- 05 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
We already do these checks in the generic code. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently Q_XQUOTASYNC calls into the quota_sync method, but XFS does something entirely different in it than the rest of the filesystems. xfs_quota which calls Q_XQUOTASYNC expects an asynchronous data writeout to flush delayed allocations, while the "VFS" quota support wants to flush changes to the quota file. So make Q_XQUOTASYNC call into the writeback code directly and make the quota_sync method optional as XFS doesn't need in the sense expected by the rest of the quota code. GFS2 was using limited XFS-style quota and has a quota_sync method fitting neither the style used by vfs_quota_sync nor xfs_fs_quota_sync. I left it in for now as per discussion with Steve it expects to be called from the sync path this way. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 30 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ryota Yamauchi 提交于
The xfs_quota returns ENOSYS when remove command is executed. Reproducable with following steps. # mount -t xfs -o uquota /dev/sda7 /mnt/mp1 # xfs_quota -x -c off -c remove XFS_QUOTARM: Function not implemented. The remove command is allowed during quotaoff, but xfs_fs_set_xstate() checks whether quota is running, and it leads to ENOSYS. To solve this problem, add a check for X_QUOTARM. Signed-off-by: NRyota Yamauchi <r-yamauchi@vf.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NUtako Kusaka <u-kusaka@wm.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
xfs_sync_inodes is used to write back either file data or inode metadata. In general we always do these separately, except for one fishy case in xfs_fs_put_super that does both. So separate xfs_sync_inodes into separate xfs_sync_data and xfs_sync_attr functions. In xfs_fs_put_super we first call the data sync and then the attr sync as that was the previous order. The moved log force in that path doesn't make a difference because we will force the log again as part of the real unmount process. The filesystem readonly checks are not performed by the new function but instead moved into the callers, given that most callers alredy have it further up in the stack. Also add debug checks that we do not pass in incorrect flags in the new xfs_sync_data and xfs_sync_attr function and fix the one place that did pass in a wrong flag. Also remove a comment mentioning xfs_sync_inodes that has been incorrect for a while because we always take either the iolock or ilock in the sync path these days. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
-
- 09 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Currently we call from the nicely abstracted linux quotaops into a ugly multiplexer just to split the calls out at the same boundary again. Rewrite the quota ops handling to remove that obfucation. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-