1. 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 11 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      xen: make -fstack-protector work under Xen · 577eebea
      Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于
      -fstack-protector uses a special per-cpu "stack canary" value.
      gcc generates special code in each function to test the canary to make
      sure that the function's stack hasn't been overrun.
      
      On x86-64, this is simply an offset of %gs, which is the usual per-cpu
      base segment register, so setting it up simply requires loading %gs's
      base as normal.
      
      On i386, the stack protector segment is %gs (rather than the usual kernel
      percpu %fs segment register).  This requires setting up the full kernel
      GDT and then loading %gs accordingly.  We also need to make sure %gs is
      initialized when bringing up secondary cpus too.
      
      To keep things consistent, we do the full GDT/segment register setup on
      both architectures.
      
      Because we need to avoid -fstack-protected code before setting up the GDT
      and because there's no way to disable it on a per-function basis, several
      files need to have stack-protector inhibited.
      
      [ Impact: allow Xen booting with stack-protector enabled ]
      Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
      577eebea
  4. 13 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 03 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 29 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • I
      x86: replace CONFIG_X86_SMP with CONFIG_SMP · 3e5095d1
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The x86/Voyager subarch used to have this distinction between
       'x86 SMP support' and 'Voyager SMP support':
      
       config X86_SMP
      	bool
      	depends on SMP && ((X86_32 && !X86_VOYAGER) || X86_64)
      
      This is a pointless distinction - Voyager can (and already does) use
      smp_ops to implement various SMP quirks it has - and it can be extended
      more to cover all the specialities of Voyager.
      
      So remove this complication in the Kconfig space.
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      3e5095d1
  8. 21 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 31 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  10. 27 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 13 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  12. 12 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • N
      x86: lockless get_user_pages_fast() · 8174c430
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      Implement get_user_pages_fast without locking in the fastpath on x86.
      
      Do an optimistic lockless pagetable walk, without taking mmap_sem or any
      page table locks or even mmap_sem.  Page table existence is guaranteed by
      turning interrupts off (combined with the fact that we're always looking
      up the current mm, means we can do the lockless page table walk within the
      constraints of the TLB shootdown design).  Basically we can do this
      lockless pagetable walk in a similar manner to the way the CPU's pagetable
      walker does not have to take any locks to find present ptes.
      
      This patch (combined with the subsequent ones to convert direct IO to use
      it) was found to give about 10% performance improvement on a 2 socket 8
      core Intel Xeon system running an OLTP workload on DB2 v9.5
      
       "To test the effects of the patch, an OLTP workload was run on an IBM
        x3850 M2 server with 2 processors (quad-core Intel Xeon processors at
        2.93 GHz) using IBM DB2 v9.5 running Linux 2.6.24rc7 kernel.  Comparing
        runs with and without the patch resulted in an overall performance
        benefit of ~9.8%.  Correspondingly, oprofiles showed that samples from
        __up_read and __down_read routines that is seen during thread contention
        for system resources was reduced from 2.8% down to .05%.  Monitoring the
        /proc/vmstat output from the patched run showed that the counter for
        fast_gup contained a very high number while the fast_gup_slow value was
        zero."
      
      (fast_gup is the old name for get_user_pages_fast, fast_gup_slow is a
      counter we had for the number of times the slowpath was invoked).
      
      The main reason for the improvement is that DB2 has multiple threads each
      issuing direct-IO.  Direct-IO uses get_user_pages, and thus the threads
      contend the mmap_sem cacheline, and can also contend on page table locks.
      
      I would anticipate larger performance gains on larger systems, however I
      think DB2 uses an adaptive mix of threads and processes, so it could be
      that thread contention remains pretty constant as machine size increases.
      In which case, we stuck with "only" a 10% gain.
      
      The downside of using get_user_pages_fast is that if there is not a pte
      with the correct permissions for the access, we end up falling back to
      get_user_pages and so the get_user_pages_fast is a bit of extra work.
      However this should not be the common case in most performance critical
      code.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: Kconfig fix]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: Makefile fix/cleanup]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: warning fix]
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
      Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
      Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
      Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8174c430
  14. 18 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 08 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 24 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 25 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 17 4月, 2008 4 次提交
  19. 11 10月, 2007 12 次提交
  20. 24 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  21. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4