When there is no space for a value in xattr block, it may be stored
in an xattr inode even if the value length is less than
EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(). So the current assumption in credits
calculation is wrong.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When a xattr entry refers to an external inode, the value data is not
available in the inline area so we should not attempt to read it using
value offset.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When moving xattr entries from inline area to a xattr block, entries
that refer to external xattr inodes need special handling because
value data is not available in the inline area but rather should be
read from its external inode.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() is interested in calculating the inline
space used in an inode. When a xattr entry refers to an external inode
the value size indicates the external inode size, not the value size in
the inline area. Change the function to take this into account.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_xattr_value_same() is used as a quick optimization in case the new
xattr value is identical to the previous value. When xattr value is
stored in a xattr inode the check becomes expensive so it is better to
just assume that they are not equal.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Two places in code missed converting xattr inode number using
le32_to_cpu().
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The input and output values of *size parameter are equal on successful
return from ext4_xattr_inode_get().  On error return, the callers ignore
the output value so there is no need to update it.

Also check for NULL return from ext4_bread().  If the actual xattr inode
size happens to be smaller than the expected size, ext4_bread() may
return NULL which would indicate data corruption.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

In general, kernel functions indicate success/failure through their return
values. This function returns the status as an output parameter and reserves
the return value for the inode. Make it follow the general convention.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The ref count on ea_inode is incremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add() which is supposed to be decremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_array_free(). The decrement is conditioned on whether
the ea_inode is currently on the orphan list. However, the orphan list
addition only happens when journaling is enabled. In non-journaled case,r
we fail to release the ref count causing an error message like below.

"VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Have a nice day..."
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Quota charging is based on the ownership of the inode. Currently, the
xattr inode owner is set to the caller which may be different from the
parent inode owner. This is inconsistent with how quota is charged for
xattr block and regular data block writes.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

In data=ordered mode jinode needs to be attached to the xattr inode when
writing data to it. Attachment normally occurs during file open for regular
files. Since we are not using file interface to write to the xattr inode,
the jinode attach needs to be done manually.

Otherwise the following crash occurs in data=ordered mode.

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
 IP: jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110
 PGD 13b3c0067
 P4D 13b3c0067
 PUD 137660067
 PMD 0

 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 3 PID: 1877 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #749
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff88010e368980 task.stack: ffffc90000374000
 RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110
 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000377980 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880123b06230 RCX: 0000000000280000
 RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88012c8585d0
 RBP: ffffc900003779b0 R08: 0000000000000202 R09: 0000000000000001
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000400 R12: ffff8801111f81c0
 R13: ffff88013b2b6800 R14: ffffc90000377ab0 R15: 0000000000000001
 FS:  00007f0c99b77740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000136d91000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
 Call Trace:
  jbd2_journal_inode_add_write+0xe/0x10
  ext4_map_blocks+0x59e/0x620
  ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x501/0x7d0
  ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
  ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
  ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
  ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
  vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
  setxattr+0x12e/0x150
  path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
  SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We don't need acls on xattr inodes because they are not directly
accessible from user mode.

Besides lockdep complains about recursive locking of xattr_sem as seen
below.

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Not tainted
  ---------------------------------------------
  python/1894 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804878a6>] ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  3 locks held by python/1894:
   #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d829f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
   #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803dda27>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
   #2:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1894 Comm: python Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8+ #402
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x67/0x99
   __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1830
   lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
   down_read+0x2f/0x60
   ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
   ext4_get_acl+0x43/0x1e0
   get_acl+0x72/0xf0
   posix_acl_create+0x5e/0x170
   ext4_init_acl+0x21/0xc0
   __ext4_new_inode+0xffd/0x16b0
   ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x5ea/0xb70
   ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b5/0x970
   ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x351/0x5d0
   ext4_xattr_set+0x124/0x180
   ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
   __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
   __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
   vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
   setxattr+0x129/0x160
   path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
   SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_orphan_add() requires caller to be holding the inode lock.
Add missing lock statements.

 WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1806 at fs/ext4/namei.c:2731 ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240
 CPU: 3 PID: 1806 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #746
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff880135d466c0 task.stack: ffffc900014b0000
 RIP: 0010:ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240
 RSP: 0018:ffffc900014b3d50 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801348fe1f0 RCX: ffffc900014b3c64
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8801348fe1f0 RDI: ffff8801348fe1f0
 RBP: ffffc900014b3da0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff80e82025
 R10: 0000000000004692 R11: 000000000000468d R12: ffff880137598000
 R13: ffff880137217000 R14: ffff880134ac58d0 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  00007fc50f09e740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00000000008bc2e0 CR3: 00000001375ac000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
 Call Trace:
  ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add.constprop.19+0x9d/0xf0
  ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x1c4/0x2f0
  ext4_evict_inode+0x15a/0x7f0
  evict+0xc0/0x1a0
  iput+0x16a/0x270
  do_unlinkat+0x172/0x290
  SyS_unlink+0x11/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Setting a large xattr value may require writing the attribute contents
to an external inode. In this case we may need to lock the xattr inode
along with the parent inode. This doesn't pose a deadlock risk because
xattr inodes are not directly visible to the user and their access is
restricted.

Assign a lockdep subclass to xattr inode's lock.

 ============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 4.12.0-rc1+ #740 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 python/1822 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff804912ca>] ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);
   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 4 locks held by python/1822:
  #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d0eef>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
  #2:  (jbd2_handle){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff80493f40>] start_this_handle+0xf0/0x420
  #3:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804920ba>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x9a/0x4f0

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 1822 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #740
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x67/0x9e
  __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1750
  lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
  down_write+0x2c/0x60
  ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0
  ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
  ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
  ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
  ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
  vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
  setxattr+0x12e/0x150
  path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
  SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Large xattr support is implemented for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE.

If the size of an xattr value is larger than will fit in a single
external block, then the xattr value will be saved into the body
of an external xattr inode.

The also helps support a larger number of xattr, since only the headers
will be stored in the in-inode space or the single external block.

The inode is referenced from the xattr header via "e_value_inum",
which was formerly "e_value_block", but that field was never used.
The e_value_size still contains the xattr size so that listing
xattrs does not need to look up the inode if the data is not accessed.

struct ext4_xattr_entry {
        __u8    e_name_len;     /* length of name */
        __u8    e_name_index;   /* attribute name index */
        __le16  e_value_offs;   /* offset in disk block of value */
        __le32  e_value_inum;   /* inode in which value is stored */
        __le32  e_value_size;   /* size of attribute value */
        __le32  e_hash;         /* hash value of name and value */
        char    e_name[0];      /* attribute name */
};

The xattr inode is marked with the EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag and also
holds a back-reference to the owning inode in its i_mtime field,
allowing the ext4/e2fsck to verify the correct inode is accessed.

[ Applied fix by Dan Carpenter to avoid freeing an ERR_PTR. ]

Lustre-Jira: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-80
Lustre-bugzilla: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4424Signed-off-by: NKalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Simmons <uja.ornl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

ext4_xattr_block_set() calls dquot_alloc_block() to charge for an xattr
block when new references are made. However if dquot_initialize() hasn't
been called on an inode, request for charging is effectively ignored
because ext4_inode_info->i_dquot is not initialized yet.

Add dquot_initialize() to call paths that lead to ext4_xattr_block_set().
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

ext4_xattr_check_entry() was redundant with validation of the full xattr
entries list in ext4_xattr_check_entries(), which all callers also did.
ext4_xattr_check_entry() also didn't actually do correct validation;
specifically, it never checked that the value doesn't overlap the xattr
names, nor did it account for padding when checking whether the xattr
value overflows the available space.  So remove it to eliminate any
potential confusion.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_xattr_check_names() actually validates both the xattr names and
values, not just the names.  So rename it to ext4_xattr_check_entries()
to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

There's no difference between ext4_xattr_list() and ext4_listxattr(), so
merge them together and just have ext4_listxattr().  Some years ago they
took different arguments, but that's no longer the case.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Constify static data in ext4 that is never (intentionally) modified so
that it is placed in .rodata and benefits from memory protection.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We must lock the xattr block before calculating or verifying the
checksum in order to avoid spurious checksum failures.

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193661Reported-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Add a shutdown bit that will cause ext4 processing to fail immediately
with EIO.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4ee: "ext4:
avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of
xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c.  With the addition of project quota
which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the
inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4ee.

The deadlock can be reproduced via:

   dmesg -n 7
   mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768
   mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc
   mkdir /vdc/a
   umount /vdc
   mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc
   echo foo > /vdc/a/foo

and looks like this:

[   11.158815] 
[   11.160276] =============================================
[   11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G        W      
[   11.161960] ---------------------------------------------
[   11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock:
[   11.161960]  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[   11.161960] 
[   11.161960] but task is already holding lock:
[   11.161960]  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152
[   11.161960] 
[   11.161960] other info that might help us debug this:
[   11.161960]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   11.161960] 
[   11.161960]        CPU0
[   11.161960]        ----
[   11.161960]   lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
[   11.161960]   lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
[   11.161960] 
[   11.161960]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   11.161960] 
[   11.161960]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   11.161960] 
[   11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519:
[   11.161960]  #0:  (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e
[   11.161960]  #1:  (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a
[   11.161960]  #2:  (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622
[   11.161960]  #3:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152
[   11.161960] 
[   11.161960] stack backtrace:
[   11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W       4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160
[   11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014
[   11.161960] Call Trace:
[   11.161960]  dump_stack+0x72/0xa3
[   11.161960]  __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9
[   11.161960]  ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29
[   11.161960]  ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66
[   11.161960]  ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66
[   11.161960]  lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a
[   11.161960]  ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[   11.161960]  down_write+0x39/0x72
[   11.161960]  ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[   11.161960]  ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[   11.161960]  ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c
[   11.161960]  ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262
[   11.161960]  ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60
[   11.161960]  ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d
[   11.161960]  ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2
[   11.161960]  ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2
[   11.161960]  ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152
[   11.161960]  ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848
[   11.161960]  ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f
[   11.161960]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f
[   11.161960]  ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b
[   11.161960]  ext4_create+0xcf/0x133
[   11.161960]  ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f
[   11.161960]  lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb
[   11.161960]  ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40
[   11.161960]  ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a
[   11.161960]  path_openat+0x35c/0x67a
[   11.161960]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2
[   11.161960]  do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c
[   11.161960]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c
[   11.161960]  ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173
[   11.161960]  do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc
[   11.161960]  SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f
[   11.161960]  do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61
[   11.161960]  entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f
[   11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469
[   11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0
[   11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6
[   11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0
[   11.161960]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4ee as a prereq)
Reported-by: NGeorge Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

It was possible for an xattr value to have a very large size, which
would then pass validation on 32-bit architectures due to a pointer
wraparound.  Fix this by validating the size in a way which avoids
pointer wraparound.

It was also possible that a value's size would fit in the available
space but its padded size would not.  This would cause an out-of-bounds
memory write in ext4_xattr_set_entry when replacing the xattr value.
For example, if an xattr value of unpadded size 253 bytes went until the
very end of the inode or block, then using setxattr(2) to replace this
xattr's value with 256 bytes would cause a write to the 3 bytes past the
end of the inode or buffer, and the new xattr value would be incorrectly
truncated.  Fix this by requiring that the padded size fit in the
available space rather than the unpadded size.

This patch shouldn't have any noticeable effect on
non-corrupted/non-malicious filesystems.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

With i_extra_isize equal to or close to the available space, it was
possible for us to read past the end of the inode when trying to detect
or validate in-inode xattrs.  Fix this by checking for the needed extra
space first.

This patch shouldn't have any noticeable effect on
non-corrupted/non-malicious filesystems.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

The parameter "handle" isn't used.
Signed-off-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

CURRENT_TIME_SEC and CURRENT_TIME are not y2038 safe.
current_time() will be transitioned to be y2038 safe
along with vfs.

current_time() returns timestamps according to the
granularities set in the super_block.
The granularity check in ext4_current_time() to call
current_time() or CURRENT_TIME_SEC is not required.
Use current_time() directly to obtain timestamps
unconditionally, and remove ext4_current_time().

Quota files are assumed to be on the same filesystem.
Hence, use current_time() for these files as well.
Signed-off-by: NDeepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Recent commits require line continuing printks to always use
pr_cont or KERN_CONT.  Add these markings to a few more printks.

Miscellaneaous:

o Integrate the ea_idebug and ea_bdebug macros to use a single
  call to printk(KERN_DEBUG instead of 3 separate printks
o Use the more common varargs macro style
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

It should be cpu_to_le32(), not le32_to_cpu().  No change in behavior.

Found with sparse, and this was the only endianness warning in fs/ext4/.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Move loop to make enough space in the inode from
ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() into a separate function to make that
function smaller and better readable and also to avoid delaration of
variables inside a loop block.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

'start' variable is completely unused in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea().
Variable 'first' is used only once in one place. So just remove them.
Variables 'entry' and 'last' are only really used later in the function
inside a loop. Move their declarations there.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Factor out function for moving xattrs from inode into external xattr
block from ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(). That function is already quite
long and factoring out this rather standalone functionality helps
readability.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We were checking whether computed offsets do not exceed end of block in
ext4_xattr_shift_entries(). However this does not make sense since we
always only decrease offsets. So replace that assertion with a check
whether we really decrease xattrs value offsets.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently we don't support xattrs with e_value_block set. We don't allow
them to pass initial xattr check so there's no point for checking for
this later. Since these tests were untested, bugs were creeping in and
not all places which should have checked were checking e_value_block
anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently we don't support xattrs with values stored out of line. Check
for that in ext4_xattr_check_names() to make sure we never work with
such xattrs since not all the code counts with that resulting is possible
weird corruption issues.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Conditions checking whether there is enough free space in an xattr block
and when xattr is large enough to make enough space in the inode forgot
to account for the fact that inode need not be completely filled up with
xattrs. Thus we could move unnecessarily many xattrs out of inode or
even falsely claim there is not enough space to expand the inode. We
also forgot to update the amount of free space in xattr block when moving
more xattrs and thus could decide to move too big xattr resulting in
unexpected failure.

Fix these problems by properly updating free space in the inode and
xattr block as we move xattrs. To simplify the math, avoid shifting
xattrs after removing each one xattr and instead just shift xattrs only
once there is enough free space in the inode.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When we need to move xattrs into external xattr block, we call
ext4_xattr_block_set() from ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(). That may end
up calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() again which will recurse back into
the inode expansion code leading to deadlocks.

Protect from recursion using EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND inode flag and move
its management into ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() since its manipulation
is safe there (due to xattr_sem) from possible races with
ext4_xattr_set_handle() which plays with it as well.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.4.x
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We did not count with the padding of xattr value when computing desired
shift of xattrs in the inode when expanding i_extra_isize. As a result
we could create unaligned start of inline xattrs. Account for alignment
properly.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org  # 4.4.x-
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

When multiple xattrs need to be moved out of inode, we did not properly
recompute total size of xattr headers in the inode and the new header
position. Thus when moving the second and further xattr we asked
ext4_xattr_shift_entries() to move too much and from the wrong place,
resulting in possible xattr value corruption or general memory
corruption.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org  # 4.4.x
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The code in ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() treated new_extra_isize
argument sometimes as the desired target i_extra_isize and sometimes as
the amount by which we need to grow current i_extra_isize. These happen
to coincide when i_extra_isize is 0 which used to be the common case and
so nobody noticed this until recently when we added i_projid to the
inode and so i_extra_isize now needs to grow from 28 to 32 bytes.

The result of these bugs was that we sometimes unnecessarily decided to
move xattrs out of inode even if there was enough space and we often
ended up corrupting in-inode xattrs because arguments to
ext4_xattr_shift_entries() were just wrong. This could demonstrate
itself as BUG_ON in ext4_xattr_shift_entries() triggering.

Fix the problem by introducing new isize_diff variable and use it where
appropriate.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.4.x
Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>