- 05 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
commit efad8a853ad2057f96664328a0d327a05ce39c76 upstream. At ctree.c:get_old_root(), we are accessing a root's header owner field after we have freed the respective extent buffer. This results in an use-after-free that can lead to crashes, and when CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set, results in a stack trace like the following: [ 3876.799331] stack segment: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 3876.799363] CPU: 0 PID: 15436 Comm: pool Not tainted 5.3.0-rc3-btrfs-next-54 #1 [ 3876.799385] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3876.799433] RIP: 0010:btrfs_search_old_slot+0x652/0xd80 [btrfs] (...) [ 3876.799502] RSP: 0018:ffff9f08c1a2f9f0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 3876.799518] RAX: ffff8dd300000000 RBX: ffff8dd85a7a9348 RCX: 000000038da26000 [ 3876.799538] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffe522ce368980 RDI: 0000000000000246 [ 3876.799559] RBP: dae1922adadad000 R08: 0000000008020000 R09: ffffe522c0000000 [ 3876.799579] R10: ffff8dd57fd788c8 R11: 000000007511b030 R12: ffff8dd781ddc000 [ 3876.799599] R13: ffff8dd9e6240578 R14: ffff8dd6896f7a88 R15: ffff8dd688cf90b8 [ 3876.799620] FS: 00007f23ddd97700(0000) GS:ffff8dda20200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3876.799643] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3876.799660] CR2: 00007f23d4024000 CR3: 0000000710bb0005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [ 3876.799682] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3876.799703] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3876.799723] Call Trace: [ 3876.799735] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 3876.799749] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x30 [ 3876.799779] resolve_indirect_refs+0x1eb/0xc80 [btrfs] [ 3876.799810] find_parent_nodes+0x38d/0x1180 [btrfs] [ 3876.799841] btrfs_check_shared+0x11a/0x1d0 [btrfs] [ 3876.799870] ? extent_fiemap+0x598/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 3876.799895] extent_fiemap+0x598/0x6e0 [btrfs] [ 3876.799913] do_vfs_ioctl+0x45a/0x700 [ 3876.799926] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 3876.799938] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x20 [ 3876.799953] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 3876.799965] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x220 [ 3876.799977] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 3876.799993] RIP: 0033:0x7f23e0013dd7 (...) [ 3876.800056] RSP: 002b:00007f23ddd96ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 3876.800078] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f23d80210f8 RCX: 00007f23e0013dd7 [ 3876.800099] RDX: 00007f23d80210f8 RSI: 00000000c020660b RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 3876.800626] RBP: 000055fa2a2a2440 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f23ddd96d7c [ 3876.801143] R10: 00007f23d8022000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f23ddd96d80 [ 3876.801662] R13: 00007f23ddd96d78 R14: 00007f23d80210f0 R15: 00007f23ddd96d80 (...) [ 3876.805107] ---[ end trace e53161e179ef04f9 ]--- Fix that by saving the root's header owner field into a local variable before freeing the root's extent buffer, and then use that local variable when needed. Fixes: 30b0463a ("Btrfs: fix accessing the root pointer in tree mod log functions") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10+ Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
commit 448de471cd4cab0cedd15770082567a69a784a11 upstream. [BUG] When reading a file from a fuzzed image, kernel can panic like: BTRFS warning (device loop0): csum failed root 5 ino 270 off 0 csum 0x98f94189 expected csum 0x00000000 mirror 1 assertion failed: !memcmp_extent_buffer(b, &disk_key, offsetof(struct btrfs_leaf, items[0].key), sizeof(disk_key)), file: fs/btrfs/ctree.c, line: 2544 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3500! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:btrfs_search_slot.cold.24+0x61/0x63 [btrfs] Call Trace: btrfs_lookup_csum+0x52/0x150 [btrfs] __btrfs_lookup_bio_sums+0x209/0x640 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_bio_hook+0x103/0x170 [btrfs] submit_one_bio+0x59/0x80 [btrfs] extent_read_full_page+0x58/0x80 [btrfs] generic_file_read_iter+0x2f6/0x9d0 __vfs_read+0x14d/0x1a0 vfs_read+0x8d/0x140 ksys_read+0x52/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [CAUSE] The fuzzed image has a corrupted leaf whose first key doesn't match its parent: checksum tree key (CSUM_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0) node 29741056 level 1 items 14 free 107 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE fs uuid 3381d111-94a3-4ac7-8f39-611bbbdab7e6 chunk uuid 9af1c3c7-2af5-488b-8553-530bd515f14c ... key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 79691776) block 29761536 gen 19 leaf 29761536 items 1 free space 1726 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE leaf 29761536 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 fs uuid 3381d111-94a3-4ac7-8f39-611bbbdab7e6 chunk uuid 9af1c3c7-2af5-488b-8553-530bd515f14c item 0 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 8798638964736) itemoff 1751 itemsize 2244 range start 8798638964736 end 8798641262592 length 2297856 When reading the above tree block, we have extent_buffer->refs = 2 in the context: - initial one from __alloc_extent_buffer() alloc_extent_buffer() |- __alloc_extent_buffer() |- atomic_set(&eb->refs, 1) - one being added to fs_info->buffer_radix alloc_extent_buffer() |- check_buffer_tree_ref() |- atomic_inc(&eb->refs) So if even we call free_extent_buffer() in read_tree_block or other similar situation, we only decrease the refs by 1, it doesn't reach 0 and won't be freed right now. The staled eb and its corrupted content will still be kept cached. Furthermore, we have several extra cases where we either don't do first key check or the check is not proper for all callers: - scrub We just don't have first key in this context. - shared tree block One tree block can be shared by several snapshot/subvolume trees. In that case, the first key check for one subvolume doesn't apply to another. So for the above reasons, a corrupted extent buffer can sneak into the buffer cache. [FIX] Call verify_level_key in read_block_for_search to do another verification. For that purpose the function is exported. Due to above reasons, although we can free corrupted extent buffer from cache, we still need the check in read_block_for_search(), for scrub and shared tree blocks. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202755 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202757 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202759 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202761 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202767 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202769Reported-by: NYoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@gatech.edu> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 07 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
commit a6279470762c19ba97e454f90798373dccdf6148 upstream. When splitting a leaf or node from one of the trees that are modified when flushing pending block groups (extent, chunk, device and free space trees), we need to allocate a new tree block, which in turn can result in the need to allocate a new block group. After allocating the new block group we may need to flush new block groups that were previously allocated during the course of the current transaction, which is what may cause a deadlock due to attempts to write lock twice the same leaf or node, as when splitting a leaf or node we are holding a write lock on it and its parent node. The same type of deadlock can also happen when increasing the tree's height, since we are holding a lock on the existing root while allocating the tree block to use as the new root node. An example trace when the deadlock happens during the leaf split path is: [27175.293054] CPU: 0 PID: 3005 Comm: kworker/u17:6 Tainted: G W 4.19.16 #1 [27175.293942] Hardware name: Penguin Computing Relion 1900/MD90-FS0-ZB-XX, BIOS R15 06/25/2018 [27175.294846] Workqueue: btrfs-extent-refs btrfs_extent_refs_helper [btrfs] (...) [27175.298384] RSP: 0018:ffffab2087107758 EFLAGS: 00010246 [27175.299269] RAX: 0000000000000bbd RBX: ffff9fadc7141c48 RCX: 0000000000000001 [27175.300155] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff9fadc7141c48 [27175.301023] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff9faeb6ac1040 R09: ffff9fa9c0000000 [27175.301887] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000040 R12: ffff9fb21aac8000 [27175.302743] R13: ffff9fb1a64d6a20 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff9fb1a64d6a18 [27175.303601] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9fb21fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [27175.304468] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [27175.305339] CR2: 00007fdc8743ead8 CR3: 0000000763e0a006 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [27175.306220] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [27175.307087] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [27175.307940] Call Trace: [27175.308802] btrfs_search_slot+0x779/0x9a0 [btrfs] [27175.309669] ? update_space_info+0xba/0xe0 [btrfs] [27175.310534] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x67/0xc0 [btrfs] [27175.311397] btrfs_insert_item+0x60/0xd0 [btrfs] [27175.312253] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0xee/0x210 [btrfs] [27175.313116] do_chunk_alloc+0x25f/0x300 [btrfs] [27175.313984] find_free_extent+0x706/0x10d0 [btrfs] [27175.314855] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x1d0 [btrfs] [27175.315707] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x100/0x5b0 [btrfs] [27175.316548] split_leaf+0x130/0x610 [btrfs] [27175.317390] btrfs_search_slot+0x94d/0x9a0 [btrfs] [27175.318235] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x67/0xc0 [btrfs] [27175.319087] alloc_reserved_file_extent+0x84/0x2c0 [btrfs] [27175.319938] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x596/0x1150 [btrfs] [27175.320792] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xed/0x1b0 [btrfs] [27175.321643] delayed_ref_async_start+0x81/0x90 [btrfs] [27175.322491] normal_work_helper+0xd0/0x320 [btrfs] [27175.323328] ? move_linked_works+0x6e/0xa0 [27175.324160] process_one_work+0x191/0x370 [27175.324976] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3b0 [27175.325763] kthread+0xf8/0x130 [27175.326531] ? rescuer_thread+0x320/0x320 [27175.327284] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x50/0x50 [27175.328027] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 [27175.328741] ---[ end trace 300a1b9f0ac30e26 ]--- Fix this by preventing the flushing of new blocks groups when splitting a leaf/node and when inserting a new root node for one of the trees modified by the flushing operation, similar to what is done when COWing a node/leaf from on of these trees. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202383Reported-by: NEli V <eliventer@gmail.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 17 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
commit a6d8654d885d7d79a3fb82da64eaa489ca332a82 upstream. When modifying the free space tree we can end up COWing one of its extent buffers which in turn might result in allocating a new chunk, which in turn can result in flushing (finish creation) of pending block groups. If that happens we can deadlock because creating a pending block group needs to update the free space tree, and if any of the updates tries to modify the same extent buffer that we are COWing, we end up in a deadlock since we try to write lock twice the same extent buffer. So fix this by skipping pending block group creation if we are COWing an extent buffer from the free space tree. This is a case missed by commit 5ce555578e091 ("Btrfs: fix deadlock when writing out free space caches"). Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202173 Fixes: 5ce555578e091 ("Btrfs: fix deadlock when writing out free space caches") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 10 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
commit be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea upstream. If we create a snapshot of a snapshot currently being used by a send operation, we can end up with send failing unexpectedly (returning -ENOENT error to user space for example). The following diagram shows how this happens. CPU 1 CPU2 CPU3 btrfs_ioctl_send() (...) create_snapshot() -> creates snapshot of a root used by the send task btrfs_commit_transaction() create_pending_snapshot() __get_inode_info() btrfs_search_slot() btrfs_search_slot_get_root() down_read commit_root_sem get reference on eb of the commit root -> eb with bytenr == X up_read commit_root_sem btrfs_cow_block(root node) btrfs_free_tree_block() -> creates delayed ref to free the extent btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> runs the delayed ref, adds extent to fs_info->pinned_extents btrfs_finish_extent_commit() unpin_extent_range() -> marks extent as free in the free space cache transaction commit finishes btrfs_start_transaction() (...) btrfs_cow_block() btrfs_alloc_tree_block() btrfs_reserve_extent() -> allocates extent at bytenr == X btrfs_init_new_buffer(bytenr X) btrfs_find_create_tree_block() alloc_extent_buffer(bytenr X) find_extent_buffer(bytenr X) -> returns existing eb, which the send task got (...) -> modifies content of the eb with bytenr == X -> uses an eb that now belongs to some other tree and no more matches the commit root of the snapshot, resuts will be unpredictable The consequences of this race can be various, and can lead to searches in the commit root performed by the send task failing unexpectedly (unable to find inode items, returning -ENOENT to user space, for example) or not failing because an inode item with the same number was added to the tree that reused the metadata extent, in which case send can behave incorrectly in the worst case or just fail later for some reason. Fix this by performing a copy of the commit root's extent buffer when doing a search in the context of a send operation. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: 1fc28d8e: Btrfs: move get root out of btrfs_search_slot to a helper CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f9ddfd05: Btrfs: remove unused check of skip_locking CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 14 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
commit 5ce55557 upstream. When writing out a block group free space cache we can end deadlocking with ourselves on an extent buffer lock resulting in a warning like the following: [245043.379979] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2608 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:251 btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs] [245043.392792] CPU: 4 PID: 2608 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G W I 4.16.8 #1 [245043.395489] RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs] [245043.396791] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000424b840 EFLAGS: 00010246 [245043.398093] RAX: 0000000000000a30 RBX: ffff8807e20a3d20 RCX: 0000000000000001 [245043.399414] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8807e20a3d20 [245043.400732] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff88041f39a700 R09: ffff880000000000 [245043.402021] R10: 0000000000000040 R11: ffff8807e20a3d20 R12: ffff8807cb220630 [245043.403296] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8807cb220628 R15: ffff88041fbdf000 [245043.404780] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88082fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [245043.406050] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [245043.407321] CR2: 00007fffdbdb9f10 CR3: 0000000001c09005 CR4: 00000000000206e0 [245043.408670] Call Trace: [245043.409977] btrfs_search_slot+0x761/0xa60 [btrfs] [245043.411278] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x62/0xb0 [btrfs] [245043.412572] btrfs_insert_item+0x5b/0xc0 [btrfs] [245043.413922] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0xfb/0x1e0 [btrfs] [245043.415216] do_chunk_alloc+0x1e5/0x2a0 [btrfs] [245043.416487] find_free_extent+0xcd0/0xf60 [btrfs] [245043.417813] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x96/0x1e0 [btrfs] [245043.419105] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xfb/0x4a0 [btrfs] [245043.420378] __btrfs_cow_block+0x127/0x550 [btrfs] [245043.421652] btrfs_cow_block+0xee/0x190 [btrfs] [245043.422979] btrfs_search_slot+0x227/0xa60 [btrfs] [245043.424279] ? btrfs_update_inode_item+0x59/0x100 [btrfs] [245043.425538] ? iput+0x72/0x1e0 [245043.426798] write_one_cache_group.isra.49+0x20/0x90 [btrfs] [245043.428131] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x102/0x420 [btrfs] [245043.429419] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x11b/0x880 [btrfs] [245043.430712] ? start_transaction+0x8e/0x410 [btrfs] [245043.432006] transaction_kthread+0x184/0x1a0 [btrfs] [245043.433341] kthread+0xf0/0x130 [245043.434628] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x4e0/0x4e0 [btrfs] [245043.435928] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 [245043.437236] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [245043.441054] ---[ end trace 15abaa2aaf36827f ]--- This is because at write_one_cache_group() when we are COWing a leaf from the extent tree we end up allocating a new block group (chunk) and, because we have hit a threshold on the number of bytes reserved for system chunks, we attempt to finalize the creation of new block groups from the current transaction, by calling btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). However here we also need to modify the extent tree in order to insert a block group item, and if the location for this new block group item happens to be in the same leaf that we were COWing earlier, we deadlock since btrfs_search_slot() tries to write lock the extent buffer that we locked before at write_one_cache_group(). We have already hit similar cases in the past and commit d9a0540a ("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation") fixed some of those cases by delaying the creation of pending block groups at the known specific spots that could lead to a deadlock. This change reworks that commit to be more generic so that we don't have to add similar logic to every possible path that can lead to a deadlock. This is done by making __btrfs_cow_block() disallowing the creation of new block groups (setting the transaction's can_flush_pending_bgs to false) before it attempts to allocate a new extent buffer for either the extent, chunk or device trees, since those are the trees that pending block creation modifies. Once the new extent buffer is allocated, it allows creation of pending block groups to happen again. This change depends on a recent patch from Josef which is not yet in Linus' tree, named "btrfs: make sure we create all new block groups" in order to avoid occasional warnings at btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata(). Fixes: d9a0540a ("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199753 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJtFHUTHna09ST-_EEiyWmDH6gAqS6wa=zMNMBsifj8ABu99cw@mail.gmail.com/Reported-by: NE V <eliventer@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 06 8月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
The v0 compat code was introduced in commit 5d4f98a2 ("Btrfs: Mixed back reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)") 9 years ago, which was merged in 2.6.31. This means that the code is there to support filesystems which are _VERY_ old and if you are using btrfs on such an old kernel, you have much bigger problems. This coupled with the fact that no one is likely testing/maintining this code likely means it has bugs lurking. All things considered I think 43 kernel releases later it's high time this remnant of the past got removed. This patch removes all code wrapped in #ifdefs but leaves the BUG_ONs in case we have a v0 with no support intact as a sort of safety-net. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
When a new extent buffer is allocated there are a few mandatory fields which need to be set in order for the buffer to be sane: level, generation, bytenr, backref_rev, owner and FSID/UUID. Currently this is open coded in the callers of btrfs_alloc_tree_block, meaning it's fairly high in the abstraction hierarchy of operations. This patch solves this by simply moving this init code in btrfs_init_new_buffer, since this is the function which initializes a newly allocated extent buffer. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This argument is unused. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The check is superfluous since all callers who set search_for_commit also have skip_locking set. ASSERT() is put in place to ensure skip_locking is set by new callers. Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
As unlock_up() is written as for () { if (!path->locks[i]) break; ... if (... && path->locks[i]) { } } Apparently, @path->locks[i] is always true at this 'if'. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Typically, when acquiring root node's lock, btrfs tries its best to get read lock and trade for write lock if @write_lock_level implies to do so. In case of (cow && (p->keep_locks || p->lowest_level)), write_lock_level is set to BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL, which means we need to acquire root node's write lock directly. In this particular case, the dance of acquiring read lock and then trading for write lock can be saved. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
It's good to have a helper instead of having all get-root details open-coded. The new helper locks (if necessary) and sets root node of the path. Also invert the checks to make the code flow easier to read. There is no functional change in this commit. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
If parent_transid "0" is passed to btrfs_buffer_uptodate(), btrfs_buffer_uptodate() is equivalent to extent_buffer_uptodate(), but extent_buffer_uptodate() is preferred since we don't have to look into verify_parent_transid(). Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
read_block_for_search() can be simplified as: tmp = find_extent_buffer(); if (tmp) return; ... free_extent_buffer(); read_tree_block(); Apparently, @tmp must be NULL at this point, free_extent_buffer() is not needed. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
If a btree block, aka. extent buffer, is not available in the extent buffer cache, it'll be read out from the disk instead, i.e. btrfs_search_slot() read_block_for_search() # hold parent and its lock, go to read child btrfs_release_path() read_tree_block() # read child Unfortunately, the parent lock got released before reading child, so commit 5bdd3536 ("Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race") had used 0 as parent transid to read the child block. It forces read_tree_block() not to check if parent transid is different with the generation id of the child that it reads out from disk. A simple PoC is included in btrfs/124, 0. A two-disk raid1 btrfs, 1. Right after mkfs.btrfs, block A is allocated to be device tree's root. 2. Mount this filesystem and put it in use, after a while, device tree's root got COW but block A hasn't been allocated/overwritten yet. 3. Umount it and reload the btrfs module to remove both disks from the global @fs_devices list. 4. mount -odegraded dev1 and write some data, so now block A is allocated to be a leaf in checksum tree. Note that only dev1 has the latest metadata of this filesystem. 5. Umount it and mount it again normally (with both disks), since raid1 can pick up one disk by the writer task's pid, if btrfs_search_slot() needs to read block A, dev2 which does NOT have the latest metadata might be read for block A, then we got a stale block A. 6. As parent transid is not checked, block A is marked as uptodate and put into the extent buffer cache, so the future search won't bother to read disk again, which means it'll make changes on this stale one and make it dirty and flush it onto disk. To avoid the problem, parent transid needs to be passed to read_tree_block(). In order to get a valid parent transid, we need to hold the parent's lock until finishing reading child. This patch needs to be slightly adapted for stable kernels, the &first_key parameter added to read_tree_block() is from 4.16+ (581c1760). The fix is to replace 0 by 'gen'. Fixes: 5bdd3536 ("Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 14 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robbie Ko 提交于
[BUG] btrfs incremental send BUG happens when creating a snapshot of snapshot that is being used by send. [REASON] The problem can happen if while we are doing a send one of the snapshots used (parent or send) is snapshotted, because snapshoting implies COWing the root of the source subvolume/snapshot. 1. When doing an incremental send, the send process will get the commit roots from the parent and send snapshots, and add references to them through extent_buffer_get(). 2. When a snapshot/subvolume is snapshotted, its root node is COWed (transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot()). 3. COWing releases the space used by the node immediately, through: __btrfs_cow_block() --btrfs_free_tree_block() ----btrfs_add_free_space(bytenr of node) 4. Because send doesn't hold a transaction open, it's possible that the transaction used to create the snapshot commits, switches the commit root and the old space used by the previous root node gets assigned to some other node allocation. Allocation of a new node will use the existing extent buffer found in memory, which we previously got a reference through extent_buffer_get(), and allow the extent buffer's content (pages) to be modified: btrfs_alloc_tree_block --btrfs_reserve_extent ----find_free_extent (get bytenr of old node) --btrfs_init_new_buffer (use bytenr of old node) ----btrfs_find_create_tree_block ------alloc_extent_buffer --------find_extent_buffer (get old node) 5. So send can access invalid memory content and have unpredictable behaviour. [FIX] So we fix the problem by copying the commit roots of the send and parent snapshots and use those copies. CallTrace looks like this: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1861! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 6 PID: 24235 Comm: btrfs Tainted: P O 3.10.105 #23721 ffff88046652d680 ti: ffff88041b720000 task.ti: ffff88041b720000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa08dd0e8>] read_node_slot+0x108/0x110 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffff88041b723b68 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffff88043ca6b000 RBX: ffff88041b723c50 RCX: ffff880000000000 RDX: 000000000000004c RSI: ffff880314b133f8 RDI: ffff880458b24000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88041b723c66 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff8803f3e48890 R13: ffff8803f3e48880 R14: ffff880466351800 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007f8c321dc8c0(0000) GS:ffff88047fcc0000(0000) CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 R2: 00007efd1006d000 CR3: 0000000213a24000 CR4: 00000000003407e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Stack: ffff88041b723c50 ffff8803f3e48880 ffff8803f3e48890 ffff8803f3e48880 ffff880466351800 0000000000000001 ffffffffa08dd9d7 ffff88041b723c50 ffff8803f3e48880 ffff88041b723c66 ffffffffa08dde85 a9ff88042d2c4400 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa08dd9d7>] ? tree_move_down.isra.33+0x27/0x50 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa08dde85>] ? tree_advance+0xb5/0xc0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa08e83d4>] ? btrfs_compare_trees+0x2d4/0x760 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0982050>] ? finish_inode_if_needed+0x870/0x870 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa09841ea>] ? btrfs_ioctl_send+0xeda/0x1050 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa094bd3d>] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x1e3d/0x33f0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81111133>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x373/0x990 [<ffffffff8153a096>] ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff81063256>] ? set_task_cpu+0xb6/0x1d0 [<ffffffff811122c3>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x143/0x2a0 [<ffffffff81539cc0>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1d0/0x500 [<ffffffff81062f07>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x57/0x90 [<ffffffff8115075a>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x4aa/0x990 [<ffffffff81034f83>] ? do_fork+0x113/0x3b0 [<ffffffff812dd7d7>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x6c [<ffffffff81150cc8>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x88/0xa0 [<ffffffff8153e422>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b ---[ end trace 29576629ee80b2e1 ]--- Fixes: 7069830a ("Btrfs: add btrfs_compare_trees function") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.6+ Signed-off-by: NRobbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest, ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the SPDX header. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 31 3月, 2018 14 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Once there was a simple int force_cow that was used with the plain barriers, and then converted to a bit, so we should use the appropriate barrier helper. Other variables in the complex if condition do not depend on a barrier, so we should be fine in case the atomic barrier becomes a no-op. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
We have several reports about node pointer points to incorrect child tree blocks, which could have even wrong owner and level but still with valid generation and checksum. Although btrfs check could handle it and print error message like: leaf parent key incorrect 60670574592 Kernel doesn't have enough check on this type of corruption correctly. At least add such check to read_tree_block() and btrfs_read_buffer(), where we need two new parameters @level and @first_key to verify the child tree block. The new @level check is mandatory and all call sites are already modified to extract expected level from its call chain. While @first_key is optional, the following call sites are skipping such check: 1) Root node/leaf As ROOT_ITEM doesn't contain the first key, skip @first_key check. 2) Direct backref Only parent bytenr and level is known and we need to resolve the key all by ourselves, skip @first_key check. Another note of this verification is, it needs extra info from nodeptr or ROOT_ITEM, so it can't fit into current tree-checker framework, which is limited to node/leaf boundary. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
A useless wrapper around tree_mod_log_insert_root that hides missing error handling. Move it to the callers. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
A trivial wrapper that can be simply opencoded and makes the GFP allocation request more visible. The error handling is now moved to the callers. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The wrapper is effectively an alias for tree_mod_log_insert_move but also hides the missing error handling. To make that more visible, lift the BUG_ON to the callers. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The wrappers are trivial and do not bring any extra value on top of the plain locking primitives. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The tree_mod_move is not used anywhere and can be embedded as anonymous structure. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
It's provided by the extent_buffer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function always sets keep_locks to 1 and saves the old value of keep_locks which is restored at the end. So there is no way it can be called without keep_locks being set. Remove comment imposing redundant requirement on callers. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Currently there are 2 function doing binary search on btrfs nodes: bin_search and btrfs_bin_search. The latter being a simple wrapper for the former. So eliminate the wrapper and just rename bin_search to btrfs_bin_search. No functional changes Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
When modifying a tree where the root is at BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 then the level variable is going to be 7 (this is the max height of the tree). On the other hand btrfs_cow_block is always called with "level + 1" as an index into the nodes and slots arrays. This leads to an out of bounds access. Admittdely this will be benign since an OOB access of the nodes array will likely read the 0th element from the slots array, which in this case is going to be 0 (since we start CoW at the top of the tree). The OOB access into the slots array in turn will read the 0th and 1st values of the locks array, which would both be 0 at the time. However, this benign behavior relies on the fact that the path being passed hasn't been initialised, if it has already been used to query a btree then it could potentially have populated the nodes/slots arrays. Fix it by explicitly checking if we are at level 7 (the maximum allowed index in nodes/slots arrays) and explicitly call the CoW routine with NULL for parent's node/slot. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Fixes-coverity-id: 711515 Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Since commit fb235dc0 (btrfs: qgroup: Move half of the qgroup accounting time out of commit trans) the assumption that btrfs_add_delayed_{data,tree}_ref can only return 0 or -ENOMEM has been false. The qgroup operations call into btrfs_search_slot and friends and can now return the full spectrum of error codes. Fortunately, the fix here is easy since update_ref_for_cow failing is already handled so we just need to bail early with the error code. Fixes: fb235dc0 (btrfs: qgroup: Move half of the qgroup accounting ...) Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.11+ Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NEdmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We need the actual root for the ref verifier tool to work, so change these functions to pass the root around instead. This will be used in a subsequent patch. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
btrfs_changed_cb_t represents the signature of the callback being passed to btrfs_compare_trees. Currently there is only one such callback, namely changed_cb in send.c. This function doesn't really uses the first 2 parameters, i.e. the roots. Since there are not other functions implementing the btrfs_changed_cb_t let's remove the unused parameters from the prototype and implementation. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 16 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-