The 'aabool' wrappers actually pass off to the 'bool' parse functions,
so you should use the same check function.  Similarly for aauint and
uint.

(Note that 'bool' module parameters also allow 'int', which is why you
got away with this, but that's changing very soon.)

Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

AppArmor is masking the capabilities returned by capget against the
capabilities mask in the profile.  This is wrong, in complain mode the
profile has effectively all capabilities, as the profile restrictions are
not being enforced, merely tested against to determine if an access is
known by the profile.

This can result in the wrong behavior of security conscience applications
like sshd which examine their capability set, and change their behavior
accordingly.  In this case because of the masked capability set being
returned sshd fails due to DAC checks, even when the profile is in complain
mode.

Kernels affected: 2.6.36 - 3.0.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

Affected kernels 2.6.36 - 3.0

AppArmor may do a GFP_KERNEL memory allocation with task_lock(tsk->group_leader);
held when called from security_task_setrlimit.  This will only occur when the
task's current policy has been replaced, and the task's creds have not been
updated before entering the LSM security_task_setrlimit() hook.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:847
 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1583, name: cupsd
 2 locks held by cupsd/1583:
  #0:  (tasklist_lock){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8104dafa>] do_prlimit+0x61/0x189
  #1:  (&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104db2d>]
do_prlimit+0x94/0x189
 Pid: 1583, comm: cupsd Not tainted 3.0.0-rc2-git1 #7
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff8102ebf2>] __might_sleep+0x10d/0x112
  [<ffffffff810e6f46>] slab_pre_alloc_hook.isra.49+0x2d/0x33
  [<ffffffff810e7bc4>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x22/0x132
  [<ffffffff8105b6e6>] prepare_creds+0x35/0xe4
  [<ffffffff811c0675>] aa_replace_current_profile+0x35/0xb2
  [<ffffffff811c4d2d>] aa_current_profile+0x45/0x4c
  [<ffffffff811c4d4d>] apparmor_task_setrlimit+0x19/0x3a
  [<ffffffff811beaa5>] security_task_setrlimit+0x11/0x13
  [<ffffffff8104db6b>] do_prlimit+0xd2/0x189
  [<ffffffff8104dea9>] sys_setrlimit+0x3b/0x48
  [<ffffffff814062bb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Reported-by: NMiles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

When invalid parameters are passed to apparmor_setprocattr a NULL deref
oops occurs when it tries to record an audit message. This is because
it is passing NULL for the profile parameter for aa_audit. But aa_audit
now requires that the profile passed is not NULL.

Fix this by passing the current profile on the task that is trying to
setprocattr.
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <kees@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

- Introduce ns_capable to test for a capability in a non-default
  user namespace.
- Teach cap_capable to handle capabilities in a non-default
  user namespace.

The motivation is to get to the unprivileged creation of new
namespaces.  It looks like this gets us 90% of the way there, with
only potential uid confusion issues left.

I still need to handle getting all caps after creation but otherwise I
think I have a good starter patch that achieves all of your goals.

Changelog:
	11/05/2010: [serge] add apparmor
	12/14/2010: [serge] fix capabilities to created user namespaces
	Without this, if user serge creates a user_ns, he won't have
	capabilities to the user_ns he created.  THis is because we
	were first checking whether his effective caps had the caps
	he needed and returning -EPERM if not, and THEN checking whether
	he was the creator.  Reverse those checks.
	12/16/2010: [serge] security_real_capable needs ns argument in !security case
	01/11/2011: [serge] add task_ns_capable helper
	01/11/2011: [serge] add nsown_capable() helper per Bastian Blank suggestion
	02/16/2011: [serge] fix a logic bug: the root user is always creator of
		    init_user_ns, but should not always have capabilities to
		    it!  Fix the check in cap_capable().
	02/21/2011: Add the required user_ns parameter to security_capable,
		    fixing a compile failure.
	02/23/2011: Convert some macros to functions as per akpm comments.  Some
		    couldn't be converted because we can't easily forward-declare
		    them (they are inline if !SECURITY, extern if SECURITY).  Add
		    a current_user_ns function so we can use it in capability.h
		    without #including cred.h.  Move all forward declarations
		    together to the top of the #ifdef __KERNEL__ section, and use
		    kernel-doc format.
	02/23/2011: Per dhowells, clean up comment in cap_capable().
	02/23/2011: Per akpm, remove unreachable 'return -EPERM' in cap_capable.

(Original written and signed off by Eric;  latest, modified version
acked by him)

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: export current_user_ns() for ecryptfs]
[serge.hallyn@canonical.com: remove unneeded extra argument in selinux's task_has_capability]
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Acked-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Remove unused macros.
Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

set_init_cxt() allocted sizeof(struct aa_task_cxt) bytes for cxt,
if register_security() failed, it will cause memory leak.
Signed-off-by: NZhitong Wang <zhitong.wangzt@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

2.6.36 introduced the abilitiy to specify the task that is having its
rlimits set.  Update mediation to ensure that confined tasks can only
set their own group_leader as expected by current policy.

Add TODO note about extending policy to support setting other tasks
rlimits.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

After rlimits tree was merged we get the following errors:
security/apparmor/lsm.c:663:2: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type

It is because AppArmor was merged in the meantime, but uses the old
prototype. So fix it by adding struct task_struct as a first parameter
of apparmor_task_setrlimit.

NOTE that this is ONLY a compilation warning fix (and crashes caused
by that). It needs proper handling in AppArmor depending on who is the
'task'.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

Fixes these build errors:
security/apparmor/lsm.c:701: error: 'param_ops_aabool' undeclared here (not in a function)
security/apparmor/lsm.c:721: error: 'param_ops_aalockpolicy' undeclared here (not in a function)
security/apparmor/lsm.c:729: error: 'param_ops_aauint' undeclared here (not in a function)
Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Remove extraneous path_truncate arguments from the AppArmor hook,
as they've been removed from the LSM API.
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

AppArmor hooks to interface with the LSM, module parameters and module
initialization.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>