- 23 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time, platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured correctly. Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them. Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up: o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify handlers for run-time PM. o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback for the ACPI platform. o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all PCI devices present in the ACPI tables. o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at run time. Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 17 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Having read the PM part of the PCIe 2.0 specification more carefully I think that it was a mistake to restrict the wake-up enable propagation to non-PCIe devices, because if we do not request control of the root ports' PME registers via OSC, PCIe PME is supposed to be handled by the platform, just like the non-PCIe PME. Even if we do that, the wake-up propagation is done to allow the devices to wake up the system from sleep states which involves the platform anyway, so it won't hurt. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Change for PCI core to use pci_is_pcie() instead of checking pci_dev->is_pcie. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 10 9月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Some PCI devices (not PCI Express), like PCI add-on cards, can generate PME#, but they don't have any special platform wake-up support. For this reason, even if they generate PME# to wake up the system from a sleep state, wake-up events are not generated by the platform. It turns out that, at least on some systems, PCI bridges and the PCI host bridge have ACPI GPEs associated with them that, if enabled to generate wake-up events, allow the system to wake up if one of the add-on devices asserts PME# while the system is in a sleep state. Following this observation, if a PCI device without direct ACPI wake-up support is prepared to wake up the system during a transition into a sleep state (eg. suspend to RAM), try to configure the bridges on the path from the device to the root bridge to wake-up the system. Reviewed-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move a debug message from acpi_pci_sleep_wake() to acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() and use the standard dev_*() macros in there. Reviewed-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the PCI wake-up code so that it's easier to read without changing the functionality. Reviewed-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 27 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bob Moore 提交于
Add new flags in the Boot Architecture flags field. Update comments for all FADT flags. Add FADT version when each flag was defined. Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Move PCI _OSC management code from drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c to drivers/acpi/pci_root.c. The benefits are - We no longer need struct osc_data and its management code (contents are moved to struct acpi_pci_root). This simplify the code, and we no longer care about kmalloc() failure. - We can make pci_acpi_osc_support() be a static function, which is called only from drivers/acpi/pci_root.c. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Tested-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 08 1月, 2009 6 次提交
-
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
Cleanup _OSC evaluation code. Some whitespace changes and a few other minor cleanups. Reviewed-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Tested-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
If a control had already been granted, we don't need to re-evaluate _OSC for it because firmware may not reject control of any feature it has previously granted control to. Reviewed-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Tested-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
Reverts adf411b8. The commit adf411b8 was based on the improper assumption that queried result was not updated when _OSC support field was changed. But, in fact, queried result is updated whenever _OSC support field was changed through __acpi_query_osc(). As a result, the commit adf411b8 only introduced unnecessary additional _OSC evaluation... Tested-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Andrew Patterson 提交于
The acpi_query_osc, __pci_osc_support_set, pci_osc_support_set, and pcie_osc_support_set functions have been obsoleted in favor of setting these capabilities during root bridge discovery with pci_acpi_osc_support. There are no longer any callers of these functions, so remove them. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Andrew Patterson 提交于
Add pci_acpi_osc_support() and call it when a PCI bridge is added. This allows us to avoid having every individual PCI root bridge driver call _OSC support for every root bridge in their probe functions, a significant savings in boot time. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kay Sievers 提交于
This patch is part of a larger patch series which will remove the "char bus_id[20]" name string from struct device. The device name is managed in the kobject anyway, and without any size limitation, and just needlessly copied into "struct device". To set and read the device name dev_name(dev) and dev_set_name(dev) must be used. If your code uses static kobjects, which it shouldn't do, "const char *init_name" can be used to statically provide the name the registered device should have. At registration time, the init_name field is cleared, to enforce the use of dev_name(dev) to access the device name at a later time. We need to get rid of all occurrences of bus_id in the entire tree to be able to enable the new interface. Please apply this patch, and possibly convert any remaining remaining occurrences of bus_id. Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-Off-By: NKay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 31 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
External driver files should not include any private acpica headers. Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Currently acpi_run_osc() checks all the bits in _OSC result code (the first DWORD in the capabilities buffer) to see error condition. But the bit 0, which doesn't indicate any error, must be ignored. The bit 0 is used as the query flag at _OSC invocation time. Some platforms clear it during _OSC evaluation, but the others don't. On latter platforms, current acpi_run_osc() mis-detects error when _OSC is evaluated with query flag set because it doesn't ignore the bit 0. Because of this, the __acpi_query_osc() always fails on such platforms. And this is the cause of the problem that pci_osc_control_set() doesn't work since the commit 4e39432f which changed pci_osc_control_set() to use __acpi_query_osc(). Tested-by: N"Tomasz Czernecki <czernecki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 25 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI Warning (nseval-0168): Insufficient arguments - method [_OSC] needs 5, found 4 [20080926] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0252): \_SB_.PCI0._OSC: Parameter count mismatch - ASL declared 5, expected 4 [20080926] ACPI Error (nspredef-0163): \_SB_.PCI0._OSC: Missing expected return value [20080926] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 IP: [<c0237671>] acpi_run_osc+0xa1/0x170 Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Tested-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 23 10月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
If acpi_query_osc() returns other than AE_OK, __pci_osc_support_set() stops scanning ACPI objects to evaluate _OSC. This prevents subsequent _OSCs from being evaluated if some of root bridge doesn't have _OSC, for example. So acpi_query_osc() should return always AE_OK to evaluate all _OSC. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
In current pci_osc_control_set() implementation, once the _OSC control field is queried, it is never queried again. But the query result can change depending on the _OSC support field. For example, if PCI Express Native Hot Plug control depends on ASPM support on a certain platform, a PCI Express Native Hot Plug Control query would fail before the ASPM driver was loaded, but it would succeed if the ASPM driver was loaded first. Therefore, pci_osc_control_set() should query the _OSC control field every time. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
Current pci_osc_control_set() evaluates _OSC without query for control bits, unless __pci_osc_support_set() is called beforehand. But as strongly recommended in PCI firmware specification, it should query control bits first. This patch changes pci_osc_control_set() to query control bits first even if __pci_osc_support_set() is not called beforehand. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
Fix possible race condition on _OSC evaluation. Current _OSC evaluation code has possible race condition because it maniputes osc_data linked list or its contents without any lock mechanism. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 29 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
The ACPI FADT table includes an ASPM control bit. If the bit is set, do not enable ASPM since it may indicate that the platform doesn't actually support the feature. Tested-by: NJack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 17 7月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the second argument of acpi_pci_choose_state() and platform_pci_choose_state() is never used, remove it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 David Brownell 提交于
Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter. The only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first parameter, which is what all the callers already do. (However, this does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.) Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 08 7月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
* Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power manageable by ACPI. * Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent) subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up capability of given device. * Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(). * Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup(). * Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(), allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the device's PME# functionality, respectively. * Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new PME#-related functions. * Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not used any more. * Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the power.can_wakeup flag of given device. * Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is unset as appropriate. * Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be wake-up capable by it. * Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their wake-up power has been enabled). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework pci_set_power_state() so that the platform callback is invoked before the native mechanism, if necessary. Also, make the function check if the device is power manageable by the platform before invoking the platform callback. This may matter if the device dependent on additional power resources controlled by the platform is being put into D0, in which case those power resources must be turned on before we attempt to handle the device itself. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce function pointer platform_pci_power_manageable to be used by the platform-related code to point to a function allowing us to check if given device is power manageable by the platform. Introduce acpi_pci_power_manageable() playing that role for ACPI. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 28 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobias Diedrich 提交于
This patch is the minimal amount of code needed to support wake-on-lan in platform mode properly (i.e. "ethtool -s eth0 wol g" is sufficient, no additional magic needed) for me. This is derived from David Brownells patch (http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2007-April/004691.html). However I decided to move the hook into pci-acpi.c since the other two pci hooks also live there and pci and acpi are the only users of the platform_enable_wakeup-hook. As a 'side-effect' this also makes wake on usb activity work for me and I had to disable usb wakeup (which is enabled by default) using the power/wakeup sysfs functionality ("echo disabled > ${sysfs_path_to_device}/power/wakeup"). (BTW I first thought the 'immediate reboot because of usb wake' effect is caused by the optical mouse generating a wake event, but it rather seems to be a problem with a flaky secondary usb host controller, which sees a connected device where nothing is attached) Signed-off-by: NTobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@tdiedrich.de> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
-
- 12 6月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the second argument of acpi_pci_choose_state() and platform_pci_choose_state() is never used, remove it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 David Brownell 提交于
Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter. The only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first parameter, which is what all the callers already do. (However, this does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.) Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Minor cleanup in pci-acpi.c. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The 'retval' variable in __pci_osc_support_set() is no longer used. Remove this unused variable. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Current pci-acpi implementation checks osc_data->support_stat to see if control bits had been already queried. It is not good from the viewpoint of easy understanding. So this patch adds new 'is_queried' flag to indicate query had been done. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Current pci-acpi implementation uses array in osc_data directly to evaluate _OSC. It needs to save the old data and restore it if _OSC evaluation fails. To make it more robust, we should use local array to evaluate _OSC. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Remove the duplicated code in acpi_query_osc() and acpi_run_osc(). It simplifies the code very much. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 14 5月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The acpi_query_osc() function can be called for the ACPI object that doesn't have _OSC method. In this case, acpi_get_osc_data() would allocate a useless memory region. To avoid this, we need to check the existence of _OSC before calling acpi_get_osc_data() in acpi_query_osc(). Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The pci_osc_control_set() function can be called for the ACPI object that doesn't have _OSC method. In this case, acpi_get_osc_data() would allocate a useless memory region. To avoid this, we need to check the existence of _OSC before calling acpi_get_osc_data(). Here is a patch to fix this problem in pci_osc_control_set. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
There is an IA64 system here which have two pci root bridges with _OSC. One _OSC disables SHPC control bit but the other not. Below patch makes _OSC data per-device instead of one global, otherwise linux takes both root bridges don't support SHPC. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Fix uninitialized variable in __pci_osc_support_set(). If the ACPI namespace doesn't have any device object corresponding to the specified hid, 'retval' in __pci_osc_support_set() is not changed by the acpi_query_osc() callback. Since 'retval' is not initizlized in the current implementation, the contents of 'retval' is undefined in this case. This causes a mis-handling of ctrlset_buf[OSC_SUPPORT_TYPE] and will cause an unexpected result in the subsequent pci_osc_control_set() call as a result. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 23 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Brownell 提交于
Minor cleanups to acpi_pci_set_power_state(): use the ACPI and PCI state symbols to make clear that a mapping is being done between PCI and ACPI states, instead of using magic numbers. For paranoia's sake, report any errors. Save five bytes (x86_64) too. Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-