Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 8月, 2017 1 次提交
    • S
      timekeeping: Use proper timekeeper for debug code · a529bea8
      由 Stafford Horne 提交于 
      When CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING is enabled the timekeeping_check_update()
function will update status like last_warning and underflow_seen on the
timekeeper.

If there are issues found this state is used to rate limit the warnings
that get printed.

This rate limiting doesn't really really work if stored in real_tk as
the shadow timekeeper is overwritten onto real_tk at the end of every
update_wall_time() call, resetting last_warning and other statuses.

Fix rate limiting by using the shadow_timekeeper for
timekeeping_check_update().

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
Fixes: commit 57d05a93 ("time: Rework debugging variables so they aren't global")
Signed-off-by: NStafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
      a529bea8
  3. 30 6月, 2017 3 次提交
  5. 29 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 26 6月, 2017 3 次提交
  9. 22 6月, 2017 2 次提交
  11. 21 6月, 2017 5 次提交
  13. 20 6月, 2017 2 次提交
    • J
      time: Fix CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW sub-nanosecond accounting · 3d88d56c
      由 John Stultz 提交于 
      Due to how the MONOTONIC_RAW accumulation logic was handled,
there is the potential for a 1ns discontinuity when we do
accumulations. This small discontinuity has for the most part
gone un-noticed, but since ARM64 enabled CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW
in their vDSO clock_gettime implementation, we've seen failures
with the inconsistency-check test in kselftest.

This patch addresses the issue by using the same sub-ns
accumulation handling that CLOCK_MONOTONIC uses, which avoids
the issue for in-kernel users.

Since the ARM64 vDSO implementation has its own clock_gettime
calculation logic, this patch reduces the frequency of errors,
but failures are still seen. The ARM64 vDSO will need to be
updated to include the sub-nanosecond xtime_nsec values in its
calculation for this issue to be completely fixed.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NDaniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "stable #4 . 8+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496965462-20003-3-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      3d88d56c
    • J
      time: Fix clock->read(clock) race around clocksource changes · ceea5e37
      由 John Stultz 提交于 
      In tests, which excercise switching of clocksources, a NULL
pointer dereference can be observed on AMR64 platforms in the
clocksource read() function:

u64 clocksource_mmio_readl_down(struct clocksource *c)
{
	return ~(u64)readl_relaxed(to_mmio_clksrc(c)->reg) & c->mask;
}

This is called from the core timekeeping code via:

	cycle_now = tkr->read(tkr->clock);

tkr->read is the cached tkr->clock->read() function pointer.
When the clocksource is changed then tkr->clock and tkr->read
are updated sequentially. The code above results in a sequential
load operation of tkr->read and tkr->clock as well.

If the store to tkr->clock hits between the loads of tkr->read
and tkr->clock, then the old read() function is called with the
new clock pointer. As a consequence the read() function
dereferences a different data structure and the resulting 'reg'
pointer can point anywhere including NULL.

This problem was introduced when the timekeeping code was
switched over to use struct tk_read_base. Before that, it was
theoretically possible as well when the compiler decided to
reload clock in the code sequence:

     now = tk->clock->read(tk->clock);

Add a helper function which avoids the issue by reading
tk_read_base->clock once into a local variable clk and then issue
the read function via clk->read(clk). This guarantees that the
read() function always gets the proper clocksource pointer handed
in.

Since there is now no use for the tkr.read pointer, this patch
also removes it, and to address stopping the fast timekeeper
during suspend/resume, it introduces a dummy clocksource to use
rather then just a dummy read function.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@linaro.org>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496965462-20003-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      ceea5e37
  15. 14 6月, 2017 18 次提交
  17. 13 6月, 2017 4 次提交
    • F
      nohz: Fix spurious warning when hrtimer and clockevent get out of sync · d4af6d93
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      The sanity check ensuring that the tick expiry cache (ts->next_tick)
is actually in sync with the hardware clock (dev->next_event) makes the
wrong assumption that the clock can't be programmed later than the
hrtimer deadline.

In fact the clock hardware can be programmed later on some conditions
such as:

    * The hrtimer deadline is already in the past.
    * The hrtimer deadline is earlier than the minimum delay supported
      by the hardware.

Such conditions can be met when we program the tick, for example if the
last jiffies update hasn't been seen by the current CPU yet, we may
program the hrtimer to a deadline that is earlier than ktime_get()
because last_jiffies_update is our timestamp base to compute the next
tick.

As a result, we can randomly observe such warning:

	WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 0 at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:794 tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick kernel/time/tick-sched.c:791 [inline]
	Call Trace:
	 tick_nohz_irq_exit
	 tick_irq_exit
	 irq_exit
	 exiting_irq
	 smp_call_function_interrupt
	 smp_call_function_single_interrupt
	 call_function_single_interrupt

Therefore, let's rather make sure that the tick expiry cache is sync'ed
with the tick hrtimer deadline, against which it is not supposed to
drift away. The clock hardware instead has its own will and can't be
used as a reliable comparison point.
Reported-and-tested-by: NSasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: NAbdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: James Hartsock <hartsjc@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Wright <tim@binbash.co.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1497326654-14122-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
[ Minor readability edit. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d4af6d93
    • T
      posix-timers: Handle relative posix-timers correctly · 67edab48
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      The recent rework of the posix timer internals broke the magic posix
mechanism, which requires that relative timers are not affected by
modifications of the underlying clock. That means relative CLOCK_REALTIME
timers cannot use CLOCK_REALTIME, because that can be set and adjusted. The
underlying hrtimer switches the clock for these timers to CLOCK_MONOTONIC.

That still works, but reading the remaining time of such a timer has been
broken in the rework. The old code used the hrtimer internals directly and
avoided the posix clock callbacks. Now common_timer_get() uses the
underlying kclock->timer_get() callback, which is still CLOCK_REALTIME
based. So the remaining time of such a timer is calculated against the
wrong time base.

Handle it by switching the k_itimer->kclock pointer according to the
resulting hrtimer mode. k_itimer->it_clock still contains CLOCK_REALTIME
because the timer might be set with ABSTIME later and then it needs to
switch back to the realtime posix clock implementation.

Fixes: eae1c4ae ("posix-timers: Make use of cancel/arm callbacks")
Reported-by: NAndrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170609201156.GB21491@outlook.office365.com
      67edab48
    • T
      posix-timers: Zero out oldval itimerspec · 5c7a3a3d
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      The recent posix timer rework moved the clearing of the itimerspec to the
real syscall implementation, but forgot that the kclock->timer_get() is
used by timer_settime() as well. That results in an uninitialized variable
and bogus values returned to user space.

Add the missing memset to timer_settime().

Fixes: eabdec04 ("posix-timers: Zero settings value in common code")
Reported-by: NAndrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170609201156.GB21491@outlook.office365.com
      5c7a3a3d
    • S
      tick/broadcast: Make tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot() static · 94114c36
      由 Stephen Boyd 提交于 
      This function isn't used outside of tick-broadcast.c, so let's
mark it static.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170608063603.13276-1-sboyd@codeaurora.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      94114c36
  19. 12 6月, 2017 1 次提交