RCU contains code of the following forms:

	ACCESS_ONCE(x)++;
	ACCESS_ONCE(x) += y;
	ACCESS_ONCE(x) -= y;

Now these constructs do operate correctly, but they really result in a
pair of volatile accesses, one to do the load and another to do the store.
This can be confusing, as the casual reader might well assume that (for
example) gcc might generate a memory-to-memory add instruction for each
of these three cases.  In fact, gcc will do no such thing.  Also, there
is a good chance that the kernel will move to separate load and store
variants of ACCESS_ONCE(), and constructs like the above could easily
confuse both people and scripts attempting to make that sort of change.
Finally, most of RCU's read-modify-write uses of ACCESS_ONCE() really
only need the store to be volatile, so that the read-modify-write form
might be misleading.

This commit therefore changes the above forms in RCU so that each instance
of ACCESS_ONCE() either does a load or a store, but not both.  In a few
cases, ACCESS_ONCE() was not critical, for example, for maintaining
statisitics.  In these cases, ACCESS_ONCE() has been dispensed with
entirely.
Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Those two arrays are being passed to lockdep_init_map(), which expects
const char *, and are stored in lockdep_map the same way.

Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Commit ac1bea85 (Make cond_resched() report RCU quiescent states)
fixed a problem where a CPU looping in the kernel with but one runnable
task would give RCU CPU stall warnings, even if the in-kernel loop
contained cond_resched() calls.  Unfortunately, in so doing, it introduced
performance regressions in Anton Blanchard's will-it-scale "open1" test.
The problem appears to be not so much the increased cond_resched() path
length as an increase in the rate at which grace periods complete, which
increased per-update grace-period overhead.

This commit takes a different approach to fixing this bug, mainly by
moving the RCU-visible quiescent state from cond_resched() to
rcu_note_context_switch(), and by further reducing the check to a
simple non-zero test of a single per-CPU variable.  However, this
approach requires that the force-quiescent-state processing send
resched IPIs to the offending CPUs.  These will be sent only once
the grace period has reached an age specified by the boot/sysfs
parameter rcutree.jiffies_till_sched_qs, or once the grace period
reaches an age halfway to the point at which RCU CPU stall warnings
will be emitted, whichever comes first.
Reported-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
[ paulmck: Made rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() as suggested by the
  ktest build robot.  Also fixed smp_mb() comment as noted by
  Oleg Nesterov. ]

Merge with e552592e (Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU)
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The variable and struct both having the name "rcu_state" confuses
sparse in some situations, so this commit changes the variable to
"rcu_state_p" in order to avoid this confusion.  This also makes
things easier for human readers.
Signed-off-by: NUma Sharma <uma.sharma523@gmail.com>
[ paulmck: Changed the declaration and several additional uses. ]
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit allows rcutorture to print additional state for the
RCU grace-period kthreads in cases where RCU seems reluctant to
start a new grace period.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

The rcutorture output currently does not distinguish between stalls in
the RCU implementation and stalls in the rcu_torture_writer() kthreads.
This commit therefore adds some diagnostics to help distinguish between
these two conditions, at least for the non-SRCU implementations.  (SRCU
does not provide evidence of update-side forward progress by design.)
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

__this_cpu_ptr is being phased out.

One special case is increment_cpu_stall_ticks().
A per cpu variable is incremented so use raw_cpu_inc().

Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <pranith@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

This patch merges the function rcu_force_quiescent_state() with
rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state(), using the rcu_state pointer.  Firstly,
the rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state() function is deleted from the file
kernel/rcu/tree.c. Also, the rcu_force_quiescent_state() function that was
calling force_quiescent_state with the argument rcu_preempt_state pointer
was deleted as well.  The new function that combines the old ones uses
the rcu_state pointer and is located after rcu_batches_completed_bh()
in kernel/rcu/tree.c.
Signed-off-by: NAndreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

kfree_call_rcu is defined two times. When defined under CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU,
it uses rcu_preempt_state. Otherwise, it uses rcu_sched_state.
This patch uses the rcu_state_pointer to combine the two definitions into one.
The resulting function is placed after the closing of the preprocessor
conditional CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU.
Signed-off-by: NAndreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

This patch replaces NR_CPUS with nr_cpu_ids as NR_CPUS should
consider cpumask_var_t.
Signed-off-by: NHimangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

This patch adds event tracing to dyntick_save_progress_counter() in the case
where it returns 1. I used the tracepoint string "dti" because this function
returns 1 in case the CPU is in dynticks idle mode.
Signed-off-by: NAndreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

The rcu_start_gp_advanced() function currently uses irq_work_queue()
to defer wakeups of the RCU grace-period kthread.  This deferring
is necessary to avoid RCU-scheduler deadlocks involving the rcu_node
structure's lock, meaning that RCU cannot call any of the scheduler's
wake-up functions while holding one of these locks.

Unfortunately, the second and subsequent calls to irq_work_queue() are
ignored, and the first call will be ignored (aside from queuing the work
item) if the scheduler-clock tick is turned off.  This is OK for many
uses, especially those where irq_work_queue() is called from an interrupt
or softirq handler, because in those cases the scheduler-clock-tick state
will be re-evaluated, which will turn the scheduler-clock tick back on.
On the next tick, any deferred work will then be processed.

However, this strategy does not always work for RCU, which can be invoked
at process level from idle CPUs.  In this case, the tick might never
be turned back on, indefinitely defering a grace-period start request.
Note that the RCU CPU stall detector cannot see this condition, because
there is no RCU grace period in progress.  Therefore, we can (and do!)
see long tens-of-seconds stalls in grace-period handling.  In theory,
we could see a full grace-period hang, but rcutorture testing to date
has seen only the tens-of-seconds stalls.  Event tracing demonstrates
that irq_work_queue() is being called repeatedly to no effect during
these stalls: The "newreq" event appears repeatedly from a task that is
not one of the grace-period kthreads.

In theory, irq_work_queue() might be fixed to avoid this sort of issue,
but RCU's requirements are unusual and it is quite straightforward to pass
wake-up responsibility up through RCU's call chain, so that the wakeup
happens when the offending locks are released.

This commit therefore makes this change.  The rcu_start_gp_advanced(),
rcu_start_future_gp(), rcu_accelerate_cbs(), rcu_advance_cbs(),
__note_gp_changes(), and rcu_start_gp() functions now return a boolean
which indicates when a wake-up is needed.  A new rcu_gp_kthread_wake()
does the wakeup when it is necessary and safe to do so: No self-wakes,
no wake-ups if the ->gp_flags field indicates there is no need (as in
someone else did the wake-up before we got around to it), and no wake-ups
before the grace-period kthread has been created.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Some of the uses of the rcu_state structure's ->jiffies_stall field
do not use ACCESS_ONCE(), despite there being unprotected accesses.
This commit therefore uses the ACCESS_ONCE() macro to protect this field.
Signed-off-by: NIulia Manda <iulia.manda21@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

The ->preemptible field in rcu_data is only initialized in the function
rcu_init_percpu_data(), and never used.  This commit therefore removes
this field.
Signed-off-by: NIulia Manda <iulia.manda21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

In the old days, the only source of requests for future grace periods
was NOCB CPUs.  This has changed: CPUs routinely post requests for
future grace periods in order to promote power efficiency and reduce
OS jitter with minimal impact on grace-period latency.  This commit
therefore updates cpu_needs_another_gp() to invoke rcu_future_needs_gp()
instead of rcu_nocb_needs_gp().  The latter is no longer used, so is
now removed.  This commit also adds tracing for the irq_work_queue()
wakeup case.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

The print_other_cpu_stall() and print_cpu_stall() functions print
grace-period numbers using an unsigned format, which means that the number
one less than zero is a very large number.  This commit therefore causes
these numbers to be printed with a signed format in order to improve
readability of the RCU CPU stall-warning output.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

A number of ->gp_flags accesses don't have ACCESS_ONCE(), but all of
the can race against other loads or stores.  This commit therefore
applies ACCESS_ONCE() to the unprotected ->gp_flags accesses.
Reported-by: NAlexey Roytman <alexey.roytman@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Mostly scripted conversion of the smp_mb__* barriers.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-55dhyhocezdw1dg7u19hmh1u@git.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The following pattern is currently not well supported by RCU:

1.	Make data element inaccessible to RCU readers.

2.	Do work that probably lasts for more than one grace period.

3.	Do something to make sure RCU readers in flight before #1 above
	have completed.

Here are some things that could currently be done:

a.	Do a synchronize_rcu() unconditionally at either #1 or #3 above.
	This works, but imposes needless work and latency.

b.	Post an RCU callback at #1 above that does a wakeup, then
	wait for the wakeup at #3.  This works well, but likely results
	in an extra unneeded grace period.  Open-coding this is also
	a bit more semi-tricky code than would be good.

This commit therefore adds get_state_synchronize_rcu() and
cond_synchronize_rcu() APIs.  Call get_state_synchronize_rcu() at #1
above and pass its return value to cond_synchronize_rcu() at #3 above.
This results in a call to synchronize_rcu() if no grace period has
elapsed between #1 and #3, but requires only a load, comparison, and
memory barrier if a full grace period did elapse.
Requested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

The kbuild test bot uncovered an implicit dependence on the
trace header being present before rcu.h in ia64 allmodconfig
that looks like this:

In file included from kernel/ksysfs.c:22:0:
kernel/rcu/rcu.h: In function '__rcu_reclaim':
kernel/rcu/rcu.h:107:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_callback' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
kernel/rcu/rcu.h:112:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_rcu_invoke_callback' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Looking at other rcu.h users, we can find that they all
were sourcing the trace header in advance of rcu.h itself,
as seen in the context of this diff.  There were also some
inconsistencies as to whether it was or wasn't sourced based
on the parent tracing Kconfig.

Rather than "fix" it at each use site, and have inconsistent
use based on whether "#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE" was used or not,
lets just source the trace header just once, in the actual consumer
of it, which is rcu.h itself.  We include it unconditionally, as
build testing shows us that is a hard requirement for some files.
Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

If CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y, then rcu_needs_cpu() will always
return false, however, the current version nevertheless checks
for RCU callbacks.  This commit therefore creates a static inline
implementation of rcu_needs_cpu() that unconditionally returns false
when CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Because jiffies is one of a very few variables marked "volatile", there
is no need to use ACCESS_ONCE() when accessing it.  This commit therefore
removes the redundant ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers.

Reported by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

All of the RCU source files have the usual GPL header, which contains a
long-obsolete postal address for FSF.  To avoid the need to track the
FSF office's movements, this commit substitutes the URL where GPL may
be found.
Reported-by: NGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

The ->n_force_qs_lh field is accessed without the benefit of any
synchronization, so this commit adds the needed ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers.
Yes, increments to ->n_force_qs_lh can be lost, but contention should
be low and the field is strictly statistical in nature, so this is not
a problem.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

RCU must ensure that there is the equivalent of a full memory
barrier between any memory access preceding grace period and any
memory access following that same grace period, regardless of
which CPU(s) happen to execute the two memory accesses.
Therefore, downgrading UNLOCK+LOCK to no longer imply a full
memory barrier requires some adjustments to RCU.

This commit therefore adds smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()
invocations as needed after the RCU lock acquisitions that need
to be part of a full-memory-barrier UNLOCK+LOCK.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1386799151-2219-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Whenever a CPU receives a scheduling-clock interrupt, RCU checks to see
if the RCU core needs anything from this CPU.  If so, RCU raises
RCU_SOFTIRQ to carry out any needed processing.

This approach has worked well historically, but it is undesirable on
NO_HZ_FULL CPUs.  Such CPUs are expected to spend almost all of their time
in userspace, so that scheduling-clock interrupts can be disabled while
there is only one runnable task on the CPU in question.  Unfortunately,
raising any softirq has the potential to wake up ksoftirqd, which would
provide the second runnable task on that CPU, preventing disabling of
scheduling-clock interrupts.

What is needed instead is for RCU to leave NO_HZ_FULL CPUs alone,
relying on the grace-period kthreads' quiescent-state forcing to
do any needed RCU work on behalf of those CPUs.

This commit therefore refrains from raising RCU_SOFTIRQ on any
NO_HZ_FULL CPUs during any grace periods that have been in effect
for less than one second.  The one-second limit handles the case
where an inappropriate workload is running on a NO_HZ_FULL CPU
that features lots of scheduling-clock interrupts, but no idle
or userspace time.
Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
Toasted-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

Each element of the rcu_state structure's ->levelspread[] array
is intended to contain the per-level fanout, where the zero-th
element corresponds to the root of the rcu_node tree, and the last
element corresponds to the leaves.  In the CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT
case, this means that the last element should be filled in
from CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF (or from the rcu_fanout_leaf boot
parameter, if provided) and that the remaining elements should
be filled in from CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT.  Unfortunately, the current
code in rcu_init_levelspread() takes the opposite approach, placing
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF in the zero-th element and CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT in
the remaining elements.

For typical power-of-two values, this generates odd but functional
rcu_node trees.  However, other values, for example CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=3
and CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=2, generate trees that can leave some CPUs
out of the grace-period computation, resulting in too-short grace periods
and therefore a broken RCU implementation.

This commit therefore fixes rcu_init_levelspread() to set the last
->levelspread[] array element from CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF and the
remaining elements from CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, thus generating the
intended rcu_node trees.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This commit fixes the following coccinelle warning:

kernel/rcu/tree.c:712:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function
'rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online' with return type bool

Return statements in functions returning bool should use
 true/false instead of 1/0.
 Generated by: coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci
Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Some RCU bugs have been specific to the layout of the rcu_node tree,
but RCU will silently adjust the tree at boot time if appropriate.
This obscures valuable debugging information, so print a message when
this happens.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The current task-level idle entry/exit code forces an entry/exit on
each call, regardless of the nesting level.  This commit therefore
properly accounts for nesting.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

Dave Jones got the following lockdep splat:

>  ======================================================
>  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>  3.12.0-rc3+ #92 Not tainted
>  -------------------------------------------------------
>  trinity-child2/15191 is trying to acquire lock:
>   (&rdp->nocb_wq){......}, at: [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
>
> but task is already holding lock:
>   (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #3 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}:
>         [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
>         [<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
>         [<ffffffff811500ff>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x2df/0x5e0
>         [<ffffffff81091b83>] perf_event_task_sched_out+0x93/0xa0
>         [<ffffffff81732052>] __schedule+0x1d2/0xa20
>         [<ffffffff81732f30>] preempt_schedule_irq+0x50/0xb0
>         [<ffffffff817352b6>] retint_kernel+0x26/0x30
>         [<ffffffff813eed04>] tty_flip_buffer_push+0x34/0x50
>         [<ffffffff813f0504>] pty_write+0x54/0x60
>         [<ffffffff813e900d>] n_tty_write+0x32d/0x4e0
>         [<ffffffff813e5838>] tty_write+0x158/0x2d0
>         [<ffffffff811c4850>] vfs_write+0xc0/0x1f0
>         [<ffffffff811c52cc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0
>         [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
>
> -> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
>         [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
>         [<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
>         [<ffffffff810980b2>] wake_up_new_task+0xc2/0x2e0
>         [<ffffffff81054336>] do_fork+0x126/0x460
>         [<ffffffff81054696>] kernel_thread+0x26/0x30
>         [<ffffffff8171ff93>] rest_init+0x23/0x140
>         [<ffffffff81ee1e4b>] start_kernel+0x3f6/0x403
>         [<ffffffff81ee1571>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
>         [<ffffffff81ee1664>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf1/0xf4
>
> -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
>         [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
>         [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
>         [<ffffffff810979d1>] try_to_wake_up+0x31/0x350
>         [<ffffffff81097d62>] default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
>         [<ffffffff81084af8>] autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x40
>         [<ffffffff8108ea38>] __wake_up_common+0x58/0x90
>         [<ffffffff8108ff59>] __wake_up+0x39/0x50
>         [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
>         [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
>         [<ffffffff81111b8d>] call_rcu+0x1d/0x20
>         [<ffffffff81093697>] cpu_attach_domain+0x287/0x360
>         [<ffffffff81099d7e>] build_sched_domains+0xe5e/0x10a0
>         [<ffffffff81efa7fc>] sched_init_smp+0x3b7/0x47a
>         [<ffffffff81ee1f4e>] kernel_init_freeable+0xf6/0x202
>         [<ffffffff817200be>] kernel_init+0xe/0x190
>         [<ffffffff8173d22c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>
> -> #0 (&rdp->nocb_wq){......}:
>         [<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0
>         [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
>         [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
>         [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
>         [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
>         [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
>         [<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30
>         [<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70
>         [<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230
>         [<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0
>         [<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0
>         [<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
>         [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
>   &rdp->nocb_wq --> &rq->lock --> &ctx->lock
>
>   Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
>         CPU0                    CPU1
>         ----                    ----
>    lock(&ctx->lock);
>                                 lock(&rq->lock);
>                                 lock(&ctx->lock);
>    lock(&rdp->nocb_wq);
>
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by trinity-child2/15191:
>  #0:  (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 2 PID: 15191 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ #92
>  ffffffff82565b70 ffff880070c2dbf8 ffffffff8172a363 ffffffff824edf40
>  ffff880070c2dc38 ffffffff81726741 ffff880070c2dc90 ffff88022383b1c0
>  ffff88022383aac0 0000000000000000 ffff88022383b188 ffff88022383b1c0
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8172a363>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
>  [<ffffffff81726741>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20f
>  [<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0
>  [<ffffffff810c6439>] ? get_lock_stats+0x19/0x60
>  [<ffffffff8100b2f4>] ? native_sched_clock+0x24/0x80
>  [<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
>  [<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50
>  [<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
>  [<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50
>  [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
>  [<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
>  [<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
>  [<ffffffff8109bc8f>] ? local_clock+0x3f/0x50
>  [<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30
>  [<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70
>  [<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230
>  [<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0
>  [<ffffffff810c9af5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x115/0x1e0
>  [<ffffffff810c9bcd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
>  [<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0
>  [<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
>  [<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2

The underlying problem is that perf is invoking call_rcu() with the
scheduler locks held, but in NOCB mode, call_rcu() will with high
probability invoke the scheduler -- which just might want to use its
locks.  The reason that call_rcu() needs to invoke the scheduler is
to wake up the corresponding rcuo callback-offload kthread, which
does the job of starting up a grace period and invoking the callbacks
afterwards.

One solution (championed on a related problem by Lai Jiangshan) is to
simply defer the wakeup to some point where scheduler locks are no longer
held.  Since we don't want to unnecessarily incur the cost of such
deferral, the task before us is threefold:

1.	Determine when it is likely that a relevant scheduler lock is held.

2.	Defer the wakeup in such cases.

3.	Ensure that all deferred wakeups eventually happen, preferably
	sooner rather than later.

We use irqs_disabled_flags() as a proxy for relevant scheduler locks
being held.  This works because the relevant locks are always acquired
with interrupts disabled.  We may defer more often than needed, but that
is at least safe.

The wakeup deferral is tracked via a new field in the per-CPU and
per-RCU-flavor rcu_data structure, namely ->nocb_defer_wakeup.

This flag is checked by the RCU core processing.  The __rcu_pending()
function now checks this flag, which causes rcu_check_callbacks()
to initiate RCU core processing at each scheduling-clock interrupt
where this flag is set.  Of course this is not sufficient because
scheduling-clock interrupts are often turned off (the things we used to
be able to count on!).  So the flags are also checked on entry to any
state that RCU considers to be idle, which includes both NO_HZ_IDLE idle
state and NO_HZ_FULL user-mode-execution state.

This approach should allow call_rcu() to be invoked regardless of what
locks you might be holding, the key word being "should".
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

It is all too easy to forget that wait_event() does not necessarily
imply a full memory barrier.  The case where it does not is where the
condition transitions to true just as wait_event() starts execution.
This is actually a feature: The standard use of wait_event() involves
locking, in which case the locks provide the needed ordering (you hold a
lock across the wake_up() and acquire that same lock after wait_event()
returns).

Given that I did forget that wait_event() does not necessarily imply a
full memory barrier in one case, this commit fixes that case.  This commit
also adds comments calling out the placement of existing memory barriers
relied on by wait_event() calls.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

When an RCU CPU stall warning occurs, the CPU invokes resched_cpu() on
itself.  This can help move the grace period forward in some situations,
but it would be even better to do this -before- the RCU CPU stall warning.
This commit therefore causes resched_cpu() to be called every five jiffies
once the system is halfway to an RCU CPU stall warning.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The old rcu_is_cpu_idle() function is just __rcu_is_watching() with
preemption disabled.  This commit therefore renames rcu_is_cpu_idle()
to rcu_is_watching.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Commit e6b80a3b (rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended
quiescent state) exported the pre-existing rcu_is_cpu_idle() function
using EXPORT_SYMBOL().  However, this is inconsistent with the remaining
exports from RCU, which are all EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().  The current state
of affairs means that a non-GPL module could use rcu_is_cpu_idle(),
but in a CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y kernel would be unable to invoke
rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock().

This commit therefore makes rcu_is_cpu_idle()'s export be consistent
with the rest of RCU, namely EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

There is currently no way for kernel code to determine whether it
is safe to enter an RCU read-side critical section, in other words,
whether or not RCU is paying attention to the currently running CPU.
Given the large and increasing quantity of code shared by the idle loop
and non-idle code, the this shortcoming is becoming increasingly painful.

This commit therefore adds __rcu_is_watching(), which returns true if
it is safe to enter an RCU read-side critical section on the currently
running CPU.  This function is quite fast, using only a __this_cpu_read().
However, the caller must disable preemption.
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

We're going to deprecate and remove set_need_resched() for it will do
the wrong thing. Make an exception for RCU and allow it to use
resched_cpu() which will do the right thing.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2eywnacjl1nllctl1nszqa5w@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This commit adds tracing to the normal grace-period request points.
These are rcu_gp_cleanup(), which checks for the need for another
grace period at the end of the previous grace period, and
rcu_start_gp_advanced(), which restarts RCU's state machine after
an idle period.  These trace events are intended to help track down
bugs where RCU remains idle despite there being work for it to do.
Reported-by: NClark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>