A context switch occurs by submitting a context descriptor to the
ExecList Submission Port. Given that we can now initialize a context,
it's possible to begin implementing the context switch by creating the
descriptor and submitting it to ELSP (actually two, since the ELSP
has two ports).

The context object must be mapped in the GGTT, which means it must exist
in the 0-4GB graphics VA range.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>

v2: This code has changed quite a lot in various rebases. Of particular
importance is that now we use the globally unique Submission ID to send
to the hardware. Also, context pages are now pinned unconditionally to
GGTT, so there is no need to bind them.

v3: Use LRCA[31:12] as hwCtxId[19:0]. This guarantees that the HW context
ID we submit to the ELSP is globally unique and != 0 (Bspec requirements
of the software use-only bits of the Context ID in the Context Descriptor
Format) without the hassle of the previous submission Id construction.
Also, re-add the ELSP porting read (it was dropped somewhere during the
rebases).

v4:
- Squash with "drm/i915/bdw: Add forcewake lock around ELSP writes" (BSPEC
  says: "SW must set Force Wakeup bit to prevent GT from entering C6 while
  ELSP writes are in progress") as noted by Thomas Daniel
  (thomas.daniel@intel.com).
- Rename functions and use an execlists/intel_execlists_ namespace.
- The BUG_ON only checked that the LRCA was <32 bits, but it didn't make
  sure that it was properly aligned. Spotted by Alistair Mcaulay
  <alistair.mcaulay@intel.com>.

v5:
- Improved source code comments as suggested by Chris Wilson.
- No need to abstract submit_ctx away, as pointed by Brad Volkin.
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Checkpatch. Sigh.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On a previous iteration of this patch, I created an Execlists
version of __i915_add_request and asbtracted it away as a
vfunc. Daniel Vetter wondered then why that was needed:

"with the clean split in command submission I expect every
function to know wether it'll submit to an lrc (everything in
intel_lrc.c) or wether it'll submit to a legacy ring (existing
code), so I don't see a need for an add_request vfunc."

The honest, hairy truth is that this patch is the glue keeping
the whole logical ring puzzle together:

- i915_add_request is used by intel_ring_idle, which in turn is
  used by i915_gpu_idle, which in turn is used in several places
  inside the eviction and gtt codes.
- Also, it is used by i915_gem_check_olr, which is littered all
  over i915_gem.c
- ...

If I were to duplicate all the code that directly or indirectly
uses __i915_add_request, I'll end up creating a separate driver.

To show the differences between the existing legacy version and
the new Execlists one, this time I have special-cased
__i915_add_request instead of adding an add_request vfunc. I
hope this helps to untangle this Gordian knot.
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Adjust to ringbuf->FIXME_lrc_ctx per the discussion with
Thomas Daniel.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Well, new-ish: if all this code looks familiar, that's because it's
a clone of the existing submission mechanism (with some modifications
here and there to adapt it to LRCs and Execlists).

And why did we do this instead of reusing code, one might wonder?
Well, there are some fears that the differences are big enough that
they will end up breaking all platforms.

Also, Execlists offer several advantages, like control over when the
GPU is done with a given workload, that can help simplify the
submission mechanism, no doubt. I am interested in getting Execlists
to work first and foremost, but in the future this parallel submission
mechanism will help us to fine tune the mechanism without affecting
old gens.

v2: Pass the ringbuffer only (whenever possible).
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Appease checkpatch. Again. And drop the legacy sarea gunk
that somehow crept in.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Execlists are indeed a brave new world with respect to workload
submission to the GPU.

In previous version of these series, I have tried to impact the
legacy ringbuffer submission path as little as possible (mostly,
passing the context around and using the correct ringbuffer when I
needed one) but Daniel is afraid (probably with a reason) that
these changes and, especially, future ones, will end up breaking
older gens.

This commit and some others coming next will try to limit the
damage by creating an alternative path for workload submission.
The first step is here: laying out a new ring init/fini.
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For the moment this is just a placeholder, but it shows one of the
main differences between the good ol' HW contexts and the shiny
new Logical Ring Contexts: LR contexts allocate  and free their
own backing objects. Another difference is that the allocation is
deferred (as the create function name suggests), but that does not
happen in this patch yet, because for the moment we are only dealing
with the default context.

Early in the series we had our own gen8_gem_context_init/fini
functions, but the truth is they now look almost the same as the
legacy hw context init/fini functions. We can always split them
later if this ceases to be the case.

Also, we do not fall back to legacy ringbuffers when logical ring
context initialization fails (not very likely to happen and, even
if it does, hw contexts would probably fail as well).

v2: Daniel says "explain, do not showcase".
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

GEN8 brings an expansion of the HW contexts: "Logical Ring Contexts".
These expanded contexts enable a number of new abilities, especially
"Execlists".

The macro is defined to off until we have things in place to hope to
work.

v2: Rename "advanced contexts" to the more correct "logical ring
contexts".

v3: Add a module parameter to enable execlists. Execlist are relatively
new, and so it'd be wise to be able to switch back to ring submission
to debug subtle problems that will inevitably arise.

v4: Add an intel_enable_execlists function.

v5: Sanitize early, as suggested by Daniel. Remove lrc_enabled.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> (v3)
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> (v2, v4 & v5)
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Some legacy HW context code assumptions don't make sense for this new
submission method, so we will place this stuff in a separate file.

Note for reviewers: I've carefully considered the best name for this file
and this was my best option (other possibilities were intel_lr_context.c
or intel_execlist.c). I am open to a certain bikeshedding on this matter,
anyway.

And some point in time, it would be a good idea to split intel_lrc.c/.h
even further, but for the moment just shove everything together.

v2: Change to intel_lrc.c

v3: Squash together with the header file addition
Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Allows us to use the 3D engine for memory management
and allows us to use vram beyond the BAR aperture.

v2: fix copy paste typo
Reported-by: NNils Wallménius <nils.wallmenius@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Cayman asics have 3 ring buffers:
ring 0 supports both gfx and compute
rings 1 and 2 are compute only

At the moment we only support ring 0.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This patch implements blit support for bo moves using
the 3D engine.  It uses the same method as r6xx/r7xx:
- store the base state in an IB
- emit variable state and vertex buffers to do the blit

This allows the hw to move bos using the 3D engine and allows
full use of vram beyond the pci aperture size.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Noticed while adding evergreen blit support.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This adds the r600 KMS + CS support to the Linux kernel.

The r600 TTM support is quite basic and still needs more
work esp around using interrupts, but the polled fencing
should work okay for now.

Also currently TTM is using memcpy to do VRAM moves,
the code is here to use a 3D blit to do this, but
isn't fully debugged yet.

Authors:
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>