Putting the context id of the primary phy context in
the placeholder of the secondary is obviously a bad
idea.
Spotted by smatch.

Fixes: dac94da8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: new BT Coex API")
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

When we disassociate, mac80211 removes the station and
then, it sets the bss it unsets the assoc bool in bss_info.

Since the firwmware wants it the opposite (first set the
MAC context as unassoc, and only then, remove the STA of
the API), we have a small period of time in which the STA
in firmware doesn't have a valid ieee80211_sta pointer.
During that time, iwl_mvm_vif->ap_sta_id, is still set
to the STA in firmware that represent the AP.

This avoids:

[ 4481.476246] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000045
[ 4481.479521] IP: [<f8416a6a>] iwl_mvm_bt_coex_reduced_txp+0x7a/0x190 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.482023] *pde = 00000000
[ 4481.484332] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 4481.486897] Modules linked in: netconsole configfs autofs4 rfcomm(O) bnep(O) nfsd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd binfmt_misc sunrpc fscache arc4 iwlmvm(O) mac80211(O) btusb(O) iwlwifi(O) bluetooth(O) cfg80211(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi coretemp dell_wmi snd_hda_codec_idt compat(O) dell_laptop aesni_intel i915 sparse_keymap dcdbas cryptd psmouse serio_raw aes_i586 microcode snd_hda_intel drm_kms_helper snd_hda_codec drm snd_pcm snd_timer i2c_algo_bit video intel_agp intel_gtt snd soundcore snd_page_alloc crc32c_intel ahci sdhci_pci libahci sdhci mmc_core e1000e xhci_hcd [last unloaded: configfs]
[ 4481.502983]
[ 4481.505599] Pid: 6507, comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G           O 3.4.43-dev #1 Dell Inc. Latitude E6430/0CMDYV
[ 4481.508575] EIP: 0060:[<f8416a6a>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
[ 4481.511248] EIP is at iwl_mvm_bt_coex_reduced_txp+0x7a/0x190 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.513947] EAX: ffffffea EBX: 00000002 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000001
[ 4481.516710] ESI: ec6f0f28 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e8175dfc ESP: e8175d9c
[ 4481.519445]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[ 4481.522185] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000045 CR3: 01a5e000 CR4: 001407d0
[ 4481.524950] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[ 4481.527768] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[ 4481.530565] Process kworker/0:1 (pid: 6507, ti=e8174000 task=e8032b20 task.ti=e8174000)
[ 4481.533447] Stack:
[ 4481.536379]  e472439f 00003a12 e8032b20 e8033048 00000001 e8175ddc 00000246 e8033040
[ 4481.540132]  00000002 01814990 ec4d1ddc e8175dcc 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 4481.543867]  00000000 00000000 00000001 000001c8 009b0002 ec4d1ddc ec6f0f28 00000000
[ 4481.547633] Call Trace:
[ 4481.550578]  [<f8418027>] iwl_mvm_bt_rssi_event+0x197/0x220 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.553537]  [<f840919c>] iwl_mvm_stat_iterator+0xdc/0x240 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.556582]  [<f8d129c2>] __iterate_active_interfaces+0xe2/0x1f0 [mac80211]
[ 4481.559544]  [<f84090c0>] ? iwl_mvm_update_smps+0x90/0x90 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.562519]  [<f84090c0>] ? iwl_mvm_update_smps+0x90/0x90 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.565498]  [<f8d12b0c>] ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces+0x3c/0x50 [mac80211]
[ 4481.568421]  [<f8409b43>] iwl_mvm_rx_statistics+0xb3/0x130 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.571349]  [<f8405431>] iwl_mvm_async_handlers_wk+0xc1/0xf0 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.574251]  [<c1052915>] ? process_one_work+0x105/0x5c0
[ 4481.577162]  [<c1052991>] process_one_work+0x181/0x5c0
[ 4481.580025]  [<c1052915>] ? process_one_work+0x105/0x5c0
[ 4481.582861]  [<f8405370>] ? iwl_mvm_rx_fw_logs+0x20/0x20 [iwlmvm]
[ 4481.585722]  [<c10530f1>] worker_thread+0x121/0x2c0
[ 4481.588536]  [<c1052fd0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x1d0/0x1d0
[ 4481.591323]  [<c105af0d>] kthread+0x7d/0x90
[ 4481.594059]  [<c105ae90>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x120/0x120
[ 4481.596868]  [<c15b7cc2>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
[ 4481.599605] Code: 9d de c3 c8 85 c0 74 0d 80 3d f8 ae 42 f8 00 0f 84 dc 00 00 00 8b 45 c8 0f b6 d3 31 ff 89 55 c0 8b 84 90 d8 03 00 00 0f b6 55 c7 <38> 50 5b 89 45 bc 0f 84 a8 00 00 00 a1 e4 d2 04 c2 85 c0 0f 84
[ 4481.611782] EIP: [<f8416a6a>] iwl_mvm_bt_coex_reduced_txp+0x7a/0x190 [iwlmvm] SS:ESP 0068:e8175d9c
[ 4481.614985] CR2: 0000000000000045
[ 4481.687441] ---[ end trace b11bc915fbac4412 ]---
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>

The activity grading indication from the firmware should
not be used in this case, but the bt_status in the firwmare
notification.
Fix that.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The firmware always expects the Coex Mode to be set.
Moreover, the firmware expects bit 0 is the valid bits to
be set all the times.
I misunderstood the API and didn't set these bits when
commands are sent to update the paramters of the Coex. As
a result, the firmware understood that the BT Coex was
disabled (Coex mode = 0) and ignored all the updates (valid
bit 0 clear).

Fix that.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

At the firmware level, IBSS support has similar programming
requirements as AP/GO support, so use the same functions with
just small differences.

With IBSS only a single virtual interface can be used, so no
changes in the advertised interface combinations are needed.

For now, don't use hardware crypto for the GTKs in IBSS mode,
the firmware should support it though.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Remove code that is not needed and always allow MIMO when
in tight mode. In loose mode, we should avoid MIMO since BT
can use the other antenna to Rx while we Tx.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Tests have shown that we should go SMSP_STATIC when BT
traffic is high, and stay in dynamic if BT traffic is low.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

BT Coex needs to be updated when the bandwidth is modified
by the AP.
While at it, remove the vif parameter from
bt_coex_vif_change since it was unused.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Single shared antenna devices need a special LUT.
Address this need.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

In loose BT Coex scheme, the aggregation size doesn't need to
be limited.

To avoid triggering it, remove a lockdep assertion - we need
to compute the AMPDU size limit from rate control code which
can't take mvm->mutex. This means that there is a race but in
the worst case, we will have a wrong AMPDU size limit which
is not a big issue.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Rssi events were enabled on interfaces using 5.2GHz.
Interfaces on 5.2GHz were taken into account while
determining the ACK / CTS kill mask. Fix that.

The last rssi notified to BT Coex was reset every BT Coex
Notification. Since we get a lot of these notifications
from the firmware, we reset the rssi all the time which
means that the bt_rssi_event is called all the time.
Fix that by puting the rssi we pull upon BT Coex
notification into iwl_mvm_vif_bf_data.last_bt_coex_event
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

When we have only one antenna for BT and WiFi, reduced Tx
power is irrelevant.
Also, in loose scheme, we should not use reduced Tx power
nor set the control mask to Tx power.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The data in MailBox comes direclty from the BT core.
We should use the data processed by the WiFi fw that is
appended to the MailBox in the BT Coex notification.
Also decide on whether the Coex type based on the input
from the the firmware and not hard coded.

Also fix the SMPS SISO threshold to 2 (it was 3).
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This was due to a fw remainder of old implementation.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This is the new API for BT Coex. The full functionality
will be implemented in further patches.

Note: this disables BT Coex for the currently existing
fw (-7 version).

There is also a new command - the channel inhibition command.

This command tells BT what channels to avoid in order to
minimise the interaction between BT and WiFi.
We can tell BT about 2 channels, primary and secondary.
BT will not tune to primary at all and will avoid secondary
as much as possible.

This also means that we need to track vifs that AP / GO.
So rename iwl_mvm_bt_coex_vif_assoc to
iwl_mvm_bt_coex_vif_change to better reflect its real
meaning.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This will deadlock due to commit 9f34783863bea806
("iwlwifi: mvm: Implement BT coex notifications"):

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  3.5.0 #10 Tainted: G        W  O
  ---------------------------------------------
  kworker/2:1/5214 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&mvm->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa03be23e>] iwl_mvm_bt_rssi_event+0x5e/0x210 [iwlmvm]

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&mvm->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa03ab2d9>] iwl_mvm_async_handlers_wk+0x49/0x120 [iwlmvm]

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&mvm->mutex);
    lock(&mvm->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

Change-Id: I9104f252b34676e2f7ffcd51166f95367e08a4d9
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.rds.intel.com/21887Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Tested-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Conflicts:
	drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/bt-coex.c

Use beacon statistics notification handler
to notify bt coex about rssi changes.
Mac80211's mechanism is not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: NAndrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This command will change and be much bigger.
Prepare to that by stop allocating on the stack.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

If a vif's RSSI gets good enough, we can enable reduced
Tx power. If so, we need to update the ACK / CTS kill mask
accordingly. Since the auditing for the interfaces was bad,
we enabled reduced Tx power, but didn't update the ACK / CTS
kill mask.
This is harmless since the firmware is most likely to
discard this setting anyway, but it is a good practice
to update it.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

When there one vif on 5GHz associating, it would clear all
the BT Coex constraints. This can't work if there is
another vif on 2.4GHz. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

1x1 products will need a special LUT.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

There was a typo in the Loose LUT for BT Coex.
Fix that.
Reported-by: NRoi Cohen <roi.cohen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

In order to avoid NIC destruction due to high temperature,
CT kill will power down the NIC.

To avoid this, thermal throttling will decrease throughput
to prevent the NIC from reaching the temperature at which
CT kill is performed.
Signed-off-by: NEytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

It actually handles a BT coex notification, so rename it
to be more self explained.
Also, this function can always look at mvm->last_bt_notif
provided that the latter is updated on time.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The iterators don't need to know what bt_kill_msk means.
All they need to know is if reduced Tx power is enabled
on an interface or not. So change the member of the
iterator to be a bool.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

When we roam to A band, we don't need to constraint WiFi
any more since it is operating on a different band.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This allows to have better wifi TPT when BT is active under
good RSSI conditions.
Wifi will have better chance to send Acks and Cts even if BT
is active.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This module parameter isn't and won't be used. So ignore
its value and set BT_CH_ANNOUNCE unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

We should disable MIMO only if bt_traffic_load goes up to 3.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This feature is not implemented yet in firmware.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The masks were wrong. They should be 0xffffffff when SCO,
HID or SNIFF profiles are used. They should be 0xffff0000
in any other case (default) to get a bit more throughput
when the BT profile allows for it.

Fix a debug print on the way.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This will allow to track how BT core updates the driver.
This is required to debug the BT Coexistence mechanism.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

When BT traffic load gets higher, we want to avoid using the
shared antenna. In order to do so, we need to tell the AP
that we don't support MIMO any more, or at least not all
the time: in short, use the SMPS to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The BT-Coex notification is sent by the fw when there are
updates wrt. BT activity. Driver action might be taken
based on the info in this notification.

For now, update the Ack/Cts_kill_msk if HID / SCO / A2DP
profiles are active.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Send the PRIO table before the calibrations. This table
tells the fw what priority to give to what (WiFi / BT)
according to events.

Send a hardcoded BT_COEX command to the fw to enable basic
BT coexistence.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>