1. 06 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 12 6月, 2009 6 次提交
    • C
      sysv: add ->sync_fs · ad43ffde
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Add a ->sync_fs method for data integrity syncs, and reimplement
      ->write_super ontop of it.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      ad43ffde
    • A
      05459ca8
    • C
      ->write_super lock_super pushdown · ebc1ac16
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Push down lock_super into ->write_super instances and remove it from the
      caller.
      
      Following filesystem don't need ->s_lock in ->write_super and are skipped:
      
       * bfs, nilfs2 - no other uses of s_lock and have internal locks in
      	->write_super
       * ext2 - uses BKL in ext2_write_super and has internal calls without s_lock
       * reiserfs - no other uses of s_lock as has reiserfs_write_lock (BKL) in
       	->write_super
       * xfs - no other uses of s_lock and uses internal lock (buffer lock on
      	superblock buffer) to serialize ->write_super.  Also xfs_fs_write_super
      	is superflous and will go away in the next merge window
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      ebc1ac16
    • A
      Push lock_super() into the ->remount_fs() of filesystems that care about it · bbd6851a
      Al Viro 提交于
      Note that since we can't run into contention between remount_fs and write_super
      (due to exclusion on s_umount), we have to care only about filesystems that
      touch lock_super() on their own.  Out of those ext3, ext4, hpfs, sysv and ufs
      do need it; fat doesn't since its ->remount_fs() only accesses assign-once
      data (basically, it's "we have no atime on directories and only have atime on
      files for vfat; force nodiratime and possibly noatime into *flags").
      
      [folded a build fix from hch]
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      bbd6851a
    • C
      push BKL down into ->put_super · 6cfd0148
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller.  A couple of
      filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of
      s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs,
      hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment.  Most
      of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually.
      Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area.
      
      [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are
      removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super()
      now]
      [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt]
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6cfd0148
    • C
      remove ->write_super call in generic_shutdown_super · 8c85e125
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      We just did a full fs writeout using sync_filesystem before, and if
      that's not enough for the filesystem it can perform it's own writeout
      in ->put_super, which many filesystems already do.
      
      Move a call to foofs_write_super into every foofs_put_super for now to
      guarantee identical behaviour until it's cleaned up by the individual
      filesystem maintainers.
      
      Exceptions:
      
       - affs already has identical copy & pasted code at the beginning of
         affs_put_super so no need to do it twice.
       - xfs does the right thing without it and I have changes pending for
         the xfs tree touching this are so I don't really need conflicts
         here..
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      8c85e125
  4. 03 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 01 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 08 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 17 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 20 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • P
      mm: Remove slab destructors from kmem_cache_create(). · 20c2df83
      Paul Mundt 提交于
      Slab destructors were no longer supported after Christoph's
      c59def9f change. They've been
      BUGs for both slab and slub, and slob never supported them
      either.
      
      This rips out support for the dtor pointer from kmem_cache_create()
      completely and fixes up every single callsite in the kernel (there were
      about 224, not including the slab allocator definitions themselves,
      or the documentation references).
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      20c2df83
  10. 17 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • C
      Remove SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR · a35afb83
      Christoph Lameter 提交于
      SLAB_CTOR_CONSTRUCTOR is always specified. No point in checking it.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      Cc: Steven French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
      Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
      Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
      Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
      Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
      Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
      Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz>
      Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a35afb83
  11. 08 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • C
      slab allocators: Remove SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL flag · 50953fe9
      Christoph Lameter 提交于
      I have never seen a use of SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL.  It is only supported by
      SLAB.
      
      I think its purpose was to have a callback after an object has been freed
      to verify that the state is the constructor state again?  The callback is
      performed before each freeing of an object.
      
      I would think that it is much easier to check the object state manually
      before the free.  That also places the check near the code object
      manipulation of the object.
      
      Also the SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL callback is only performed if the kernel was
      compiled with SLAB debugging on.  If there would be code in a constructor
      handling SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL then it would have to be conditional on
      SLAB_DEBUG otherwise it would just be dead code.  But there is no such code
      in the kernel.  I think SLUB_DEBUG_INITIAL is too problematic to make real
      use of, difficult to understand and there are easier ways to accomplish the
      same effect (i.e.  add debug code before kfree).
      
      There is a related flag SLAB_CTOR_VERIFY that is frequently checked to be
      clear in fs inode caches.  Remove the pointless checks (they would even be
      pointless without removeal of SLAB_DEBUG_INITIAL) from the fs constructors.
      
      This is the last slab flag that SLUB did not support.  Remove the check for
      unimplemented flags from SLUB.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      50953fe9
  12. 13 2月, 2007 2 次提交
  13. 08 12月, 2006 2 次提交
  14. 27 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  16. 24 3月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] cpuset memory spread: slab cache filesystems · 4b6a9316
      Paul Jackson 提交于
      Mark file system inode and similar slab caches subject to SLAB_MEM_SPREAD
      memory spreading.
      
      If a slab cache is marked SLAB_MEM_SPREAD, then anytime that a task that's
      in a cpuset with the 'memory_spread_slab' option enabled goes to allocate
      from such a slab cache, the allocations are spread evenly over all the
      memory nodes (task->mems_allowed) allowed to that task, instead of favoring
      allocation on the node local to the current cpu.
      
      The following inode and similar caches are marked SLAB_MEM_SPREAD:
      
          file                               cache
          ====                               =====
          fs/adfs/super.c                    adfs_inode_cache
          fs/affs/super.c                    affs_inode_cache
          fs/befs/linuxvfs.c                 befs_inode_cache
          fs/bfs/inode.c                     bfs_inode_cache
          fs/block_dev.c                     bdev_cache
          fs/cifs/cifsfs.c                   cifs_inode_cache
          fs/coda/inode.c                    coda_inode_cache
          fs/dquot.c                         dquot
          fs/efs/super.c                     efs_inode_cache
          fs/ext2/super.c                    ext2_inode_cache
          fs/ext2/xattr.c (fs/mbcache.c)     ext2_xattr
          fs/ext3/super.c                    ext3_inode_cache
          fs/ext3/xattr.c (fs/mbcache.c)     ext3_xattr
          fs/fat/cache.c                     fat_cache
          fs/fat/inode.c                     fat_inode_cache
          fs/freevxfs/vxfs_super.c           vxfs_inode
          fs/hpfs/super.c                    hpfs_inode_cache
          fs/isofs/inode.c                   isofs_inode_cache
          fs/jffs/inode-v23.c                jffs_fm
          fs/jffs2/super.c                   jffs2_i
          fs/jfs/super.c                     jfs_ip
          fs/minix/inode.c                   minix_inode_cache
          fs/ncpfs/inode.c                   ncp_inode_cache
          fs/nfs/direct.c                    nfs_direct_cache
          fs/nfs/inode.c                     nfs_inode_cache
          fs/ntfs/super.c                    ntfs_big_inode_cache_name
          fs/ntfs/super.c                    ntfs_inode_cache
          fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmfs.c               dlmfs_inode_cache
          fs/ocfs2/super.c                   ocfs2_inode_cache
          fs/proc/inode.c                    proc_inode_cache
          fs/qnx4/inode.c                    qnx4_inode_cache
          fs/reiserfs/super.c                reiser_inode_cache
          fs/romfs/inode.c                   romfs_inode_cache
          fs/smbfs/inode.c                   smb_inode_cache
          fs/sysv/inode.c                    sysv_inode_cache
          fs/udf/super.c                     udf_inode_cache
          fs/ufs/super.c                     ufs_inode_cache
          net/socket.c                       sock_inode_cache
          net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c              rpc_inode_cache
      
      The choice of which slab caches to so mark was quite simple.  I marked
      those already marked SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, except for fs/xfs, dentry_cache,
      inode_cache, and buffer_head, which were marked in a previous patch.  Even
      though SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT is for a different purpose, it marks the same
      potentially large file system i/o related slab caches as we need for memory
      spreading.
      
      Given that the rule now becomes "wherever you would have used a
      SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT slab cache flag before (usually the inode cache), use
      the SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag too", this should be easy enough to maintain.
      Future file system writers will just copy one of the existing file system
      slab cache setups and tend to get it right without thinking.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4b6a9316
  17. 10 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  18. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4