1. 10 11月, 2015 4 次提交
  2. 04 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 29 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915/kbl: Introduce Kabylake platform defition. · ef11bdb3
      Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
      Kabylake is a Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
      following Skylake.
      
      It is Gen9p5, so it inherits everything from Skylake.
      
      Let's start by adding the platform separated from Skylake
      but reusing most of all features, functions etc. Later we
      rebase the PCI-ID patch without is_skylake=1
      so we don't replace what original Author did there.
      
      Few IS_SKYLAKEs if statements are not being covered by this patch
      on purpose:
         - Workarounds: Kabylake is derivated from Skylake H0 so no
           		  W/As apply here.
         - GuC: A following patch removes Kabylake support with an
           	  explanation: No firmware available yet.
         - DMC/CSR: Done in a separated patch since we need to be carefull
           	      and load the version for revision 7 since
      	      Kabylake is Skylake H0.
      
      v2: relative cleaner commit message and added the missed
          IS_KABYLAKE to intel_i2c.c as pointed out by Jani.
      
      Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      ef11bdb3
  4. 09 10月, 2015 2 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915: fix FBC buffer size checks · 856312ae
      Paulo Zanoni 提交于
      According to my experiments (and later confirmation from the hardware
      developers), the maximum sizes mentioned in the specification delimit
      how far in the buffer the hardware tracking can go. And the hardware
      calculates the size based on the plane address we provide - and the
      provided plane address might not be the real x:0,y:0 point due to the
      compute_page_offset() function.
      
      On platforms that do the x/y offset adjustment trick it will be really
      hard to reproduce a bug, but on the current SKL we can reproduce the
      bug with igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-farfromfence. With this
      patch, we'll go from "CRC assertion failure" to "FBC unexpectedly
      disabled", which is still a failure on the test suite but is not a
      perceived user bug - you will just not save as much power as you could
      if FBC is disabled.
      
      v2, rewrite patch after clarification from the Hadware guys:
        - Rename function so it's clear what the check is for.
        - Use the new intel_fbc_get_plane_source_sizes() function in order
          to get the proper sizes as seen by FBC.
      v3:
        - Rebase after the s/sizes/size/ on the previous patch.
        - Adjust comment wording (Ville).
        - s/used_/effective_/ (Ville).
      
      Testcase: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-farfromfence (SKL)
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      856312ae
    • P
      drm/i915: fix CFB size calculation · c4ffd409
      Paulo Zanoni 提交于
      We were considering the whole framebuffer height, but the spec says we
      should only consider the active display height size. There were still
      some unclear questions based on the spec, but the hardware guys
      clarified them for us. According to them:
      
      - CFB size = CFB stride * Number of lines FBC writes to CFB
      - CFB stride = plane stride / compression limit
      - Number of lines FBC writes to CFB = MIN(plane source height, maximum
        number of lines FBC writes to CFB)
      - Plane source height =
        - pipe source height (PIPE_SRCSZ register) (before SKL)
        - plane size register height (PLANE_SIZE register) (SKL+)
      - Maximum number of lines FBC writes to CFB =
        - plane source height (before HSW)
        - 2048 (HSW+)
      
      For the plane source height, I could just have made our code do
      I915_READ() in order to be more future proof, but since it's not cool
      to do register reads I decided to just recalculate the values we use
      when we actually write to those registers.
      
      With this patch, depending on your machine configuration, a lot of the
      kms_frontbuffer_tracking subtests that used to result in a SKIP due to
      not enough stolen memory still start resulting in a PASS.
      
      v2: Use the clipped src size instead of pipe_src_h (Ville).
      v3: Use the appropriate information provided by the hardware guys.
      v4: Bikesheds: s/sizes/size/, s/fb_cpp/cpp/ (Ville).
      v5: - Don't use crtc->config->pipe_src_x for BDW- (Ville).
          - Fix the register name written in the comment.
      Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c4ffd409
  5. 30 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  6. 23 9月, 2015 10 次提交
  7. 05 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915: fix FBC frontbuffer tracking flushing code · 6f4551fe
      Paulo Zanoni 提交于
      Due to the way busy_bits was handled, we were not doing any flushes if
      we didn't previously get an invalidate. Since it's possible to get
      flushes without an invalidate first, remove the busy_bits early
      return.
      
      So now that we don't have the busy_bits guard anymore we'll need the
      origin check for the GTT tracking (we were not doing anything on GTT
      flushes due to the GTT check at invalidate()).
      
      As a last detail, since we can get multiple consecutive flushes,
      disable FBC before updating it, otherwise intel_fbc_update() will just
      keep FBC enabled instead of restarting it.
      
      Notice that this does not fix any of the current IGT tests due to the
      fact that we still have a few intel_fbc() calls at points where we
      also have the frontbuffer tracking calls: we didn't fully convert to
      frontbuffer tracking yet. Once we remove those calls and start relying
      only on the frontbuffer tracking infrastructure we'll need this patch.
      Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      6f4551fe
  8. 08 7月, 2015 6 次提交
  9. 06 7月, 2015 4 次提交
  10. 03 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 16 6月, 2015 3 次提交
  12. 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 26 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 18 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 24 2月, 2015 2 次提交