Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 150
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 10 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      x86, pci-dma.c: don't always add __GFP_NORETRY to gfp · b7f09ae5
      由 Miquel van Smoorenburg 提交于 
      Currently arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c always adds __GFP_NORETRY
to the allocation flags, because it wants to be reasonably
sure not to deadlock when calling alloc_pages().

But really that should only be done in two cases:
- when allocating memory in the lower 16 MB DMA zone.
  If there's no free memory there, waiting or OOM killing is of no use
- when optimistically trying an allocation in the DMA32 zone
  when dma_mask < DMA_32BIT_MASK hoping that the allocation
  happens to fall within the limits of the dma_mask

Also blindly adding __GFP_NORETRY to the the gfp variable might
not be a good idea since we then also use it when calling
dma_ops->alloc_coherent(). Clearing it might also not be a
good idea, dma_alloc_coherent()'s caller might have set it
on purpose. The gfp variable should not be clobbered.

[ mingo@elte.hu: converted to delta patch ontop of previous version. ]
Signed-off-by: NMiquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b7f09ae5
  3. 02 6月, 2008 3 次提交
    • P
      suspend-vs-iommu: prevent suspend if we could not resume · f529626a
      由 Pavel Machek 提交于 
      iommu/gart support misses suspend/resume code, which can do bad stuff,
including memory corruption on resume.  Prevent system suspend in case we
would be unable to resume.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Tested-by: NPatrick <ragamuffin@datacomm.ch>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      f529626a
    • M
      x86: pci-dma.c: use __GFP_NO_OOM instead of __GFP_NORETRY · db9f600b
      由 Miquel van Smoorenburg 提交于 
      On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 04:47 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So...  why not just remove the setting of __GFP_NORETRY?  Why is it
> > wrong to oom-kill things in this case?
>
> When the 16MB zone overflows (which can be common in some workloads)
> calling the OOM killer is pretty useless because it has barely any
> real user data [only exception would be the "only 16MB" case Alan
> mentioned]. Killing random processes in this case is bad.
>
> I think for 16MB __GFP_NORETRY is ok because there should be
> nothing freeable in there so looping is useless. Only exception would be the
> "only 16MB total" case again but I'm not sure 2.6 supports that at all
> on x86.
>
> On the other hand d_a_c() does more allocations than just 16MB, especially
> on 64bit and the other zones need different strategies.

Okay, so how about this then ?
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      db9f600b
    • B
      pci, x86: add workaround for bug in ASUS A7V600 BIOS (rev 1005) · 75b19b79
      由 Bertram Felgenhauer 提交于 
      This BIOS claims the VIA 8237 south bridge to be compatible with VIA 586,
which it is not.

Without this patch, I get the following warning while booting,
among others,

| PCI: Using IRQ router VIA [1106/3227] at 0000:00:11.0
| ------------[ cut here ]------------
| WARNING: at arch/x86/pci/irq.c:265 pirq_via586_get+0x4a/0x60()
| Modules linked in:
| Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc4-00015-g1ec7d99c #1
|  [<c0119fd4>] warn_on_slowpath+0x54/0x70
|  [<c02246e0>] ? vt_console_print+0x210/0x2b0
|  [<c02244d0>] ? vt_console_print+0x0/0x2b0
|  [<c011a413>] ? __call_console_drivers+0x43/0x60
|  [<c011a482>] ? _call_console_drivers+0x52/0x80
|  [<c011aa89>] ? release_console_sem+0x1c9/0x200
|  [<c0291d21>] ? raw_pci_read+0x41/0x70
|  [<c0291e8f>] ? pci_read+0x2f/0x40
|  [<c029151a>] pirq_via586_get+0x4a/0x60
|  [<c02914d0>] ? pirq_via586_get+0x0/0x60
|  [<c029178d>] pcibios_lookup_irq+0x15d/0x430
|  [<c03b895a>] pcibios_irq_init+0x17a/0x3e0
|  [<c03a66f0>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x250
|  [<c03a6763>] kernel_init+0x73/0x250
|  [<c03b87e0>] ? pcibios_irq_init+0x0/0x3e0
|  [<c0114d00>] ? schedule_tail+0x10/0x40
|  [<c0102dee>] ? ret_from_fork+0x6/0x1c
|  [<c03a66f0>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x250
|  [<c03a66f0>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x250
|  [<c010324b>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x1c
|  =======================
| ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---

and IRQ trouble later,

| irq 10: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

Now that's an VIA 8237 chip, so pirq_via586_get shouldn't be called
at all; adding this workaround to via_router_probe() fixes the
problem for me.

Amazingly I have a 2.6.23.8 kernel that somehow works fine ... I'll
never understand why.
Signed-off-by: NBertram Felgenhauer <int-e@gmx.de>
Acked-by: NAlan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      75b19b79
  5. 24 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 23 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      PCI: Correct last two HP entries in the bfsort whitelist · a1676072
      由 Tony Camuso 提交于 
      Greetings.

There is a code flaw in the bfsort whitelist, where there are redundant
entries for the same two HP systems, DL385 G2 and DL585 G2. This patch
replaces those redundant entries with the correct ones. The correct
entries are for large-volume systems, the DL360 and DL380.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

commit ec69f0374c3b0ad7ea991b0e9ac00377acfe5b1a
Author: Tony Camuso <tony.camuso@hp.com>
Date:   Wed May 14 07:09:28 2008 -0400

     Replace Redundant Whitelist Entries with the Correct Ones

     The ProLiant DL585 G2 and the DL585 G2 are entered reundantly
     in the dmi_system_id table. What should have been there are the
     DL360 and DL380. This patch simply replaces the redundant
     entries with the correct entries.

 arch/x86/pci/common.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: NTony Camuso <tony.camuso@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPat Schoeller <patrick.schoeller@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      a1676072
  9. 22 5月, 2008 17 次提交
  11. 21 5月, 2008 17 次提交