1. 09 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      [ARM] prevent crashing when too much RAM installed · 60296c71
      Lennert Buytenhek 提交于
      This patch will truncate and/or ignore memory banks if their kernel
      direct mappings would (partially) overlap with the vmalloc area or
      the mappings between the vmalloc area and the address space top, to
      prevent crashing during early boot if there happens to be more RAM
      installed than we are expecting.
      
      Since the start of the vmalloc area is not at a fixed address (but
      the vmalloc end address is, via the per-platform VMALLOC_END define),
      a default area of 128M is reserved for vmalloc mappings, which can
      be shrunk or enlarged by passing an appropriate vmalloc= command line
      option as it is done on x86.
      
      On a board with a 3:1 user:kernel split, VMALLOC_END at 0xfe000000,
      two 512M RAM banks and vmalloc=128M (the default), this patch gives:
      
      	Truncating RAM at 20000000-3fffffff to -35ffffff (vmalloc region overlap).
      	Memory: 512MB 352MB = 864MB total
      
      On a board with a 3:1 user:kernel split, VMALLOC_END at 0xfe800000,
      two 256M RAM banks and vmalloc=768M, this patch gives:
      
      	Truncating RAM at 00000000-0fffffff to -0e7fffff (vmalloc region overlap).
      	Ignoring RAM at 10000000-1fffffff (vmalloc region overlap).
      Signed-off-by: NLennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
      Tested-by: NRiku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
      60296c71
  2. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 08 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • B
      Introduce flags for reserve_bootmem() · 72a7fe39
      Bernhard Walle 提交于
      This patchset adds a flags variable to reserve_bootmem() and uses the
      BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE flag in crashkernel reservation code to detect collisions
      between crashkernel area and already used memory.
      
      This patch:
      
      Change the reserve_bootmem() function to accept a new flag BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE.
      If that flag is set, the function returns with -EBUSY if the memory already
      has been reserved in the past.  This is to avoid conflicts.
      
      Because that code runs before SMP initialisation, there's no race condition
      inside reserve_bootmem_core().
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix powerpc build]
      Signed-off-by: NBernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
      Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
      Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      72a7fe39
  4. 21 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 05 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] Fix non-page aligned boot time mappings · 7b9c7b4d
      Russell King 提交于
      AT91SAM9260 stopped booting with the recent changes to MM
      initialisation - it was asking for a non-aligned virtual address
      which caused loops to be non-terminal.  Fix this by rounding
      virtual addresses down, but remember to include the offset in
      the length, and round the length up to the following page.
      
      This means that asking for a mapping of 4K starting at 2K into
      a page maps two pages as one would expect.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      7b9c7b4d
  6. 21 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 06 5月, 2007 2 次提交
  8. 22 4月, 2007 6 次提交
  9. 12 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  10. 18 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 13 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • R
      [ARM] Unuse another Linux PTE bit · ad1ae2fe
      Russell King 提交于
      L_PTE_ASID is not really required to be stored in every PTE, since we
      can identify it via the address passed to set_pte_at().  So, create
      set_pte_ext() which takes the address of the PTE to set, the Linux
      PTE value, and the additional CPU PTE bits which aren't encoded in
      the Linux PTE value.
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      ad1ae2fe
  12. 08 12月, 2006 2 次提交
  13. 02 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  14. 30 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 27 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  16. 20 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4