1. 26 4月, 2007 8 次提交
  2. 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 31 1月, 2007 1 次提交
    • L
      [IPV6]: fix BUG of ndisc_send_redirect() · 29556526
      Li Yewang 提交于
        When I tested IPv6 redirect function about kernel 2.6.19.1, and found
      that the kernel can send redirect packets whose target address is global
      address, and the target is not the actual endpoint of communication.
      
        But the criteria conform to RFC2461, the target address defines as
      following:
      
        Target Address An IP address that is a better first hop to use for
                       he ICMP Destination Address.  When the target is
                       the actual endpoint of communication, i.e., the
                       destination is a neighbor, the Target Address field
                       MUST contain the same value as the ICMP Destination
                       Address field.  Otherwise the target is a better
                       first-hop router and the Target Address MUST be the
                       router's link-local address so that hosts can
                       uniquely identify routers.
      
      According to this definition, when a router redirect to a host, the
      target address either the better first-hop router's link-local address
      or the same as the ICMP destination address field. But the function of
      ndisc_send_redirect() in net/ipv6/ndisc.c, does not check the target
      address correctly.
      
      There is another definition about receive Redirect message in RFC2461:
      
      8.1.  Validation of Redirect Messages
      
         A host MUST silently discard any received Redirect message that does
         not satisfy all of the following validity checks:
         ......
         - The ICMP Target Address is either a link-local address (when
           redirected to a router) or the same as the ICMP Destination
           Address (when redirected to the on-link destination).
         ......
      
      And the receive redirect function of ndisc_redirect_rcv() implemented
      this definition, checks the target address correctly.
          if (ipv6_addr_equal(dest, target)) {
              on_link = 1;
          } else if (!(ipv6_addr_type(target) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)) {
              ND_PRINTK2(KERN_WARNING
                     "ICMPv6 Redirect: target address is not link-local.\n");
              return;
          }
      
      So, I think the send redirect function must check the target address
      also.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Yewang <lyw@nanjing-fnst.com>
      Acked-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      29556526
  4. 11 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 03 12月, 2006 3 次提交
  6. 06 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 16 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 23 9月, 2006 9 次提交
  9. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 21 3月, 2006 6 次提交
  11. 14 1月, 2006 1 次提交
    • J
      [NET]: Use NIP6_FMT in kernel.h · 46b86a2d
      Joe Perches 提交于
      There are errors and inconsistency in the display of NIP6 strings.
      	ie: net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
      
      There are errors and inconsistency in the display of NIPQUAD strings too.
      	ie: net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c
      
      This patch:
      	adds NIP6_FMT to kernel.h
      	changes all code to use NIP6_FMT
      	fixes net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
      	adds NIPQUAD_FMT to kernel.h
      	fixes net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ftp.c
      	changes a few uses of "%u.%u.%u.%u" to NIPQUAD_FMT for symmetry to NIP6_FMT
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      46b86a2d
  12. 06 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 09 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  14. 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  15. 22 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  16. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4