1. 15 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 14 5月, 2008 6 次提交
  3. 13 5月, 2008 16 次提交
  4. 12 5月, 2008 2 次提交
  5. 09 5月, 2008 4 次提交
  6. 08 5月, 2008 7 次提交
    • B
      net: Added ASSERT_RTNL() to dev_open() and dev_close(). · e46b66bc
      Ben Hutchings 提交于
      dev_open() and dev_close() must be called holding the RTNL, since they
      call device functions and netdevice notifiers that are promised the RTNL.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e46b66bc
    • O
      can: Fix can_send() handling on dev_queue_xmit() failures · c2ab7ac2
      Oliver Hartkopp 提交于
      The tx packet counting and the local loopback of CAN frames should
      only happen in the case that the CAN frame has been enqueued to the
      netdevice tx queue successfully.
      
      Thanks to Andre Naujoks <nautsch@gmail.com> for reporting this issue.
      Signed-off-by: NOliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
      Signed-off-by: NUrs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c2ab7ac2
    • P
      netns: Fix arbitrary net_device-s corruptions on net_ns stop. · aca51397
      Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
      When a net namespace is destroyed, some devices (those, not killed
      on ns stop explicitly) are moved back to init_net.
      
      The problem, is that this net_ns change has one point of failure -
      the __dev_alloc_name() may be called if a name collision occurs (and
      this is easy to trigger). This allocator performs a likely-to-fail
      GFP_ATOMIC allocation to find a suitable number. Other possible 
      conditions that may cause error (for device being ns local or not
      registered) are always false in this case.
      
      So, when this call fails, the device is unregistered. But this is
      *not* the right thing to do, since after this the device may be
      released (and kfree-ed) improperly. E. g. bridges require more
      actions (sysfs update, timer disarming, etc.), some other devices 
      want to remove their private areas from lists, etc.
      
      I. e. arbitrary use-after-free cases may occur.
      
      The proposed fix is the following: since the only reason for the
      dev_change_net_namespace to fail is the name generation, we may
      give it a unique fall-back name w/o %d-s in it - the dev<ifindex>
      one, since ifindexes are still unique.
      
      So make this change, raise the failure-case printk loglevel to 
      EMERG and replace the unregister_netdevice call with BUG().
      
      [ Use snprintf() -DaveM ]
      Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      aca51397
    • P
      netfilter: Kconfig: default DCCP/SCTP conntrack support to the protocol config values · f3261aff
      Patrick McHardy 提交于
      When conntrack and DCCP/SCTP protocols are enabled, chances are good
      that people also want DCCP/SCTP conntrack and NAT support.
      Signed-off-by: NPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f3261aff
    • P
      netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: restrict RTP expect flushing on error to last request · ef75d49f
      Patrick McHardy 提交于
      Some Inovaphone PBXs exhibit very stange behaviour: when dialing for
      example "123", the device sends INVITE requests for "1", "12" and
      "123" back to back.  The first requests will elicit error responses
      from the receiver, causing the SIP helper to flush the RTP
      expectations even though we might still see a positive response.
      
      Note the sequence number of the last INVITE request that contained a
      media description and only flush the expectations when receiving a
      negative response for that sequence number.
      Signed-off-by: NPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ef75d49f
    • J
      net/ipv4: correct RFC 1122 section reference in comment · c67fa027
      J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) 提交于
      RFC 1122 does not have a section 3.1.2.2. The requirement to silently
      discard datagrams with a bad checksum is in section 3.2.1.2 instead.
      
      Addresses http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10611Signed-off-by: NJ.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <jdassen@debian.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c67fa027
    • I
      tcp FRTO: SACK variant is errorneously used with NewReno · 62ab2227
      Ilpo Järvinen 提交于
      Note: there's actually another bug in FRTO's SACK variant, which
      is the causing failure in NewReno case because of the error
      that's fixed here. I'll fix the SACK case separately (it's
      a separate bug really, though related, but in order to fix that
      I need to audit tp->snd_nxt usage a bit).
      
      There were two places where SACK variant of FRTO is getting
      incorrectly used even if SACK wasn't negotiated by the TCP flow.
      This leads to incorrect setting of frto_highmark with NewReno
      if a previous recovery was interrupted by another RTO.
      
      An eventual fallback to conventional recovery then incorrectly
      considers one or couple of segments as forward transmissions
      though they weren't, which then are not LOST marked during
      fallback making them "non-retransmittable" until the next RTO.
      In a bad case, those segments are really lost and are the only
      one left in the window. Thus TCP needs another RTO to continue.
      The next FRTO, however, could again repeat the same events
      making the progress of the TCP flow extremely slow.
      
      In order for these events to occur at all, FRTO must occur
      again in FRTOs step 3 while the key segments must be lost as
      well, which is not too likely in practice. It seems to most
      frequently with some small devices such as network printers
      that *seem* to accept TCP segments only in-order. In cases
      were key segments weren't lost, things get automatically
      resolved because those wrongly marked segments don't need to be
      retransmitted in order to continue.
      
      I found a reproducer after digging up relevant reports (few
      reports in total, none at netdev or lkml I know of), some
      cases seemed to indicate middlebox issues which seems now
      to be a false assumption some people had made. Bugzilla
      #10063 _might_ be related. Damon L. Chesser <damon@damtek.com>
      had a reproducable case and was kind enough to tcpdump it
      for me. With the tcpdump log it was quite trivial to figure
      out.
      Signed-off-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      62ab2227
  7. 06 5月, 2008 3 次提交
  8. 05 5月, 2008 1 次提交