- 10 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
RTAS token "ibm,get-config-addr-info" or ibm,get-config-addr-info2" are used to retrieve the PE address according to PCI address, which made up of domain/bus/slot/function. If we don't have those 2 tokens, the domain/bus/slot/function would be used as the address for EEH RTAS operations. Some older f/w might not have those 2 tokens and that blocks the EEH functionality to be initialized. It was introduced by commit e2af155c ("powerpc/eeh: pseries platform EEH initialization"). The patch skips the check on those 2 tokens so we can bring up EEH functionality successfully. And domain/bus/slot/function will be used as address for EEH RTAS operations. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.4+ Reported-by: NRobert Knight <knight@princeton.edu> Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NRobert Knight <knight@princeton.edu> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 10 9月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
While EEH module is installed, PCI devices is checked one by one to see if it supports eeh. On different platforms, the PCI devices are referred through different ways when the EEH module is loaded. For example, on pSeries platform, that is done by OF node. However, we would do that by real PCI devices (struct pci_dev) on PowerNV platform in future. So we needs some mechanism to differentiate those cases by classifying them to probe modes, either from OF nodes or real PCI devices. The patch implements the support to eeh probe mode. Also, the EEH on pSeries has set it into EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE. That means the probe will be done based on OF nodes on pSeries platform. In addition, On pSeries platform, it's done by OF nodes. The patch moves the the probe function from EEH core to platform dependent backend and some cleanup applied. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
Originally, all the EEH operations were implemented based on OF node. Actually, it explicitly breaks the rules that the operation target is PE instead of device. Therefore, the patch makes all the operations based on PE instead of device. Unfortunately, the backend for config space has to be kept as original because it doesn't depend on PE. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
The patch adds more logs to EEH initialization functions for debugging purpose. Also, the machine type (pSeries) is checked in the platform initialization to assure it's the correct platform to invoke it. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
Currently, we have 3 phases for EEH initialization on pSeries platform. All of them are done through builtin functions: platform initialization, EEH device creation, and EEH subsystem enablement. All of them are done no later than ppc_md.setup_arch. That means that the slab/slub isn't ready yet, so we have to allocate memory chunks on basis of PAGE_SIZE for those dynamically created EEH devices. That's pretty expensive. In order to utilize slab/slub for memory allocation, we have to move the EEH initialization functions around, but all of them should be called after slab is ready. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 10 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Neuling 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Acked-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 09 3月, 2012 11 次提交
-
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
With the original EEH implementation, the access to config space of the corresponding PCI device is done by RTAS sensitive function. That depends on pci_dn heavily. That would limit EEH extension to other platforms like powernv because other platforms might have different ways to access PCI config space. The patch splits those functions used to access PCI config space and implement them in platform related EEH component. It would be helpful to support EEH on multiple platforms simutaneously in future. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
The pci_dn has been replaced with eeh_dev. In order to comply with the rule, the EEH platform implementation on pSeries should also be adjusted for a little bit so that it will depend on eeh_dev instead of pci_dn. The patch replaces pci_dn with eeh_dev. The corresponding information will be retrieved from eeh_dev instead of pci_dn. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
In order to enable particular PCI device, which has been included in the parent PE. The involved PCI bridges should be enabled explicitly if there has. On pSeries platform, there're dedicated RTAS calls to fulfil the purpose. The patch implements the function of configuring PCI bridges through the dedicated RTAS calls. Besides, the function has been abstracted by struct eeh_ops::configure_bridge so that the EEH core components could support multiple platforms in future. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
On RTAS compliant pSeries platform, one dedicated RTAS call has been introduced to retrieve EEH temporary or permanent error log. The patch implements the function of retriving EEH error log through RTAS call. Besides, it has been abstracted by struct eeh_ops::get_log so that EEH core components could support multiple platforms in future. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
On RTAS compliant pSeries platform, there is a dedicated RTAS call (ibm,set-slot-reset) to reset the specified PE. Furthermore, two types of resets are supported: hot and fundamental. the type of reset is to be used actually depends on the included PCI device's requirements. The patch implements resetting PE on pSeries platform through RTAS call. Besides, it has been abstracted through struct eeh_ops::reset so that EEH core components could support multiple platforms in future. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
On pSeries platform, the PE state might be temporarily unavailable. In that case, the firmware will return the corresponding wait time. That means the kernel has to wait for appropriate time in order to get the PE state. The patch does the implementation for that. Besides, the function has been abstracted through struct eeh_ops::wait_state so that EEH core components could support multiple platforms in future. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
On pSeries platform, there're 2 dedicated RTAS calls introduced to retrieve the corresponding PE's state: ibm,read-slot-reset-state and ibm,read-slot-reset-state2. The patch implements the retrieval of PE's state according to the given PE address. Besides, the implementation has been abstracted by struct eeh_ops::get_state so that EEH core components could support multiple platforms in future. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
There're 2 types of addresses used for EEH operations. The first one would be BDF (Bus/Device/Function) address which is retrieved from the reg property of the corresponding FDT node. Another one is PE address that should be enquired from firmware through RTAS call on pSeries platform. When issuing EEH operation, the PE address has precedence over BDF address. The patch implements retrieving PE address according to the given BDF address on pSeries platform. Also, the struct eeh_early_enable_info has been removed since the information can be figured out from dn->pdn->phb->buid directly and that simplifies the code. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
There're 4 EEH operations that are covered by the dedicated RTAS call <ibm,set-eeh-option>: enable or disable EEH, enable MMIO and enable DMA. At early stage of system boot, the EEH would be tried to enable on PCI device related device node. MMIO and DMA for particular PE should be enabled when doing recovery on EEH errors so that the PE could function properly again. The patch implements it and abstract that through struct eeh_ops::set_eeh. It would be help for EEH to support multiple platforms in future. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
The platform specific EEH operations have been abstracted by struct eeh_ops. The individual platroms, including pSeries, needs doing necessary initialization before the platform dependent EEH operations work properly. The patch is addressing that and do necessary platform initialization for pSeries platform. More specificly, it will figure out the tokens of EEH related RTAS calls. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Gavin Shan 提交于
EEH has been implemented on RTAS-compliant pSeries platform. That's to say, the EEH operations will be implemented through RTAS calls eventually. The situation limited feasible extension on EEH. In order to support EEH on multiple platforms like pseries and powernv simutaneously. We have to split the platform dependent EEH options up out of current implementation. The patch addresses supporting EEH on multiple platforms. The pseries platform dependent EEH operations will be abstracted by struct eeh_ops. EEH core components will be built based on the registered EEH operations. With the mechanism, what the individual platform needs to do is implement platform dependent EEH operations. For now, the pseries platform is covered under the mechanism. That means we have to think about other platforms to support EEH, like powernv. Besides, we only have framework for the mechanism and we have to implement it for pseries platform later. Signed-off-by: NGavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-