- 07 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chen Gang 提交于
Need use 'clk' instead of 'mclk', which is the original removed local variable. The related original commit: "652ed95d cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routine" The related error with allmodconfig for unicore32: CC drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.o drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c: In function ‘ucv2_target’: drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c:48: error: ‘struct cpufreq_policy’ has no member named ‘mclk’ make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 Fixes: 652ed95d (cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routine) Signed-off-by: NChen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sachin Kamat 提交于
The current exynos cpufreq drivers are not multiplatform compliant and give build errors as they refer to header files from machine directory. Work to migrate them to generic cpufreq framework is under way. Till such time disable the build on multiplatform so that other multiplatform ready features get tested. Signed-off-by: NSachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
cpufreq_notify_transition() and cpufreq_notify_post_transition() shouldn't be called directly by cpufreq drivers anymore and so these should be marked static. Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
CPUFreq core has new infrastructure that would guarantee serialized calls to target() or target_index() callbacks. These are called cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() and cpufreq_freq_transition_end(). This patch converts existing drivers to use these new set of routines. Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
Whenever we change the frequency of a CPU, we call the PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized, i.e. PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE notifiers should strictly alternate, thereby preventing two different sets of PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE notifiers from interleaving arbitrarily. The following examples illustrate why this is important: Scenario 1: ----------- A thread reading the value of cpuinfo_cur_freq, will call __cpufreq_cpu_get()->cpufreq_out_of_sync()->cpufreq_notify_transition() The ondemand governor can decide to change the frequency of the CPU at the same time and hence it can end up sending the notifications via ->target(). If the notifiers are not serialized, the following sequence can occur: - PRECHANGE Notification for freq A (from cpuinfo_cur_freq) - PRECHANGE Notification for freq B (from target()) - Freq changed by target() to B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq B - POSTCHANGE Notification for freq A We can see from the above that the last POSTCHANGE Notification happens for freq A but the hardware is set to run at freq B. Where would we break then?: adjust_jiffies() in cpufreq.c & cpufreq_callback() in arch/arm/kernel/smp.c (which also adjusts the jiffies). All the loops_per_jiffy calculations will get messed up. Scenario 2: ----------- The governor calls __cpufreq_driver_target() to change the frequency. At the same time, if we change scaling_{min|max}_freq from sysfs, it will end up calling the governor's CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS notification, which will also call __cpufreq_driver_target(). And hence we end up issuing concurrent calls to ->target(). Typically, platforms have the following logic in their ->target() routines: (Eg: cpufreq-cpu0, omap, exynos, etc) A. If new freq is more than old: Increase voltage B. Change freq C. If new freq is less than old: decrease voltage Now, if the two concurrent calls to ->target() are X and Y, where X is trying to increase the freq and Y is trying to decrease it, we get the following race condition: X.A: voltage gets increased for larger freq Y.A: nothing happens Y.B: freq gets decreased Y.C: voltage gets decreased X.B: freq gets increased X.C: nothing happens Thus we can end up setting a freq which is not supported by the voltage we have set. That will probably make the clock to the CPU unstable and the system might not work properly anymore. This patch introduces a set of synchronization primitives to serialize frequency transitions, which are to be used as shown below: cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(); //Perform the frequency change cpufreq_freq_transition_end(); The _begin() call sends the PRECHANGE notification whereas the _end() call sends the POSTCHANGE notification. Also, all the necessary synchronization is handled within these calls. In particular, even drivers which set the ASYNC_NOTIFICATION flag can also use these APIs for performing frequency transitions (ie., you can call _begin() from one task, and call the corresponding _end() from a different task). The actual synchronization underneath is not that complicated: The key challenge is to allow drivers to begin the transition from one thread and end it in a completely different thread (this is to enable drivers that do asynchronous POSTCHANGE notification from bottom-halves, to also use the same interface). To achieve this, a 'transition_ongoing' flag, a 'transition_lock' spinlock and a wait-queue are added per-policy. The flag and the wait-queue are used in conjunction to create an "uninterrupted flow" from _begin() to _end(). The spinlock is used to ensure that only one such "flow" is in flight at any given time. Put together, this provides us all the necessary synchronization. Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Ensure that no timer callback is running since we are about to free the timer structure. We cannot guarantee that the call back is called on the CPU where the timer is running. Reported-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
During suspend, we first stop governors and then suspend cpufreq drivers and resume must be exactly opposite of that. i.e. resume drivers first and then start governors. But the current code in resume enables governors first and then resume drivers. Fix it be changing code sequence there. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Change to use the new ->stop_cpu() callback to do clean up during CPU hotplug. The requested P state for an offline core will be used by the hardware coordination function to select the package P state. If the core is under load when it is offlined it will fix the package P state floor to the requested P state of offline core. Reported-by: NPatrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
This callback allows the driver to do clean up before the CPU is completely down and its state cannot be modified. This is used by the intel_pstate driver to reduce the requested P state prior to the core going away. This is required because the requested P state of the offline core is used to select the package P state. This effectively sets the floor package P state to the requested P state on the offline core. Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> [rjw: Minor modifications] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
Remove unnecessary braces from a single statement. Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
Fix 2 checkpatch errors about using assignment in if condition, 1 checkpatch error about a required space after comma and 3 warnings about line over 80 characters. Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Zhuoyu Zhang 提交于
According to the data provided by HW Team, at least 12 internal platform clock cycles are required to stabilize a DFS clock switch on FSL e500mc Socs. This patch replaces the CPUFREQ_ETERNAL with appropriate HW clock transition latency to make DFS governors work normally on Freescale e500mc boards. Signed-off-by: NZhuoyu Zhang <Zhuoyu.Zhang@freescale.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Two cpufreq notifiers CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE and CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE have not been used for some time, so remove them to clean up code a bit. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
cpufreq drivers that provide the ->setpolicy() callback are supposed to have integrated governors, so they don't need to set ->target() or ->target_index() and may confuse the core if any of these callbacks is present. For this reason, add a check preventing ->setpolicy cpufreq drivers from registering if they have non-NULL ->target or ->target_index. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 viresh kumar 提交于
We have a per-CPU variable for managing which cluster a CPU belongs to. Currently, physical_cluster is set for policy->cpu only which leads to the following on some SoC's: - There are two clusters: - Cluster 0 has four ARM Cortex A7 CPUs (slower ones): 0,1,2,3 - Cluster 1 has four ARM Cortex A15 CPUs (faster ones): 4,5,6,7 - CPUs are booted in order 0,1..7 and so initially policy->cpu for A7 cluster would be 0 and for A15 cluster would be 4. - Now CPU4 (i.e. A15_0) is hotplugged out and so policy->cpu for A15 cluster becomes 5 (i.e. A15_1). - But physical cluster is only set for CPU0 and CPU4 in ARM big LITTLE driver and isn't updated. - Now freq change request comes for A15 cluster and we would try to update freq of physical_cluster of CPU5, i.e. A15_1. And it is currently set to zero (default value of uninitialized global variables). - And so we actually try to change freq of A7 cluster instead of A15. - This also results in kernel crash as sometimes we might request freq above A7's limit and CPU may behave badly.. Fix this by initializing physical_cluster for all CPUs of a policy. Based on previous work by Xin Wang. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 viresh kumar 提交于
Currently vexpress big LITTLE driver selects ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ, so if CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE isn't enabled and CONFIG_ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ is enabled, we get the following build warnings: warning: (ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ) selects ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ which has unmet direct dependencies (ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ && CPU_FREQ && (ARM || ARM64) && ARM && BIG_LITTLE && ARM_CPU_TOPOLOGY && HAVE_CLK) To fix this, make ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ depend on ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ instead of selecting it. This also moves the entry for ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ along with other big LITTLE config entries. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 13 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
The architectures that override cputime_t (s390, ppc) don't provide any version of nsecs_to_cputime(). Indeed this cputime_t implementation by backend only happens when CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE=y under which the core code doesn't make any use of nsecs_to_cputime(). At least for now. We are going to make a broader use of it so lets provide a default version with a per usecs granularity. It should be good enough for most usecases. Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit da60ce9f (cpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()) __cpufreq_add_dev() sometimes fails for CPUs handled by intel_pstate, because that driver may return 0 from its ->get() callback if it has not run long enough to collect enough samples on the given CPU. That didn't happen before commit da60ce9f which added policy->cur initialization to __cpufreq_add_dev() to help reduce code duplication in other cpufreq drivers. However, the code added by commit da60ce9f need not be executed for cpufreq drivers having the ->setpolicy callback defined, because the subsequent invocation of cpufreq_set_policy() will use that callback to initialize the policy anyway and it doesn't need policy->cur to be initialized upfront. The analogous code in cpufreq_update_policy() is also unnecessary for cpufreq drivers having ->setpolicy set and may be skipped for them as well. Since intel_pstate provides ->setpolicy, skipping the upfront policy->cur initialization for cpufreq drivers with that callback set will cover intel_pstate and the problem it's been having after commit da60ce9f will be addressed. Fixes: da60ce9f (cpufreq: call cpufreq_driver->get() after calling ->init()) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71931Reported-and-tested-by: NPatrik Lundquist <patrik.lundquist@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
As multiplatform build is being adopted by more and more ARM platforms, initcall function should be used very carefully. For example, when SPEAr cpufreq driver is enabled on a kernel booted on a non-SPEAr board, we will get following boot time error: spear_cpufreq: Invalid cpufreq_tbl To eliminate this undesired the effect, the patch changes SPEAr driver to have it instantiated as a platform_driver. Then it will only run on platforms that create the platform_device "spear-cpufreq". This patch also creates platform node for SPEAr13xx boards. Reported-by: NJosh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
We have used 'frozen' variable/function parameter at many places to distinguish between CPU offline/online on suspend/resume vs sysfs removals. We now have another variable cpufreq_suspended which can be used in these cases, so we can get rid of all those variables or function parameters. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
cpufreq_generic_exit() is empty now and can be deleted. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
freq table is not per CPU but per policy, so it makes more sense to keep it within struct cpufreq_policy instead of a per-cpu variable. This patch does it. Over that, there is no need to set policy->freq_table to NULL in ->exit(), as policy structure is going to be freed soon. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
- Add missing newlines - Coalesce format fragments - Convert printks to pr_<level> - Align arguments Based-on-patch-by: NSören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2014 9 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The cpufreq core now supports suspending and resuming of cpufreq drivers and governors during systems suspend and resume, so use the common infrastructure instead of defining special PM notifiers for the same thing. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The cpufreq core now supports suspending and resuming of cpufreq drivers and governors during systems suspend and resume, so use the common infrastructure instead of defining special PM notifiers for the same thing. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The cpufreq core now supports suspending and resuming of cpufreq drivers and governors during systems suspend and resume, so use the common infrastructure instead of defining special PM notifiers for the same thing. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Multiple platforms need to set CPUs to a particular frequency before suspending the system, so provide a common infrastructure for them. Those platforms only need to point their ->suspend callback pointers to the generic routine. Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This patch adds cpufreq suspend/resume calls to dpm_{suspend|resume}() for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors. Lan Tianyu (Intel) & Jinhyuk Choi (Broadcom) found an issue where the tunables configuration for clusters/sockets with non-boot CPUs was lost after system suspend/resume, as we were notifying governors with CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT on removal of the last CPU for that policy which caused the tunables memory to be freed. This is fixed by preventing any governor operations from being carried out between the device suspend and device resume stages of system suspend and resume, respectively. We could have added these callbacks at dpm_{suspend|resume}_noirq() level, but there is an additional problem that the majority of I/O devices is already suspended at that point and if cpufreq drivers want to change the frequency before suspending, then that not be possible on some platforms (which depend on peripherals like i2c, regulators, etc). Reported-and-tested-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Reported-by: NJinhyuk Choi <jinchoi@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 viresh kumar 提交于
We call __find_governor() during the addition of the first CPU of each policy from __cpufreq_add_dev() to find the last governor used for this CPU before it was hot-removed. After that we call cpufreq_parse_governor() in cpufreq_init_policy(), either with this governor, or with the default governor. Right after that policy->governor is set to NULL. While that code is not functionally problematic, the structure of it is suboptimal, because some of the code required in cpufreq_init_policy() is being executed by its caller, __cpufreq_add_dev(). So, it would make more sense to get all of it together in a single place to make code more readable. Accordingly, move the code needed for policy initialization to cpufreq_init_policy() and initialize policy->governor to NULL at the beginning. In order to clean up the code a bit more, some of the #ifdefs for CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU are dropped too. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
policy->rwsem is used to lock access to all parts of code modifying struct cpufreq_policy, but it's not used on a new policy created by __cpufreq_add_dev(). Because of that, if cpufreq_update_policy() is called in a tight loop on one CPU in parallel with offline/online of another CPU, then the following crash can be triggered: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 pgd = c0003000 [00000020] *pgd=80000000004003, *pmd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 206 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM PC is at __cpufreq_governor+0x10/0x1ac LR is at cpufreq_update_policy+0x114/0x150 ---[ end trace f23a8defea6cd706 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception CPU0: stopping CPU: 0 PID: 7136 Comm: mpdecision Tainted: G D W 3.10.0-gd727407-00074-g979ede8 #396 [<c0afe180>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68) from [<c02a23ac>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x58) [<c02a23ac>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x58) from [<c02a23d8>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c) [<c02a23d8>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c) from [<c0803c68>] (cpufreq_set_policy+0xd4/0x2b8) [<c0803c68>] (cpufreq_set_policy+0xd4/0x2b8) from [<c0803e7c>] (cpufreq_init_policy+0x30/0x98) [<c0803e7c>] (cpufreq_init_policy+0x30/0x98) from [<c0805a18>] (__cpufreq_add_dev.isra.17+0x4dc/0x7a4) [<c0805a18>] (__cpufreq_add_dev.isra.17+0x4dc/0x7a4) from [<c0805d38>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x58/0x84) [<c0805d38>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x58/0x84) from [<c0afe180>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68) [<c0afe180>] (notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x68) from [<c02812dc>] (__cpu_notify+0x28/0x44) [<c02812dc>] (__cpu_notify+0x28/0x44) from [<c0aeed90>] (_cpu_up+0xf4/0x1dc) [<c0aeed90>] (_cpu_up+0xf4/0x1dc) from [<c0aeeed4>] (cpu_up+0x5c/0x78) [<c0aeeed4>] (cpu_up+0x5c/0x78) from [<c0aec808>] (store_online+0x44/0x74) [<c0aec808>] (store_online+0x44/0x74) from [<c03a40f4>] (sysfs_write_file+0x108/0x14c) [<c03a40f4>] (sysfs_write_file+0x108/0x14c) from [<c03517d4>] (vfs_write+0xd0/0x180) [<c03517d4>] (vfs_write+0xd0/0x180) from [<c0351ca8>] (SyS_write+0x38/0x68) [<c0351ca8>] (SyS_write+0x38/0x68) from [<c0205de0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30) Fix that by taking locks at appropriate places in __cpufreq_add_dev() as well. Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Suggested-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Policy must be fully initialized before it is being made available for use by others. Otherwise cpufreq_cpu_get() would be able to grab a half initialized policy structure that might not have affected_cpus (for example) populated. Then, anybody accessing those fields will get a wrong value and that will lead to unpredictable results. In order to fix this, do all the necessary initialization before we make the policy structure available via cpufreq_cpu_get(). That will guarantee that any code accessing fields of the policy will get correct data from them. Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Aaron Plattner 提交于
If a module calls cpufreq_get while cpufreq is initializing, it's possible for it to be called after cpufreq_driver is set but before cpufreq_cpu_data is written during subsys_interface_register. This happens because cpufreq_get doesn't take the cpufreq_driver_lock around its use of cpufreq_cpu_data. Fix this by using cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu) to look up the policy rather than reading it out of cpufreq_cpu_data directly. cpufreq_cpu_get() takes the appropriate locks to prevent this race from happening. Since it's possible for policy to be NULL if the caller passes in an invalid CPU number or calls the function before cpufreq is initialized, delete the BUG_ON(!policy) and simply return 0. Don't try to return -ENOENT because that's negative and the function returns an unsigned integer. References: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=177934Signed-off-by: NAaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com> Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.13+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 02 3月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Saravana Kannan 提交于
cpufreq_frequency_get_table() is called from all callers of __cpufreq_stats_create_table(). So, move it inside. Suggested-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Saravana Kannan 提交于
Remove sysfs group if __cpufreq_stats_create_table() fails after creating one. Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Saravana Kannan 提交于
__cpufreq_stats_create_table always gets pass the valid and real policy struct. So, there's no need to call cpufreq_cpu_get() to get the policy again. Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
commit d253d2a5 (Improve accuracy by not truncating until final result), changed internal variables of the PID to be fixed point numbers. Update the pid_reset() to reflect this change. Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dirk Brandewie 提交于
Remove unneeded sample buffers, intel_pstate operates on the most recent sample only. This save some memory and make the code more readable. Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
cpufreq_update_policy() calls cpufreq_driver->get() to get current frequency of a CPU and it is not supposed to fail or return zero. Return error in case that happens. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rob Herring 提交于
Enable cpufreq and power kconfig menus on arm64 along with arm cpufreq drivers. The power menu is needed for OPP support. At least on Calxeda systems, the same cpufreq driver is used for arm and arm64 based systems. Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rob Herring 提交于
Enable cpufreq and power kconfig menus on arm64 along with arm cpufreq drivers. The power menu is needed for OPP support. At least on Calxeda systems, the same cpufreq driver is used for arm and arm64 based systems. Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-