- 26 8月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Sandeep Paulraj 提交于
Patch updates DM365 PINMUX by adding entries for Video, SPI 1 - 4, PWM 0 - 3. Signed-off-by: NSandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: NSteve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NMikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Sandeep Paulraj 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
由 Sandeep Paulraj 提交于
The patch adds base support for new TI SOC DM365, which s similar to the dm355. Signed-off-by: NSandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
Different SoC have different numbers of pinmux registers and other resources that overlap with each other. To clean up the code and eliminate defines that overlap with each other, move the PINMUX defines to the SoC specific files. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The pinmux register base and setup can be different for different SoCs so move the pinmux reg base, pinmux table (and its size) to the SoC infrastructure. Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Hilman 提交于
Update MUX support to be more general and useful across multiple SoCs in the DaVinci family. Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Barinov 提交于
Support pin multiplexing configurations driver for TI DaVinci SoC Signed-off-by: NVladimir Barinov <vbarinov@ru.mvista.com> Acked-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-