1. 31 10月, 2016 4 次提交
    • V
      drm/i915: Bail if plane/crtc init fails · b079bd17
      Ville Syrjälä 提交于
      Due to the plane->index not getting readjusted in drm_plane_cleanup(),
      we can't continue initialization of some plane/crtc init fails.
      Well, we sort of could I suppose if we left all initialized planes on
      the list, but that would expose those planes to userspace as well.
      
      But for crtcs the situation is even worse since we assume that
      pipe==crtc index occasionally, so we can't really deal with a partially
      initialize set of crtcs.
      
      So seems safest to just abort the entire thing if anything goes wrong.
      All the failure paths here are kmalloc()s anyway, so it seems unlikely
      we'd get very far if these start failing.
      
      v2: Add (enum plane) case to silence gcc
      Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477411083-19255-4-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b079bd17
    • V
      drm/i915: Initialize planes in a reasonable order · a81d6fa0
      Ville Syrjälä 提交于
      The zpos magic sorting uses the object ID to solve conflicting zpos
      values. Let's initialize our planes in an order that makes the object
      IDs agree with the normal primary->sprites->cursor z order.
      Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477411083-19255-3-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a81d6fa0
    • V
      drm/i915: Don't try to initialize sprite planes on pre-ilk · 33edc24d
      Ville Syrjälä 提交于
      We don't currently implement support for sprite planes on pre-ilk
      platforms, so let's leave num_sprites at 0 so that we don't get
      spurious errors during driver init.
      Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1477411083-19255-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      33edc24d
    • C
      drm/i915: Mark up obj->mm.lock for shrinker · 7b7a119e
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      As we may allocate from within the obj->mm.lock we may enter the
      shrinker for direct reclaim. Operating on the current object is
      prevented by checking for obj->mm.pages (which is only set as the last
      operation in the allocation path). However, we need to identify the
      single recursion of accessing another object's obj->mm.lock as the two
      locks have identical class and so appear to be the same to lockdep,
      convincing it that a deadlock is possible. Use mutex_lock_nested() to
      remove the false positive.
      
      [ 2165.945734] =================================
      [ 2165.945749] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
      [ 2165.945765] 4.9.0-rc2+ #2 Tainted: G        W
      [ 2165.945781] ---------------------------------
      [ 2165.945796] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
      [ 2165.945816] kswapd0/62 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (&obj->mm.lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffffc0289a1f>] i915_gem_shrink+0x29f/0x500 [i915]
      [ 2165.945904] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
      [ 2165.945931] [<ffffffffb10bd50f>] mark_held_locks+0x6f/0xa0
      [ 2165.945956] [<ffffffffb10bf889>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x69/0xc0
      [ 2165.945982] [<ffffffffb11eea53>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x33/0x2a0
      [ 2165.946019] [<ffffffffc028a28a>] i915_gem_object_get_pages_stolen+0x6a/0xd0 [i915]
      [ 2165.946060] [<ffffffffc027e1d0>] ____i915_gem_object_get_pages+0x20/0x60 [i915]
      [ 2165.946098] [<ffffffffc027e268>] __i915_gem_object_get_pages+0x58/0x70 [i915]
      [ 2165.946138] [<ffffffffc028a3dc>] _i915_gem_object_create_stolen+0xec/0x120 [i915]
      [ 2165.946177] [<ffffffffc028af73>] i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated+0xf3/0x3f0 [i915]
      [ 2165.946222] [<ffffffffc02bae43>] intel_alloc_initial_plane_obj.isra.125+0xd3/0x200 [i915]
      [ 2165.946266] [<ffffffffc02cb1c1>] intel_modeset_init+0x931/0x1530 [i915]
      [ 2165.946301] [<ffffffffc023d584>] i915_driver_load+0xa14/0x14a0 [i915]
      [ 2165.946335] [<ffffffffc0248aff>] i915_pci_probe+0x4f/0x70 [i915]
      [ 2165.946362] [<ffffffffb13cc452>] local_pci_probe+0x42/0xa0
      [ 2165.946386] [<ffffffffb13cd903>] pci_device_probe+0x103/0x150
      [ 2165.946411] [<ffffffffb14adeb3>] driver_probe_device+0x223/0x430
      [ 2165.946436] [<ffffffffb14ae1a3>] __driver_attach+0xe3/0xf0
      [ 2165.946461] [<ffffffffb14ab943>] bus_for_each_dev+0x73/0xc0
      [ 2165.946485] [<ffffffffb14ad5ee>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
      [ 2165.946508] [<ffffffffb14ad003>] bus_add_driver+0x173/0x270
      [ 2165.946533] [<ffffffffb14aee70>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0
      [ 2165.946557] [<ffffffffb13cbd6d>] __pci_register_driver+0x5d/0x60
      [ 2165.946606] [<ffffffffc0378057>] soundcore_open+0x17/0x230 [soundcore]
      [ 2165.946636] [<ffffffffb1000450>] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x180
      [ 2165.946661] [<ffffffffb117fd2d>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x1f1
      [ 2165.946685] [<ffffffffb1108964>] load_module+0x2174/0x2a80
      [ 2165.946709] [<ffffffffb11094df>] SYSC_finit_module+0xdf/0x110
      [ 2165.946734] [<ffffffffb110952e>] SyS_finit_module+0xe/0x10
      [ 2165.946758] [<ffffffffb1742aea>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
      [ 2165.946776] irq event stamp: 90871
      [ 2165.946788] hardirqs last  enabled at (90871):
      [ 2165.946805] [<ffffffffb173e9da>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x11a/0x1c0
      [ 2165.946823] hardirqs last disabled at (90870):
      [ 2165.946839] [<ffffffffb173e91b>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x5b/0x1c0
      [ 2165.946856] softirqs last  enabled at (90858):
      [ 2165.946872] [<ffffffffb174581a>] __do_softirq+0x39a/0x4c6
      [ 2165.946887] softirqs last disabled at (90671):
      [ 2165.946902] [<ffffffffb1066cea>] irq_exit+0xea/0xf0
      [ 2165.946916] other info that might help us debug this:
      [ 2165.946936]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [ 2165.946955]        CPU0
      [ 2165.946965]        ----
      [ 2165.946975]   lock(&obj->mm.lock);
      [ 2165.947000]   <Interrupt>
      [ 2165.947010]     lock(&obj->mm.lock);
      [ 2165.947035] *** DEADLOCK ***
      [ 2165.947054] 2 locks held by kswapd0/62:
      [ 2165.947067]  #0: (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffb119a20e>] shrink_slab.part.40+0x5e/0x5d0
      [ 2165.947120]  #1: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc028954b>] i915_gem_shrinker_lock+0x1b/0x60 [i915]
      [ 2165.948909] stack backtrace:
      [ 2165.950650] CPU: 2 PID: 62 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G        W 4.9.0-rc2+ #2
      [ 2165.951587] Hardware name: LENOVO 80MX/Lenovo E31-80, BIOS DCCN34WW(V2.03) 12/01/2015
      [ 2165.952484]  ffffc90000b5f8c8 ffffffffb137f645 ffff88016c5a2700 ffffffffb25f20a0
      [ 2165.953395]  ffffc90000b5f918 ffffffffb10bcecd 0000000000000000 ffff880100000001
      [ 2165.954305]  0000000000000001 000000000000000a ffff88016c5a2fd0 ffff88016c5a2700
      [ 2165.955240] Call Trace:
      [ 2165.956170]  [<ffffffffb137f645>] dump_stack+0x68/0x93
      [ 2165.957071]  [<ffffffffb10bcecd>] print_usage_bug+0x1dd/0x1f0
      [ 2165.957979]  [<ffffffffb10bd439>] mark_lock+0x559/0x5c0
      [ 2165.958875]  [<ffffffffb10bc3f0>] ?  print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x1b0/0x1b0
      [ 2165.959829]  [<ffffffffb10be04d>] __lock_acquire+0x66d/0x12a0
      [ 2165.960729]  [<ffffffffb11ef541>] ? __slab_free+0xa1/0x340
      [ 2165.961625]  [<ffffffffb10dba5d>] ?  debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
      [ 2165.962530]  [<ffffffffb10bd50f>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6f/0xa0
      [ 2165.963457]  [<ffffffffb10bf0b0>] lock_acquire+0xf0/0x1f0
      [ 2165.964368]  [<ffffffffc0289a1f>] ? i915_gem_shrink+0x29f/0x500 [i915]
      [ 2165.965269]  [<ffffffffc0289a1f>] ? i915_gem_shrink+0x29f/0x500 [i915]
      [ 2165.966150]  [<ffffffffb173d837>] mutex_lock_nested+0x77/0x420
      [ 2165.967030]  [<ffffffffc0289a1f>] ? i915_gem_shrink+0x29f/0x500 [i915]
      [ 2165.967952]  [<ffffffffc027c7a1>] ?  __i915_gem_object_put_pages.part.58+0x161/0x1b0 [i915]
      [ 2165.968835]  [<ffffffffc0289a1f>] i915_gem_shrink+0x29f/0x500 [i915]
      [ 2165.969712]  [<ffffffffc0289e40>] i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x70/0xb0 [i915]
      [ 2165.970591]  [<ffffffffb119a3ae>] shrink_slab.part.40+0x1fe/0x5d0
      [ 2165.971504]  [<ffffffffb119f19c>] shrink_node+0x22c/0x320
      [ 2165.972371]  [<ffffffffb11a05fb>] kswapd+0x38b/0x9b0
      [ 2165.973238]  [<ffffffffb11a0270>] ?  mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x330/0x330
      [ 2165.974068]  [<ffffffffb108630f>] kthread+0xff/0x120
      [ 2165.974929]  [<ffffffffb1086210>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
      [ 2165.975847]  [<ffffffffb1742d57>] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
      Reported-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Fixes: 1233e2db ("drm/i915: Move object backing storage manipulation...")
      Testcase: igt/gem_ctx_create/maximum-swap
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161031124048.30355-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      7b7a119e
  2. 29 10月, 2016 36 次提交