- 07 1月, 2006 40 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The procedure that decodes statd sm_notify call seems to be skipping a few arguments. How did this ever work? >From folks at Polyserve. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
If the server receives an NLM cancel call and finds no waiting lock to cancel, then chances are the lock has already been applied, and the client just hadn't yet processed the NLM granted callback before it sent the cancel. The Open Group text, for example, perimts a server to return either success (LCK_GRANTED) or failure (LCK_DENIED) in this case. But returning an error seems more helpful; the client may be able to use it to recognize that a race has occurred and to recover from the race. So, modify the relevant functions to return an error in this case. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The fl_next check here is superfluous (and possibly a layering violation). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Currently when lockd gets an NLM_CANCEL request, it also does an unlock for the same range. This is incorrect. The Open Group documentation says that "This procedure cancels an *outstanding* blocked lock request." (Emphasis mine.) Also, consider a client that holds a lock on the first byte of a file, and requests a lock on the entire file. If the client cancels that request (perhaps because the requesting process is signalled), the server shouldn't apply perform an unlock on the entire file, since that will also remove the previous lock that the client was already granted. Or consider a lock request that actually *downgraded* an exclusive lock to a shared lock. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Slightly simpler logic here makes it more trivial to verify that the up's and down's are balanced here. Break out an assignment from a conditional while we're at it. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch removes ths unused function xdr_decode_string(). Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Acked-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: NCharles Lever <Charles.Lever@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...and ensure that nfs_update_inode() respects wcc Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Upon return of a write delegation, the server will almost always bump the change attribute. Ensure that we pick up that change so that we don't invalidate our data cache unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
According to RFC3530 we're supposed to cache the change attribute at the time the client receives a write delegation. If the inode is clean, a CB_GETATTR callback by the server to the client is supposed to return the cached change attribute. If, OTOH, the inode is dirty, the client should bump the cached change attribute by 1. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...and avoid calling set_page_dirty on them Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The SuS states that a call to write() will cause mtime to be updated on the file. In order to satisfy that requirement, we need to flush out any cached writes in nfs_getattr(). Speed things up slightly by not committing the writes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Most NFS server implementations allow up to 64KB reads and writes on the wire. The Solaris NFS server allows up to a megabyte, for instance. Now the Linux NFS client supports transfer sizes up to 1MB, too. This will help reduce protocol and context switch overhead on read/write intensive NFS workloads, and support larger atomic read and write operations on servers that support them. Test-plan: Connectathon and iozone on mount point with wsize=rsize>32768 over TCP. Tests with NFS over UDP to verify the maximum RPC payload size cap. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
To help NFS users and server developers, make the "inode number mismatch" message display more useful information. Test-plan: None. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
nfs_statfs() generates a log message when GETATTR returns an error. This is usually a useless message. Make it a dprintk. Test plan: None Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Minor cleanup: inlined bit ops in nfs_page.h can be simpler. Test plan: Write-intensive workload against a server that requires COMMITs. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Red Hat found a problem in the error recovery logic in __init_nfs. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Replace ad hoc write parameter sanity checking in nfs_file_direct_write() with a call to generic_write_checks(). This should make the proper checks modulo the O_LARGEFILE flag, and should catch NFSv2-specific limitations by virtue of i_sb->s_maxbytes. Test plan: Posix compliance testing with both NFSv2 and NFSv3. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <cel@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use a cred from the nfs4_client->cl_state_owners list. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In RFC3530, the RENEW operation is allowed to use either the same principal, RPC security flavour and (if RPCSEC_GSS), the same mechanism and service that was used for SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM OR Any principal, RPC security flavour and service combination that currently has an OPEN file on the server. Choose the latter since that doesn't require us to keep credentials for the same principal for the entire duration of the mount. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Convert private implementations in NFSv4 state recovery and delegation code to use kthreads. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use wait_on_bit() when waiting for state recovery to complete. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Cut down on the number of unnecessary RENEW requests on the wire. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...and make sure that the "intr" flag also enables SIGHUP and SIGTERM to interrupt RPC calls too (as per the Solaris implementation). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In order to allow users to interrupt/cancel it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Get rid of some unnecessary intermediate structures Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When recovering from a delegation recall or a network partition, we need to replay open(O_RDWR), open(O_RDONLY) and open(O_WRONLY) separately. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
A closer reading of RFC3530 reveals that OPEN_DOWNGRADE must always specify a access modes that have been the argument of a previous OPEN operation. IOW: doing OPEN(O_RDWR) and then OPEN_DOWNGRADE(O_WRONLY) is forbidden unless the user called OPEN(O_WRONLY) In order to fix that, we really need to track the three possible open states separately. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
OPEN is a stateful operation, so we must ensure that it always completes. In order to allow users to interrupt the operation, we need to make the RPC call asynchronous, and then wait on completion (or cancel). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Cleanup in preparation for making OPEN calls interruptible by the user. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The NFSv4 model requires us to complete all RPC calls that might establish state on the server whether or not the user wants to interrupt it. We may also need to schedule new work (including new RPC calls) in order to cancel the new state. The asynchronous RPC model will allow us to ensure that RPC calls always complete, but in order to allow for "synchronous" RPC, we want to add the ability to wait for completion. The waits are, of course, interruptible. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-