Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 1月, 2016 16 次提交
    • Z
      btrfs: raid56: Use raid_write_end_io for scrub · a6111d11
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      No need to create additional end_io function for scrub, it increased
code size and introduced some un-unified lines, as:
raid_write_parity_end_io():
        int err = bio->bi_error;
        if (bio->bi_error)
raid_write_end_io():
        int err = bio->bi_error;
        if (err)

This patch combines them.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a6111d11
    • Z
      btrfs: Remove unnecessary ClearPageUptodate for raid56 · 748f4ef4
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      PageUptodate flag already initialized to 0 for new page,
no need to set it again.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      748f4ef4
    • Z
      btrfs: use rbio->nr_pages to reduce calculation · 915e2290
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      We can use rbio->stripe_npages to reduce unnecessary calculation in
many code place.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      915e2290
    • Z
      btrfs: Use unified stripe_page's index calculation · b7178a5f
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      We are using different index calculation method for stripe_page in
current code:
1: (rbio->stripe_len / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) * stripe_index + page_index
2: DIV_ROUND_UP(rbio->stripe_len, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) * stripe_index + page_index
3: DIV_ROUND_UP(rbio->stripe_len * stripe_index, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) + page_index
...

They can get same result when stripe_len align to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
this is why current code can work, intruduce and use a common function
for calculation is a better choose.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      b7178a5f
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix calculation of rbio->dbitmap's size calculation · bfca9a6d
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      Current code is trying to calculate rbio->dbitmap's size to make it
align to sizeof(long), but implement haven't achived this object,
it is align to sizeof(char) instead.
This patch fixed above calculation, and use sizeof(long) instead of
fixed "8" to increate compatibility.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      bfca9a6d
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix no_space in write and rm loop · e1746e83
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      I see no_space in v4.4-rc1 again in xfstests generic/102.
It happened randomly in some node only.
(one of 4 phy-node, and a kvm with non-virtio block driver)

By bisect, we can found the first-bad is:
 commit bdced438 ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting")'
But above patch only triggered the bug by making bio operation
faster(or slower).

Main reason is in our space_allocating code, we need to commit
page writeback before wait it complish, this patch fixed above
bug.

BTW, there is another reason for generic/102 fail, caused by
disable default mixed-blockgroup, I'll fix it in xfstests.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e1746e83
    • Z
      btrfs: merge functions for wait snapshot creation · 0bc19f90
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      wait_for_snapshot_creation() is in same group with oher two:
 btrfs_start_write_no_snapshoting()
 btrfs_end_write_no_snapshoting()

Rename wait_for_snapshot_creation() and move it into same place
with other two.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0bc19f90
    • Z
      btrfs: delete unused argument in btrfs_copy_from_user · ee22f0c4
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      size_t write_bytes is not necessary for btrfs_copy_from_user(),
delete it.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ee22f0c4
    • Z
      btrfs: Use direct way to determine raid56 write/recover mode · ad1ba2a0
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      Old code used bbio->raid_map to determine whether in raid56
write/recover operation, because we didn't't have bbio->map_type.

Now we have direct way for this condition, rid of using
the function-relative data, and make the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ad1ba2a0
    • Z
      btrfs: Small cleanup for get index_srcdev loop · 94a97dfe
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      1: Adjust condition in loop to make less TAB
2: Move btrfs_put_bbio()'s line for combine, and makes logic clean.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      94a97dfe
    • Q
      btrfs: Enhance chunk validation check · f04b772b
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Enhance chunk validation:
1) Num_stripes
   We already have such check but it's only in super block sys chunk
   array.
   Now check all on-disk chunks.

2) Chunk logical
   It should be aligned to sector size.
   This behavior should be *DOUBLE CHECKED* for 64K sector size like
   PPC64 or AArch64.
   Maybe we can found some hidden bugs.

3) Chunk length
   Same as chunk logical, should be aligned to sector size.

4) Stripe length
   It should be power of 2.

5) Chunk type
   Any bit out of TYPE_MAS | PROFILE_MASK is invalid.

With all these much restrict rules, several fuzzed image reported in
mail list should no longer cause kernel panic.
Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f04b772b
    • Q
      btrfs: Enhance super validation check · 319e4d06
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points:
1) Restrict sector/node size check
   Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2.
   So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now.

2) Super flag check
   For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and
   btrfs-progs super flags.
   And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this
   check will only output warning.

3) Better root alignment check
   Now root bytenr is checked against sector size.

4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid().
   Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check.
   And magic number check.
Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      319e4d06
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock running delayed iputs at transaction commit time · c2d6cb16
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed
iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace:

[  886.399989] =============================================
[  886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted
[  886.402384] ---------------------------------------------
[  886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock:
[  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] but task is already holding lock:
[  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] other info that might help us debug this:
[  886.403568]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]        CPU0
[  886.403568]        ----
[  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277:
[  886.403568]  #0:  (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[  886.403568]  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs]
[  886.403568]  #2:  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] stack backtrace:
[  886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[  886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0
[  886.403568]  ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290
[  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804
[  886.403568] Call Trace:
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 1081.854348]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 1081.863227] fio        D ffff880213f9bb28     0  8244   8240 0x00000000
[ 1081.868719]  ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240
[ 1081.872499]  ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400
[ 1081.876834]  ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4
[ 1081.880782] Call Trace:
[ 1081.881793]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
[ 1081.883340]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
[ 1081.895525]  [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab
[ 1081.897419]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1081.899251]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1081.901063]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
[ 1081.902365]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
[ 1081.903846]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1081.906078]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1081.908846]  [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c
[ 1081.910409]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
[ 1081.912482]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
[ 1081.914597]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
[ 1081.919037]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[ 1081.920754]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
[ 1081.922496]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
[ 1081.923922]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[ 1081.925275]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[ 1081.926584]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
[ 1081.927968]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 1081.987434]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 1081.990147] fio        D ffff880218febbb8     0  8249   8240 0x00000000
[ 1081.991626]  ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240
[ 1081.993258]  ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00
[ 1081.994850]  ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4
[ 1081.996485] Call Trace:
[ 1081.997037]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
[ 1081.998017]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
[ 1081.999241]  [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76
[ 1082.000306]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1082.001533]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1082.002776]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
[ 1082.003995]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
[ 1082.005000]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1082.007403]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1082.008988]  [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs]
[ 1082.010193]  [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77
[ 1082.011280]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[ 1082.012265]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[ 1082.013021]  [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
[ 1082.013738]  [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
[ 1082.014778]  [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea
[ 1082.015778]  [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[ 1082.016806]  [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[ 1082.017789]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[ 1082.018706]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore
fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy
a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing
a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the
delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling
an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction
and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more
delayed iput operations.
This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a
semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep
class for each level of recursion.

Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that
is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs
instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are
run from anywhere.

Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.1+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c2d6cb16
    • F
      Btrfs: fix typo in log message when starting a balance · fedc0045
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      The recent change titled "Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance"
(already in linux-next) left a typo in a message for users:
metatdata -> metadata.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      fedc0045
    • C
      Merge branch 'misc-for-4.5' of... · 326f7842
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      Merge branch 'misc-for-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
      326f7842
    • C
      Merge branch 'misc-cleanups-4.5' of... · acc30855
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      Merge branch 'misc-cleanups-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
      acc30855
  3. 19 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 16 1月, 2016 6 次提交
    • S
      btrfs: initialize the seq counter in struct btrfs_device · 546bed63
      由 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 提交于 
      I managed to trigger this:
| INFO: trying to register non-static key.
| the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
| turning off the locking correctness validator.
| CPU: 1 PID: 781 Comm: systemd-gpt-aut Not tainted 4.4.0-rt2+ #14
| Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express
| [<80307cec>] (dump_stack)
| [<80070e98>] (__lock_acquire)
| [<8007184c>] (lock_acquire)
| [<80287800>] (btrfs_ioctl)
| [<8012a8d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl)
| [<8012ac14>] (SyS_ioctl)

so I think that btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is not invoked behind
a macro somewhere.

Fixes: 7cc8e58d ("Btrfs: fix unprotected device's variants on 32bits machine")
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      546bed63
    • D
      Btrfs: clean up an error code in btrfs_init_space_info() · 0dc924c5
      由 Dan Carpenter 提交于 
      If we return 1 here, then the caller treats it as an error and returns
-EINVAL.  It causes a static checker warning to treat positive returns
as an error.

Fixes: 1aba86d6 ('Btrfs: fix easily get into ENOSPC in mixed case')
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      0dc924c5
    • G
      btrfs: fix iterator with update error in backref.c · 8e217858
      由 Geliang Tang 提交于 
      Fix the following error:

fs/btrfs/backref.c:565:1-20: iterator with update on line 577

Fixes: a7ca4225('btrfs: use list_for_each_entry* in backref.c')
Signed-off-by: NGeliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      8e217858
    • T
      Btrfs: fix output of compression message in btrfs_parse_options() · b7c47bbb
      由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于 
      The compression message might not be correctly output.
Fix it.

[[before fix]]

# mount -o compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  996.874264] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
[  996.874268] BTRFS: has skinny extents
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress-force /dev/sdb3 /test3
[ 1035.075017] BTRFS info (device sdb3): force zlib compression
[ 1035.075021] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress-force=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[ 1053.679092] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

[[after fix]]

# mount -o compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  401.021753] BTRFS info (device sdb3): use zlib compression
[  401.021758] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
[  401.021760] BTRFS: has skinny extents
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress-force /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  439.824624] BTRFS info (device sdb3): force zlib compression
[  439.824629] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress-force=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  459.918430] BTRFS info (device sdb3): use zlib compression
[  459.918434] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      b7c47bbb
    • C
      Btrfs: Initialize btrfs_root->highest_objectid when loading tree root and subvolume roots · f32e48e9
      由 Chandan Rajendra 提交于 
      The following call trace is seen when btrfs/031 test is executed in a loop,

[  158.661848] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  158.662634] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 890 at /home/chandan/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:558 create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea()
[  158.664102] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[  158.664774] Modules linked in:
[  158.665266] CPU: 2 PID: 890 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-g511711af #2
[  158.666251] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[  158.667392]  ffffffff81c0a6b0 ffff8806c7c4f8e8 ffffffff81431fc8 ffff8806c7c4f930
[  158.668515]  ffff8806c7c4f920 ffffffff81051aa1 ffff880c85aff000 ffff8800bb44d000
[  158.669647]  ffff8808863b5c98 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe ffff8806c7c4f980
[  158.670769] Call Trace:
[  158.671153]  [<ffffffff81431fc8>] dump_stack+0x44/0x5c
[  158.671884]  [<ffffffff81051aa1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
[  158.672769]  [<ffffffff81051b27>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
[  158.673620]  [<ffffffff813bc98d>] create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea
[  158.674440]  [<ffffffff813777c9>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.30+0x369/0x520
[  158.675376]  [<ffffffff8108a4aa>] ? percpu_down_read+0x1a/0x50
[  158.676235]  [<ffffffff81377a81>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x101/0x180
[  158.677268]  [<ffffffff81377b52>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x52/0x70
[  158.678183]  [<ffffffff8137afb4>] btrfs_ioctl+0x474/0x2f90
[  158.678975]  [<ffffffff81144b8e>] ? vma_merge+0xee/0x300
[  158.679751]  [<ffffffff8115be31>] ? alloc_pages_vma+0x91/0x170
[  158.680599]  [<ffffffff81123f62>] ? lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable+0x22/0x70
[  158.681686]  [<ffffffff813d99cf>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0xff/0x1d0
[  158.682581]  [<ffffffff8117b791>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2c1/0x490
[  158.683399]  [<ffffffff813d3cde>] ? security_file_ioctl+0x3e/0x60
[  158.684297]  [<ffffffff8117b9d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
[  158.685051]  [<ffffffff819b2bd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
[  158.685958] ---[ end trace 4b63312de5a2cb76 ]---
[  158.686647] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in create_subvol:558: errno=-2 No such entry
[  158.709508] BTRFS info (device loop0): forced readonly
[  158.737113] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
[  158.738096] BTRFS error (device loop0): Remounting read-write after error is not allowed
[  158.851303] BTRFS error (device loop0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30

This occurs because,

Mount filesystem
Create subvol with ID 257
Unmount filesystem
Mount filesystem
Delete subvol with ID 257
  btrfs_drop_snapshot()
    Add root corresponding to subvol 257 into
    btrfs_transaction->dropped_roots list
Create new subvol (i.e. create_subvol())
  257 is returned as the next free objectid
  btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name()
    Finds the btrfs_root instance corresponding to the old subvol with ID 257
    in btrfs_fs_info->fs_roots_radix.
    Returns error since btrfs_root_item->refs has the value of 0.

To fix the issue the commit initializes tree root's and subvolume root's
highest_objectid when loading the roots from disk.
Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f32e48e9
    • J
      btrfs: cleanup, stop casting for extent_map->lookup everywhere · 95617d69
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      Overloading extent_map->bdev to struct map_lookup * might have started out
as a means to an end, but it's a pattern that's used all over the place
now. Let's get rid of the casting and just add a union instead.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      95617d69
  7. 12 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 11 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  11. 08 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix fitrim discarding device area reserved for boot loader's use · 8cdc7c5b
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      As of the 4.3 kernel release, the fitrim ioctl can now discard any region
of a disk that is not allocated to any chunk/block group, including the
first megabyte which is used for our primary superblock and by the boot
loader (grub for example).

Fix this by not allowing to trim/discard any region in the device starting
with an offset not greater than min(alloc_start_mount_option, 1Mb), just
as it was not possible before 4.3.

A reproducer test case for xfstests follows.

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"
  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      cd /
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _need_to_be_root
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch

  rm -f $seqres.full

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1

  # Write to the [0, 64Kb[ and [68Kb, 1Mb[ ranges of the device. These ranges are
  # reserved for a boot loader to use (GRUB for example) and btrfs should never
  # use them - neither for allocating metadata/data nor should trim/discard them.
  # The range [64Kb, 68Kb[ is used for the primary superblock of the filesystem.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 0 64K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 68K 956K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io

  # Now mount the filesystem and perform a fitrim against it.
  _scratch_mount
  _require_batched_discard $SCRATCH_MNT
  $FSTRIM_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT

  # Now unmount the filesystem and verify the content of the ranges was not
  # modified (no trim/discard happened on them).
  _scratch_unmount
  echo "Content of the ranges [0, 64Kb] and [68Kb, 1Mb[ after fitrim:"
  od -t x1 -N $((64 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV
  od -t x1 -j $((68 * 1024)) -N $((956 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV

  status=0
  exit
Reported-by: NVincent Petry  <PVince81@yahoo.fr>
Reported-by: NAndrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109341
Fixes: 499f377f (btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.3+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      8cdc7c5b
  13. 07 1月, 2016 13 次提交