1. 04 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  2. 03 12月, 2013 6 次提交
  3. 25 11月, 2013 7 次提交
  4. 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / driver core: Store an ACPI device pointer in struct acpi_dev_node · 7b199811
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device
      associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion
      device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it.  Introduce two
      new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way,
      ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the
      ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account.
      Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to
      use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead.  For some of them who used to
      pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET()
      introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an
      equivalent thing.
      
      The main motivation for doing this is that there are things
      represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid
      ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as
      power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform
      device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions
      in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the
      lack of valid ACPI handles).  However, there are more reasons
      why it may be useful.
      
      First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking
      than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more
      difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node
      and the new macros.  Second, the change should help to reduce (over
      time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is
      passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the
      struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device,
      because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly.
      Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that
      will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit
      compiler directives to it.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell
      Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
      7b199811
  5. 06 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  6. 31 10月, 2013 3 次提交
  7. 30 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  8. 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • L
      ARM: 7841/1: sa1100: remove complex GPIO interface · 40ca061b
      Linus Walleij 提交于
      The SA1100 was implementing its own variants of gpio_get_value()
      and gpio_set_value() and only selectively falling back to
      gpiolib for extended (EGPIO) handling. However the driver in
      gpio/gpio-sa1100.c already handles the same functionality for
      these lines, yet remain unused.
      
      The only upside would be things like a timing-critical hotpath
      on bit-banged GPIO, but that kind of things does not seem to
      happen on these GPIOs, so it is not worth having the extra
      complexity.
      
      Tested with some buttons on the Compaq iPAQ H3630.
      
      Cc: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      40ca061b
  9. 26 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 23 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 20 10月, 2013 6 次提交
  12. 19 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 16 10月, 2013 6 次提交