- 03 2月, 2016 8 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Roper 提交于
Due to our lack of two-step watermark programming, our driver has historically pretended that the cursor plane is always on for the purpose of watermark calculations; this helps avoid serious flickering when the cursor turns off/on (e.g., when the user moves the mouse pointer to a different screen). That workaround was accidentally dropped as we started working toward atomic watermark updates. Since we still aren't quite there yet with two-stage updates, we need to resurrect the workaround and treat the cursor as always active. v2: Tweak cursor width calculations slightly to more closely match the logic we used before the atomic overhaul began. (Ville) Cc: simdev11@outlook.com Cc: manfred.kitzbichler@gmail.com Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Reported-by: simdev11@outlook.com Reported-by: manfred.kitzbichler@gmail.com Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93892 Fixes: 43d59eda ("drm/i915: Eliminate usage of plane_wm_parameters from ILK-style WM code (v2)") Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454479611-6804-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
-
由 Matt Roper 提交于
In commit bfb9faab8 we added a workaround for some BXT BIOS that fail to properly initialize the DDI_A_4_LANES bit of the control register (4 lanes is the only valid configuration on BXT since there is no DDI E to share with). A recent patch added some additional checks on this register bit before the workaround gets applied; this breaks eDP on BXT in some settings. Some minor code shuffling is all we need to restore the workaround. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Fixes: 7cd87cb80 ("drm/i915: Check max number of lanes when registering DDI ports") Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454022577-834-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.comReviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Matt Roper 提交于
Our attempts save/restore panel power state in i915_suspend.c are causing unclaimed register warnings on BXT since the registers for this platform differ from older platforms. The big hammer suspend/resume shouldn't be necessary for PP since the connector/encoder hooks should already handle this. In theory we could remove this for all platforms, but in practice it's likely that would cause some regressions since older platforms with LVDS may have incomplete PP handling. For now we'll leave the PCH save/restore alone and change the non-PCH branch to only operate on gen <= 4 so that BXT and future platforms aren't included. v2: Typo fix: s/||/&&/ v3: Change non-PCH condition to a gen <= 4 test rather than listing VLV/CHV/BXT as specific platforms to exclude; should be more future-proof as we add new platforms. (Daniel) Cc: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1452102821-17190-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454071949-24677-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
While not being able to enable MSI interrupts may be a normal circumstance, for debugging it may still be a useful information, so emit an info about this. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454071949-24677-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Atm we wouldn't catch these errors or on the error path we would end up with a division-by-zero, fix this up. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454071949-24677-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
While we are calling intel_dp_aux_transfer() with msg->size=0 whenever msg->buffer is NULL, passing NULL to memcpy() is undefined according to the ISO C standard. I haven't found any notes about this in the GNU C's or the kernel's documentation of the function and can't imagine what it would do with the NULL ptr. To better document this use of the parameters it still make sense to add an explicit check for this to the code. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Weinehall <david.weinehall@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454071949-24677-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Add PCIIDs for new versions of the SOC, based on BSpec. Also add the name of the versions as code comment where this is available. The new versions don't have any changes visible to the kernel driver. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453989852-13569-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
- 02 2月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Patrik Jakobsson 提交于
On SKL and KBL we can have pipe A/B/C disabled by fuse settings. The pipes must be fused in descending order (e.g. C, B+C, A+B+C). We simply decrease info->num_pipes if we find a valid fused out config. v2: Don't store the pipe disabled mask in device info (Damien) v3: Don't check FUSE_STRAP register for pipe c disabled Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> [Jani: fixed some checkpatch indentation complaints] Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453300280-10661-1-git-send-email-patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
Unfortunately we don't know all panels and platforms out there and we found internal prototypes without VBT proper set but where only link in standby worked well. So, before enable PSR by default let's instrument the PSR parameter in a way that we can identify different panels out there that might require or work better with link standby mode. It is also useful to say that for backward compatibility I'm not changing the meaning of this flag. So "0" still means disabled and "1" means enabled with full support and maximum power savings. v2: Use positive value instead of negative for different operation mode as suggested by Daniel. v3: As Paulo suggested use 2 to force link standby and 3 to force link fully on. Also split the link_standby introduction in a separated patch. v4: Use DRM_ERROR for link off request on platforms that don't support and Remove the quirk promise. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454356928-19779-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
Link standby support has been deprecated with 'commit 89251b17 ("drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms.")' The reason for that is that main link in full off offers more power savings and on HSW and BDW implementations on source side had known bugs with link standby. However that same HSD report only mentions BDW and HSW and tells that a fix was going to new platforms. Since on Skylake link standby didn't cause the bad blank flickering screens seen on HSW and BDW let's respect VBT again for this and future platforms. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
Current code not just block link_standby for non DDI platforms but also block PSR from work on other ports B/C/D/E. So, besides change any behaviour let's just fix the mess a bit here and reuse HSW check to block the other ports and reduce the second if only to link stadnby request. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
-
由 Mat Martineau 提交于
The driver does not load firmware for unknown steppings, so these new steppings must be added to the list. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454023163-25469-1-git-send-email-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com
-
- 30 1月, 2016 26 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
When we stop the sink CRC calculation we wait a while until the counter is reset to zero and return -ETIMEDOUT. However the sink crc was calculated already by this point so we just ignore this return at the main function. So, let's also ignore the message and put it as a debug message instead of an error one. The message might still be useful when debuging test failures so we could be able to know something was not going so well with sink crc stop. v2: Improve log message. Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93694 Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454107499-29678-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
The FBC fixes we've been doing in the last months required a lot of refactor, so functions that were once big and called from different spots are now small and called only once. IMHO now it's better to just move the contents of these functions to their only callers since this reduces the number of indirections while reading the code. While at it, also improve the related comments a little bit. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-26-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We already make sure we run intel_fbc_update_update during modesets and page flips, and this function takes care of deactivating FBC, so it shouldn't be possible for us to reach the condition we check at intel_fbc_work_fn. So instead of grabbing framebuffer references and adding a lot of code to track when we need to free them, just don't track anything at all since we shouldn't need to. v2: Rebase. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-25-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Make sure we do the pre_update - which also deactivates FBC - before we actually schedule the page flip, just to make sure we don't flip to the new FB with FBC still activated for the previous FB. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-24-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We don't actually use fb_id anywhere. We already compare all parameters that matter to the hardware: pixel format, stride, fence_reg and ggtt_offset. The ID shouldn't make a difference. Besides, we already update the FBC data at every modeset/flip, so this can't change behind our backs. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-23-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Our dmesg messages started being misleading after we converted to the enable+activate model: we always print "Disabling FBC", even when we're just deactivating it. So, for example, when I boot my machine and do "dmesg | grep -i fbc", I see: [drm:intel_fbc_enable] Enabling FBC on pipe A [drm:set_no_fbc_reason] Disabling FBC: framebuffer not tiled or fenced but then, if I read the debugfs file, I will see: $ sudo cat i915_fbc_status FBC enabled Compressing: yes so we can conclude that dmesg is misleading, since FBC is actually enabled. What happened is that we deactivated FBC due to fbcon not being tiled, but when we silently reactivated it when the display manager started. We don't print activation messages since there may be way too many of these operations per second during normal desktop usage. One possible solution would be to change set_no_fbc_reason to correctly differentiate between disable and deactivation, but we removed support from printing activation/deactivation messages in the past because they were too frequent. So instead of doing this, let's just not print anything on dmesg, and leave the debugfs file if the user needs to investigate something. We already print when we enable and disable FBC anyway on a given pipe, so this should already help triaging bugs. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-22-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
During FBC invalidation, don't call intel_fbc_deactivate if it's not enabled. This doesn't fix any bug, but helps making the interface saner. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-21-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Move intel_fbc_enable to a place where it is called regardless of the "modeset" variable, and make sure intel_fbc_enable can be called multiple times without intel_fbc_disable being called. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-20-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Instead of duplicating the calls for every platform, let's just put them in the correct places inside intel_atomic_commit. This will also make it easier for us to move the enable call in order to support fasbtoot. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-19-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
This opens the possibility of implementing nicer schemes to choose the CRTC, such as checking the amount of stolen memory available, or choosing the best pipe on platforms that don't die FBC to pipe or plane A. This code was written for another refactor that I ended up discarding, so I don't actually need it, but I figured this patch would be an improvement on its own so I kept it on the series. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-18-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We already have a dev variable, there's no need to access state->dev. Also, I plan to add another dev_priv user here, so declare one for the current user. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-17-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Older FBC platforms have this restriction where FBC can't be enabled if multiple pipes are enabled. In the current code, we disable FBC before the second pipe becomes visible. One of the problems with this code is that the current multiple_pipes_ok() implementation just iterates through all CRTCs looking at their states, but it doesn't make sure that the state locks are grabbed. It also can't just grab the locks for every CRTC since this would kill one of the biggest advantages of atomic modesetting. After the recent FBC changes, we now have the appropriate locks for the given CRTC, so we can just try to maintain the state of each CRTC and update it once intel_fbc_pre_update is called. As a last note, I don't have gen 2/3 machines to test this code. My current plan is to enable FBC on just the newer platforms, so this patch is just an attempt to get the gen 2/3 code at least looking sane, so if one day someone decide to fix FBC on these platforms, they may have less work to do. Not-tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> (only on HSW+) Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-16-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Just to be sure nothing will survive a module unload. We need to do this after the unlock in order to make sure the function won't get stuck trying to grab the lock we already own while we wait for it to finish. Reported-by: NReported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-15-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Instead of: - intel_fbc_disable_crtc(crtc) - intel_fbc_disable(dev_priv) we now have: - intel_fbc_disable(crtc) - intel_fbc_global_disable(dev_priv) This is because all the other functions that take a CRTC are called - intel_fbc_something(crtc) Instead of: - intel_fbc_something_crtc(crtc) And I also hope that the word "global" is going to help make it more explicit that "global" is the unusual case, not the opposite. Reported-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-14-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
With the addition and usage of intel_fbc_pre_update, intel_fbc_deactivate is not used anymore outside intel_fbc.c, so kill the exported function and rename __intel_fbc_deactivate. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-13-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We'll now call intel_fbc_pre_update instead of intel_fbc_deactivate during atomic commits. This will continue to guarantee that we deactivate FBC and it will also update the state checking structures at the correct time. Then, later, at the point where we were calling intel_fbc_update, we'll only need to call intel_fbc_post_update. Also add the proper warnings in case we don't have the appropriate locks. Daniel mentioned the warnings will have to be removed for async commits, but let's keep them here while we can. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-12-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
So now pre_update will be responsible for unconditionally deactivating FBC and updating the state cache, while post_update will be responsible for checking if it can be enabled, then enabling it. This is one more step into proper locking. Notice that intel_fbc_flush now calls post_update directly. The FBC flush can only happen for drawing operations - since we explicitly ignore the flips -, so the FBC state is not expected to have changed at this point. With this we can just run post_update, which will make sure we won't deactivate+reactivate FBC as would be the case now if we called pre_update + post_update. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-11-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Per the new atomic locking rules, we need to cache the CRTC, plane and FB state structures we use so we can access them later without needing more locks. So do this. Notice that there are some pieces of the FBC code that look at things that are only computed during the modeset, so we can't just can't precompute whether FBC can be activated during the update_state_cache stage. We may be able to do this later. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-10-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We unconditionally disable/update FBC even during the page flip IOCTLs, and an unconditional disable/update at every atomic commit touching the primary plane shouldn't impact PC state residency noticeably. Besides, the code that checks for rotation is a good hint that we may be forgetting something else, so let's leave all the decisions to intel_fbc.c, making the code much safer. Once we have the code to properly make FBC enable/update decisions based on atomic states, with proper locking, then we'll be able to evaluate whether it will be worth trying to optimize the cases where a disable isn't needed. v2: Upstream moved and now our patch needs to remove dev_priv. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453406837-10511-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
If frontbuffer_bits doesn't match the current frontbuffer, there's no reason to recompress or update FBC. There was a plan to make the FBC test suite catch this type of problem, but it never got implemented due to being low priority. While at it, also implement Ville's suggestion and use plane->frontbuffer_bit instead of INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-8-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Before this patch, page flips would call intel_frontbuffer_flip() and intel_frontbuffer_flip_complete(), which would call intel_fbc_flush(), which would call intel_fbc_update(). The problem is that drawing operations also trigger intel_fbc_flush() calls, so it's not guaranteed that we have the CRTC and FB locks grabbed when intel_fbc_flush() happens, since the call trace may come from the rendering path. We're trying to make the FBC code grab the appropriate CRTC/FB locks, so split the drawing and the flipping logic in order to achieve that in later patches. So now the frontbuffer tracking code is just going to be used for frontbuffer drawing, and intel_fbc_update() is going to be used directly for actual page flips. As a note, we don't need to call intel_fbc_flip() during the two places where we call intel_frontbuffer_flip() since in one of them we already have an intel_fbc_update() call, and in the other we have the planes disabled. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-7-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
We say "dev_priv->fbc.something" way too many times in our code while we could be saying just "fbc->something" with a previous declaration of fbc. This has been bothering me for a while but I didn't want to patch it since I wanted to fix the real problems first. But as I add more code I keep thinking about it, especially since it makes the code easier to read and it can make us fit 80 columns easier, so let's just do the change now. While at it, also rename from i915_fbc to intel_fbc because the whole FBC code uses intel_fbc. v2: Rebase after the work_fn changes. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453406763-10400-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
The early return inside __intel_fbc_update does not completely check all the parameters that affect the FBC register values. For example, we currently lack looking at crtc->adjusted_y (for the fence Y offset) and all the parameters that affect the CFB size (for i8xx). Instead of just adding the missing parameters to the check and hoping that any changes to the fbc_activate functions also come with a matching change to the __intel_fbc_update check, introduce a new structure where we store these parameters and use the structure at the fbc_activate function. Of course, it's still possible to access everything from dev_priv in those functions, but IMHO the new code will be harder to break. v2: Rebase. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-5-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Make our enable/activate checking model more explicit, especially since we now have intel_fbc_can_activate(). Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-4-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Extract all the code that checks if the FBC configuration is valid to its own function, making __intel_fbc_update() much simpler. Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453210558-7875-3-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Instead of waiting for 50ms, just wait until the next vblank, since it's the minimum requirement. The whole infrastructure of FBC is based on vblanks, so waiting for X vblanks instead of X milliseconds sounds like the correct way to go. Besides, 50ms may be less than a vblank on super slow modes that may or may not exist. There are some small improvements in PC state residency (due to the fact that we're now using 16ms for the common modes instead of 50ms), but the biggest advantage is still the correctness of being vblank-based instead of time-based. v2: - Rebase after changing the patch order. - Update the commit message. v3: - Fix bogus vblank_get() instead of vblank_count() (Ville). - Don't forget to call drm_crtc_vblank_{get,put} (Chris, Ville) - Adjust the performance details on the commit message. v4: - Don't grab the FBC mutex just to grab the vblank (Maarten) Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453406585-10233-1-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
- 29 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mat Martineau 提交于
No functional change Signed-off-by: NMat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Fixes: f8d03ea0 ("drm/i915: increase the tries for HDMI hotplug live status checking") Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454023325-26265-1-git-send-email-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-