Currently we rely on rtnl locking in bond_set_rx_mode(), however it's not
always the case:

RTNL: assertion failed at drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c (3391)
...
 [<ffffffff81651ca5>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
 [<ffffffffa029e717>] bond_set_rx_mode+0xc7/0xd0 [bonding]
 [<ffffffff81553af7>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81557ff8>] __dev_mc_add+0x58/0x70
 [<ffffffff81558020>] dev_mc_add+0x10/0x20
 [<ffffffff8161e26e>] igmp6_group_added+0x18e/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff81186f76>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x236/0x260
 [<ffffffff8161f80f>] ipv6_dev_mc_inc+0x29f/0x320
 [<ffffffff8161f9e7>] ipv6_sock_mc_join+0x157/0x260
...

Fix this by using RCU primitives.
Reported-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Tested-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It's a forgotten function declaration, which was removed some time ago
already.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

There are no users left, so it's safe to remove.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We don't need the circular loop there and it's the only current user of
bond_next_slave() - so just use the standard bond_for_each_slave().

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It has no users, so it's safe to remove it completely.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Convert all instances of

for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port)

to the standard bond_for_each_slave().

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Convert all instances of

for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port)

to the standard bond_for_each_slave(). Also, remove the useless checks
before calling bond_3ad_set_carrier() - if we have something NULL - it
would fire long ago, in __get_first/next_port(), per example.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently we're relying on suboptimal construct

for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) {

where aggregator is an argument of __get_active_agg() which is _always_ the
first slave's aggregator - judging by all the callers, comments in the
ad_agg_selection_logic() and by logic.

Convert it to use the standard bond_for_each_slave().

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, ad_port_selection_logic() uses

for (aggregator = __get_first_agg(port); aggregator;
     aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) {

construct, however it's suboptimal, difficult to read and understand.

Change it to a standard bond_for_each_slave(), so that we won't need
__get_first/next_agg() and have it more readable.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently we have only one user of it, so it's kind of useless and just
obfusicates things.

Remove it and move the logic to the only user -
bond_3ad_state_machine_handler().

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently this function is only used in constructs like

for (port = __get_first_port(bond); port; port = __get_next_port(port))

which is basicly the same as

bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
	port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port);

but a more time consuming.

Remove the function and convert the users to bond_for_each_slave().

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

After commit 1f718f0f ("bonding: populate
neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the unlinking of the slave
to the earliest position possible - so that nobody will see an
half-uninited slave.

However, bond_3ad_unbind_slave() relied that, even while removing the last
slave, it is still accessible - via __get_first_agg() (and, eventually,
bond_first_slave()).

Fix that by verifying if the aggregator return is an actual aggregator, but
not NULL.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

After commit 1f718f0f ("bonding: populate
neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the actual 'linking' in the
end of the function - so that, once linked, the slave is ready to be used,
and is not still in the process of enslaving.

However, 802.3ad verified if it's the first slave by looking at the

if (bond_first_slave(bond) == new_slave)

which, because we've moved the linking to the end, became broken - on the
first slave bond_first_slave(bond) returns NULL.

Fix this by verifying if the prev_slave, that equals bond_last_slave(), is
actually populated - if it is - then it's not the first slave, and vice
versa.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done
for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour.

The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like
lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device
bridge0.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, we can have only one master upper neighbour, so it would be
useful to create a symlink to it in the sysfs device directory, the way
that bonding now does it, for every device. Lower devices from
bridge/team/etc will automagically get it, so we could rely on it.

Also, remove the same functionality from bonding.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

And all the initialization.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use the new function __bond_next_slave().

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Add a new function, __bond_next_slave(), which uses neighbours to find the
next slave after the slave provided. It will be further used to gradually
go start using neighbour netdev_adjacent infrastructure instead of
bonding's own lists.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We don't really need it, and it's really hard to RCUify the list->prev.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

For that, use netdev_adjacent_get_private(list_head) on bond's lower
neighbour list members. Also, add a small macro - bond_slave_list(bond),
which returns the bond list via neighbour list.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The same way as it was used for its own slave_list.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently we verify if we have slaves by checking if bond->slave_list is
empty. Create a define bond_has_slaves() and use it, a bit more readable
and easier to change in the future.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It has no users, so we can remove it.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently it uses the hard-to-rcuify bond_for_each_slave_from(), and also
it doesn't check every slave for disrepencies between the actual
IS_UP(slave) and the slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP, but only till we find the
next suitable slave.

Fix this by using bond_for_each_slave() and storing the first good slave in
*before till we find the current_arp_slave, after that we store the first good
slave in new_slave. If new_slave is empty - use the slave stored in before,
and if it's also empty - then we didn't find any suitable slave.

Also, in the meanwhile, check for each slave status.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

bond_find_best_slave() does not have to be balanced - i.e. return the slave
that is *after* some other slave, but rather return the best slave that
suits, except of bond->primary_slave - in which case we just return it if
it's suitable.

After that we just look through all the slaves and return either first up
slave or the slave whose link came back earliest.

We also don't care about curr_active_slave lock cause we use it in
bond_should_change_active() only and there we take it right away - i.e. it
won't go away.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, we're using bond_for_each_slave_from(), which is really hard to
implement under RCU and/or neighbour list.

Remove it and use bond_for_each_slave() instead, taking care of the last
used slave.

Also, rename next_rx_slave to rx_slave and store the current (last)
rx_slave.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, there are two loops - first we find the first slave in an
aggregator after the xmit_hash_policy() returned number, and after that we
loop from that slave, over bonding head, and till that slave to find any
suitable slave to send the packet through.

Replace it by just one bond_for_each_slave() loop, which first loops
through the requested number of slaves, saving the first suitable one, and
after that we've hit the requested number of slaves to skip - search for
any up slave to send the packet through. If we don't find such kind of
slave - then just send the packet through the first suitable slave found.

Logic remains unchainged, and we skip two loops. Also, refactor it a bit
for readability.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We're safe agains removal there, cause we use neighbours primitives.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It needs a list_head *iter, so add it wherever needed. Use both non-rcu and
rcu variants.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We only use it in rollback scenarios and can easily use the standart
bond_for_each_dev() instead.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

It should be used under rtnl/bonding lock, so use the non-RCU version.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Use the new provided function when attaching the lower slave to populate
its ->private with struct slave *new_slave. Also, move it to the end to
be able to 'find' it only after it was completely initialized, and
deinitialize in the first place on release.

CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from
non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be
quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through
neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for
this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on
top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go
through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices.

This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases
when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path.

To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure -
adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in
pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list),
i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains
also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible,
currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't
change the main linked logic at all.

Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in
netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following
rules:

netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_*

If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower
devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to
get better stack traces.

CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

running bonding in ALB mode requires that learning packets be sent periodically,
so that the switch knows where to send responding traffic.  However, depending
on switch configuration, there may not be any need to send traffic at the
default rate of 3 packets per second, which represents little more than wasted
data.  Allow the ALB learning packet interval to be made configurable via sysfs
Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: NAcked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We make bond_arp_rcv global so it can be used in bond_sysfs if the bond
interface is up and arp_interval is being changed to a positive value
and cleared otherwise as per Jay's suggestion.
This also fixes a problem where bond_arp_rcv was set even though
arp_validate was disabled while the bond was up by unsetting recv_probe
in bond_store_arp_validate and respectively setting it if enabled.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We need to protect store_arp_validate via rtnl because it can race with
mode changing and we can end up having arp_validate set in a mode
different from active-backup.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

bond_compute_features is always called with RTNL held, so we can safely
drop the read bond->lock.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We're protected by RTNL so nothing can happen and we can safely drop the
read bond->lock.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We can drop the use of bond->lock for mutual exclusion in
bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate and use RTNL in the sysfs store function
instead. This way we'll prevent races with mode change and interface
up/down as well as simplify update_lacp_rate by removing the check for
port->slave because it'll always be initialized (done while enslaving
with RTNL). This change will also help in the future removal of reader
bond->lock from bond_enslave.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

We don't have to release all slaves when closing the bond dev, so remove
the outdated comment and the braces around the left single statement.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>