Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      fs: try to clone files first in vfs_copy_file_range · a76b5b04
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      A clone is a perfectly fine implementation of a file copy, so most
file systems just implement the copy that way.  Instead of duplicating
this logic move it to the VFS.  Currently btrfs and XFS implement copies
the same way as clones and there is no behavior change for them, cifs
only implements clones and grow support for copy_file_range with this
patch.  NFS implements both, so this will allow copy_file_range to work
on servers that only implement CLONE and be lot more efficient on servers
that implements CLONE and COPY.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      a76b5b04
  3. 04 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • O
      Btrfs: catch invalid free space trees · 6675df31
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      There are two separate issues that can lead to corrupted free space
trees.

1. The free space tree bitmaps had an endianness issue on big-endian
   systems which is fixed by an earlier patch in this series.
2. btrfs-progs before v4.7.3 modified filesystems without updating the
   free space tree.

To catch both of these issues at once, we need to force the free space
tree to be rebuilt. To do so, add a FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID compat_ro bit.
If the bit isn't set, we know that it was either produced by a broken
big-endian kernel or may have been corrupted by btrfs-progs.

This also provides us with a way to add rudimentary read-write support
for the free space tree to btrfs-progs: it can just clear this bit and
have the kernel rebuild the free space tree.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5+
Tested-by: NHolger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Tested-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6675df31
  5. 27 9月, 2016 5 次提交
  7. 26 9月, 2016 3 次提交
  9. 16 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 06 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • W
      btrfs: introduce tickets_id to determine whether asynchronous metadata reclaim work makes progress · ce129655
      由 Wang Xiaoguang 提交于 
      In btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space(), we use ticket's address to
determine whether asynchronous metadata reclaim work is making progress.

	ticket = list_first_entry(&space_info->tickets,
				  struct reserve_ticket, list);
	if (last_ticket == ticket) {
		flush_state++;
	} else {
		last_ticket = ticket;
		flush_state = FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS_NR;
		if (commit_cycles)
			commit_cycles--;
	}

But indeed it's wrong, we should not rely on local variable's address to
do this check, because addresses may be same. In my test environment, I
dd one 168MB file in a 256MB fs, found that for this file, every time
wait_reserve_ticket() called, local variable ticket's address is same,

For above codes, assume a previous ticket's address is addrA, last_ticket
is addrA. Btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space() finished this ticket and
wake up it, then another ticket is added, but with the same address addrA,
now last_ticket will be same to current ticket, then current ticket's flush
work will start from current flush_state, not initial FLUSH_DELAYED_ITEMS_NR,
which may result in some enospc issues(I have seen this in my test machine).
Signed-off-by: NWang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ce129655
  13. 25 8月, 2016 3 次提交
    • W
      btrfs: fix fsfreeze hang caused by delayed iputs deal · 9e7cc91a
      由 Wang Xiaoguang 提交于 
      When running fstests generic/068, sometimes we got below deadlock:
  xfs_io          D ffff8800331dbb20     0  6697   6693 0x00000080
  ffff8800331dbb20 ffff88007acfc140 ffff880034d895c0 ffff8800331dc000
  ffff880032d243e8 fffffffeffffffff ffff880032d24400 0000000000000001
  ffff8800331dbb38 ffffffff816a9045 ffff880034d895c0 ffff8800331dbba8
  Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff816a9045>] schedule+0x35/0x80
  [<ffffffff816abab2>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0xf2/0x140
  [<ffffffff8118f5e1>] ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xd1/0x100
  [<ffffffff8134f978>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x18/0x30
  [<ffffffffa06631fc>] ? btrfs_alloc_block_rsv+0x2c/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff810d32b5>] percpu_down_read+0x35/0x50
  [<ffffffff81217dfc>] __sb_start_write+0x2c/0x40
  [<ffffffffa067f5d5>] start_transaction+0x2a5/0x4d0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa067f857>] btrfs_join_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa068ba34>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3c4/0x5d0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81230a1a>] evict+0xba/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff812316b6>] iput+0x196/0x200
  [<ffffffffa06851d0>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x70/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa067f1d8>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x928/0xa80 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0646df0>] btrfs_freeze+0x30/0x40 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81218040>] freeze_super+0xf0/0x190
  [<ffffffff81229275>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4a5/0x5c0
  [<ffffffff81003176>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x66/0x70
  [<ffffffff810038cf>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x11f/0x140
  [<ffffffff81229409>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
  [<ffffffff81003c12>] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x110
  [<ffffffff816acbe1>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

>From this warning, freeze_super() already holds SB_FREEZE_FS, but
btrfs_freeze() will call btrfs_commit_transaction() again, if
btrfs_commit_transaction() finds that it has delayed iputs to handle,
it'll start_transaction(), which will try to get SB_FREEZE_FS lock
again, then deadlock occurs.

The root cause is that in btrfs, sync_filesystem(sb) does not make
sure all metadata is updated. There still maybe some codes adding
delayed iputs, see below sample race window:

         CPU1                                  |         CPU2
|-> freeze_super()                             |
    |-> sync_filesystem(sb);                   |
    |                                          |-> cleaner_kthread()
    |                                          |   |-> btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
    |                                          |       |-> btrfs_remove_chunk()
    |                                          |           |-> btrfs_remove_block_group()
    |                                          |               |-> btrfs_add_delayed_iput()
    |                                          |
    |-> sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_FS;   |
    |-> sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS);       |
    |   acquire SB_FREEZE_FS lock.             |
    |                                          |
    |-> btrfs_freeze()                         |
        |-> btrfs_commit_transaction()         |
            |-> btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()      |
            |   will handle delayed iputs,     |
            |   that means start_transaction() |
            |   will be called, which will try |
            |   to get SB_FREEZE_FS lock.      |

To fix this issue, introduce a "int fs_frozen" to record internally whether
fs has been frozen. If fs has been frozen, we can not handle delayed iputs.
Signed-off-by: NWang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment to btrfs_freeze ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      9e7cc91a
    • W
      btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely · 18513091
      由 Wang Xiaoguang 提交于 
      This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
	#!/bin/bash
	dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
	dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
	mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
	mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
	mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
	cd /tmp/mntpoint
	xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile

Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
btrfs_fallocate()
|-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
|   bytes_may_use += 64M
|-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
    |-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
        |-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
        |   alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
        |   change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
        |   bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
        |   than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
        |   Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
        |   end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.

Here is another simple case for buffered write:
                    CPU 1              |              CPU 2
                                       |
|-> cow_file_range()                   |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
    |-> btrfs_reserve_extent()         |   |
    |                                  |   |
    |                                  |   |
    |    .....                         |   |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
    |                                  |
    |                                  |
    |-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |

In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
If
	100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
		data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
		data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.

To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
and RESERVE_FREE.

As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.

Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
Signed-off-by: NWang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      18513091
    • J
      btrfs: properly track when rescan worker is running · d2c609b8
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      The qgroup_flags field is overloaded such that it reflects the on-disk
status of qgroups and the runtime state.  The BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN
flag is used to indicate that a rescan operation is in progress, but if
the file system is unmounted while a rescan is running, the rescan
operation is paused.  If the file system is then mounted read-only,
the flag will still be present but the rescan operation will not have
been resumed.  When we go to umount, btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion
will see the flag and interpret it to mean that the rescan worker is
still running and will wait for a completion that will never come.

This patch uses a separate flag to indicate when the worker is
running.  The locking and state surrounding the qgroup rescan worker
needs a lot of attention beyond this patch but this is enough to
avoid a hung umount.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Signed-off-by; Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      d2c609b8
  15. 26 7月, 2016 8 次提交
  17. 08 7月, 2016 3 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: add tracepoints for flush events · f376df2b
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We want to track when we're triggering flushing from our reservation code and
what flushing is being done when we start flushing.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f376df2b
    • J
      Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc infrastructure · 957780eb
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Our enospc flushing sucks.  It is born from a time where we were early
enospc'ing constantly because multiple threads would race in for the same
reservation and randomly starve other ones out.  So I came up with this solution
to block any other reservations from happening while one guy tried to flush
stuff to satisfy his reservation.  This gives us pretty good correctness, but
completely crap latency.

The solution I've come up with is ticketed reservations.  Basically we try to
make our reservation, and if we can't we put a ticket on a list in order and
kick off an async flusher thread.  This async flusher thread does the same old
flushing we always did, just asynchronously.  As space is freed and added back
to the space_info it checks and sees if we have any tickets that need
satisfying, and adds space to the tickets and wakes up anything we've satisfied.

Once the flusher thread stops making progress it wakes up all the current
tickets and tells them to take a hike.

There is a priority list for things that can't flush, since the async flusher
could do anything we need to avoid deadlocks.  These guys get priority for
having their reservation made, and will still do manual flushing themselves in
case the async flusher isn't running.

This patch gives us significantly better latencies.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      957780eb
    • J
      Btrfs: fix callers of btrfs_block_rsv_migrate · 25d609f8
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      So btrfs_block_rsv_migrate just unconditionally calls block_rsv_migrate_bytes.
Not only this but it unconditionally changes the size of the block_rsv.  This
isn't a bug strictly speaking, but it makes truncate block rsv's look funny
because every time we migrate bytes over its size grows, even though we only
want it to be a specific size.  So collapse this into one function that takes an
update_size argument and make truncate and evict not update the size for
consistency sake.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      25d609f8
  19. 23 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: track transid for delayed ref flushing · 31b9655f
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Using the offwakecputime bpf script I noticed most of our time was spent waiting
on the delayed ref throttling.  This is what is supposed to happen, but
sometimes the transaction can commit and then we're waiting for throttling that
doesn't matter anymore.  So change this stuff to be a little smarter by tracking
the transid we were in when we initiated the throttling.  If the transaction we
get is different then we can just bail out.  This resulted in a 50% speedup in
my fs_mark test, and reduced the amount of time spent throttling by 60 seconds
over the entire run (which is about 30 minutes).  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      31b9655f
  21. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 13 5月, 2016 2 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between block group relocation and nocow writes · f78c436c
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Relocation of a block group waits for all existing tasks flushing
dellaloc, starting direct IO writes and any ordered extents before
starting the relocation process. However for direct IO writes that end
up doing nocow (inode either has the flag nodatacow set or the write is
against a prealloc extent) we have a short time window that allows for a
race that makes relocation proceed without waiting for the direct IO
write to complete first, resulting in data loss after the relocation
finishes. This is illustrated by the following diagram:

           CPU 1                                     CPU 2

 btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)

                                               direct IO write starts against
                                               an extent in block group X
                                               using nocow mode (inode has the
                                               nodatacow flag or the write is
                                               for a prealloc extent)

                                               btrfs_direct_IO()
                                                 btrfs_get_blocks_direct()
                                                   --> can_nocow_extent() returns 1

   btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(bg X)
     --> turns block group into RO mode

   btrfs_wait_ordered_roots()
     --> returns and does not know about
         the DIO write happening at CPU 2
         (the task there has not created
          yet an ordered extent)

   relocate_block_group(bg X)
     --> rc->stage == MOVE_DATA_EXTENTS

     find_next_extent()
       --> returns extent that the DIO
           write is going to write to

     relocate_data_extent()

       relocate_file_extent_cluster()

         --> reads the extent from disk into
             pages belonging to the relocation
             inode and dirties them

                                                   --> creates DIO ordered extent

                                                 btrfs_submit_direct()
                                                   --> submits bio against a location
                                                       on disk obtained from an extent
                                                       map before the relocation started

   btrfs_wait_ordered_range()
     --> writes all the pages read before
         to disk (belonging to the
         relocation inode)

   relocation finishes

                                                 bio completes and wrote new data
                                                 to the old location of the block
                                                 group

So fix this by tracking the number of nocow writers for a block group and
make sure relocation waits for that number to go down to 0 before starting
to move the extents.

The same race can also happen with buffered writes in nocow mode since the
patch I recently made titled "Btrfs: don't do unnecessary delalloc flushes
when relocating", because we are no longer flushing all delalloc which
served as a synchonization mechanism (due to page locking) and ensured
the ordered extents for nocow buffered writes were created before we
called btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(). The race with direct IO writes in nocow
mode existed before that patch (no pages are locked or used during direct
IO) and that fixed only races with direct IO writes that do cow.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      f78c436c
    • F
      Btrfs: don't do unnecessary delalloc flushes when relocating · 9cfa3e34
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Before we start the actual relocation process of a block group, we do
calls to flush delalloc of all inodes and then wait for ordered extents
to complete. However we do these flush calls just to make sure we don't
race with concurrent tasks that have actually already started to run
delalloc and have allocated an extent from the block group we want to
relocate, right before we set it to readonly mode, but have not yet
created the respective ordered extents. The flush calls make us wait
for such concurrent tasks because they end up calling
filemap_fdatawrite_range() (through btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() ->
__start_delalloc_inodes() -> btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work() ->
btrfs_run_delalloc_work()) which ends up serializing us with those tasks
due to attempts to lock the same pages (and the delalloc flush procedure
calls the allocator and creates the ordered extents before unlocking the
pages).

These flushing calls not only make us waste time (cpu, IO) but also reduce
the chances of writing larger extents (applications might be writing to
contiguous ranges and we flush before they finish dirtying the whole
ranges).

So make sure we don't flush delalloc and just wait for concurrent tasks
that have already started flushing delalloc and have allocated an extent
from the block group we are about to relocate.

This change also ends up fixing a race with direct IO writes that makes
relocation not wait for direct IO ordered extents. This race is
illustrated by the following diagram:

        CPU 1                                       CPU 2

 btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)

                                           starts direct IO write,
                                           target inode currently has no
                                           ordered extents ongoing nor
                                           dirty pages (delalloc regions),
                                           therefore the root for our inode
                                           is not in the list
                                           fs_info->ordered_roots

                                           btrfs_direct_IO()
                                             __blockdev_direct_IO()
                                               btrfs_get_blocks_direct()
                                                 btrfs_lock_extent_direct()
                                                   locks range in the io tree
                                                 btrfs_new_extent_direct()
                                                   btrfs_reserve_extent()
                                                     --> extent allocated
                                                         from bg X

   btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(bg X)

   btrfs_start_delalloc_roots()
     __start_delalloc_inodes()
       --> does nothing, no dealloc ranges
           in the inode's io tree so the
           inode's root is not in the list
           fs_info->delalloc_roots

   btrfs_wait_ordered_roots()
     --> does not find the inode's root in the
         list fs_info->ordered_roots

     --> ends up not waiting for the direct IO
         write started by the task at CPU 2

   relocate_block_group(rc->stage ==
     MOVE_DATA_EXTENTS)

     prepare_to_relocate()
       btrfs_commit_transaction()

     iterates the extent tree, using its
     commit root and moves extents into new
     locations

                                                   btrfs_add_ordered_extent_dio()
                                                     --> now a ordered extent is
                                                         created and added to the
                                                         list root->ordered_extents
                                                         and the root added to the
                                                         list fs_info->ordered_roots
                                                     --> this is too late and the
                                                         task at CPU 1 already
                                                         started the relocation

     btrfs_commit_transaction()

                                                   btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
                                                     btrfs_alloc_reserved_file_extent()
                                                       --> adds delayed data reference
                                                           for the extent allocated
                                                           from bg X

   relocate_block_group(rc->stage ==
     UPDATE_DATA_PTRS)

     prepare_to_relocate()
       btrfs_commit_transaction()
         --> delayed refs are run, so an extent
             item for the allocated extent from
             bg X is added to extent tree
         --> commit roots are switched, so the
             next scan in the extent tree will
             see the extent item

     sees the extent in the extent tree

When this happens the relocation produces the following warning when it
finishes:

[ 7260.832836] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 7260.834653] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 6765 at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4318 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]()
[ 7260.838268] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor ppdev raid6_pq psmouse sg acpi_cpufreq evdev i2c_piix4 tpm_tis serio_raw tpm i2c_core pcspkr parport_pc
[ 7260.850935] CPU: 5 PID: 6765 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-28+ #1
[ 7260.852998] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 7260.852998]  0000000000000000 ffff88020bf57bc0 ffffffff812648b3 0000000000000000
[ 7260.852998]  0000000000000009 ffff88020bf57bf8 ffffffff81051608 ffffffffa03c1b2d
[ 7260.852998]  ffff8800b2bbb800 0000000000000000 ffff8800b17bcc58 ffff8800399dd000
[ 7260.852998] Call Trace:
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff812648b3>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81051608>] warn_slowpath_common+0x99/0xb2
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03c1b2d>] ? btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff810516d4>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03c1b2d>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x245/0x2a1 [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa039d9de>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x66/0xdb [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa039f314>] btrfs_balance+0xde1/0xe4e [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff8127d671>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03a9583>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x255/0x2d3 [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffffa03ac96a>] btrfs_ioctl+0x11e0/0x1dff [btrfs]
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff811451df>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x443/0xd63
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81491817>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x44
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff8108b36a>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff811876ab>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81187cb2>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81190c30>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81187d77>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[ 7260.852998]  [<ffffffff81492017>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b
[ 7260.893268] ---[ end trace eb7803b24ebab8ad ]---

This is because at the end of the first stage, in relocate_block_group(),
we commit the current transaction, which makes delayed refs run, the
commit roots are switched and so the second stage will find the extent
item that the ordered extent added to the delayed refs. But this extent
was not moved (ordered extent completed after first stage finished), so
at the end of the relocation our block group item still has a positive
used bytes counter, triggering a warning at the end of
btrfs_relocate_block_group(). Later on when trying to read the extent
contents from disk we hit a BUG_ON() due to the inability to map a block
with a logical address that belongs to the block group we relocated and
is no longer valid, resulting in the following trace:

[ 7344.885290] BTRFS critical (device sdi): unable to find logical 12845056 len 4096
[ 7344.887518] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 7344.888431] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1833!
[ 7344.888431] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 7344.888431] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor ppdev raid6_pq psmouse sg acpi_cpufreq evdev i2c_piix4 tpm_tis serio_raw tpm i2c_core pcspkr parport_pc
[ 7344.888431] CPU: 0 PID: 6831 Comm: od Tainted: G        W       4.5.0-rc6-btrfs-next-28+ #1
[ 7344.888431] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 7344.888431] task: ffff880215818600 ti: ffff880204684000 task.ti: ffff880204684000
[ 7344.888431] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa037c88c>]  [<ffffffffa037c88c>] btrfs_merge_bio_hook+0x54/0x6b [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431] RSP: 0018:ffff8802046878f0  EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 7344.888431] RAX: 00000000ffffffea RBX: 0000000000001000 RCX: 0000000000000001
[ 7344.888431] RDX: ffff88023ec0f950 RSI: ffffffff8183b638 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[ 7344.888431] RBP: ffff880204687908 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 7344.888431] R10: ffff880204687770 R11: ffffffff82f2d52d R12: 0000000000001000
[ 7344.888431] R13: ffff88021afbfee8 R14: 0000000000006208 R15: ffff88006cd199b0
[ 7344.888431] FS:  00007f1f9e1d6700(0000) GS:ffff88023ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 7344.888431] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 7344.888431] CR2: 00007f1f9dc8cb60 CR3: 000000023e3b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[ 7344.888431] Stack:
[ 7344.888431]  0000000000001000 0000000000001000 ffff880204687b98 ffff880204687950
[ 7344.888431]  ffffffffa0395c8f ffffea0004d64d48 0000000000000000 0000000000001000
[ 7344.888431]  ffffea0004d64d48 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[ 7344.888431] Call Trace:
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa0395c8f>] submit_extent_page+0xf5/0x16f [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa03970ac>] __do_readpage+0x4a0/0x4f1 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039680d>] ? btrfs_create_repair_bio+0xcb/0xcb [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8108df55>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039728c>] __do_contiguous_readpages.constprop.26+0xc2/0xe4 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa039739b>] __extent_readpages.constprop.25+0xed/0x100 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81129d24>] ? lru_cache_add+0xe/0x10
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa0397ea8>] extent_readpages+0x160/0x1aa [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037eeb4>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xbc/0xbc [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8115daad>] ? alloc_pages_current+0xa9/0xcd
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffffa037cdc9>] btrfs_readpages+0x1f/0x21 [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81128316>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x168/0x1fc
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff811285a0>] ondemand_readahead+0x1f6/0x207
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff811285a0>] ? ondemand_readahead+0x1f6/0x207
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8111cf34>] ? pagecache_get_page+0x2b/0x154
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8112870e>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x3d/0x3f
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8111dbf7>] generic_file_read_iter+0x197/0x4e1
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff8117773a>] __vfs_read+0x79/0x9d
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81178050>] vfs_read+0x8f/0xd2
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81178a38>] SyS_read+0x50/0x7e
[ 7344.888431]  [<ffffffff81492017>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6b
[ 7344.888431] Code: 8d 4d e8 45 31 c9 45 31 c0 48 8b 00 48 c1 e2 09 48 8b 80 80 fc ff ff 4c 89 65 e8 48 8b b8 f0 01 00 00 e8 1d 42 02 00 85 c0 79 02 <0f> 0b 4c 0
[ 7344.888431] RIP  [<ffffffffa037c88c>] btrfs_merge_bio_hook+0x54/0x6b [btrfs]
[ 7344.888431]  RSP <ffff8802046878f0>
[ 7344.970544] ---[ end trace eb7803b24ebab8ae ]---
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      9cfa3e34
  27. 28 4月, 2016 9 次提交