1. 24 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 04 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 19 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • D
      mm: add context argument to shrinker callback · 7f8275d0
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      The current shrinker implementation requires the registered callback
      to have global state to work from. This makes it difficult to shrink
      caches that are not global (e.g. per-filesystem caches). Pass the shrinker
      structure to the callback so that users can embed the shrinker structure
      in the context the shrinker needs to operate on and get back to it in the
      callback via container_of().
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      7f8275d0
  5. 15 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 06 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 07 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 06 12月, 2009 4 次提交
  9. 05 12月, 2009 2 次提交
  10. 09 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  11. 10 8月, 2009 5 次提交
  12. 18 6月, 2009 11 次提交
  13. 03 4月, 2009 2 次提交
    • D
      NFS: Add mount options to enable local caching on NFS · b797cac7
      David Howells 提交于
      Add NFS mount options to allow the local caching support to be enabled.
      
      The attached patch makes it possible for the NFS filesystem to be told to make
      use of the network filesystem local caching service (FS-Cache).
      
      To be able to use this, a recent nfsutils package is required.
      
      There are three variant NFS mount options that can be added to a mount command
      to control caching for a mount.  Only the last one specified takes effect:
      
       (*) Adding "fsc" will request caching.
      
       (*) Adding "fsc=<string>" will request caching and also specify a uniquifier.
      
       (*) Adding "nofsc" will disable caching.
      
      For example:
      
      	mount warthog:/ /a -o fsc
      
      The cache of a particular superblock (NFS FSID) will be shared between all
      mounts of that volume, provided they have the same connection parameters and
      are not marked 'nosharecache'.
      
      Where it is otherwise impossible to distinguish superblocks because all the
      parameters are identical, but the 'nosharecache' option is supplied, a
      uniquifying string must be supplied, else only the first mount will be
      permitted to use the cache.
      
      If there's a key collision, then the second mount will disable caching and give
      a warning into the kernel log.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Tested-by: NDaire Byrne <Daire.Byrne@framestore.com>
      b797cac7
    • D
      NFS: Define and create superblock-level objects · 08734048
      David Howells 提交于
      Define and create superblock-level cache index objects (as managed by
      nfs_server structs).
      
      Each superblock object is created in a server level index object and is itself
      an index into which inode-level objects are inserted.
      
      Ideally there would be one superblock-level object per server, and the former
      would be folded into the latter; however, since the "nosharecache" option
      exists this isn't possible.
      
      The superblock object key is a sequence consisting of:
      
       (1) Certain superblock s_flags.
      
       (2) Various connection parameters that serve to distinguish superblocks for
           sget().
      
       (3) The volume FSID.
      
       (4) The security flavour.
      
       (5) The uniquifier length.
      
       (6) The uniquifier text.  This is normally an empty string, unless the fsc=xyz
           mount option was used to explicitly specify a uniquifier.
      
      The key blob is of variable length, depending on the length of (6).
      
      The superblock object is given no coherency data to carry in the auxiliary data
      permitted by the cache.  It is assumed that the superblock is always coherent.
      
      This patch also adds uniquification handling such that two otherwise identical
      superblocks, at least one of which is marked "nosharecache", won't end up
      trying to share the on-disk cache.  It will be possible to manually provide a
      uniquifier through a mount option with a later patch to avoid the error
      otherwise produced.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Tested-by: NDaire Byrne <Daire.Byrne@framestore.com>
      08734048
  14. 20 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      NFS: Optimise NFS close() · 7fe5c398
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Close-to-open cache consistency rules really only require us to flush out
      writes on calls to close(), and require us to revalidate attributes on the
      very last close of the file.
      
      Currently we appear to be doing a lot of extra attribute revalidation
      and cache flushes.
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      7fe5c398
  15. 12 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      NFS: Throttle page dirtying while we're flushing to disk · 72cb77f4
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      The following patch is a combination of a patch by myself and Peter
      Staubach.
      
      Trond: If we allow other processes to dirty pages while a process is doing
      a consistency sync to disk, we can end up never making progress.
      
      Peter: Attached is a patch which addresses a continuing problem with
      the NFS client generating out of order WRITE requests.  While
      this is compliant with all of the current protocol
      specifications, there are servers in the market which can not
      handle out of order WRITE requests very well.  Also, this may
      lead to sub-optimal block allocations in the underlying file
      system on the server.  This may cause the read throughputs to
      be reduced when reading the file from the server.
      
      Peter: There has been a lot of work recently done to address out of
      order issues on a systemic level.  However, the NFS client is
      still susceptible to the problem.  Out of order WRITE
      requests can occur when pdflush is in the middle of writing
      out pages while the process dirtying the pages calls
      generic_file_buffered_write which calls
      generic_perform_write which calls
      balance_dirty_pages_rate_limited which ends up calling
      writeback_inodes which ends up calling back into the NFS
      client to writes out dirty pages for the same file that
      pdflush happens to be working with.
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
      [modification by Trond to merge the two similar patches]
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      72cb77f4
  16. 24 12月, 2008 3 次提交
  17. 11 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 08 10月, 2008 1 次提交