As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue(),
so it is better to just make it void.
Signed-off-by: Nanish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
[ Fix stale comments, remove now unnecessary __irq_work_queue() intermediate function ]
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359925703-24304-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use llist in irq_work instead of the lock-less linked list
implementation in irq_work to avoid the code duplication.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315461646-1379-6-git-send-email-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Provide a mechanism that allows running code in IRQ context. It is
most useful for NMI code that needs to interact with the rest of the
system -- like wakeup a task to drain buffers.

Perf currently has such a mechanism, so extract that and provide it as
a generic feature, independent of perf so that others may also
benefit.

The IRQ context callback is generated through self-IPIs where
possible, or on architectures like powerpc the decrementer (the
built-in timer facility) is set to generate an interrupt immediately.

Architectures that don't have anything like this get to do with a
callback from the timer tick. These architectures can call
irq_work_run() at the tail of any IRQ handlers that might enqueue such
work (like the perf IRQ handler) to avoid undue latencies in
processing the work.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Acked-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
[ various fixes ]
Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <1287036094.7768.291.camel@yhuang-dev>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>