- 22 8月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Delete ida_pre_get(), ida_get_new(), ida_get_new_above() and ida_remove() from the public API. Some of these functions still exist as internal helpers, but they should not be called by consumers. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
get_slot_offset() can be called with a NULL 'parent' argument. In this case, the calculated value will not be used, but calculating it is undefined. Rather than fixing the caller (__radix_tree_delete) to not call get_slot_offset(), make get_slot_offset() robust against being called with a NULL parent. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
-
- 26 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
If the radix tree underlying the IDR happens to be full and we attempt to remove an id which is larger than any id in the IDR, we will call __radix_tree_delete() with an uninitialised 'slot' pointer, at which point anything could happen. This was easiest to hit with a single entry at id 0 and attempting to remove a non-0 id, but it could have happened with 64 entries and attempting to remove an id >= 64. Roman said: The syzcaller test boils down to opening /dev/kvm, creating an eventfd, and calling a couple of KVM ioctls. None of this requires superuser. And the result is dereferencing an uninitialized pointer which is likely a crash. The specific path caught by syzbot is via KVM_HYPERV_EVENTD ioctl which is new in 4.17. But I guess there are other user-triggerable paths, so cc:stable is probably justified. Matthew added: We have around 250 calls to idr_remove() in the kernel today. Many of them pass an ID which is embedded in the object they're removing, so they're safe. Picking a few likely candidates: drivers/firewire/core-cdev.c looks unsafe; the ID comes from an ioctl. drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c is similar drivers/atm/nicstar.c could be taken down by a handcrafted packet Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180518175025.GD6361@bombadil.infradead.org Fixes: 0a835c4f ("Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree") Reported-by: <syzbot+35666cba7f0a337e2e79@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Debugged-by: NRoman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ross Zwisler 提交于
Fix a race in the multi-order iteration code which causes the kernel to hit a GP fault. This was first seen with a production v4.15 based kernel (4.15.6-300.fc27.x86_64) utilizing a DAX workload which used order 9 PMD DAX entries. The race has to do with how we tear down multi-order sibling entries when we are removing an item from the tree. Remember for example that an order 2 entry looks like this: struct radix_tree_node.slots[] = [entry][sibling][sibling][sibling] where 'entry' is in some slot in the struct radix_tree_node, and the three slots following 'entry' contain sibling pointers which point back to 'entry.' When we delete 'entry' from the tree, we call : radix_tree_delete() radix_tree_delete_item() __radix_tree_delete() replace_slot() replace_slot() first removes the siblings in order from the first to the last, then at then replaces 'entry' with NULL. This means that for a brief period of time we end up with one or more of the siblings removed, so: struct radix_tree_node.slots[] = [entry][NULL][sibling][sibling] This causes an issue if you have a reader iterating over the slots in the tree via radix_tree_for_each_slot() while only under rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() protection. This is a common case in mm/filemap.c. The issue is that when __radix_tree_next_slot() => skip_siblings() tries to skip over the sibling entries in the slots, it currently does so with an exact match on the slot directly preceding our current slot. Normally this works: V preceding slot struct radix_tree_node.slots[] = [entry][sibling][sibling][sibling] ^ current slot This lets you find the first sibling, and you skip them all in order. But in the case where one of the siblings is NULL, that slot is skipped and then our sibling detection is interrupted: V preceding slot struct radix_tree_node.slots[] = [entry][NULL][sibling][sibling] ^ current slot This means that the sibling pointers aren't recognized since they point all the way back to 'entry', so we think that they are normal internal radix tree pointers. This causes us to think we need to walk down to a struct radix_tree_node starting at the address of 'entry'. In a real running kernel this will crash the thread with a GP fault when you try and dereference the slots in your broken node starting at 'entry'. We fix this race by fixing the way that skip_siblings() detects sibling nodes. Instead of testing against the preceding slot we instead look for siblings via is_sibling_entry() which compares against the position of the struct radix_tree_node.slots[] array. This ensures that sibling entries are properly identified, even if they are no longer contiguous with the 'entry' they point to. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180503192430.7582-6-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com Fixes: 148deab2 ("radix-tree: improve multiorder iterators") Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: NCR, Sapthagirish <sapthagirish.cr@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Patch series "XArray", v9. (First part thereof). This patchset is, I believe, appropriate for merging for 4.17. It contains the XArray implementation, to eventually replace the radix tree, and converts the page cache to use it. This conversion keeps the radix tree and XArray data structures in sync at all times. That allows us to convert the page cache one function at a time and should allow for easier bisection. Other than renaming some elements of the structures, the data structures are fundamentally unchanged; a radix tree walk and an XArray walk will touch the same number of cachelines. I have changes planned to the XArray data structure, but those will happen in future patches. Improvements the XArray has over the radix tree: - The radix tree provides operations like other trees do; 'insert' and 'delete'. But what most users really want is an automatically resizing array, and so it makes more sense to give users an API that is like an array -- 'load' and 'store'. We still have an 'insert' operation for users that really want that semantic. - The XArray considers locking as part of its API. This simplifies a lot of users who formerly had to manage their own locking just for the radix tree. It also improves code generation as we can now tell RCU that we're holding a lock and it doesn't need to generate as much fencing code. The other advantage is that tree nodes can be moved (not yet implemented). - GFP flags are now parameters to calls which may need to allocate memory. The radix tree forced users to decide what the allocation flags would be at creation time. It's much clearer to specify them at allocation time. - Memory is not preloaded; we don't tie up dozens of pages on the off chance that the slab allocator fails. Instead, we drop the lock, allocate a new node and retry the operation. We have to convert all the radix tree, IDA and IDR preload users before we can realise this benefit, but I have not yet found a user which cannot be converted. - The XArray provides a cmpxchg operation. The radix tree forces users to roll their own (and at least four have). - Iterators take a 'max' parameter. That simplifies many users and will reduce the amount of iteration done. - Iteration can proceed backwards. We only have one user for this, but since it's called as part of the pagefault readahead algorithm, that seemed worth mentioning. - RCU-protected pointers are not exposed as part of the API. There are some fun bugs where the page cache forgets to use rcu_dereference() in the current codebase. - Value entries gain an extra bit compared to radix tree exceptional entries. That gives us the extra bit we need to put huge page swap entries in the page cache. - Some iterators now take a 'filter' argument instead of having separate iterators for tagged/untagged iterations. The page cache is improved by this: - Shorter, easier to read code - More efficient iterations - Reduction in size of struct address_space - Fewer walks from the top of the data structure; the XArray API encourages staying at the leaf node and conducting operations there. This patch (of 8): None of these bits may be used for slab allocations, so we can use them as radix tree flags as long as we mask them off before passing them to the slab allocator. Move the IDR flag from the high bits to the GFP_ZONEMASK bits. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180313132639.17387-3-willy@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
As far as I can tell, the only place the per-cpu ida_bitmap is populated is in ida_pre_get. The pre-allocated element is stolen in two places in ida_get_new_above, in both cases immediately followed by a memset(0). Since ida_get_new_above is called with locks held, do the zeroing in ida_pre_get, or rather let kmalloc() do it. Also, apparently gcc generates ~44 bytes of code to do a memset(, 0, 128): $ scripts/bloat-o-meter vmlinux.{0,1} add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 5/-88 (-83) Function old new delta ida_pre_get 115 119 +4 vermagic 27 28 +1 ida_get_new_above 715 627 -88 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180108225634.15340-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dkSigned-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Acked-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
It has no more users, so remove it. Move idr_alloc() back into idr.c, move the guts of idr_alloc_cmn() into idr_alloc_u32(), remove the wrappers around idr_get_free_cmn() and rename it to idr_get_free(). While there is now no interface to allocate IDs larger than a u32, the IDR internals remain ready to handle a larger ID should a need arise. These changes make it possible to provide the guarantee that, if the nextid pointer points into the object, the object's ID will be initialised before a concurrent lookup can find the object. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
-
- 16 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
During truncation, the mapping has already been checked for shmem and dax so it's known that workingset_update_node is required. This patch avoids the checks on mapping for each page being truncated. In all other cases, a lookup helper is used to determine if workingset_update_node() needs to be called. The one danger is that the API is slightly harder to use as calling workingset_update_node directly without checking for dax or shmem mappings could lead to surprises. However, the API rarely needs to be used and hopefully the comment is enough to give people the hint. sparsetruncate (tiny) 4.14.0-rc4 4.14.0-rc4 oneirq-v1r1 pickhelper-v1r1 Min Time 141.00 ( 0.00%) 140.00 ( 0.71%) 1st-qrtle Time 142.00 ( 0.00%) 141.00 ( 0.70%) 2nd-qrtle Time 142.00 ( 0.00%) 142.00 ( 0.00%) 3rd-qrtle Time 143.00 ( 0.00%) 143.00 ( 0.00%) Max-90% Time 144.00 ( 0.00%) 144.00 ( 0.00%) Max-95% Time 147.00 ( 0.00%) 145.00 ( 1.36%) Max-99% Time 195.00 ( 0.00%) 191.00 ( 2.05%) Max Time 230.00 ( 0.00%) 205.00 ( 10.87%) Amean Time 144.37 ( 0.00%) 143.82 ( 0.38%) Stddev Time 10.44 ( 0.00%) 9.00 ( 13.74%) Coeff Time 7.23 ( 0.00%) 6.26 ( 13.41%) Best99%Amean Time 143.72 ( 0.00%) 143.34 ( 0.26%) Best95%Amean Time 142.37 ( 0.00%) 142.00 ( 0.26%) Best90%Amean Time 142.19 ( 0.00%) 141.85 ( 0.24%) Best75%Amean Time 141.92 ( 0.00%) 141.58 ( 0.24%) Best50%Amean Time 141.69 ( 0.00%) 141.31 ( 0.27%) Best25%Amean Time 141.38 ( 0.00%) 140.97 ( 0.29%) As you'd expect, the gain is marginal but it can be detected. The differences in bonnie are all within the noise which is not surprising given the impact on the microbenchmark. radix_tree_update_node_t is a callback for some radix operations that optionally passes in a private field. The only user of the callback is workingset_update_node and as it no longer requires a mapping, the private field is removed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171018075952.10627-3-mgorman@techsingularity.netSigned-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 09 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
__radix_tree_preload() only disables preemption if no error is returned. So we really need to make sure callers always check the return value. idr_preload() contract is to always disable preemption, so we need to add a missing preempt_disable() if an error happened. Similarly, ida_pre_get() only needs to call preempt_enable() in the case no error happened. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1504637190.15310.62.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com Fixes: 0a835c4f ("Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree") Fixes: 7ad3d4d8 ("ida: Move ida_bitmap to a percpu variable") Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.11+] Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 31 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mi 提交于
The following new APIs are added: int idr_alloc_ext(struct idr *idr, void *ptr, unsigned long *index, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, gfp_t gfp); void *idr_remove_ext(struct idr *idr, unsigned long id); void *idr_find_ext(const struct idr *idr, unsigned long id); void *idr_replace_ext(struct idr *idr, void *ptr, unsigned long id); void *idr_get_next_ext(struct idr *idr, unsigned long *nextid); Signed-off-by: NChris Mi <chrism@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
This was the competing idea long ago, but it was only with the rewrite of the idr as an radixtree and using the radixtree directly ourselves, along with the realisation that we can store the vma directly in the radixtree and only need a list for the reverse mapping, that made the patch performant enough to displace using a hashtable. Though the vma ht is fast and doesn't require any extra allocation (as we can embed the node inside the vma), it does require a thread for resizing and serialization and will have the occasional slow lookup. That is hairy enough to investigate alternatives and favour them if equivalent in peak performance. One advantage of allocating an indirection entry is that we can support a single shared bo between many clients, something that was done on a first-come first-serve basis for shared GGTT vma previously. To offset the extra allocations, we create yet another kmem_cache for them. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170816085210.4199-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 04 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
The current implementation of the reclaim lockup detection can lead to false positives and those even happen and usually lead to tweak the code to silence the lockdep by using GFP_NOFS even though the context can use __GFP_FS just fine. See http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160512080321.GA18496@dastard as an example. ================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 4.5.0-rc2+ #4 Tainted: G O --------------------------------- inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage. kswapd0/543 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++-+}, at: xfs_ilock+0x177/0x200 [xfs] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} state was registered at: mark_held_locks+0x79/0xa0 lockdep_trace_alloc+0xb3/0x100 kmem_cache_alloc+0x33/0x230 kmem_zone_alloc+0x81/0x120 [xfs] xfs_refcountbt_init_cursor+0x3e/0xa0 [xfs] __xfs_refcount_find_shared+0x75/0x580 [xfs] xfs_refcount_find_shared+0x84/0xb0 [xfs] xfs_getbmap+0x608/0x8c0 [xfs] xfs_vn_fiemap+0xab/0xc0 [xfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x498/0x670 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f CPU0 ---- lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); <Interrupt> lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/543: stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 543 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G O 4.5.0-rc2+ #4 Call Trace: lock_acquire+0xd8/0x1e0 down_write_nested+0x5e/0xc0 xfs_ilock+0x177/0x200 [xfs] xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range+0x150/0x300 [xfs] xfs_fs_evict_inode+0xdc/0x1e0 [xfs] evict+0xc5/0x190 dispose_list+0x39/0x60 prune_icache_sb+0x4b/0x60 super_cache_scan+0x14f/0x1a0 shrink_slab.part.63.constprop.79+0x1e9/0x4e0 shrink_zone+0x15e/0x170 kswapd+0x4f1/0xa80 kthread+0xf2/0x110 ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 To quote Dave: "Ignoring whether reflink should be doing anything or not, that's a "xfs_refcountbt_init_cursor() gets called both outside and inside transactions" lockdep false positive case. The problem here is lockdep has seen this allocation from within a transaction, hence a GFP_NOFS allocation, and now it's seeing it in a GFP_KERNEL context. Also note that we have an active reference to this inode. So, because the reclaim annotations overload the interrupt level detections and it's seen the inode ilock been taken in reclaim ("interrupt") context, this triggers a reclaim context warning where it thinks it is unsafe to do this allocation in GFP_KERNEL context holding the inode ilock..." This sounds like a fundamental problem of the reclaim lock detection. It is really impossible to annotate such a special usecase IMHO unless the reclaim lockup detection is reworked completely. Until then it is much better to provide a way to add "I know what I am doing flag" and mark problematic places. This would prevent from abusing GFP_NOFS flag which has a runtime effect even on configurations which have lockdep disabled. Introduce __GFP_NOLOCKDEP flag which tells the lockdep gfp tracking to skip the current allocation request. While we are at it also make sure that the radix tree doesn't accidentaly override tags stored in the upper part of the gfp_mask. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306131408.9828-3-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
There's a relatively rare race where we look at the per-cpu preallocated IDA bitmap, see it's NULL, allocate a new one, and atomically update it. If the kmalloc() happened to sleep and we were rescheduled to a different CPU, or an interrupt came in at the exact right time, another task might have successfully allocated a bitmap and already deposited it. I forgot what the semantics of cmpxchg() were and ended up freeing the wrong bitmap leading to KASAN reporting a use-after-free. Dmitry found the bug with syzkaller & wrote the patch. I wrote the test case that will reproduce the bug without his patch being applied. Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2017 11 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Many places were missing __rcu annotations. A few places needed a few lines of explanation about why it was safe to not use RCU accessors. Add a custom CFLAGS setting to the Makefile to ensure that new patches don't miss RCU annotations. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Some of these have been missing for many years. Others were recently introduced by me. Fortunately, we have tools that help us find such things. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The address sanitizer occasionally finds an out of bounds error while running the test-suite. It turned out to be a read of the pointer immediately next to the tree root, but this out of bounds error could have occurred elsewhere. This happens because radix_tree_iter_resume() dereferences 'slot' before checking whether we've come to the end of the chunk. We can just delete this line; the value was never used. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Instead of having this mysterious private_data in each radix_tree_node, store a pointer to the root, which can be useful for debugging. This also relieves the mm code from the duty of updating it. Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Chaining through the ->private_data member means we have to zero ->private_data after removing preallocated nodes from the list. We're about to initialise ->parent anyway, so we can avoid zeroing it. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
We can use the root entry as a bitmap and save allocating a 128 byte bitmap for an IDA that contains only a few entries (30 on a 32-bit machine, 62 on a 64-bit machine). This costs about 300 bytes of kernel text on x86-64, so as long as 3 IDAs fall into this category, this is a net win for memory consumption. Thanks to Rasmus Villemoes for his work documenting the problem and collecting statistics on IDAs. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
When we preload the IDA, we allocate an IDA bitmap. Instead of storing that preallocated bitmap in the IDA, we store it in a percpu variable. Generally there are more IDAs in the system than CPUs, so this cuts down on the number of preallocated bitmaps that are unused, and about half of the IDA users did not call ida_destroy() so they were leaking IDA bitmaps. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The IDR is very similar to the radix tree. It has some functionality that the radix tree did not have (alloc next free, cyclic allocation, a callback-based for_each, destroy tree), which is readily implementable on top of the radix tree. A few small changes were needed in order to use a tag to represent nodes with free space below them. More extensive changes were needed to support storing NULL as a valid entry in an IDR. Plain radix trees still interpret NULL as a not-present entry. The IDA is reimplemented as a client of the newly enhanced radix tree. As in the current implementation, it uses a bitmap at the last level of the tree. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Factor the deletion code out into __radix_tree_delete() and provide a nice iterator-based wrapper around it. If we free the node, advance the iterator to avoid reading from freed memory. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> -
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The counterpart to radix_tree_iter_tag_set(), used by the IDR code Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: NRehas Sachdeva <aquannie@gmail.com>
-
由 Song Liu 提交于
It will be used in drivers/md/raid5-cache.c Signed-off-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
-
- 28 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
If we're just getting the value of a tag, or looking up an entry, we won't modify the radix tree, so we can declare these functions as taking a const pointer. Mostly for documentation purposes, though it might help code generation. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The newly introduced warning in radix_tree_free_nodes() was testing the wrong variable; it should have been 'old' instead of 'node'. Fixes: ea07b862 ("mm: workingset: fix use-after-free in shadow node shrinker") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118163746.GA32495@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Several people report seeing warnings about inconsistent radix tree nodes followed by crashes in the workingset code, which all looked like use-after-free access from the shadow node shrinker. Dave Jones managed to reproduce the issue with a debug patch applied, which confirmed that the radix tree shrinking indeed frees shadow nodes while they are still linked to the shadow LRU: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 53 at lib/radix-tree.c:643 delete_node+0x1e4/0x200 CPU: 2 PID: 53 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc2-think+ #3 Call Trace: delete_node+0x1e4/0x200 __radix_tree_delete_node+0xd/0x10 shadow_lru_isolate+0xe6/0x220 __list_lru_walk_one.isra.4+0x9b/0x190 list_lru_walk_one+0x23/0x30 scan_shadow_nodes+0x2e/0x40 shrink_slab.part.44+0x23d/0x5d0 shrink_node+0x22c/0x330 kswapd+0x392/0x8f0 This is the WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&node->private_list)) placed in the inlined radix_tree_shrink(). The problem is with 14b46879 ("mm: workingset: move shadow entry tracking to radix tree exceptional tracking"), which passes an update callback into the radix tree to link and unlink shadow leaf nodes when tree entries change, but forgot to pass the callback when reclaiming a shadow node. While the reclaimed shadow node itself is unlinked by the shrinker, its deletion from the tree can cause the left-most leaf node in the tree to be shrunk. If that happens to be a shadow node as well, we don't unlink it from the LRU as we should. Consider this tree, where the s are shadow entries: root->rnode | [0 n] | | [s ] [sssss] Now the shadow node shrinker reclaims the rightmost leaf node through the shadow node LRU: root->rnode | [0 ] | [s ] Because the parent of the deleted node is the first level below the root and has only one child in the left-most slot, the intermediate level is shrunk and the node containing the single shadow is put in its place: root->rnode | [s ] The shrinker again sees a single left-most slot in a first level node and thus decides to store the shadow in root->rnode directly and free the node - which is a leaf node on the shadow node LRU. root->rnode | s Without the update callback, the freed node remains on the shadow LRU, where it causes later shrinker runs to crash. Pass the node updater callback into __radix_tree_delete_node() in case the deletion causes the left-most branch in the tree to collapse too. Also add warnings when linked nodes are freed right away, rather than wait for the use-after-free when the list is scanned much later. Fixes: 14b46879 ("mm: workingset: move shadow entry tracking to radix tree exceptional tracking") Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Reported-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reported-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
[ This resurrects commit 53855d10, which was reverted in 2b41226b. It depended on commit d544abd5 ("lib/radix-tree: Convert to hotplug state machine") so now it is correct to apply ] Patch "lib/radix-tree: Convert to hotplug state machine" breaks the test suite as it adds a call to cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() which is not currently emulated in the test suite. Add it, and delete the emulation of the old CPU hotplug mechanism. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-36-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 12月, 2016 12 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
radix_tree_join() was freeing nodes with a non-zero ->exceptional count, and radix_tree_split() wasn't zeroing ->exceptional when it allocated the new node. Fix this by making all callers of radix_tree_node_alloc() pass in the new counts (and some other always-initialised fields), which will prevent the problem recurring if in future we decide to do something similar. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481667692-14500-3-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
When replacing an entry with NULL, we need to delete any sibling entries. Also account deleting exceptional entries properly. Also fix a bug with radix_tree_iter_replace() where we would fail to remove entirely freed nodes. Also fix accounting bug when switching between normal and exceptional entries with replace_slot. Also add testcases for all these bugs. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-61-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Calculate how many nodes we need to allocate to split an old_order entry into multiple entries, each of size new_order. The test suite checks that we allocated exactly the right number of nodes; neither too many (checked by rtp->nr == 0), nor too few (checked by comparing nr_allocated before and after the call to radix_tree_split()). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-60-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
This new function splits a larger multiorder entry into smaller entries (potentially multi-order entries). These entries are initialised to RADIX_TREE_RETRY to ensure that RCU walkers who see this state aren't confused. The caller should then call radix_tree_for_each_slot() and radix_tree_replace_slot() in order to turn these retry entries into the intended new entries. Tags are replicated from the original multiorder entry into each new entry. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-59-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
This new function allows for the replacement of many smaller entries in the radix tree with one larger multiorder entry. From the point of view of an RCU walker, they may see a mixture of the smaller entries and the large entry during the same walk, but they will never see NULL for an index which was populated before the join. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-58-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
This is an exceptionally complicated function with just one caller (tag_pages_for_writeback). We devote a large portion of the runtime of the test suite to testing this one function which has one caller. By introducing the new function radix_tree_iter_tag_set(), we can eliminate all of the complexity while keeping the performance. The caller can now use a fairly standard radix_tree_for_each() loop, and it doesn't need to worry about tricksy things like 'start' wrapping. The test suite continues to spend a large amount of time investigating this function, but now it's testing the underlying primitives such as radix_tree_iter_resume() and the radix_tree_for_each_tagged() iterator which are also used by other parts of the kernel. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-57-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
This rather complicated function can be better implemented as an iterator. It has only one caller, so move the functionality to the only place that needs it. Update the test suite to follow the same pattern. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-56-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Acked-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
This fixes several interlinked problems with the iterators in the presence of multiorder entries. 1. radix_tree_iter_next() would only advance by one slot, which would result in the iterators returning the same entry more than once if there were sibling entries. 2. radix_tree_next_slot() could return an internal pointer instead of a user pointer if a tagged multiorder entry was immediately followed by an entry of lower order. 3. radix_tree_next_slot() expanded to a lot more code than it used to when multiorder support was compiled in. And I wasn't comfortable with entry_to_node() being in a header file. Fixing radix_tree_iter_next() for the presence of sibling entries necessarily involves examining the contents of the radix tree, so we now need to pass 'slot' to radix_tree_iter_next(), and we need to change the calling convention so it is called *before* dropping the lock which protects the tree. Also rename it to radix_tree_iter_resume(), as some people thought it was necessary to call radix_tree_iter_next() each time around the loop. radix_tree_next_slot() becomes closer to how it looked before multiorder support was introduced. It only checks to see if the next entry in the chunk is a sibling entry or a pointer to a node; this should be rare enough that handling this case out of line is not a performance impact (and such impact is amortised by the fact that the entry we just processed was a multiorder entry). Also, radix_tree_next_slot() used to force a new chunk lookup for untagged entries, which is more expensive than the out of line sibling entry skipping. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-55-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Print the indices of the entries as unsigned (instead of signed) integers and print the parent node of each entry to help navigate around larger trees where the layout is not quite so obvious. Print the indices covered by a node. Rearrange the order of fields printed so the indices and parents line up for each type of entry. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-53-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Since this function is specialised to the radix tree, pass in the node and tag to calculate the address of the bitmap in radix_tree_find_next_bit() instead of the caller. Likewise, there is no need to pass in the size of the bitmap. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-52-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Similar to node_tag_clear(), factor node_tag_set() out of radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-51-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
I want to be able to reference node->parent after freeing node. Currently node->parent is in a union with rcu_head, so it is overwritten when the node is put on the RCU list. We know that private_list is not referenced after the node is freed, so it is safe for these two members to share space. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480369871-5271-50-git-send-email-mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.comSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-