- 17 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Noam Camus 提交于
This will better reflect its description i.e. "any needed setup..." and not just do an "IPI request". Signed-off-by: NNoam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> Acked-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 28 10月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Note this is not part of platform owned static machine_desc, but more of device owned plat_smp_ops (rather misnamed) which a IPI provider or some such typically defines. This will help us seperate out the IPI registration from platform specific init_cpu_smp() into device specific init_irq_cpu() Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
This conveys better that it is called for each cpu Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
This adds a platform agnostic early SMP init hook which is called on Master core before calling setup_processor() setup_arch() smp_init_cpus() smp_ops.init_early_smp() ... setup_processor() How this helps: - Used for one time init of certain SMP centric IP blocks, before calling setup_processor() which probes various bits of core, possibly including this block - Currently platforms need to call this IP block init from their init routines, which doesn't make sense as this is specific to ARC core and not platform and otherwise requires copy/paste in all (and hence a possible point of failure) e.g. MCIP init is called from 2 platforms currently (axs10x and sim) which will go away once we have this. This change only adds the hooks but they are empty for now. Next commit will populate them and remove the explicit init calls from platforms. Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
For non halt-on-reset case, all cores start of simultaneously in @stext. Master core0 proceeds with kernel boot, while other spin-wait on @wake_flag being set by master once it is ready. So NO hardware assist is needed for master to "kick" the others. This patch moves this soft implementation out of mcip.c (as there is no hardware assist) into common smp.c Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
- Handle possible interrupt coalescing from MCIP - chk if prev IPI ack before sending new Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
This allows platforms to provide their own cpu wakeup routines as well as IPI send / clear backends, while allowing a SMP kernel w/o any such backend to build/boot Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 02 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 27 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
In light of recent SNAFU with SMP build, allow simple platform to build as SMP but run UP. * Remove the dependence on simulation SMP extension to enable quick build/test iterations of SMP kernel. * In absence of platform SMP registration, prevent the NULL smp feature name from borkign the system Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
The current cpu-private IRQ registration is ugly as it requires need to expose arch_unmask_irq() outside of intc code. So switch to percpu IRQ APIs: -request_percpu_irq [boot core] -enable_percpu_irq [all cores] Encapsulated in helper arc_request_percpu_irq() Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 26 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Noam Camus 提交于
Handle it just like timer. Current request_percpu_irq() would fail on non-boot cpus and thus IRQ will remian unmasked on those cpus. [vgupta: fix changelong] Signed-off-by: NNoam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 23 12月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
* Don't send an IPI if receiver already has a pending IPI. Atomically piggyback the new msg with pending msg. * IPI receiver looping on xchg() not required References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/25/232Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
* ipi_data is just a word, no need to keep it as struct * find_next_bit() not needed to loop thru a 32bit word, ffs suffices
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
The interface is confusing, it feels like we are getting "sender" info, whereas it is the "receiver", which can very well be retrived by smp_processor_id(), if need be. Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
The current IPI sending callstack needlessly involves cpumask. arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu) / smp_send_reschedule(cpu) ipi_send_msg(cpumask_of(cpu)) --> [cpu to cpumask] plat_smp_ops.ipi_send(callmap) for_each_cpu(callmap) --> [cpuask to cpu] do_plat_specific_ipi_PER_CPU Given that current backends are not capable of 1:N IPIs, lets simplify the interface for now, by keeping "a" cpu all along. Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Commit 9a46ad6d "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 06 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
- Add mm_cpumask setting (aggregating only, unlike some other arches) used to restrict the TLB flush cross-calling - cross-calling versions of TLB flush routines (thanks to Noam) Signed-off-by: NNoam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 27 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the arch/arc uses of the __cpuinit macros from all C files. Currently arc does not have any __CPUINIT used in assembly files. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
-
- 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The generic idle loop implements all functionality. Aside of that it allows arc to implement the tsk_is_polling() functionality correctly, despite the patently (now gone) comment in the original arc cpu_idle() function: /* Since we SLEEP in idle loop, TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can't be set */ See kernel/cpu/idle.c Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NCc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> Acked-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Tested-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130321215233.711253792@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 16 2月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
This again is for switch from singleton platform SMP API to multi-platform paradigm Platform code is not yet setup to populate the callbacks, that happens in next commit Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
-platform API is retired and instead callbacks are used Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
The orig platform code orgnaization was singleton design pattern - only one platform (and board thereof) would build at a time. Thus any platform/board specific code (e.g. irq init, early init ...) expected by ARC common code was exported as well defined set of APIs, with only ONE instance building ever. Now with multiple-platform build requirement, that design of code no longer holds - multiple board specific calls need to build at the same time - so ARC common code can't use the API approach, it needs a callback based design where each board registers it's specific set of functions, and at runtime, depending on board detection, the callbacks are used from the registry. This commit adds all the infrastructure, where board specific callbacks are specified as a "maThine description". All the hooks are placed in right spots, no board callbacks registered yet (with MACHINE_STARt/END constructs) so the hooks will not run. Next commit will actually convert the platform to this infrastructure. Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
由 Vineet Gupta 提交于
ARC common code to enable a SMP system + ISS provided SMP extensions. ARC700 natively lacks SMP support, hence some of the core features are are only enabled if SoCs have the necessary h/w pixie-dust. This includes: -Inter Processor Interrupts (IPI) -Cache coherency -load-locked/store-conditional ... The low level exception handling would be completely broken in SMP because we don't have hardware assisted stack switching. Thus a fair bit of this code is repurposing the MMU_SCRATCH reg for event handler prologues to keep them re-entrant. Many thanks to Rajeshwar Ranga for his initial "major" contributions to SMP Port (back in 2008), and to Noam Camus and Gilad Ben-Yossef for help with resurrecting that in 3.2 kernel (2012). Note that this platform code is again singleton design pattern - so multiple SMP platforms won't build at the moment - this deficiency is addressed in subsequent patches within this series. Signed-off-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Rajeshwar Ranga <rajeshwar.ranga@gmail.com> Cc: Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
-