1. 15 11月, 2016 2 次提交
  2. 18 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • B
      remoteproc: Introduce auto-boot flag · ddf71187
      Bjorn Andersson 提交于
      Introduce an "auto-boot" flag on rprocs to make it possible to flag
      remote processors without vdevs to automatically boot once the firmware
      is found.
      
      Preserve previous behavior of the wkup_m3 processor being explicitly
      booted by a consumer.
      
      Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
      Cc: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
      Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
      ddf71187
  3. 13 8月, 2016 2 次提交
  4. 07 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 13 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 09 12月, 2014 4 次提交
  7. 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 07 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 11 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 29 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 28 9月, 2012 2 次提交
  12. 06 7月, 2012 2 次提交
    • O
      remoteproc: remove the now-redundant kref · 7183a2a7
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Now that every rproc instance contains a device, we don't need a
      kref anymore to maintain the refcount of the rproc instances:
      that's what device are good with!
      
      This patch removes the now-redundant kref, and switches to
      {get, put}_device instead of kref_{get, put}.
      
      We also don't need the kref's release function anymore, and instead,
      we just utilize the class's release handler (which is now responsible
      for all memory de-allocations).
      
      Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      7183a2a7
    • O
      remoteproc: maintain a generic child device for each rproc · b5ab5e24
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      For each registered rproc, maintain a generic remoteproc device whose
      parent is the low level platform-specific device (commonly a pdev, but
      it may certainly be any other type of device too).
      
      With this in hand, the resulting device hierarchy might then look like:
      
      omap-rproc.0
       |
       - remoteproc0  <---- new !
          |
          - virtio0
          |
          - virtio1
             |
             - rpmsg0
             |
             - rpmsg1
             |
             - rpmsg2
      
      Where:
      - omap-rproc.0 is the low level device that's bound to the
        driver which invokes rproc_register()
      - remoteproc0 is the result of this patch, and will be added by the
        remoteproc framework when rproc_register() is invoked
      - virtio0 and virtio1 are vdevs that are registered by remoteproc
        when it realizes that they are supported by the firmware
        of the physical remote processor represented by omap-rproc.0
      - rpmsg0, rpmsg1 and rpmsg2 are rpmsg devices that represent rpmsg
        channels, and are registerd by the rpmsg bus when it gets notified
        about their existence
      
      Technically, this patch:
      - changes 'struct rproc' to contain this generic remoteproc.x device
      - creates a new "remoteproc" type, to which this new generic remoteproc.x
        device belong to.
      - adds a super simple enumeration method for the indices of the
        remoteproc.x devices
      - updates all dev_* messaging to use the generic remoteproc.x device
        instead of the low level platform-specific device
      - updates all dma_* allocations to use the parent of remoteproc.x (where
        the platform-specific memory pools, most commonly CMA, are to be found)
      
      Adding this generic device has several merits:
      - we can now add remoteproc runtime PM support simply by hooking onto the
        new "remoteproc" type
      - all remoteproc log messages will now carry a common name prefix
        instead of having a platform-specific one
      - having a device as part of the rproc struct makes it possible to simplify
        refcounting (see subsequent patch)
      
      Thanks to Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> for suggesting and
      discussing these ideas in one of the remoteproc review threads and
      to Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com> for trying them out
      with the (upcoming) runtime PM support for remoteproc.
      
      Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
      Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      b5ab5e24
  13. 04 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      remoteproc: allocate vrings on demand, free when not needed · 6db20ea8
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Dynamically allocate the vrings' DMA when the remote processor
      is about to be powered on (i.e. when ->find_vqs() is invoked),
      and release them as soon as it is powered off (i.e. when ->del_vqs()
      is invoked).
      
      The obvious and immediate benefit is better memory utilization, since
      memory for the vrings is now only allocated when the relevant remote
      processor is used.
      
      Additionally, this approach also makes recovery of a (crashing)
      remote processor easier: one just needs to remove the relevant
      vdevs, and the entire vrings cleanup takes place automagically.
      Tested-by: NFernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      6db20ea8
  14. 07 3月, 2012 4 次提交
    • O
      remoteproc: remove the hardcoded vring alignment · 63140e0e
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Remove the hardcoded vring alignment of 4096 bytes,
      and instead utilize tha vring alignment as specified in
      the resource table.
      
      This is needed for remote processors that have rigid
      memory requirement, and which have found the alignment of
      4096 bytes to be excessively big.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
      Cc: Iliyan Malchev <malchev@google.com>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
      Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
      Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
      Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
      Cc: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
      Cc: Guzman Lugo Fernando <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
      Cc: Anna Suman <s-anna@ti.com>
      Cc: Clark Rob <rob@ti.com>
      Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@gmail.com>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      63140e0e
    • O
      remoteproc: remove the single rpmsg vdev limitation · 7a186941
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Now that the resource table supports publishing a virtio device
      in a single resource entry, firmware images can start supporting
      more than a single vdev.
      
      This patch removes the single vdev limitation of the remoteproc
      framework so multi-vdev firmwares can be leveraged: VDEV resource
      entries are parsed when the rproc is registered, and as a result
      their vrings are set up and the virtio devices are registered
      (and they go away when the rproc goes away).
      
      Moreover, we no longer only support VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG vdevs; any
      virtio device type goes now. As a result, there's no more any
      rpmsg-specific APIs or code in remoteproc: it all becomes generic
      virtio handling.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
      Cc: Iliyan Malchev <malchev@google.com>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
      Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
      Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
      Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
      Cc: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
      Cc: Guzman Lugo Fernando <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
      Cc: Anna Suman <s-anna@ti.com>
      Cc: Clark Rob <rob@ti.com>
      Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@gmail.com>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      7a186941
    • O
      remoteproc: safer boot/shutdown order · 41a6ee09
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Boot the remote processor only after setting up the virtqueues,
      and shut it down before deleting them.
      
      Remote processors should obey virtio status changes, and
      therefore not manipulate/trigger the virtqueues while the virtio
      driver isn't ready, but it's just safer not to rely on that
      (plus a vq access might already be inflight while a vdev
      status is changed).
      
      We also don't have yet status change notifications, but that's
      a temporary limitation.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
      Cc: Iliyan Malchev <malchev@google.com>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
      Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
      Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
      Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
      Cc: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
      Cc: Guzman Lugo Fernando <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
      Cc: Anna Suman <s-anna@ti.com>
      Cc: Clark Rob <rob@ti.com>
      Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@gmail.com>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      41a6ee09
    • O
      remoteproc: remoteproc_rpmsg -> remoteproc_virtio · 04a9016e
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      At this point remoteproc can only register a single VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG virtio
      device.
      
      This limitation is going away soon: remoteproc is getting support for
      registering any number of virtio devices and of any type (as
      published by the firmware of the remote processor).
      
      Rename remoteproc_rpmsg.c to remoteproc_virtio.c in preparation of
      this generalization work.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
      Cc: Iliyan Malchev <malchev@google.com>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
      Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com>
      Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>
      Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
      Cc: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com>
      Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
      Cc: Guzman Lugo Fernando <fernando.lugo@ti.com>
      Cc: Anna Suman <s-anna@ti.com>
      Cc: Clark Rob <rob@ti.com>
      Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@gmail.com>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      04a9016e
  15. 23 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      remoteproc: don't use virtio's weak barriers · dd6da1c5
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      When creating a virtqueue for rpmsg, tell virtio we're not interested
      in "weak" smp barriers, since we're talking to a real device.
      
      On ARM, this means using a DSB instead of a DMB, which is needed
      for platforms that kick the remote processor using some kind of
      a mailbox device mapped to Device memory (otherwise the kick can
      jump ahead and wake the remote processor before it has observed
      the changes to the vrings).
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      dd6da1c5
  16. 09 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      remoteproc: create rpmsg virtio device · ac8954a4
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Create an rpmsg virtio device to allow message-based communication
      with the remote processor (but only if supported by its firmware).
      
      There are several advantages to provide this functionality at
      the remoteproc-level:
      - to support it, platforms only have to provide their own ->kick()
        handler; no need to duplicate the rest of the code.
      - the virtio device is created only when the remote processor is
        registered and ready to go. No need to depend on initcall magic.
        moreover, we only add the virtio device if the firmware really
        supports it, and only after we know the supported virtio device features.
      - correct device model hierarchy can be set, and that is useful
        for natural power management and DMA API behavior.
      - when the remote processor crashes (or removed) we only need
        to remove the virtio device, and the driver core will take care of
        the rest. No need to implement any out-of-bound notifiers.
      - we can now easily bind the virtio device to its rproc handle, and
        this way we don't need any name-based remoteproc ->get() API.
      
      Currently we only support creating a single rpmsg virtio device per
      remote processor, but later this is going to be extended to support
      creating numerous virtio devices of other types too (block, net,
      console...).
      
      Designed with Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      ac8954a4