1. 15 7月, 2013 6 次提交
    • P
      arm64: delete __cpuinit usage from all users · b8c6453a
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
      of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the arch/arm64 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
      all C files.  Currently arm64 does not have any __CPUINIT used in
      assembly files.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      b8c6453a
    • P
      sparc: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all users · 2066aadd
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
      of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the arch/sparc uses of the __cpuinit macros from
      C files and removes __CPUINIT from assembly files.  Note that even
      though arch/sparc/kernel/trampoline_64.S has instances of ".previous"
      in it, they are all paired off against explicit ".section" directives,
      and not implicitly paired with __CPUINIT (unlike mips and arm were).
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      2066aadd
    • P
      arm: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all ARM users · 8bd26e3a
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      and are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
      rid of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code,
      and all __CPUINIT from assembly code.  It also had two ".previous"
      section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT
      (aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      8bd26e3a
    • P
      MIPS: Delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS code · 078a55fc
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      commit 3747069b25e419f6b51395f48127e9812abc3596 upstream.
      
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      and are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
      rid of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      Here, we remove all the MIPS __cpuinit from C code and __CPUINIT
      from asm files.  MIPS is interesting in this respect, because there
      are also uasm users hiding behind their own renamed versions of the
      __cpuinit macros.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      [ralf@linux-mips.org: Folded in Paul's followup fix.]
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
      Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5494/
      Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5495/
      Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5509/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      078a55fc
    • P
      parisc: delete __cpuinit usage from all users · 60ffef06
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      This removes all the parisc uses of the __cpuinit macros.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589Acked-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
      Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      60ffef06
    • P
      alpha: delete __cpuinit usage from all users · ab39c77c
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      This removes all the alpha uses of the __cpuinit macros.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
      Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
      Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      ab39c77c
  2. 13 7月, 2013 3 次提交
  3. 12 7月, 2013 3 次提交
  4. 11 7月, 2013 5 次提交
  5. 10 7月, 2013 23 次提交