Some functions dereferenced their GPIO descriptor argument without
checking its validity first, potentially leading to an oops when given
an invalid argument.

This patch also makes gpio_get_value() more resilient when given an
invalid GPIO, returning 0 instead of silently crashing.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Convert to the much saner new idr interface.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The debugfs files really need to hold the gpiolib spinlock before
accessing the list. Otherwise chip addition/removal will cause an oops.

Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Add a pointer to the gpio_chip structure that references the array of
GPIO descriptors belonging to the chip, and update gpiolib code to use
this pointer instead of the global gpio_desc[] array. This is another
step towards the removal of the gpio_desc[] global array.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.orh>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Make sure gpiolib works internally with descriptors and (chip, offset)
pairs instead of using the global integer namespace. This prepares the
ground for the removal of the global gpio_desc[] array and the
introduction of the descriptor-based GPIO API.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
[grant.likely: Squash in fix for link error when CONFIG_SYSFS=n]
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Re-implement gpiochip_find_base using the list of chips instead of the
global gpio_desc[] array. This makes it both simpler and more efficient,
and is needed to remove the global descriptors array.

The new code should preserve the exact same GPIO number assignment
policy as the code it is replacing. There shouldn't be any visible
change to the assigned GPIO numbers.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
[grant.likely: Added comment about assignment policy]
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

This makes the code both simpler and faster compared to parsing the GPIO
number space.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Using the GPIO chips list is much faster than parsing the entire GPIO
number space.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Use the small list of GPIO chips instead of parsing the whole GPIO
number space.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Add a list member to gpio_chip that allows all chips to be parsed
quickly. The current method requires parsing the entire GPIO integer
space, which is painfully slow. Using a list makes many chip operations
that involve lookup or parsing faster, and also simplifies the code. It
is also necessary to eventually get rid of the global gpio_desc[] array.

The list of gpio_chips is always ordered by base GPIO number to ensure
chips traversal is done in the right order.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

All in-kernel users of class_find_device() don't really need mutable
data for match callback.

In two places (kernel/power/suspend_test.c, drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c)
this patch changes match callbacks to use const search data.

The const is propagated to rtc_class_open() and power_supply_get_by_name()
parameters.

Note that there's a dev reference leak in suspend_test.c that's not
touched in this patch.
Signed-off-by: NMichał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add missing braces in an if..else condition.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

gpiochip_reserve() has no user and stands in the way of the removal of
the static gpio_desc[] array. Remove this function as well as the now
unneeded RESERVED flag of struct gpio_desc.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This is introduced by commit 9ab6e988
"gpiolib: return any error code from range creation".
Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

To be crystal clear on what the arguments mean in this
funtion dealing with both GPIO and PIN ranges with confusing
naming, we now have gpio_offset and pin_offset and we are
on the clear that these are offsets into the specific GPIO
and pin controller respectively. The GPIO chip itself will
of course keep track of the base offset into the global
GPIO number space.
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

If we try to create a range for a certain GPIO chip and the
target pin controller is not yet available it may return
a probe deferral error code, so handle this all the way
our by checking the error code.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Rename the function find_pinctrl_and_add_gpio_range()
to pinctrl_find_and_add_gpio_range() so as to be consistent
with the rest of the functions.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Like with commit 3c739ad0
it is not always enough to specify all the pins of a gpio_chip
from offset zero to be added to a pin map range, since the
mapping from GPIO to pin controller may not be linear at all,
but need to be broken into a few consecutive sub-ranges or
1-pin entries for complicated cases. The ranges may also be
sparse.

This alters the signature of the function to accept offsets
into both the GPIO-chip local pinspace and the pin controller
local pinspace.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.

So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.

This is done by:

- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
  reliably check whether this succeeds.

- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
  pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
  pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
  function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
  purpose-specific.

- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
  pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
  gpiochip_add_pin_range().

Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This makes us call gpiochio_remove_pin_ranges() in the
gpiochip_remove() function, so we get rid of ranges when
freeing the chip.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"

Got most of it's function prototypes wrong, so fix this up by:

- Moving the void declarations into static inlines in
  <linux/gpio.h> (previously the actual prototypes were declared
  here...)

- Declare the gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
  gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() functions in <asm-generic/gpio.h>
  together with the pin range struct declaration itself.

- Actually only implement these very functions in gpiolib.c
  if CONFIG_PINCTRL is set.

- Additionally export the symbols since modules will need to
  be able to do this.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

pinctrl subsystem needs gpio chip base to prepare set of gpio
pin ranges, which a given pinctrl driver can handle. This is
important to handle pinctrl gpio request calls in order to
program a given pin properly for gpio operation.

As gpio base is allocated dynamically during gpiochip
registration, presently there exists no clean way to pass this
information to the pinctrl subsystem.

After few discussions from [1], it was concluded that may be
gpio controller reporting the pin range it supports, is a
better way than pinctrl subsystem directly registering it.

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/184816

Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NShiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[Edited documentation a bit]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

We need to unlock here before returning.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

gpios requested with invalid numbers, or gpios requested from userspace via sysfs
should not try to be deferred on failure.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Add .get_direction callback to gpio_chip. This allows gpiolib
to check the current direction of a gpio.
Used to show the correct gpio direction in sysfs and debug entries.

If callback is not set then gpiolib will work as previously;
e.g. guessing everything is input until a direction is set.
Signed-off-by: NMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The gpio_export function uses nested if statements and the status
variable to handle the failure cases. This makes the function logic
difficult to follow. Refactor the code to abort immediately on failure
using goto. This makes the code slightly longer, but significantly
reduces the nesting and number of split lines and makes the code easier
to read.
Signed-off-by: NRyan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

When dumping a collection of items via seq_file, it is recommended to
use the iterator interface. For the gpiolib debugfs interface this can
be done to dump each GPIO chip in turn.

Note that for gpiolib this is a little cumbersome because it does not
provide a list of registered GPIO chips and the only way to iterate is
over each GPIO individually. Once a chip is found, the number of GPIOs
it provides can be skipped as a small optimization.

This patch was requested by Arnd Bergmann here:

	http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.tegra/3535Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Since users must be explicitly provided with a GPIO number in order to
request one the overwhelmingly common case for failing to request will
be that the required GPIO driver has not yet registered and we should
therefore defer until it has registered.

In order to avoid having to code this logic in individual drivers have
gpio_request() return -EPROBE_DEFER when failing to look up the GPIO.
Drivers which don't want this behaviour can override it if they desire.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Commit 3d0f7cf0 "gpio: Adjust of_xlate API to support multiple GPIO
chips" changed the api of gpiochip_find to drop const from the data
parameter of the match hook, but didn't also drop const from data
causing a build warning.
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

The pr_info message in gpiochip_add gets displayed for every
gpiochip registered. When first bringing up a system this
information could be helpful but for normal use it's just a
bunch of noise. Change the message to a pr_debug.
Signed-off-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

This patch changes the of_xlate API to make it possible for multiple
gpio_chips to refer to the same device tree node.  This is useful for
banked GPIO controllers that use multiple gpio_chips for a single
device.  With this change the core code will try calling of_xlate on
each gpio_chip that references the device_node and will return the
gpio number for the first one to return 'true'.
Tested-by: NRoland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Introduce new flags to automatically export GPIOs when using the convenience
functions gpio_request_one() or gpio_request_array(). This eases support for
custom boards where lots of GPIOs need to be exported for customer
applications.
Signed-off-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

I've seen users getting very confused by the WARN_ON()s for can_sleep
GPIOs in the atomic-safe paths, the discoverability of the non-atomic
version of the API seems to be hampered by the fact that it's defined
in a header file not the .c file where the warnings are.

Add a couple of comments next to the warnings to help people on their
way.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Reviwed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Adding support for the open source gpio on which client
can specify the open source property through GPIO flag
GPIOF_OPEN_SOURCE at the time of gpio request.
The open source pins are normally pulled low and it
cannot be driven to output with value of 0 and so
when client request for setting the pin to LOW, the
gpio will be set to input direction to make pin in tristate
and hence PULL-DOWN on pins will make the state to LOW.
The open source pin can be driven to HIGH by setting output
with value of 1.
Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Reviwed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Adding support for the open drain gpio on which client
can specify the open drain property through GPIO flag
GPIOF_OPEN_DRAIN at the time of gpio request.
The open drain pins are normally pulled high and it
cannot be driven to output with value of 1 and so
when client request for setting the pin to HIGH, the
gpio will be set to input direction to make pin in tristate
and hence PULL-UP on pins will make the state to HIGH.
The open drain pin can be driven to LOW by setting output
with value of 0.
Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Reviwed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have just triggered the folllowing:
>
> [   84.860321] ======================================================
> [   84.860321] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [   84.860321] 3.3.0-rc2-00026-ge4e8a39 #474 Not tainted
> [   84.860321] -------------------------------------------------------
> [   84.860321] bash/949 is trying to acquire lock:
> [   84.860321]  (sysfs_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0275358>] gpio_value_store+0x24/0xcc
> [   84.860321]
> [   84.860321] but task is already holding lock:
> [   84.860321]  (s_active#22){++++.+}, at: [<c016996c>] sysfs_write_file+0xdc/0x184
> [   84.911468]
> [   84.911468] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [   84.911468]
> [   84.920043]
> [   84.920043] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [   84.920043]
> [   84.927886] -> #1 (s_active#22){++++.+}:
> [   84.927886]        [<c008f640>] check_prevs_add+0xdc/0x150
> [   84.927886]        [<c008fc18>] validate_chain.clone.24+0x564/0x694
> [   84.927886]        [<c0090cdc>] __lock_acquire+0x49c/0x980
> [   84.951660]        [<c0091838>] lock_acquire+0x98/0x100
> [   84.951660]        [<c016a8e8>] sysfs_deactivate+0xb0/0x100
> [   84.962982]        [<c016b1b4>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x2c/0x6c
> [   84.962982]        [<c016b8bc>] sysfs_remove_dir+0x84/0x98
> [   84.962982]        [<c02590d8>] kobject_del+0x10/0x78
> [   84.974670]        [<c02c29e8>] device_del+0x140/0x170
> [   84.974670]        [<c02c2a24>] device_unregister+0xc/0x18
> [   84.985382]        [<c0276894>] gpio_unexport+0xbc/0xdc
> [   84.985382]        [<c02768c8>] gpio_free+0x14/0xfc
> [   85.001708]        [<c0276a28>] unexport_store+0x78/0x8c
> [   85.001708]        [<c02c5af8>] class_attr_store+0x18/0x24
> [   85.007293]        [<c0169990>] sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x184
> [   85.018981]        [<c0109d48>] vfs_write+0xb4/0x148
> [   85.018981]        [<c0109fd0>] sys_write+0x40/0x70
> [   85.018981]        [<c0013cc0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c
> [   85.035003]
> [   85.035003] -> #0 (sysfs_lock){+.+.+.}:
> [   85.035003]        [<c008f54c>] check_prev_add+0x680/0x698
> [   85.035003]        [<c008f640>] check_prevs_add+0xdc/0x150
> [   85.052093]        [<c008fc18>] validate_chain.clone.24+0x564/0x694
> [   85.052093]        [<c0090cdc>] __lock_acquire+0x49c/0x980
> [   85.052093]        [<c0091838>] lock_acquire+0x98/0x100
> [   85.069885]        [<c047e280>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x2f4
> [   85.069885]        [<c0275358>] gpio_value_store+0x24/0xcc
> [   85.069885]        [<c02c18dc>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24
> [   85.087158]        [<c0169990>] sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x184
> [   85.087158]        [<c0109d48>] vfs_write+0xb4/0x148
> [   85.098297]        [<c0109fd0>] sys_write+0x40/0x70
> [   85.098297]        [<c0013cc0>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c
> [   85.109069]
> [   85.109069] other info that might help us debug this:
> [   85.109069]
> [   85.117462]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [   85.117462]
> [   85.117462]        CPU0                    CPU1
> [   85.128417]        ----                    ----
> [   85.128417]   lock(s_active#22);
> [   85.128417]                                lock(sysfs_lock);
> [   85.128417]                                lock(s_active#22);
> [   85.142486]   lock(sysfs_lock);
> [   85.151794]
> [   85.151794]  *** DEADLOCK ***
> [   85.151794]
> [   85.151794] 2 locks held by bash/949:
> [   85.158020]  #0:  (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01698b8>] sysfs_write_file+0x28/0x184
> [   85.170349]  #1:  (s_active#22){++++.+}, at: [<c016996c>] sysfs_write_file+0xdc/0x184
> [   85.170349]
> [   85.178588] stack backtrace:
> [   85.178588] [<c001b824>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c008de64>] (print_circular_bug+0x100/0x114)
> [   85.193023] [<c008de64>] (print_circular_bug+0x100/0x114) from [<c008f54c>] (check_prev_add+0x680/0x698)
> [   85.193023] [<c008f54c>] (check_prev_add+0x680/0x698) from [<c008f640>] (check_prevs_add+0xdc/0x150)
> [   85.212524] [<c008f640>] (check_prevs_add+0xdc/0x150) from [<c008fc18>] (validate_chain.clone.24+0x564/0x694)
> [   85.212524] [<c008fc18>] (validate_chain.clone.24+0x564/0x694) from [<c0090cdc>] (__lock_acquire+0x49c/0x980)
> [   85.233306] [<c0090cdc>] (__lock_acquire+0x49c/0x980) from [<c0091838>] (lock_acquire+0x98/0x100)
> [   85.233306] [<c0091838>] (lock_acquire+0x98/0x100) from [<c047e280>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x2f4)
> [   85.242614] [<c047e280>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x2f4) from [<c0275358>] (gpio_value_store+0x24/0xcc)
> [   85.261840] [<c0275358>] (gpio_value_store+0x24/0xcc) from [<c02c18dc>] (dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24)
> [   85.261840] [<c02c18dc>] (dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24) from [<c0169990>] (sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x184)
> [   85.271240] [<c0169990>] (sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x184) from [<c0109d48>] (vfs_write+0xb4/0x148)
> [   85.290008] [<c0109d48>] (vfs_write+0xb4/0x148) from [<c0109fd0>] (sys_write+0x40/0x70)
> [   85.298400] [<c0109fd0>] (sys_write+0x40/0x70) from [<c0013cc0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c)
> -bash: echo: write error: Operation not permitted
>
> the way to trigger is:
>
> root@legolas:~# cd /sys/class/gpio/
> root@legolas:/sys/class/gpio# echo 2 > export
> root@legolas:/sys/class/gpio# echo 2 > unexport
> root@legolas:/sys/class/gpio# echo 2 > export
> root@legolas:/sys/class/gpio# cd gpio2/
> root@legolas:/sys/class/gpio/gpio2# echo 1 > value

Looks 'sysfs_lock' needn't to be held for unregister, so the patch below may
fix the problem.
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

A large chunk of qe_pin_request() is unnecessarily cut-and-paste
directly from of_get_named_gpio_flags().  This patch cuts out the
duplicate code and replaces it with a call to of_get_gpio().

v2: fixed compile error due to missing gpio_to_chip()
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>

This patch adds a kernel message, containing GPIO range and device
name on successful device registration, and removes duplicate messages from the following drivers:
	* gpio-adp5588
	* gpio-bt8xx
	* gpio-cs5535
	* gpio-janz-ttl
	* gpio-nomadik
	* gpio-pcf857x
	* gpio-xilinx
	* drivers/of/gpio.c
Signed-off-by: NHartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
[grant.likely@secretlab.ca: squashed 2 patches together]
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

gpio_{request,free}_array should not (and do not) modify the passed gpio
array, so make the parameter const.
Signed-off-by: NLars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: NEric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>