- 25 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. pmd_alloc_one allocate PMD_ORDER which is 1. This means that this flag has never been actually useful here because it has always been used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-10-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
This is the third version of the patchset previously sent [1]. I have basically only rebased it on top of 4.7-rc1 tree and dropped "dm: get rid of superfluous gfp flags" which went through dm tree. I am sending it now because it is tree wide and chances for conflicts are reduced considerably when we want to target rc2. I plan to send the next step and rename the flag and move to a better semantic later during this release cycle so we will have a new semantic ready for 4.8 merge window hopefully. Motivation: While working on something unrelated I've checked the current usage of __GFP_REPEAT in the tree. It seems that a majority of the usage is and always has been bogus because __GFP_REPEAT has always been about costly high order allocations while we are using it for order-0 or very small orders very often. It seems that a big pile of them is just a copy&paste when a code has been adopted from one arch to another. I think it makes some sense to get rid of them because they are just making the semantic more unclear. Please note that GFP_REPEAT is documented as * __GFP_REPEAT: Try hard to allocate the memory, but the allocation attempt * _might_ fail. This depends upon the particular VM implementation. while !costly requests have basically nofail semantic. So one could reasonably expect that order-0 request with __GFP_REPEAT will not loop for ever. This is not implemented right now though. I would like to move on with __GFP_REPEAT and define a better semantic for it. $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT origin/master | wc -l 111 $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT | wc -l 36 So we are down to the third after this patch series. The remaining places really seem to be relying on __GFP_REPEAT due to large allocation requests. This still needs some double checking which I will do later after all the simple ones are sorted out. I am touching a lot of arch specific code here and I hope I got it right but as a matter of fact I even didn't compile test for some archs as I do not have cross compiler for them. Patches should be quite trivial to review for stupid compile mistakes though. The tricky parts are usually hidden by macro definitions and thats where I would appreciate help from arch maintainers. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461849846-27209-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org This patch (of 19): __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations. Yet we have the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0 allocations. This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is explicitly documented to allow allocation failures which is a weaker semantic than the current order-0 has (basically nofail). Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places. This would allow to identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and formulate a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do actually. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile] Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helge Deller 提交于
The first pmd entry is marked with PxD_FLAG_ATTACHED instead of _PAGE_GATEWAY. Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
-
- 19 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christophe Jaillet 提交于
Commit 0e0da48d ("parisc: mm: don't count preallocated pmds") introduced a memory leak. After this commit, the 'return' statement in pmd_free is executed in all cases. Even for pmd that are not attached to the pgd. So 'free_pages' can never be called anymore, leading to a memory leak. Signed-off-by: NChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Acked-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.0+ Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
-
- 22 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guenter Roeck 提交于
The following warning is seen when compiling parisc images ./arch/parisc/include/asm/pgalloc.h: In function 'pgd_alloc': ./arch/parisc/include/asm/pgalloc.h:29:5: warning: "PT_NLEVELS" is not defined Some definitions of PT_NLEVELS were missed with the conversion to CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS. Fixes: f24ffde4 ("parisc: expose number of page table levels on Kconfig level") Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
-
- 15 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
We would want to use number of page table level to define mm_struct. Let's expose it as CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS. Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Tested-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 23 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Helge Deller 提交于
Make the code which sets up the pmd depend on PT_NLEVELS == 3, not on CONFIG_64BIT. The reason is, that a 64bit kernel with a page size greater than 4k doesn't need the pmd and thus has PT_NLEVELS = 2. Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
The patch dc6c9a35 that counts pmds allocated for a process introduced a bug on 64-bit PA-RISC kernels. The PA-RISC architecture preallocates one pmd with each pgd. This preallocated pmd can never be freed - pmd_free does nothing when it is called with this pmd. When the kernel attempts to free this preallocated pmd, it decreases the count of allocated pmds. The result is that the counter underflows and this error is reported. This patch fixes the bug by artifically incrementing the counter in pmd_free when the kernel tries to free the preallocated pmd. Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
-
- 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kyle McMartin 提交于
-
- 16 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kyle McMartin 提交于
Commit 2f569afd broke the compile rather spectacularly. Fix code errors. Signed-off-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
-
- 09 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
Background: I've implemented 1K/2K page tables for s390. These sub-page page tables are required to properly support the s390 virtualization instruction with KVM. The SIE instruction requires that the page tables have 256 page table entries (pte) followed by 256 page status table entries (pgste). The pgstes are only required if the process is using the SIE instruction. The pgstes are updated by the hardware and by the hypervisor for a number of reasons, one of them is dirty and reference bit tracking. To avoid wasting memory the standard pte table allocation should return 1K/2K (31/64 bit) and 2K/4K if the process is using SIE. Problem: Page size on s390 is 4K, page table size is 1K or 2K. That means the s390 version for pte_alloc_one cannot return a pointer to a struct page. Trouble is that with the CONFIG_HIGHPTE feature on x86 pte_alloc_one cannot return a pointer to a pte either, since that would require more than 32 bit for the return value of pte_alloc_one (and the pte * would not be accessible since its not kmapped). Solution: The only solution I found to this dilemma is a new typedef: a pgtable_t. For s390 pgtable_t will be a (pte *) - to be introduced with a later patch. For everybody else it will be a (struct page *). The additional problem with the initialization of the ptl lock and the NR_PAGETABLE accounting is solved with a constructor pgtable_page_ctor and a destructor pgtable_page_dtor. The page table allocation and free functions need to call these two whenever a page table page is allocated or freed. pmd_populate will get a pgtable_t instead of a struct page pointer. To get the pgtable_t back from a pmd entry that has been installed with pmd_populate a new function pmd_pgtable is added. It replaces the pmd_page call in free_pte_range and apply_to_pte_range. Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 06 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
(with Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>) The pgd/pud/pmd/pte page table allocation functions get a mm_struct pointer as first argument. The free functions do not get the mm_struct argument. This is 1) asymmetrical and 2) to do mm related page table allocations the mm argument is needed on the free function as well. [kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com: i386 fix] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-syle fixes] Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NKamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helge Deller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
-
- 23 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Helge Deller 提交于
Drop the unused do_check_pgt_cache routine from mm/init.c and its prototype in asm/pgalloc.h Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@parisc-linux.org> Signed-off-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-