- 26 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark A. Greer 提交于
The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: NSteve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NMikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NMark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Brownell 提交于
Remove remnants of dm6446-specific SRAM allocator, as preparation for a more generic replacement. Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Both of these symbols should be defined by a platform, or neither should be defined. Ensure that all platforms conform. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 28 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
Let's provide an overridable default instead of having every machine class define __virt_to_bus and __bus_to_virt to the same thing. What most platforms are using is bus_addr == phys_addr so such is the default. One exception is ebsa110 which has no DMA what so ever, so the actual definition is not important except only for proper compilation. Also added a comment about the special footbridge bus translation. Let's also remove comments alluding to set_dma_addr which is not (and should not) be commonly used. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Hilman 提交于
Add base kernel support for the TI DaVinci platform. This patch only includes interrupts, timers, CPU identification, serial support and basic power and sleep controller init. More drivers to come. Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-