- 06 10月, 2013 17 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The LE advertising parameters can only be modified when advertising is disabled. So before enabling it, make sure the controller has all the right parameters. Right now all default values are used and thus this does no change any existing behavior. One minor exception is that in case of single mode LE-only controllers without a public address, now the random address is used for advertising. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The tasks of enabling and disabling advertising are required in many cases. So refactor the actual HCI operations into two common helpers to make the code simpler. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This is not a functional change, just change the code to make it easy to understand that advertising gets disabled before LE support will be turned off. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
For single mode LE-only controllers, it is possible that they come without a public address. If a public address is not available, then use the random address for connection establishment and scanning. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When counting the number for AMP controllers, a positive check is used. To be consistent, use the same check when actually adding the data for the AMP contollers. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The BR/EDR and LE setup procedures apply only to BR/EDR device types and so check for that explicitly. Checking that it is not an AMP controller is dangerous in case there will be ever a third device type. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
In case of a single mode LE-only controller it is possible that no public address is used. These type of controllers require a random address to be configured. Without a configured static random address, such a controller is not functional. So reject powering on the controller in this case until it gets configured with a random address. The controller setup stage is still run since it is the only way to determinate if a public address is available or not. So it is similar on how RFKILL gets handled during initial setup of the controller. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Within the AMP discover response, all controllers that are not the primary BR/EDR controller are valid. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The check if a L2CAP connection is AMP capable was a little bit complicated. This changes the code to make it simpler and more readable. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The hci_amp_capable() function has only a single user inside the L2CAP core. Instead of exporting the function, place it next to its user. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The number of controllers for the AMP discover response has already been calculated. And since the hci_dev_list lock is held, it can not change. So there is no need for any extra checks. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The inline function for BR/EDR controller AMP discover response info is rather useless. Just include the code into the function that builds the whole response. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The AMP controller status constants need to be actually used to avoid crypted hardcoded numbers. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The special AMP controller id 0 is reserved for the BR/EDR controller that has the main link. It is a fixed value and so use a constant for this throughout the code to make it more visible when the handling is for the BR/EDR channel or when it is for the AMP channel. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
There are two defined HCI device types. One is for BR/EDR controllers and the other is for AMP controllers. The HCI device type is not the same as the AMP controller type. It just happens that currently the defined types match, but that is not guaranteed. Split the usage of AMP controller type into its own domain so that it is possible to separate between BR/EDR controllers, 802.11 AMP controllers and any other AMP technology that might be defined in the future. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The list of controllers can be counted ahead of time and inline inside the AMP discover handling. There is no need to export such a function at all. In addition just count the AMP controller and only allocated space for a single mandatory BR/EDR controller. No need to allocate more space than needed. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The AMP discover response should list exactly one BR/EDR controller and ignore all other BR/EDR controller. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
LE controllers will automatically disable advertising whenever they accept a new connection. In order not to fall out of sync with the advertising setting we need to re-enable advertising whenever the last LE connection drops. A failure to re-enable advertising should cause the setting to be disabled, so this patch also calls mgmt_new_settings() when this happens. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
A function is needed so that the HCI event processing can ask the mgmt code to emit a new settings event. This is necessary e.g. when the event processing does updates to mgmt related states without any dependency of actual mgmt commands. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This flag is used to indicate whether we want to have advertising enabled or not, so give it a more suitable name. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 04 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andre Guedes 提交于
This patch moves some hci_conn fields initialization from hci_le_ create_connection() to hci_connect_le(). It makes more sense to initialize these fields within the function that creates the hci_ conn object. Signed-off-by: NAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Andre Guedes 提交于
This patch simply rename the hci_conn variable "le" to "conn" since it is a better name. Signed-off-by: NAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 03 10月, 2013 13 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth specification makes it clear that only one command should be present in the L2CAP LE signalling packet. So tighten the checks here and restrict it to exactly one command. This is different from L2CAP BR/EDR signalling where multiple commands can be part of the same packet. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When SMP packets are received, make sure they contain at least 1 byte header for the opcode. If not, drop the packet and disconnect the link. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The ATT fixed channel is only valid when using LE connections. On BR/EDR it is required to go through L2CAP connection oriented channel for ATT. Drop ATT packets when they are received on a BR/EDR connection. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When receiving connectionless packets on a LE connection, just drop the packet. There is no concept of connectionless channels for LE. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When receiving SMP packets on a BR/EDR connection, then just drop the packet and do not try to process it. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The L2CAP raw sockets are only used for BR/EDR signalling. Packets on LE links should not be forwarded there. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The switch statement for the various L2CAP fixed channel handlers is not really ordered. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Changing the device class when BR/EDR is disabled has no visible effect for remote devices. However to simplify the logic allow it as long as the controller supports BR/EDR operations. If it is not allowed, then the overall logic becomes rather complicated since the class of device values would need clearing or restoring when BR/EDR setting changes. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Loading long term keys into a BR/EDR only controller make no sense. The kernel would never use any of these keys. So instead of allowing userspace to waste memory, reject such operation with a not supported error message. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Loading link keys into a LE only controller make no sense. The kernel would never use any of these keys. So instead of allowing userspace to waste memory, reject such operation with a not supported error message. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Setting the static address does not depend on LE beeing enabled. It only depends on a controller with LE support. When depending on LE enabled this command becomes really complicated since in case LE gets disabled, it would be required to clear the static address and also its random address representation inside the controller. With future support for private addresses such complex setup should be avoided. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Only when BR/EDR is supported and enabled, allow changing of the SSP setting. Just checking if the hardware supports SSP is not enough since it might be the case that BR/EDR is disabled. In the case that BR/EDR is disabled, but SSP supported by the controller the not supported error message is now returned. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The wrong type of L2CAP signalling packets on the wrong type of either BR/EDR or LE links need to be dropped. When that happens the packet is dropped, but the memory not freed. So actually free the memory as well. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
-
- 02 10月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch increments the management interface revision due to the various fixes, improvements and other changes that have gone in lately. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
We shouldn't include the simultaneous LE & BR/EDR flags in the LE advertising data if BR/EDR is disabled on a dual-mode controller. This patch fixes this issue and ensures that the create_ad function generates the correct flags when BR/EDR is disabled. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The REJECTED management response should mainly be used when the adapter is in a state where we cannot accept some command or a specific parameter value. The NOT_SUPPORTED response in turn means that the adapter really cannot support the command or parameter value. This patch fixes this distinction and adds two helper functions to easily get the appropriate LE or BR/EDR related status response. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
On dual-mode BR/EDR/LE and LE only controllers it is possible to configure a random address. There are two types or random addresses, one is static and the other private. Since the random private addresses require special privacy feature to be supported, the configuration of these two are kept separate. This command allows for setting the static random address. It is only supported on controllers with LE support. The static random address is suppose to be valid for the lifetime of the controller or at least until the next power cycle. To ensure such behavior, setting of the address is limited to when the controller is powered off. The special BDADDR_ANY address (00:00:00:00:00:00) can be used to disable the static address. This is also the default value. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Disabling the high speed setting when the controller is powered on has too many side effects that are not taken care of. And in general it is not an useful operation anyway. So just make such a command fail with a rejection error message. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-