- 05 9月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Currently udf_iget() (triggered by NFS) can race with udf_new_inode() leading to two inode structures with the same inode number: nfsd: iget_locked() creates inode nfsd: try to read from disk, block on that. udf_new_inode(): allocate inode with that inumber udf_new_inode(): insert it into icache, set it up and dirty udf_write_inode(): write inode into buffer cache nfsd: get CPU again, look into buffer cache, see nice and sane on-disk inode, set the in-core inode from it Fix the problem by putting inode into icache in locked state (I_NEW set) and unlocking it only after it's fully set up. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
boilerplate code in udf_{create,mknod,symlink} taken to new helper symlink case converted to unique id calculated by udf_new_inode() - no point finding a new one. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently __udf_read_inode() wasn't returning anything and we found out whether we succeeded reading inode by checking whether inode is bad or not. udf_iget() returned NULL on failure and inode pointer otherwise. Make these two functions properly propagate errors up the call stack and use the return value in callers. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 20 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chao Yu 提交于
We have released the ->i_data_sem before invoking udf_add_entry(), so in following error path, we should not release this lock again. Signed-off-by: NChao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 24 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Lockdep is complaining about UDF: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.12.0+ #16 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- ln/7386 is trying to acquire lock: (&ei->i_data_sem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8142f06d>] udf_get_block+0x8d/0x130 but task is already holding lock: (&ei->i_data_sem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81431a8d>] udf_symlink+0x8d/0x690 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&ei->i_data_sem); lock(&ei->i_data_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** This is because we hold i_data_sem of the symlink inode while calling udf_add_entry() for the directory. I don't think this can ever lead to deadlocks since we never hold i_data_sem for two inodes in any other place. The fix is simple - move unlock of i_data_sem for symlink inode up. We don't need it for anything when linking symlink inode to directory. Reported-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 29 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 26 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
This patch is a follow up on below patch: [PATCH] exportfs: add FILEID_INVALID to indicate invalid fid_type commit: 216b6cbdSigned-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NVivek Trivedi <t.vivek@samsung.com> Acked-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Acked-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 14 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead; Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed not to be there yet. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Just the flags; only NFS cares even about that, but there are legitimate uses for such argument. And getting rid of that completely would require splitting ->lookup() into a couple of methods (at least), so let's leave that alone for now... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 13 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mathias Krause 提交于
For type 0x51 the udf.parent_partref member in struct fid gets copied uninitialized to userland. Fix this by initializing it to 0. Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
pass inode + parent's inode or NULL instead of dentry + bool saying whether we want the parent or not. NOTE: that needs ceph fix folded in. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This allows comparing hash and len in one operation on 64-bit architectures. Right now only __d_lookup_rcu() takes advantage of this, since that is the case we care most about. The use of anonymous struct/unions hides the alternate 64-bit approach from most users, the exception being a few cases where we initialize a 'struct qstr' with a static initializer. This makes the problematic cases use a new QSTR_INIT() helper function for that (but initializing just the name pointer with a "{ .name = xyzzy }" initializer remains valid, as does just copying another qstr structure). Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
New field of struct super_block - ->s_max_links. Maximal allowed value of ->i_nlink or 0; in the latter case all checks still need to be done in ->link/->mkdir/->rename instances. Note that this limit applies both to directoris and to non-directories. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 04 1月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
vfs_create() ignores everything outside of 16bit subset of its mode argument; switching it to umode_t is obviously equivalent and it's the only caller of the method Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
vfs_mkdir() gets int, but immediately drops everything that might not fit into umode_t and that's the only caller of ->mkdir()... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 02 11月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Replace remaining direct i_nlink updates with a new set_nlink() updater function. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Tested-by: NToshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Replace direct i_nlink updates with the respective updater function (inc_nlink, drop_nlink, clear_nlink, inode_dec_link_count). Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
-
- 11 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Rename udf_warning to udf_warn for consistency with normal logging uses of pr_warn. Rename function udf_warning to _udf_warn. Remove __func__ from uses and move __func__ to a new udf_warn macro that calls _udf_warn. Add \n's to uses of udf_warn, remove \n from _udf_warn. Coalesce formats. Reviewed-by: NNamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 28 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
udf does not have problems with references to unlinked directories. CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 26 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Only a few file systems need this. Start by pushing it down into each rename method (except gfs2 and xfs) so that it can be dealt with on a per-fs basis. Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Only a few file systems need this. Start by pushing it down into each fs rmdir method (except gfs2 and xfs) so it can be dealt with on a per-fs basis. This does not change behavior for any in-tree file systems. Acked-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 14 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
The exportfs encode handle function should return the minimum required handle size. This helps user to find out the handle size by passing 0 handle size in the first step and then redoing to the call again with the returned handle size value. Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
(256 << sizeof(x)) - 1 is not the maximal possible value of x... In reality, the maximal allowed value for UDF FileLinkCount is 65535. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 07 1月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
Hi, There's a small memory leak in fs/udf/namei.c::udf_find_entry(). We dynamically allocate memory for 'fname' with kmalloc() and in most situations we free it before we leave the function, but there is one situation where we do not (but should). This patch closes the leak by jumping to the 'out_ok' label which does the correct cleanup rather than doing half the cleanup and returning directly. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
If udf_bread() called from udf_add_entry() managed to merge created extent to an already existing one (or if previous extents could be merged), the code truncating the last extent to proper size would just overwrite the freshly allocated extent with an extent that used to be in that place. This obviously results in a directory corruption. Fix the problem by properly reloading the last extent. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Alessio Igor Bogani 提交于
The udf_readdir(), udf_lookup(), udf_create(), udf_mknod(), udf_mkdir(), udf_rmdir(), udf_link(), udf_get_parent() and udf_unlink() seems already adequately protected by i_mutex held by VFS invoking calls. The udf_rename() instead should be already protected by lock_rename again by VFS. The udf_ioctl(), udf_fill_super() and udf_evict_inode() don't requires any further protection. This work was supported by a hardware donation from the CE Linux Forum. Signed-off-by: NAlessio Igor Bogani <abogani@texware.it> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Alessio Igor Bogani 提交于
Replace bkl with the UDF_I(inode)->i_data_sem rw semaphore in udf_release_file(), udf_symlink(), udf_symlink_filler(), udf_get_block(), udf_block_map(), and udf_setattr(). The rule now is that any operation on regular file's or symlink's extents (or generally allocation information including goal block) needs to hold i_data_sem. This work was supported by a hardware donation from the CE Linux Forum. Signed-off-by: NAlessio Igor Bogani <abogani@texware.it> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
uniqueID handling has been duplicated in three places. Move it into a common helper. Since we modify an LVID buffer with uniqueID update, we take sbi->s_alloc_mutex to protect agaist other modifications of the structure. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 26 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Clones an existing reference to inode; caller must already hold one. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 24 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Quota on UDF is non-functional at least since 2.6.16 (I'm too lazy to do more archeology) because it does not provide .quota_write and .quota_read functions and thus quotaon(8) just returns EINVAL. Since nobody complained for all those years and quota support is not even in UDF standard just nuke it. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 22 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 08 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
generic setattr not longer responsible for quota transfer. use udf_setattr for all udf's inodes. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 05 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Get rid of the initialize dquot operation - it is now always called from the filesystem and if a filesystem really needs it's own (which none currently does) it can just call into it's own routine directly. Rename the now static low-level dquot_initialize helper to __dquot_initialize and vfs_dq_init to dquot_initialize to have a consistent namespace. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently various places in the VFS call vfs_dq_init directly. This means we tie the quota code into the VFS. Get rid of that and make the filesystem responsible for the initialization. For most metadata operations this is a straight forward move into the methods, but for truncate and open it's a bit more complicated. For truncate we currently only call vfs_dq_init for the sys_truncate case because open already takes care of it for ftruncate and open(O_TRUNC) - the new code causes an additional vfs_dq_init for those which is harmless. For open the initialization is moved from do_filp_open into the open method, which means it happens slightly earlier now, and only for regular files. The latter is fine because we don't need to initialize it for operations on special files, and we already do it as part of the namespace operations for directories. Add a dquot_file_open helper that filesystems that support generic quotas can use to fill in ->open. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 04 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 15 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
It is not very good to do IO in udf_clear_inode. First, VFS does not really expect inode to become dirty there and thus we have to write it ourselves, second, memory reclaim gets blocked waiting for IO when it does not really expect it, third, the IO pattern (e.g. on umount) resulting from writes in udf_clear_inode is bad and it slows down writing a lot. The reason why UDF needed to do IO in udf_clear_inode is that UDF standard mandates extent length to exactly match inode size. But when we allocate extents to a file or directory, we don't really know what exactly the final file size will be and thus temporarily set it to block boundary and later truncate it to exact length in udf_clear_inode. Now, this is changed to truncate to final file size in udf_release_file for regular files. For directories and symlinks, we do the truncation at the moment when learn what the final file size will be. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 15 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Recomputation of the pointer was wrong (it should have been just increment). Luckily, we never use the computed value. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 02 4月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Pekka Enberg 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Pekka Enberg 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-