This is used only once by ath9k_hw_process_ini() to
write an array of phy registers through REG_WRITE_ARRAY(),
but we already call REG_WRITE_ARRAY() multiple times
on the same caller so just remove this pointless wrapper.
We'll eventually just move the ath9k_hw_process_ini()
caller as an callback to abstract away between different
hardware families.

Although this change is subtle I should note that this
does change the delay pattern on writing the next series
of registers. REG_WRITE_ARRAY() uses a counter for each
register write and does a udelay(1) every 64 writes. By
removing this call it means that the counter is processed
for all the iniBB_RfGain registers and is incremented
on ath9k_hw_process_ini(), before this the after the call
ath9k_hw_write_regs() was made the register counter was
kept at the same index number prior to the call.
Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

AR9003 does not have a reset control for AHB.
Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This is not a stable code fix as this register is not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

AR9300 will be the first device supported of the AR9003
family. AR9300 1.0 hardware exists but it is not going to
be sold anywhere so we completely skip its support.
Signed-off-by: NFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

ath9k supports the AR5008, AR9001 and AR9002 family of Atheros
chipsets, all 802.11n. The new breed of 802.11n chips, the
AR9003 family will be supported as well soon. To help with its
support we're going to add a few callbacks for hardware routines
which differ considerably instead of adding branch checks for
the revision at runtime.
Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Davinci platforms apparently need more time in-between helper firmware
blocks.  Even though this is an increased delay, we only take this hit
once at initialization time.
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Consolidate a bunch of C&P code that waits for the firmware to be ready.
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In preparation for new rtl818x devices, move the existing rtl818x configuration
into the rtl818x directory.
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Acked-by: NHin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

wl1251 is embedded chip that can be connected using SDIO bus, and is not
an actual SDIO card. For this reason there is a need to pass some board
specific data, like 'EEPROM is attached' flag or power control callback.

However currently there is no way to pass this data through SDIO subsystem,
so this patch registers dummy platform_device to allow that, until we
have a better solution to this.
Signed-off-by: NGrazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This patch fixes a bug which was just recently introduced by
("p54pci: prevent stuck rx-ring on slow system").

make M=drivers/net/wireless/p54 C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
  CHECK   drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54pci.c
drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54pci.c:143:11: warning: cast to restricted __le32
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54pci.o
Reported-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

0x0e66,0x0009 HWUN2 Hawking Technologies Hi-Gain Wireless-150N USB Adapter w/ Upgradable Antenna
0x0e66,0x000b HWDN2 Hawking Technologies Hi-Gain USB Wireless-150N Dish Adapter
0x0e66,0x0013 Hawking Technologies Hi-Gain Wireless-N USB Adapter
0x0e66,0x0017 Hawking Wireless-N Network Adapter
0x0e66,0x0018 Hawking Wireless-N Network Adapter

Hawking Technologies Technical Support guys say:

All our N adapters use the same chipset. Ralink RT 2870 chipset.
Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

rt2800pci used the callback write_tx_desc to write the tx descriptor but
also to update the txwi which is part of the dma mapped skb. Since the
memory was already DMA mapped _before_ the call to write_tx_desc the
device didn't get the txwi data at all or only sporadically.

The call order is basically as follows (from rt2x00queue.c):
1) write_tx_data
2) rt2x00queue_map_txskb
3) write_tx_desc

Hence, we shouldn't touch the skb in write_tx_desc anymore.

To fix this issue create a new rt2800pci_write_tx_data callback and use it
for updating the txwi _before_ the memory gets DMA mapped.

The tx descriptor is still written (as before) in write_tx_desc.

This patch allows basic TX on an rt305x soc device but I'm pretty sure
that it will fix pci based cards as well. I can associate just fine with
an AP now but I wasn't able to get a wpa secured connection working yet.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Extend the write_tx_data callback with a txdesc parameter to allow
access to the tx desciptor while preparing the tx data.
Signed-off-by: NHelmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In a scenario, where a cfg80211 driver (station mode) does not send assoc request
and assoc response IEs in cfg80211_connect_result after a successful association
to an AP, cfg80211 sends IWEVASSOCREQIE and IWEVASSOCRESPIE to the user space
application with NULL data. This can cause an issue at the event recipient.

An example of this is when cfg80211 sends IWEVASSOCREQIE and IWEVASSOCRESPIE
events with NULL event body to wpa_supplicant. The wpa_supplicant overwrites
the assoc request and assoc response IEs for this station with NULL data.
If the association is WPA/WPA2, the wpa_supplicant is not able to generate
EAPOL handshake messages, since the IEs are NULL.

With the patch, req_ie and resp_ie will be NULL by avoiding the
assignment if the driver has not sent the IEs to cfg80211. The event sending
code sends the events only if resp_ie and req_ie are not NULL. This
will ensure that the events are not sent with NULL event body.
Signed-off-by: NNishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Some wl1251 hardware configurations (like in WG7210 module) have
EEPROM attached where NVS data is kept, which includes MAC address.

In such configurations, let's read default MAC address from EEPROM,
instead of using random one.
Signed-off-by: NGrazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

A very useful information was provided by Sitecom R&D guys:

Please find the information regarding our latest Ralink adapters below;

WL-302    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x002D    -    Ralink RT2771
WL-315    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x0039    -    Ralink RT2770
WL-319    -    VID: 0x182D,    PID: 0x0037    -    Ralink RT2860
WL-321    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x003B    -    Ralink RT2770
WL-324    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x003D    -    Ralink RT2870
WL-329    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x0041    -    Ralink RT3572
WL-343    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x003E    -    Ralink RT3070
WL-344    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x0040    -    Ralink RT3071
WL-345    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x0042    -    Ralink RT3072
WL-608    -    VID: 0x0DF6,    PID: 0x003F    -    Ralink RT2070

Note:
PID: 0x003C, 0x004A, and 0x004D:   --these products do not exist; devices were never produced/shipped--

The WL-349v4 USB dongle (0x0df6,0x0050) will be shipped soon (it isn't available yet), and uses a Ralink RT3370 chipset.
Signed-off-by: NXose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This patch adds the following 5 entries to the usbid device table:

 * Netgear WNA1000
 * Proxim ORiNOCO Dual Band 802.11n USB Adapter
 * 3Com Dual Band 802.11n USB Adapter
 * H3C Dual Band 802.11n USB Adapter
 * WNC Generic 11n USB dongle

CC: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

If EEPROM is used, NVS data is now loaded but ignored.
Stop loading it to avoid need of dummy NVS file for modules with EEPROM.
Signed-off-by: NGrazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This patch fixes two warnings below after unplugging ar9271 usb device:
	-one is a kernel warning[1]
	-another is a lockdep warning[2]

The root reason is that __skb_queue_purge can't be executed in hardirq
context, so the patch forks ath9k_skb_queue_purge(ath9k version of _skb_queue_purge),
which frees skb with dev_kfree_skb_any which can be run in hardirq
context safely, then prevent the lockdep warning and kernel warning after
unplugging ar9271 usb device.

[1] kernel warning
[  602.894005] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  602.894005] WARNING: at net/core/skbuff.c:398 skb_release_head_state+0x71/0x87()
[  602.894005] Hardware name: 6475EK2
[  602.894005] Modules linked in: ath9k_htc ath9k ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath bridge stp llc sunrpc ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table kvm_intel kvm arc4 ecb mac80211 snd_hda_codec_conexant snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep thinkpad_acpi snd_pcm snd_timer hwmon iTCO_wdt snd e1000e pcspkr i2c_i801 usbhid iTCO_vendor_support wmi cfg80211 yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic pata_acpi snd_page_alloc soundcore uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core video output [last unloaded: ath]
[  602.894005] Pid: 2506, comm: ping Tainted: G        W  2.6.34-rc3-wl #20
[  602.894005] Call Trace:
[  602.894005]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8104a41c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x94
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa022f398>] ? __skb_queue_purge+0x43/0x4a [ath9k_htc]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8104a448>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x16
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813269c1>] skb_release_head_state+0x71/0x87
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8132829a>] __kfree_skb+0x16/0x81
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813283b2>] kfree_skb+0x7e/0x86
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa022f398>] __skb_queue_purge+0x43/0x4a [ath9k_htc]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa022f560>] __hif_usb_tx+0x1c1/0x21b [ath9k_htc]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa022f73c>] hif_usb_tx_cb+0x12f/0x154 [ath9k_htc]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa00d2fbe>] usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x91/0xc5 [usbcore]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa00f6c34>] ehci_urb_done+0x7a/0x8b [ehci_hcd]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa00f6f33>] qh_completions+0x2ee/0x376 [ehci_hcd]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa00f8ba5>] ehci_work+0x95/0x76e [ehci_hcd]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa00fa5ae>] ? ehci_irq+0x2f/0x1d4 [ehci_hcd]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa00fa725>] ehci_irq+0x1a6/0x1d4 [ehci_hcd]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810a6d18>] ? __rcu_process_callbacks+0x7a/0x2df
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810a47a4>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x22/0xd2
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffffa00d268d>] usb_hcd_irq+0x4a/0xa7 [usbcore]
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810a2853>] handle_IRQ_event+0x77/0x14f
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813285ce>] ? skb_release_data+0xc9/0xce
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810a4814>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x92/0xd2
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8100c4fb>] handle_irq+0x88/0x91
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8100baed>] do_IRQ+0x63/0xc9
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81354245>] ? ip_flush_pending_frames+0x4d/0x5c
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813ba993>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x16
[  602.894005]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff811095fe>] ? __delete_object+0x5a/0xb1
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813ba5f5>] ? _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x7e
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813ba5fa>] ? _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x7e
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff811095fe>] __delete_object+0x5a/0xb1
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81109814>] delete_object_full+0x25/0x31
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813a60c0>] kmemleak_free+0x26/0x45
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810ff517>] kfree+0xaa/0x149
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81323fb7>] ? sock_def_write_space+0x84/0x89
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81354245>] ? ip_flush_pending_frames+0x4d/0x5c
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813285ce>] skb_release_data+0xc9/0xce
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813282a2>] __kfree_skb+0x1e/0x81
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813283b2>] kfree_skb+0x7e/0x86
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81354245>] ip_flush_pending_frames+0x4d/0x5c
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81370c1f>] raw_sendmsg+0x653/0x709
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81379e31>] inet_sendmsg+0x54/0x5d
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813207a2>] ? sock_recvmsg+0xc6/0xdf
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813208c1>] sock_sendmsg+0xc0/0xd9
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810e13b4>] ? might_fault+0x68/0xb8
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810e13fd>] ? might_fault+0xb1/0xb8
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8132a1c3>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8132a5b3>] ? verify_iovec+0x54/0x91
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81320d41>] sys_sendmsg+0x1da/0x241
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8103d327>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xc9
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8103d327>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xc9
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8107642e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x150
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813ba27d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x56/0x63
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8103d3cb>] ? finish_task_switch+0xa4/0xc9
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8103d327>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xc9
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff810357fe>] ? need_resched+0x23/0x2d
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff8107642e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x150
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff813b9750>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[  602.894005]  [<ffffffff81009c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[  602.894005] ---[ end trace 91ba2d8dc7826839 ]---

[2] lockdep warning
[  169.363215] ======================================================
[  169.365390] [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
[  169.366334] 2.6.34-rc3-wl #20
[  169.366872] ------------------------------------------------------
[  169.366872] khubd/78 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
[  169.366872]  (clock-AF_INET){++.?..}, at: [<ffffffff81323f51>] sock_def_write_space+0x1e/0x89
[  169.366872]
[  169.366872] and this task is already holding:
[  169.366872]  (&(&hif_dev->tx.tx_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa03715b0>] hif_usb_stop+0x24/0x53 [ath9k_htc]
[  169.366872] which would create a new lock dependency:
[  169.366872]  (&(&hif_dev->tx.tx_lock)->rlock){-.-...} -> (clock-AF_INET){++.?..}
[  169.366872]
[  169.366872] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
[  169.366872]  (&(&hif_dev->tx.tx_lock)->rlock){-.-...}
[  169.366872] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff810772d5>] __lock_acquire+0x2c6/0xd2b
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8107866d>] lock_acquire+0xec/0x119
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff813b99bb>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffffa037163d>] hif_usb_tx_cb+0x5e/0x154 [ath9k_htc]
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffffa00d2fbe>] usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x91/0xc5 [usbcore]
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffffa00f6c34>] ehci_urb_done+0x7a/0x8b [ehci_hcd]
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffffa00f6f33>] qh_completions+0x2ee/0x376 [ehci_hcd]
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffffa00f8ba5>] ehci_work+0x95/0x76e [ehci_hcd]
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffffa00fa725>] ehci_irq+0x1a6/0x1d4 [ehci_hcd]
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffffa00d268d>] usb_hcd_irq+0x4a/0xa7 [usbcore]
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff810a2853>] handle_IRQ_event+0x77/0x14f
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff810a4814>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x92/0xd2
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8100c4fb>] handle_irq+0x88/0x91
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8100baed>] do_IRQ+0x63/0xc9
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff813ba993>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x16
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8130f6ee>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xa7/0x115
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff81008c4f>] cpu_idle+0x68/0xc4
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff813a41e0>] rest_init+0x104/0x10b
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff81899db3>] start_kernel+0x3f1/0x3fc
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff818992c8>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xb3/0xb7
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff818993c4>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf8/0x107
[  169.366872]
[  169.366872] to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
[  169.366872]  (clock-AF_INET){++.?..}
[  169.366872] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
[  169.366872] ...  [<ffffffff81077349>] __lock_acquire+0x33a/0xd2b
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8107866d>] lock_acquire+0xec/0x119
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff813b9d07>] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x45/0x7a
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8135cf14>] tcp_close+0x165/0x34d
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8137aced>] inet_release+0x55/0x5c
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff81321350>] sock_release+0x1f/0x6e
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff813213c6>] sock_close+0x27/0x2b
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8110dd45>] __fput+0x125/0x1ca
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8110de04>] fput+0x1a/0x1c
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8110adc9>] filp_close+0x68/0x72
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff8110ae80>] sys_close+0xad/0xe7
[  169.366872]   [<ffffffff81009c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

(Trimmed at the "other info that might help us debug this" line in
the interest of brevity... -- JWL)
Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In ath9k-htc register out path, ath9k-htc will pass skb->data into
usb hcd and usb hcd will do dma mapping and unmapping to the buffer
pointed by skb->data, so we should pass a cache-line aligned address.

This patch replace __dev_alloc_skb with alloc_skb to make skb->data
pointed to a cacheline aligned address simply since ath9k-htc does not
skb_push on the skb and pass it to mac80211, also use kfree_skb to free
the skb allocated by alloc_skb(we can use kfree_skb safely in hardirq
context since skb->destructor is NULL always in the path).
Signed-off-by: NSujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>
Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In ath9k-htc register in path, ath9k-htc will pass skb->data into
usb hcd and usb hcd will do dma mapping and unmapping to the buffer
pointed by skb->data, so we should pass a cache-line aligned address.

This patch replace __dev_alloc_skb with alloc_skb to make skb->data
pointed to a cacheline aligned address simply since ath9k-htc does not
skb_push on the skb and pass it to mac80211, also use kfree_skb to free
the skb allocated by alloc_skb(we can use kfree_skb safely in hardirq
context since skb->destructor is NULL always in the path).
Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In ath9k_hif_usb_alloc_rx_urbs, ath9k-htc will pass skb->data into
usb hcd and usb hcd will do dma mapping and unmapping to the buffer
pointed by skb->data, so we should pass a cache-line aligned address.

This patch replace __dev_alloc_skb with alloc_skb to make skb->data
pointed to a cacheline aligned address simply since ath9k-htc does not
skb_push on the skb and pass it to mac80211, also use kfree_skb to free
the skbs allocated by alloc_skb(we can use kfree_skb safely in hardirq
context since skb->destructor is NULL always in the path).
Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

We get RXORN interrupts when all receive buffers are full. This is not
necessarily a fatal situation. It can also happen when the bus is busy or the
CPU is not fast enough to process all frames.

Older chipsets apparently need a reset to come out of this situration, but on
newer chips we can treat RXORN like RX, as going thru a full reset does more
harm than good, there.

The exact chip revisions which need a reset are unknown - this guess
AR5K_SREV_AR5212 ("venice") is copied from the HAL.

Inspired by openwrt 413-rxorn.patch:
"treat rxorn like rx, reset after rxorn seems to do more harm than good"
Signed-off-by: NBruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There was a confusion in the usage of the bits AR5K_STA_ID1_ACKCTS_6MB and
AR5K_STA_ID1_BASE_RATE_11B. If they are set (1), we will get lower bitrates for
ACK and CTS. Therefore ath5k_hw_set_ack_bitrate_high(ah, false) actually
resulted in high bitrates, which i think is what we want anyways. Cleared the
confusion and added some documentation.
Signed-off-by: NBruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add RT3390 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3390 vendor driver.

Untested as I don't actually own an RT3390 based device, but given experiences
on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work..
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add RT3090 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3090 vendor driver.

Untested as I don't actually own an RT3090 based device, but given experiences
on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work..
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
Ralink rt3070 vendor driver.

With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was
incomplete.
Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink
vendor driver.

With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Align the rt2800 register initializations with the latest versions of the
Ralink vendor driver.
This patch is also preparation for the addition of support for RT3070 /
RT3071 / RT3090 / RT3390 based devices.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't
mean a lot of things anyway. Refactor the constants to have some more
meaningful names, and introduce and use some new helpers to check these
chipset revisions. At the same time rename to revision, as they are more
revision numbers rather than version numbers.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Only include definitions for RT chipsets that are also used inside the
Ralink vendor drivers.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Definitions taken from the latest rt2860 / rt2870 / rt3070 / rt3090 Ralink
vendor drivers.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It seems that the distinction between RF channel switch method is solely based
on the RF chipset that is used.
Refactor the channel switch decision to just take the RF chipset into account,
thereby greatly simplifying the check.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This patch fixes an old problem, which - under certain
circumstances - could cause the device to become
unresponsive.

most of p54pci's rx-ring management is implemented in just
two distinct standalone functions. p54p_check_rx_ring takes
care of processing incoming data, while p54p_refill_rx_ring
tries to replenish all depleted communication buffers.

This has always worked fine on my fast machine, but
now I know there is a hidden race...

The most likely candidate here is ring_control->device_idx.
Quintin Pitts had already analyzed the culprit and posted
a patch back in Oct 2009. But sadly, no one's picked up on this.
( https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/53079/ [2 & 3] ).
This patch does the same way, except that it also prioritize
rx data processing, simply because tx routines *can* wait.
Reported-by: NSean Young <sean@mess.org>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11386Reported-by: NQuintin Pitts <geek4linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NQuintin Pitts <geek4linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Merge branch 'wireless-next-2.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-2.6

We used to free all the Tx queues memory when interface is brought
down and reallocate them again in interface up. This requires
order-4 allocation for txq->cmd[]. In situations like s2ram, this
usually leads to allocation failure in the memory subsystem. The
patch fixed this problem by allocating the Tx queues memory only at
the first time. Later iwl_down/iwl_up only initialize but don't
free and reallocate them. The memory is freed at the device removal
time. BTW, we have already done this for the Rx queue.

This fixed bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551Signed-off-by: NZhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Acked-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Check return code on iwl_send_cmd_pdu() to get rid of compiler warning.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>