“762533ba9c0306b97e8587fdcafc500a3d7115ae”上不存在“drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/api/scan.h”
- 01 10月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Oh well. v2: Fix one more spelling fail Paulo spotted. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
So I think I've spotted a small gap in the frontbuffer tracking while discussing the logic with Paulo on irc: 1. Userspace schedules gpu rendering to the current frontbuffer. This gets tracked in dev_priv->fb_tracking.busy_bits. 2. We pageflip a fully rendered buffer before the frontbuffer rendering completes. 3. The request retiring will never clear busy_bits (since at retire time the old frontbuffer won't have obj->frontbuffer_bits set), so these bits now are stuck until someone again does a bit of frontbuffer tracking. If we clear stale busy_bits in flip_prepare this gap is closed. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 29 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
The sw cache clean on BDW is a tempoorary workaround because we cannot set cache clean on blt ring with risk of hungs. So we are doing the cache clean on sw. However we are doing much more than needed. Not only when using blt ring. So, with this extra w/a we minimize the ammount of cache cleans and call it only on same cases that it was being called on gen7. The traditional FBC Cache clean happens over LRI on BLT ring when there is a frontbuffer touch happening. frontbuffer tracking set fbc_dirty variable to let BLT flush that it must clean FBC cache. fbc.need_sw_cache_clean works in the opposite information direction of ring->fbc_dirty telling software on frontbuffer tracking to perform the cache clean on sw side. v2: Clean it a little bit and fully check for Broadwell instead of gen8. v3: Rebase after frontbuffer organization. v4: Wiggle confused me. So fixing v3! Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 20 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
I shouldn't ask everyone to do this and fail myself ... This extracts all the frontbuffer tracking functions into intel_frontbuffer.c, adds a DOC overview section and also adds the missing kerneldoc for i915_gem_track_fb and also pulls it into the same section for convenience. v2: Don't forget about the header files. v3: Oops, might check compilation next time around. To make my life easier drop the increase_pllclock from set_base_atomic since really, it doesn't matter if you see your Oops or kgdb with a tiny bit of lag. v4: Try to better explain how to actually use this, requested by Paulo on irc. v5: Explain invalidate/flush a bit clearer. v6: s/business/busyness/ Acked-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-