1. 14 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  2. 07 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 05 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 04 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 02 7月, 2016 4 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Move the get/put irq locking into the caller · 31bb59cc
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      With only a single callsite for intel_engine_cs->irq_get and ->irq_put,
      we can reduce the code size by moving the common preamble into the
      caller, and we can also eliminate the reference counting.
      
      For completeness, as we are no longer doing reference counting on irq,
      rename the get/put vfunctions to enable/disable respectively and are
      able to review the use of posting reads. We only require the
      serialisation with hardware when enabling the interrupt (i.e. so we
      cannot miss an interrupt by going to sleep before the hardware truly
      enables it).
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-18-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      31bb59cc
    • C
      drm/i915: Refactor scratch object allocation for gen2 w/a buffer · 7d5ea807
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      The gen2 w/a buffer is stuffed into the same slot as the gen5+ scratch
      buffer. If we pass in the size we want to allocate for the scratch
      buffer, both callers can use the same routine.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-11-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      7d5ea807
    • C
      drm/i915: Use HWS for seqno tracking everywhere · 1b7744e7
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      By using the same address for storing the HWS on every platform, we can
      remove the platform specific vfuncs and reduce the get-seqno routine to
      a single read of a cached memory location.
      
      v2: Fix semaphore_passed() to look at the signaling engine (not the
      waiter's)
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-8-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      1b7744e7
    • C
      drm/i915: Slaughter the thundering i915_wait_request herd · 688e6c72
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      One particularly stressful scenario consists of many independent tasks
      all competing for GPU time and waiting upon the results (e.g. realtime
      transcoding of many, many streams). One bottleneck in particular is that
      each client waits on its own results, but every client is woken up after
      every batchbuffer - hence the thunder of hooves as then every client must
      do its heavyweight dance to read a coherent seqno to see if it is the
      lucky one.
      
      Ideally, we only want one client to wake up after the interrupt and
      check its request for completion. Since the requests must retire in
      order, we can select the first client on the oldest request to be woken.
      Once that client has completed his wait, we can then wake up the
      next client and so on. However, all clients then incur latency as every
      process in the chain may be delayed for scheduling - this may also then
      cause some priority inversion. To reduce the latency, when a client
      is added or removed from the list, we scan the tree for completed
      seqno and wake up all the completed waiters in parallel.
      
      Using igt/benchmarks/gem_latency, we can demonstrate this effect. The
      benchmark measures the number of GPU cycles between completion of a
      batch and the client waking up from a call to wait-ioctl. With many
      concurrent waiters, with each on a different request, we observe that
      the wakeup latency before the patch scales nearly linearly with the
      number of waiters (before external factors kick in making the scaling much
      worse). After applying the patch, we can see that only the single waiter
      for the request is being woken up, providing a constant wakeup latency
      for every operation. However, the situation is not quite as rosy for
      many waiters on the same request, though to the best of my knowledge this
      is much less likely in practice. Here, we can observe that the
      concurrent waiters incur extra latency from being woken up by the
      solitary bottom-half, rather than directly by the interrupt. This
      appears to be scheduler induced (having discounted adverse effects from
      having a rbtree walk/erase in the wakeup path), each additional
      wake_up_process() costs approximately 1us on big core. Another effect of
      performing the secondary wakeups from the first bottom-half is the
      incurred delay this imposes on high priority threads - rather than
      immediately returning to userspace and leaving the interrupt handler to
      wake the others.
      
      To offset the delay incurred with additional waiters on a request, we
      could use a hybrid scheme that did a quick read in the interrupt handler
      and dequeued all the completed waiters (incurring the overhead in the
      interrupt handler, not the best plan either as we then incur GPU
      submission latency) but we would still have to wake up the bottom-half
      every time to do the heavyweight slow read. Or we could only kick the
      waiters on the seqno with the same priority as the current task (i.e. in
      the realtime waiter scenario, only it is woken up immediately by the
      interrupt and simply queues the next waiter before returning to userspace,
      minimising its delay at the expense of the chain, and also reducing
      contention on its scheduler runqueue). This is effective at avoid long
      pauses in the interrupt handler and at avoiding the extra latency in
      realtime/high-priority waiters.
      
      v2: Convert from a kworker per engine into a dedicated kthread for the
      bottom-half.
      v3: Rename request members and tweak comments.
      v4: Use a per-engine spinlock in the breadcrumbs bottom-half.
      v5: Fix race in locklessly checking waiter status and kicking the task on
      adding a new waiter.
      v6: Fix deciding when to force the timer to hide missing interrupts.
      v7: Move the bottom-half from the kthread to the first client process.
      v8: Reword a few comments
      v9: Break the busy loop when the interrupt is unmasked or has fired.
      v10: Comments, unnecessary churn, better debugging from Tvrtko
      v11: Wake all completed waiters on removing the current bottom-half to
      reduce the latency of waking up a herd of clients all waiting on the
      same request.
      v12: Rearrange missed-interrupt fault injection so that it works with
      igt/drv_missed_irq_hang
      v13: Rename intel_breadcrumb and friends to intel_wait in preparation
      for signal handling.
      v14: RCU commentary, assert_spin_locked
      v15: Hide BUG_ON behind the compiler; report on gem_latency findings.
      v16: Sort seqno-groups by priority so that first-waiter has the highest
      task priority (and so avoid priority inversion).
      v17: Add waiters to post-mortem GPU hang state.
      v18: Return early for a completed wait after acquiring the spinlock.
      Avoids adding ourselves to the tree if the is already complete, and
      skips the awkward question of why we don't do completion wakeups for
      waits earlier than or equal to ourselves.
      v19: Prepare for init_breadcrumbs to fail. Later patches may want to
      allocate during init, so be prepared to propagate back the error code.
      
      Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit
      Testcase: igt/benchmarks/gem_latency
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: "Rogozhkin, Dmitry V" <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
      Cc: "Gong, Zhipeng" <zhipeng.gong@intel.com>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
      Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> #v18
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467390209-3576-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      688e6c72
  6. 30 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 24 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      drm/i915: Small compaction of the engine init code · a19d6ff2
      Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
      Effectively removes one layer of indirection between the mask of
      possible engines and the engine constructors. Instead of spelling
      out in code the mapping of HAS_<engine> to constructors, makes
      more use of the recently added data driven approach by putting
      engine constructor vfuncs into the table as well.
      
      Effect is fewer lines of source and smaller binary.
      
      At the same time simplify the error handling since engine
      destructors can run on unitialized engines anyway.
      
      Similar approach could be done for legacy submission is wanted.
      
      v2: Removed ugly BUILD_BUG_ONs in favour of newly introduced
          ENGINE_MASK and HAS_ENGINE macros.
          Also removed the forward declarations by shuffling functions
          around.
      
      v3: Warn when logical_rings table does not contain enough data
          and disable the engines which could not be initialized.
          (Chris Wilson)
      
      v4: Chris Wilson suggested a nicer engine init loop.
      Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466689961-23232-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
      a19d6ff2
  8. 18 6月, 2016 4 次提交
  9. 08 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  10. 06 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 01 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · e42aeef1
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This reverts the following patches:
      
      d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
      15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
      95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
      03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
      2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
      ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
      2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
      b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
      8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
      143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
      84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
      6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
      aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
      afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      
      "drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
      split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
      the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.
      
      "drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
      updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
      caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
      have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.
      
      Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
      came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
      removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
      Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(
      
      There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
      serious.
      
      Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
      since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
      breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
      (especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
      hard to revert things cleanly.
      
      Lessons learned:
      - Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
        the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.
      
      - Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
        patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
        mix up different things in one patch.
      
      - Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
        doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
        tricky core code.
      
      - Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
        bisect breakage is not a good idea.
      
      - I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
        postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
        there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
        have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.
      
      (cherry picked from commit 5a21b665
      from drm-intel-next-queeud)
      
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      e42aeef1
  12. 25 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · 5a21b665
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This reverts the following patches:
      
      d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
      15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
      95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
      03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
      2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
      ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
      2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
      b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
      8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
      143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
      84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
      6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
      aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
      afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      
      "drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
      split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
      the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.
      
      "drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
      updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
      caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
      have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.
      
      Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
      came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
      removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
      Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(
      
      There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
      serious.
      
      Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
      since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
      breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
      (especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
      hard to revert things cleanly.
      
      Lessons learned:
      - Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
        the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.
      
      - Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
        patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
        mix up different things in one patch.
      
      - Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
        doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
        tricky core code.
      
      - Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
        bisect breakage is not a good idea.
      
      - I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
        postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
        there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
        have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.
      
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      5a21b665
  13. 24 5月, 2016 3 次提交
  14. 23 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  15. 19 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 09 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  17. 29 4月, 2016 3 次提交
  18. 28 4月, 2016 6 次提交