered_update_i_size() return 1). # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1 # mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt # touch /mnt/a # truncate -s 856002 /mnt/a # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/a bs=4K count=1 conv=nocreat,notrunc # umount /mnt # btrfsck /dev/sdb1 root 5 inode 257 errors 400 found 32768 bytes used err is 1 Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we write some data to the place that is beyond the end of the file in direct I/O mode, a data hole will be created. And Btrfs should insert a file extent item that point to this hole into the fs tree. But unfortunately Btrfs forgets doing it. The following is a simple way to reproduce it: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc2 # mount /dev/sdc2 /test4 # touch /test4/a # dd if=/dev/zero of=/test4/a seek=8 count=1 bs=4K oflag=direct conv=nocreat,notrunc # umount /test4 # btrfsck /dev/sdc2 root 5 inode 257 errors 100 Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The function - btrfs_cont_expand() forgot to close the transaction handle before it jump out the while loop. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
At the beginning of create_pending_snapshot, trans->block_rsv is set to pending->block_rsv and is used for snapshot things, however, when it is done, we do not recover it as will. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
While truncating free space cache, we forget to change trans->block_rsv back to the original one, but leave it with the orphan_block_rsv, and then with option inode_cache enable, it leads to countless warnings of btrfs_alloc_free_block and btrfs_orphan_commit_root: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5711 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x180/0x350 [btrfs]() ... WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]() Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-