1. 27 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 05 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • D
      CRED: Fix regression in cap_capable() as shown up by sys_faccessat() [ver #2] · 14eaddc9
      David Howells 提交于
      Fix a regression in cap_capable() due to:
      
      	commit 5ff7711e635b32f0a1e558227d030c7e45b4a465
      	Author: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      	Date:   Wed Dec 31 02:52:28 2008 +0000
      
      	    CRED: Differentiate objective and effective subjective credentials on a task
      
      The problem is that the above patch allows a process to have two sets of
      credentials, and for the most part uses the subjective credentials when
      accessing current's creds.
      
      There is, however, one exception: cap_capable(), and thus capable(), uses the
      real/objective credentials of the target task, whether or not it is the current
      task.
      
      Ordinarily this doesn't matter, since usually the two cred pointers in current
      point to the same set of creds.  However, sys_faccessat() makes use of this
      facility to override the credentials of the calling process to make its test,
      without affecting the creds as seen from other processes.
      
      One of the things sys_faccessat() does is to make an adjustment to the
      effective capabilities mask, which cap_capable(), as it stands, then ignores.
      
      The affected capability check is in generic_permission():
      
      	if (!(mask & MAY_EXEC) || execute_ok(inode))
      		if (capable(CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE))
      			return 0;
      
      This change splits capable() from has_capability() down into the commoncap and
      SELinux code.  The capable() security op now only deals with the current
      process, and uses the current process's subjective creds.  A new security op -
      task_capable() - is introduced that can check any task's objective creds.
      
      strictly the capable() security op is superfluous with the presence of the
      task_capable() op, however it should be faster to call the capable() op since
      two fewer arguments need be passed down through the various layers.
      
      This can be tested by compiling the following program from the XFS testsuite:
      
      /*
       *  t_access_root.c - trivial test program to show permission bug.
       *
       *  Written by Michael Kerrisk - copyright ownership not pursued.
       *  Sourced from: http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2003-10/6030.html
       */
      #include <limits.h>
      #include <unistd.h>
      #include <stdio.h>
      #include <stdlib.h>
      #include <fcntl.h>
      #include <sys/stat.h>
      
      #define UID 500
      #define GID 100
      #define PERM 0
      #define TESTPATH "/tmp/t_access"
      
      static void
      errExit(char *msg)
      {
          perror(msg);
          exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
      } /* errExit */
      
      static void
      accessTest(char *file, int mask, char *mstr)
      {
          printf("access(%s, %s) returns %d\n", file, mstr, access(file, mask));
      } /* accessTest */
      
      int
      main(int argc, char *argv[])
      {
          int fd, perm, uid, gid;
          char *testpath;
          char cmd[PATH_MAX + 20];
      
          testpath = (argc > 1) ? argv[1] : TESTPATH;
          perm = (argc > 2) ? strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 8) : PERM;
          uid = (argc > 3) ? atoi(argv[3]) : UID;
          gid = (argc > 4) ? atoi(argv[4]) : GID;
      
          unlink(testpath);
      
          fd = open(testpath, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0);
          if (fd == -1) errExit("open");
      
          if (fchown(fd, uid, gid) == -1) errExit("fchown");
          if (fchmod(fd, perm) == -1) errExit("fchmod");
          close(fd);
      
          snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "ls -l %s", testpath);
          system(cmd);
      
          if (seteuid(uid) == -1) errExit("seteuid");
      
          accessTest(testpath, 0, "0");
          accessTest(testpath, R_OK, "R_OK");
          accessTest(testpath, W_OK, "W_OK");
          accessTest(testpath, X_OK, "X_OK");
          accessTest(testpath, R_OK | W_OK, "R_OK | W_OK");
          accessTest(testpath, R_OK | X_OK, "R_OK | X_OK");
          accessTest(testpath, W_OK | X_OK, "W_OK | X_OK");
          accessTest(testpath, R_OK | W_OK | X_OK, "R_OK | W_OK | X_OK");
      
          exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
      } /* main */
      
      This can be run against an Ext3 filesystem as well as against an XFS
      filesystem.  If successful, it will show:
      
      	[root@andromeda src]# ./t_access_root /tmp/xxx 0 4043 4043
      	---------- 1 dhowells dhowells 0 2008-12-31 03:00 /tmp/xxx
      	access(/tmp/xxx, 0) returns 0
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK) returns 0
      	access(/tmp/xxx, W_OK) returns 0
      	access(/tmp/xxx, X_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK | W_OK) returns 0
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK | X_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, W_OK | X_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK | W_OK | X_OK) returns -1
      
      If unsuccessful, it will show:
      
      	[root@andromeda src]# ./t_access_root /tmp/xxx 0 4043 4043
      	---------- 1 dhowells dhowells 0 2008-12-31 02:56 /tmp/xxx
      	access(/tmp/xxx, 0) returns 0
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, W_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, X_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK | W_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK | X_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, W_OK | X_OK) returns -1
      	access(/tmp/xxx, R_OK | W_OK | X_OK) returns -1
      
      I've also tested the fix with the SELinux and syscalls LTP testsuites.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      14eaddc9
  4. 14 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      CRED: Make execve() take advantage of copy-on-write credentials · a6f76f23
      David Howells 提交于
      Make execve() take advantage of copy-on-write credentials, allowing it to set
      up the credentials in advance, and then commit the whole lot after the point
      of no return.
      
      This patch and the preceding patches have been tested with the LTP SELinux
      testsuite.
      
      This patch makes several logical sets of alteration:
      
       (1) execve().
      
           The credential bits from struct linux_binprm are, for the most part,
           replaced with a single credentials pointer (bprm->cred).  This means that
           all the creds can be calculated in advance and then applied at the point
           of no return with no possibility of failure.
      
           I would like to replace bprm->cap_effective with:
      
      	cap_isclear(bprm->cap_effective)
      
           but this seems impossible due to special behaviour for processes of pid 1
           (they always retain their parent's capability masks where normally they'd
           be changed - see cap_bprm_set_creds()).
      
           The following sequence of events now happens:
      
           (a) At the start of do_execve, the current task's cred_exec_mutex is
           	 locked to prevent PTRACE_ATTACH from obsoleting the calculation of
           	 creds that we make.
      
           (a) prepare_exec_creds() is then called to make a copy of the current
           	 task's credentials and prepare it.  This copy is then assigned to
           	 bprm->cred.
      
        	 This renders security_bprm_alloc() and security_bprm_free()
           	 unnecessary, and so they've been removed.
      
           (b) The determination of unsafe execution is now performed immediately
           	 after (a) rather than later on in the code.  The result is stored in
           	 bprm->unsafe for future reference.
      
           (c) prepare_binprm() is called, possibly multiple times.
      
           	 (i) This applies the result of set[ug]id binaries to the new creds
           	     attached to bprm->cred.  Personality bit clearance is recorded,
           	     but now deferred on the basis that the exec procedure may yet
           	     fail.
      
               (ii) This then calls the new security_bprm_set_creds().  This should
      	     calculate the new LSM and capability credentials into *bprm->cred.
      
      	     This folds together security_bprm_set() and parts of
      	     security_bprm_apply_creds() (these two have been removed).
      	     Anything that might fail must be done at this point.
      
               (iii) bprm->cred_prepared is set to 1.
      
      	     bprm->cred_prepared is 0 on the first pass of the security
      	     calculations, and 1 on all subsequent passes.  This allows SELinux
      	     in (ii) to base its calculations only on the initial script and
      	     not on the interpreter.
      
           (d) flush_old_exec() is called to commit the task to execution.  This
           	 performs the following steps with regard to credentials:
      
      	 (i) Clear pdeath_signal and set dumpable on certain circumstances that
      	     may not be covered by commit_creds().
      
               (ii) Clear any bits in current->personality that were deferred from
                   (c.i).
      
           (e) install_exec_creds() [compute_creds() as was] is called to install the
           	 new credentials.  This performs the following steps with regard to
           	 credentials:
      
               (i) Calls security_bprm_committing_creds() to apply any security
                   requirements, such as flushing unauthorised files in SELinux, that
                   must be done before the credentials are changed.
      
      	     This is made up of bits of security_bprm_apply_creds() and
      	     security_bprm_post_apply_creds(), both of which have been removed.
      	     This function is not allowed to fail; anything that might fail
      	     must have been done in (c.ii).
      
               (ii) Calls commit_creds() to apply the new credentials in a single
                   assignment (more or less).  Possibly pdeath_signal and dumpable
                   should be part of struct creds.
      
      	 (iii) Unlocks the task's cred_replace_mutex, thus allowing
      	     PTRACE_ATTACH to take place.
      
               (iv) Clears The bprm->cred pointer as the credentials it was holding
                   are now immutable.
      
               (v) Calls security_bprm_committed_creds() to apply any security
                   alterations that must be done after the creds have been changed.
                   SELinux uses this to flush signals and signal handlers.
      
           (f) If an error occurs before (d.i), bprm_free() will call abort_creds()
           	 to destroy the proposed new credentials and will then unlock
           	 cred_replace_mutex.  No changes to the credentials will have been
           	 made.
      
       (2) LSM interface.
      
           A number of functions have been changed, added or removed:
      
           (*) security_bprm_alloc(), ->bprm_alloc_security()
           (*) security_bprm_free(), ->bprm_free_security()
      
           	 Removed in favour of preparing new credentials and modifying those.
      
           (*) security_bprm_apply_creds(), ->bprm_apply_creds()
           (*) security_bprm_post_apply_creds(), ->bprm_post_apply_creds()
      
           	 Removed; split between security_bprm_set_creds(),
           	 security_bprm_committing_creds() and security_bprm_committed_creds().
      
           (*) security_bprm_set(), ->bprm_set_security()
      
           	 Removed; folded into security_bprm_set_creds().
      
           (*) security_bprm_set_creds(), ->bprm_set_creds()
      
           	 New.  The new credentials in bprm->creds should be checked and set up
           	 as appropriate.  bprm->cred_prepared is 0 on the first call, 1 on the
           	 second and subsequent calls.
      
           (*) security_bprm_committing_creds(), ->bprm_committing_creds()
           (*) security_bprm_committed_creds(), ->bprm_committed_creds()
      
           	 New.  Apply the security effects of the new credentials.  This
           	 includes closing unauthorised files in SELinux.  This function may not
           	 fail.  When the former is called, the creds haven't yet been applied
           	 to the process; when the latter is called, they have.
      
       	 The former may access bprm->cred, the latter may not.
      
       (3) SELinux.
      
           SELinux has a number of changes, in addition to those to support the LSM
           interface changes mentioned above:
      
           (a) The bprm_security_struct struct has been removed in favour of using
           	 the credentials-under-construction approach.
      
           (c) flush_unauthorized_files() now takes a cred pointer and passes it on
           	 to inode_has_perm(), file_has_perm() and dentry_open().
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      a6f76f23
  5. 14 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      security: Fix setting of PF_SUPERPRIV by __capable() · 5cd9c58f
      David Howells 提交于
      Fix the setting of PF_SUPERPRIV by __capable() as it could corrupt the flags
      the target process if that is not the current process and it is trying to
      change its own flags in a different way at the same time.
      
      __capable() is using neither atomic ops nor locking to protect t->flags.  This
      patch removes __capable() and introduces has_capability() that doesn't set
      PF_SUPERPRIV on the process being queried.
      
      This patch further splits security_ptrace() in two:
      
       (1) security_ptrace_may_access().  This passes judgement on whether one
           process may access another only (PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH for ptrace() and
           PTRACE_MODE_READ for /proc), and takes a pointer to the child process.
           current is the parent.
      
       (2) security_ptrace_traceme().  This passes judgement on PTRACE_TRACEME only,
           and takes only a pointer to the parent process.  current is the child.
      
           In Smack and commoncap, this uses has_capability() to determine whether
           the parent will be permitted to use PTRACE_ATTACH if normal checks fail.
           This does not set PF_SUPERPRIV.
      
      Two of the instances of __capable() actually only act on current, and so have
      been changed to calls to capable().
      
      Of the places that were using __capable():
      
       (1) The OOM killer calls __capable() thrice when weighing the killability of a
           process.  All of these now use has_capability().
      
       (2) cap_ptrace() and smack_ptrace() were using __capable() to check to see
           whether the parent was allowed to trace any process.  As mentioned above,
           these have been split.  For PTRACE_ATTACH and /proc, capable() is now
           used, and for PTRACE_TRACEME, has_capability() is used.
      
       (3) cap_safe_nice() only ever saw current, so now uses capable().
      
       (4) smack_setprocattr() rejected accesses to tasks other than current just
           after calling __capable(), so the order of these two tests have been
           switched and capable() is used instead.
      
       (5) In smack_file_send_sigiotask(), we need to allow privileged processes to
           receive SIGIO on files they're manipulating.
      
       (6) In smack_task_wait(), we let a process wait for a privileged process,
           whether or not the process doing the waiting is privileged.
      
      I've tested this with the LTP SELinux and syscalls testscripts.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      Acked-by: NAndrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      5cd9c58f
  6. 14 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 28 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 18 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 17 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  10. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4