- 11 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have to do weird things when handling enospc in the transaction joining code. Because we've already joined the transaction we cannot commit the transaction within the reservation code since it will deadlock, so we have to return EAGAIN and then make sure we don't retry too many times. Instead of doing this, just do the reservation the normal way before we join the transaction, that way we can do whatever we want to try and reclaim space, and then if it fails we know for sure we are out of space and we can return ENOSPC. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
data parameter should be u64 because a full-sized chunk flags field is passed instead of 0/1 for distinguishing data from metadata. All underlying functions expect u64. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 13 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Even when delalloc_bytes is zero, we may need to sleep while waiting for delalloc space. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I was testing with empty_cluster = 0 to try and reproduce a problem and kept hitting early enospc panics. This was because our loop logic was a little confused. So this is what I did 1) Make the loop variable the ultimate decider on wether we should loop again isntead of checking to see if we had an uncached bg, empty size or empty cluster. 2) Increment loop before checking to see what we are on to make the loop definitions make more sense. 3) If we are on the chunk alloc loop don't set empty_size/empty_cluster to 0 unless we didn't actually allocate a chunk. If we did allocate a chunk we should be able to easily setup a new cluster so clearing empty_size/empty_cluster makes us less efficient. This kept me from hitting panics while trying to reproduce the other problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I noticed when running an enospc test that we would get stuck committing the transaction in check_data_space even though we truly didn't have enough space. So check to see if bytes_pinned is bigger than num_bytes, if it's not don't commit the transaction. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 04 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
wrap checking of filesystem 'closing' flag and fix a few missing memory barriers. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 24 5月, 2011 9 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Currently, btrfs_truncate_item and btrfs_extend_item returns only 0. So, the check by BUG_ON in the caller is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Sergei Trofimovich 提交于
Observed as a large delay when --mixed filesystem is filled up. Test example: 1. create tiny --mixed FS: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=2G.img seek=$((2048 * 1024 * 1024 - 1)) count=1 bs=1 $ mkfs.btrfs --mixed 2G.img $ mount -oloop 2G.img /mnt/ut/ 2. Try to fill it up: $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=10M.file bs=10240 count=1024 $ seq 1 256 | while read file_no; do echo $file_no; time cp 10M.file ${file_no}.copy; done Up to '200.copy' it goes fast, but when disk fills-up each -ENOSPC message takes 3 seconds to pop-up _every_ ENOSPC (and in usermode linux it's even more: 30-60 seconds!). (Maybe, time depends on kernel's timer resolution). No IO, no CPU load, just rescheduling. Some debugging revealed busy spinning in shrink_delalloc. Signed-off-by: NSergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we have a very large filesystem, we can spend a lot of time in find_free_extent just trying to allocate from empty block groups. So instead check to see if the block group even has enough space for the allocation, and if not go on to the next block group. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Our readahead is sort of sloppy, and really isn't always needed. For example if ls is doing a stating ls (which is the default) it's going to stat in non-disk order, so if say you have a directory with a stupid amount of files, readahead is going to do nothing but waste time in the case of doing the stat. Taking the unconditional readahead out made my test go from 57 minutes to 36 minutes. This means that everywhere we do loop through the tree we want to make sure we do set path->reada properly, so I went through and found all of the places where we loop through the path and set reada to 1. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When the fs is super full and we unmount the fs, we could get stuck in this thing where unmount is waiting for the caching kthread to make progress and the caching kthread keeps scheduling because we're in the middle of a commit. So instead just let the caching kthread keep going and only yeild if need_resched(). This makes my horrible umount case go from taking up to 10 minutes to taking less than 20 seconds. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Originally this was going to be used as a way to give hints to the allocator, but frankly we can get much better hints elsewhere and it's not even used at all for anything usefull. In addition to be completely useless, when we initialize an inode we try and find a freeish block group to set as the inodes block group, and with a completely full 40gb fs this takes _forever_, so I imagine with say 1tb fs this is just unbearable. So just axe the thing altoghether, we don't need it and it saves us 8 bytes in the inode and saves us 500 microseconds per inode lookup in my testcase. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
The ceph guys keep running into problems where we have space reserved in our orphan block rsv when freeing it up. This is because they tend to do snapshots alot, so their truncates tend to use a bunch of space, so when we go to do things like update the inode we have to steal reservation space in order to make the reservation happen. This happens because truncate can use as much space as it freaking feels like, but we still have to hold space for removing the orphan item and updating the inode, which will definitely always happen. So in order to fix this we need to split all of the reservation stuf up. So with this patch we have 1) The orphan block reserve which only holds the space for deleting our orphan item when everything is over. 2) The truncate block reserve which gets allocated and used specifically for the space that the truncate will use on a per truncate basis. 3) The transaction will always have 1 item's worth of data reserved so we can update the inode normally. Hopefully this will make the ceph problem go away. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We use trans_mutex for lots of things, here's a basic list 1) To serialize trans_handles joining the currently running transaction 2) To make sure that no new trans handles are started while we are committing 3) To protect the dead_roots list and the transaction lists Really the serializing trans_handles joining is not too hard, and can really get bogged down in acquiring a reference to the transaction. So replace the trans_mutex with a trans_lock spinlock and use it to do the following 1) Protect fs_info->running_transaction. All trans handles have to do is check this, and then take a reference of the transaction and keep on going. 2) Protect the fs_info->trans_list. This doesn't get used too much, basically it just holds the current transactions, which will usually just be the currently committing transaction and the currently running transaction at most. 3) Protect the dead roots list. This is only ever processed by splicing the list so this is relatively simple. 4) Protect the fs_info->reloc_ctl stuff. This is very lightweight and was using the trans_mutex before, so this is a pretty straightforward change. 5) Protect fs_info->no_trans_join. Because we don't hold the trans_lock over the entirety of the commit we need to have a way to block new people from creating a new transaction while we're doing our work. So we set no_trans_join and in join_transaction we test to see if that is set, and if it is we do a wait_on_commit. 6) Make the transaction use count atomic so we don't need to take locks to modify it when we're dropping references. 7) Add a commit_lock to the transaction to make sure multiple people trying to commit the same transaction don't race and commit at the same time. 8) Make open_ioctl_trans an atomic so we don't have to take any locks for ioctl trans. I have tested this with xfstests, but obviously it is a pretty hairy change so lots of testing is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I keep forgetting that btrfs_join_transaction() just ignores the num_items argument, which leads me to sending pointless patches and looking stupid :). So just kill the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction and btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction, since neither of them use it. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 21 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NItaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 liubo 提交于
When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data & metadata option, it will have no pure data or pure metadata space info. In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920 (Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space infos at the very beginning. The problem is this initialization does not take the mixed case into account, which will cause btrfs will easily get into ENOSPC in mixed case. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Remove code which has been #if0-ed out for a very long time and does not seem to be related to current codebase anymore. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 02 5月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
parameter tree root it's not used since commit 5f39d397 ("Btrfs: Create extent_buffer interface for large blocksizes") Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
pass GFP_NOFS directly to kmem_cache_alloc Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 26 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
The check on the return value of kmalloc() is added to some places. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
This is similar to block group caching. We dedicate a special inode in fs tree to save free ino cache. At the very first time we create/delete a file after mount, the free ino cache will be loaded from disk into memory. When the fs tree is commited, the cache will be written back to disk. To keep compatibility, we check the root generation against the generation of the special inode when loading the cache, so the loading will fail if the btrfs filesystem was mounted in an older kernel before. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
There's a potential problem in 32bit system when we exhaust 32bit inode numbers and start to allocate big inode numbers, because btrfs uses inode->i_ino in many places. So here we always use BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid, which is an u64 variable. There are 2 exceptions that BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid != inode->i_ino: the btree inode (0 vs 1) and empty subvol dirs (256 vs 2), and inode->i_ino will be used in those cases. Another reason to make this change is I'm going to use a special inode to save free ino cache, and the inode number must be > (u64)-256. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
So we can re-use the code to cache free inode numbers. The change is quite straightforward. Two new structures are introduced. - struct btrfs_free_space_ctl We move those variables that are used for caching free space from struct btrfs_block_group_cache to this new struct. - struct btrfs_free_space_op We do block group specific work (e.g. calculation of extents threshold) through functions registered in this struct. And then we can remove references to struct btrfs_block_group_cache. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 16 4月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Everytime we try to allocate disk space we try and see if we can pre-emptively allocate a chunk, but in the common case we don't allocate anything, so there is no sense in taking the chunk_mutex at all. So instead if we are allocating a chunk, mark it in the space_info so we don't get two people trying to allocate at the same time. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
find_free_extent likes to allocate in contiguous clusters, which makes writeback faster, especially on SSD storage. As the FS fragments, these clusters become harder to find and we have to decide between allocating a new chunk to make more clusters or giving up on the cluster to allocate from the free space we have. Right now it creates too many chunks, and you can end up with a whole FS that is mostly empty metadata chunks. This commit changes the allocation code to be more strict and only allocate new chunks when we've made good use of the chunks we already have. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2011 10 次提交
-
-
由 liubo 提交于
btrfs will remove unused block groups after balance. When a empty filesystem is balanced, the block group with tag "DATA" may be dropped, and after umount and mount again, it will not find "DATA" space_info and lead to OOPS. So we initial the necessary space_infos(DATA, SYSTEM, METADATA) to avoid OOPS. Reported-by: NDaniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 liubo 提交于
After Josef's patch(commit 3c14874a), btrfs will exclude super bytes when reading block groups(by marking a extent state UPTODATE). However, these bytes do not get freed while balance remove unused block groups, and we won't process those removed ones any more, when we do umount and unload the btrfs module, btrfs hits a memory leak. This patch add the missing free operation. Reproduce steps: $ mkfs.btrfs disk $ mount disk /mnt/btrfs -o loop $ btrfs filesystem balance /mnt/btrfs $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ rmmod btrfs Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Yoshinori Sano 提交于
To make Btrfs code more robust, several return value checks where memory allocation can fail are introduced. I use BUG_ON where I don't know how to handle the error properly, which increases the number of using the notorious BUG_ON, though. Signed-off-by: NYoshinori Sano <yoshinori.sano@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Dongyang 提交于
We take an free extent out from allocator, trim it, then put it back, but before we trim the block group, we should make sure the block group is cached, so plus a little change to make cache_block_group() run without a transaction. Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Dongyang 提交于
Callers of btrfs_discard_extent() should check if we are mounted with -o discard, as we want to make fitrim to work even the fs is not mounted with -o discard. Also we should use REQ_DISCARD to map the free extent to get a full mapping, last we only return errors if 1. the error is not a EOPNOTSUPP 2. no device supports discard Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Dongyang 提交于
Make the function public as we should update the reserved extents calculations after taking out an extent for trimming. Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
In the filesystem context, we must allocate memory by GFP_NOFS, or we may start another filesystem operation and make kswap thread hang up. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
This patch is checking return value of read_tree_block(), and if it is NULL, error processing. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
This patch changes some BUG_ON() to the error return. (but, most callers still use BUG_ON()) Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 liubo 提交于
Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly helpful for debugging, e.g dd-7822 [000] 2121.641088: btrfs_inode_request: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 4, ino = 256, blocks = 8, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 8, logged_trans = 0 dd-7822 [000] 2121.641100: btrfs_inode_new: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 8, ino = 257, blocks = 0, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 0, logged_trans = 0 btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.935420: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29368320 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29388800 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.935473: btrfs_cow_block: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29364224 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29392896 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.972221: btrfs_transaction_commit: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), gen = 8 flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824210: btrfs_chunk_alloc: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), offset = 1103101952, size = 1073741824, num_stripes = 1, sub_stripes = 0, type = DATA flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824241: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29388800 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29396992 (cow_level = 0) flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824255: btrfs_cow_block: root = 4(DEV_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29372416 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29401088 (cow_level = 0) flush-btrfs-2-7821 [000] 2155.824329: btrfs_cow_block: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 20971520 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 20975616 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-endio-wri-7800 [001] 2155.898019: btrfs_cow_block: root = 5(FS_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29384704 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29405184 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-endio-wri-7800 [001] 2155.898043: btrfs_cow_block: root = 7(CSUM_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29376512 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29409280 (cow_level = 0) Here is what I have added: 1) ordere_extent: btrfs_ordered_extent_add btrfs_ordered_extent_remove btrfs_ordered_extent_start btrfs_ordered_extent_put These provide critical information to understand how ordered_extents are updated. 2) extent_map: btrfs_get_extent extent_map is used in both read and write cases, and it is useful for tracking how btrfs specific IO is running. 3) writepage: __extent_writepage btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook Pages are cirtical resourses and produce a lot of corner cases during writeback, so it is valuable to know how page is written to disk. 4) inode: btrfs_inode_new btrfs_inode_request btrfs_inode_evict These can show where and when a inode is created, when a inode is evicted. 5) sync: btrfs_sync_file btrfs_sync_fs These show sync arguments. 6) transaction: btrfs_transaction_commit In transaction based filesystem, it will be useful to know the generation and who does commit. 7) back reference and cow: btrfs_delayed_tree_ref btrfs_delayed_data_ref btrfs_delayed_ref_head btrfs_cow_block Btrfs natively supports back references, these tracepoints are helpful on understanding btrfs's COW mechanism. 8) chunk: btrfs_chunk_alloc btrfs_chunk_free Chunk is a link between physical offset and logical offset, and stands for space infomation in btrfs, and these are helpful on tracing space things. 9) reserved_extent: btrfs_reserved_extent_alloc btrfs_reserved_extent_free These can show how btrfs uses its space. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently if we have corrupted items things will blow up in spectacular ways. So as we read in blocks and they are leaves, check the entire leaf to make sure all of the items are correct and point to valid parts in the leaf for the item data the are responsible for. If the item is corrupt we will kick back EIO and not read any of the copies since they are likely to not be correct either. This will catch generic corruptions, it will be up to the individual callers of btrfs_search_slot to make sure their items are right. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we cannot truncate an inode for some reason we will never delete the orphan item associated with that inode, which means that we will loop forever in btrfs_orphan_cleanup. Instead of doing this just return error so we fail to mount. It sucks, but hey it's better than hanging. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-