Since the scratch allocation and cleanup is shared by all engine
submission backends, move it out of the legacy intel_ringbuffer.c and
into the new home for common routines, intel_engine_cs.c
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1471254551-25805-20-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Until now code was calling hweight32 to figure out the
number from device_info->ring_mask at runtime. Instead
we can cache it at engine init time and use directly.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470842530-35854-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

In commit 2529d570 ("drm/i915: Drop racy markup of missed-irqs from
idle-worker") the racy detection of missed interrupts was removed when
we went idle. This however opened up the issue that the stuck waiters
were not being reported, causing a test case failure. If we move the
stuck waiter detection out of hangcheck and into the breadcrumb
mechanims (i.e. the waiter) itself, we can avoid this issue entirely.
This leaves hangcheck looking for a stuck GPU (inspecting for request
advancement and HEAD motion), and breadcrumbs looking for a stuck
waiter - hopefully make both easier to understand by their segregation.

v2: Reduce the error message as we now run independently of hangcheck,
and the hanging batch used by igt also counts as a stuck waiter causing
extra warnings in dmesg.
v3: Move the breadcrumb's hangcheck kickstart to the first missed wait.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97104
Fixes: 2529d570 (waiter"drm/i915: Drop racy markup of missed-irqs...")
Testcase: igt/drv_missed_irq
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470761272-1245-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The principal motivation for this was to try and eliminate the
struct_mutex from i915_gem_suspend - but we still need to hold the mutex
current for the i915_gem_context_lost(). (The issue there is that there
may be an indirect lockdep cycle between cpu_hotplug (i.e. suspend) and
struct_mutex via the stop_machine().) For the moment, enabling last
request tracking for the engine, allows us to do busyness checking and
waiting without requiring the struct_mutex - which is useful in its own
right.

As a side-effect of having a robust means for tracking engine busyness,
we can replace our other busyness heuristic, that of comparing against
the last submitted seqno. For paranoid reasons, we have a semi-ordered
check of that seqno inside the hangchecker, which we can now improve to
an ordered check of the engine's busyness (removing a locked xchg in the
process).

v2: Pass along "bool interruptible" as being unlocked we cannot rely on
i915->mm.interruptible being stable or even under our control.
v3: Replace check Ironlake i915_gpu_busy() with the common precalculated value
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470388464-28458-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We should not rely on obj->active being uptodate unless we manually
flush it. Instead, we can verify that the next available batch object is
idle by looking at its last active request (and checking it for
completion).

v2: remove the struct drm_device forward declaration added in the
process of removing its necessity
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

With the introduction of requests, we amplified the number of atomic
refcounted objects we use and update every execbuffer; from none to
several references, and a set of references that need to be changed. We
also introduced interesting side-effects in the order of retiring
requests and objects.

Instead of independently tracking the last request for an object, track
the active objects for each request. The object will reside in the
buffer list of its most recent active request and so we reduce the kref
interchange to a list_move. Now retirements are entirely driven by the
request, dramatically simplifying activity tracking on the object
themselves, and removing the ambiguity between retiring objects and
retiring requests.

Furthermore with the consolidation of managing the activity tracking
centrally, we can look forward to using RCU to enable lockless lookup of
the current active requests for an object. In the future, we will be
able to query the status or wait upon rendering to an object without
even touching the struct_mutex BKL.

All told, less code, simpler and faster, and more extensible.

v2: Add a typedef for the function pointer for convenience later.
v3: Make the noop retirement callback explicit. Allow passing NULL to
the init_request_active() which is expanded to a common noop function.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we initialize the state to both legacy and execlists inside
intel_engine_cs, we should also clean up that state from the common
functions.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470226756-24401-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

The state stored in this struct is not only the information about the
buffer object, but the ring used to communicate with the hardware. Using
buffer here is overly specific and, for me at least, conflates with the
notion of buffer objects themselves.

s/struct intel_ringbuffer/struct intel_ring/
s/enum intel_ring_hangcheck/enum intel_engine_hangcheck/
s/describe_ctx_ringbuf()/describe_ctx_ring()/
s/intel_ring_get_active_head()/intel_engine_get_active_head()/
s/intel_ring_sync_index()/intel_engine_sync_index()/
s/intel_ring_init_seqno()/intel_engine_init_seqno()/
s/ring_stuck()/engine_stuck()/
s/intel_cleanup_engine()/intel_engine_cleanup()/
s/intel_stop_engine()/intel_engine_stop()/
s/intel_pin_and_map_ringbuffer_obj()/intel_pin_and_map_ring()/
s/intel_unpin_ringbuffer()/intel_unpin_ring()/
s/intel_engine_create_ringbuffer()/intel_engine_create_ring()/
s/intel_ring_flush_all_caches()/intel_engine_flush_all_caches()/
s/intel_ring_invalidate_all_caches()/intel_engine_invalidate_all_caches()/
s/intel_ringbuffer_free()/intel_ring_free()/
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

It appears that we never told Pineview it has a RENDER_RING. This was
all fine until we started using the ring_mask for determining all the
available rings to initialise for legacy ringbuffer submission in commit
88d2ba2e ("drm/i915: Unify engine init loop"). Though really it is a
latent bug since the ring_mask inception in commit 73ae478c
("drm/i915: Replace has_bsd/blt/vebox with a mask").

To prevent similar mishaps in future, add a WARN_ON() if we find
ourselves with a device without any rings.

Fixes: 73ae478c ("drm/i915: Replace has_bsd/blt/vebox with a mask")
Fixes: 88d2ba2e ("drm/i915: Unify engine init loop")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469749535-2382-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org

When we refer to intel_engine_cs, we want to use engine so as not to
confuse ourselves about ringbuffers.

v2: Rename all the functions as well, as well as a few more stray comments.
v3: Split the really long error message strings
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469606850-28659-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

dma-buf provides a generic fence class for interoperation between
drivers. Internally we use the request structure as a fence, and so with
only a little bit of interfacing we can rebase those requests on top of
dma-buf fences. This will allow us, in the future, to pass those fences
back to userspace or between drivers.

v2: The fence_context needs to be globally unique, not just unique to
this device.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469002875-2335-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Created two common helpers for engine setup and engine init phases
respectively to help with code sharing.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1468422221-12132-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris-wilson.co.uk>

Common code deserves to be put in a separate file from legacy and
execlists implementation for clarity and ease of maintenance.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris-wilson.co.uk>