Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 19 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 14 3月, 2018 2 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: Implement dynamic GuC WOPCM offset and size calculation · 6b0478fb
      由 Jackie Li 提交于 
      Hardware may have specific restrictions on GuC WOPCM offset and size. On
Gen9, the value of the GuC WOPCM size register needs to be larger than the
value of GuC WOPCM offset register + a Gen9 specific offset (144KB) for
reserved GuC WOPCM. Fail to enforce such a restriction on GuC WOPCM size
will lead to GuC firmware execution failures. On the other hand, with
current static GuC WOPCM offset and size values (512KB for both offset and
size), the GuC WOPCM size verification will fail on Gen9 even if it can be
fixed by lowering the GuC WOPCM offset by calculating its value based on
HuC firmware size (which is likely less than 200KB on Gen9), so that we can
have a GuC WOPCM size value which is large enough to pass the GuC WOPCM
size check.

This patch updates the reserved GuC WOPCM size for RC6 context on Gen9 to
24KB to strictly align with the Gen9 GuC WOPCM layout. It also adds support
to verify the GuC WOPCM size aganist the Gen9 hardware restrictions. To
meet all above requirements, let's provide dynamic partitioning of the
WOPCM that will be based on platform specific HuC/GuC firmware sizes.

v2:
 - Removed intel_wopcm_init (Ville/Sagar/Joonas)
 - Renamed and Moved the intel_wopcm_partition into intel_guc (Sagar)
 - Removed unnecessary function calls (Joonas)
 - Init GuC WOPCM partition as soon as firmware fetching is completed

v3:
 - Fixed indentation issues (Chris)
 - Removed layering violation code (Chris/Michal)
 - Created separat files for GuC wopcm code  (Michal)
 - Used inline function to avoid code duplication (Michal)

v4:
 - Preset the GuC WOPCM top during early GuC init (Chris)
 - Fail intel_uc_init_hw() as soon as GuC WOPCM partitioning failed

v5:
 - Moved GuC DMA WOPCM register updating code into intel_wopcm.c
 - Took care of the locking status before writing to GuC DMA
   Write-Once registers. (Joonas)

v6:
 - Made sure the GuC WOPCM size to be multiple of 4K (4K aligned)

v8:
 - Updated comments and fixed naming issues (Sagar/Joonas)
 - Updated commit message to include more description about the hardware
   restriction on GuC WOPCM size (Sagar)

v9:
 - Minor changes variable names and code comments (Sagar)
 - Added detailed GuC WOPCM layout drawing (Sagar/Michal)
 - Refined macro definitions to be reader friendly (Michal)
 - Removed redundent check to valid flag (Michal)
 - Unified first parameter for exported GuC WOPCM functions (Michal)
 - Refined the name and parameter list of hardware restriction checking
   functions (Michal)

v10:
 - Used shorter function name for internal functions (Joonas)
 - Moved init-ealry function into c file (Joonas)
 - Consolidated and removed redundant size checks (Joonas/Michal)
 - Removed unnecessary unlikely() from code which is only called once
   during boot (Joonas)
 - More fixes to kernel-doc format and content (Michal)
 - Avoided the use of PAGE_MASK for 4K pages (Michal)
 - Added error log messages to error paths (Michal)

v11:
 - Replaced intel_guc_wopcm with more generic intel_wopcm and attached
   intel_wopcm to drm_i915_private instead intel_guc (Michal)
 - dynamic calculation of GuC non-wopcm memory start (a.k.a WOPCM Top
   offset from GuC WOPCM base) (Michal)
 - Moved WOPCM marco definitions into .c source file (Michal)
 - Exported WOPCM layout diagram as kernel-doc (Michal)

v12:
 - Updated naming, function kernel-doc to align with new changes (Michal)

v13:
 - Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
 - Corrected one tense error in comment (Sagar)
 - Corrected typos and removed spurious comments (Joonas)

Bspec: 12690
Signed-off-by: NJackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: John Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-2-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
      6b0478fb
    • J
      drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset · 3c009e3c
      由 Jackie Li 提交于 
      GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.

This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
definition.

v8:
 - Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
 - Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
   intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)

v9:
 - Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)

v10:
 - Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
   to avoid potential issues (Joonas)

v13:
 - Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
Signed-off-by: NJackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
      3c009e3c
  7. 13 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 10 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 03 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 14 12月, 2017 2 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex · 3176ff49
      由 Michał Winiarski 提交于 
      This gets rid of the following lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
       __might_fault+0x63/0x90
       _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70
       filldir+0x8c/0xf0
       dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160
       iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150
       SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89

-> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}:
       lockref_get+0x9/0x20

-> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}:
       wait_for_common+0x54/0x210
       devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150
       device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0
       device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0
       device_create+0x35/0x40
       msr_device_create+0x22/0x40
       cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0
       cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210
       smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270
       kthread+0x173/0x1b0
       ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30

-> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}:
       cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0
       __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0
       __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50
       page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c
       start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2
       secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0

-> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}:
       __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
       __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0
       __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50
       page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26
       start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2
       secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0

-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
       cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0
       apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40
       __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1
       intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915]
       intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915]
       i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915]
       i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915]
       i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915]
       i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915]
       pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
       driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480
       __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
       bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
       bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260
       driver_register+0x52/0xc0
       do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150
       do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef
       load_module+0x231c/0x2d70
       SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89

-> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}:
       lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
       __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
       i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
       i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915]
       __do_fault+0x15/0x70
       __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40
       handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
       __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
       page_fault+0x22/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                               lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
  lock(&dev->struct_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351:
 #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1
Hardware name:                  /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x5f/0x86
 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0
 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0
 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20
 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30
 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0
 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0
 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80
 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915]
 __do_fault+0x15/0x70
 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40
 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
 page_fault+0x22/0x30
RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116
RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283
RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680
RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0
RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0
R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0

v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris)
v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris)

Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1
Signed-off-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
      3176ff49
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Move shared data allocation away from submission path · 1bbbca0d
      由 Michał Winiarski 提交于 
      We need shared data for actions (e.g. guc suspend/resume), and we're
using those with GuC submission disabled.
Let's introduce intel_guc_init and move shared data alloc there.

This fixes GPF during module unload with HuC, but without GuC submission:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000005aee7809
IP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915]
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: i915(O-) netconsole x86_pkg_temp_thermal
intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel
mei_me i2c_i801 mei prime_numbers [last unloaded: i915]
CPU: 2 PID: 2794 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G     U  W  O 4.15.0-rc2+ #297
Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0054.2016.0930.1102 09/30/2016
task: 0000000055945c61 task.stack: 00000000264ccb43
RIP: 0010:intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915]
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000483df8 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880829180000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: ffff880844c2c938 RDI: ffff880844c2c000
RBP: ffff880829180000 R08: 00000000a29c58c1 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffa040ba40
R13: ffffffffa040bab0 R14: ffff88084a195060 R15: 000055df3ef357a0
FS:  00007ff43c043740(0000) GS:ffff88084e200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000000000f9 CR3: 000000083f179005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
Call Trace:
 i915_gem_suspend+0x9d/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_driver_unload+0x68/0x180 [i915]
 i915_driver_unload+0x70/0x180 [i915]
 i915_pci_remove+0x15/0x20 [i915]
 pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
 device_release_driver_internal+0x15f/0x220
 driver_detach+0x3a/0x80
 bus_remove_driver+0x58/0xd0
 pci_unregister_driver+0x29/0x90
 SyS_delete_module+0x150/0x1e0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0x9a
RIP: 0033:0x7ff43b51b5c7
RSP: 002b:00007ffe6825a758 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007ff43b51b5c7
RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055df3ef35808
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffe682596d1 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00007ff43b594880 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055df3ef357a0
R13: 00007ffe68259740 R14: 000055df3ef35260 R15: 000055df3ef357a0
Code: 00 00 02 74 03 31 c0 c3 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 52 0f
f8 ff 48 b8 01 05 00 00 02 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 04 48 8b 83 00 12 00 00 <f6> 80
f9 00 00 00 01 0f 84 a7 00 00 00 f6 80 98 00 00 00 01 0f
RIP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] RSP: ffffc90000483df8
CR2: 00000000000000f9
---[ end trace 23a192a61d937a3e ]---

Fixes: b8e5eb96 ("drm/i915/guc: Allocate separate shared data object for GuC communication")
Signed-off-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com
      1bbbca0d
  15. 24 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 16 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 27 10月, 2017 3 次提交
  21. 16 10月, 2017 3 次提交
  23. 06 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  25. 05 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  27. 26 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  29. 18 9月, 2017 4 次提交
  31. 07 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  33. 26 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  35. 19 5月, 2017 4 次提交
  37. 11 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  39. 02 5月, 2017 1 次提交