Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 09 8月, 2015 4 次提交
  5. 02 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 03 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 13 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: qgroup: do a reservation in a higher level. · e2d1f923
      由 Dongsheng Yang 提交于 
      There are two problems in qgroup:

a). The PAGE_CACHE is 4K, even when we are writing a data of 1K,
qgroup will reserve a 4K size. It will cause the last 3K in a qgroup
is not available to user.

b). When user is writing a inline data, qgroup will not reserve it,
it means this is a window we can exceed the limit of a qgroup.

The main idea of this patch is reserving the data size of write_bytes
rather than the reserve_bytes. It means qgroup will not care about
the data size btrfs will reserve for user, but only care about the
data size user is going to write. Then reserve it when user want to
write and release it in transaction committed.

In this way, qgroup can be released from the complex procedure in
btrfs and only do the reserve when user want to write and account
when the data is written in commit_transaction().
Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e2d1f923
  11. 11 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: allow block group cache writeout outside critical section in commit · 1bbc621e
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write
the free space cache.  In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do
this while no other writers are allowed in the commit.

If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long
stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs
trying to change the filesystem.

This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate
locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit.  We'll still have to
redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work
out of the way without blocking the entire FS.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      1bbc621e
  13. 13 12月, 2014 2 次提交
  15. 04 10月, 2014 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: fix build_backref_tree issue with multiple shared blocks · bbe90514
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Marc Merlin sent me a broken fs image months ago where it would blow up in the
upper->checked BUG_ON() in build_backref_tree.  This is because we had a
scenario like this

block a -- level 4 (not shared)
   |
block b -- level 3 (reloc block, shared)
   |
block c -- level 2 (not shared)
   |
block d -- level 1 (shared)
   |
block e -- level 0 (shared)

We go to build a backref tree for block e, we notice block d is shared and add
it to the list of blocks to lookup it's backrefs for.  Now when we loop around
we will check edges for the block, so we will see we looked up block c last
time.  So we lookup block d and then see that the block that points to it is
block c and we can just skip that edge since we've already been up this path.
The problem is because we clear need_check when we see block d (as it is shared)
we never add block b as needing to be checked.  And because block c is in our
path already we bail out before we walk up to block b and add it to the backref
check list.

To fix this we need to reset need_check if we trip over a block that doesn't
need to be checked.  This will make sure that any subsequent blocks in the path
as we're walking up afterwards are added to the list to be processed.  With this
patch I can now mount Marc's fs image and it'll complete the balance without
panicing.  Thanks,
Reported-by: NMarc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      bbe90514
    • J
      Btrfs: cleanup error handling in build_backref_tree · 75bfb9af
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      When balance panics it tends to panic in the

BUG_ON(!upper->checked);

test, because it means it couldn't build the backref tree properly.  This is
annoying to users and frankly a recoverable error, nothing in this function is
actually fatal since it is just an in-memory building of the backrefs for a
given bytenr.  So go through and change all the BUG_ON()'s to ASSERT()'s, and
fix the BUG_ON(!upper->checked) thing to just return an error.

This patch also fixes the error handling so it tears down the work we've done
properly.  This code was horribly broken since we always just panic'ed instead
of actually erroring out, so it needed to be completely re-worked.  With this
patch my broken image no longer panics when I mount it.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      75bfb9af
  17. 02 10月, 2014 4 次提交
  19. 18 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  21. 10 6月, 2014 2 次提交
  23. 07 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: do not reset last_snapshot after relocation · ba8b0289
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      This was done to allow NO_COW to continue to be NO_COW after relocation but it
is not right.  When relocating we will convert blocks to FULL_BACKREF that we
relocate.  We can leave some of these full backref blocks behind if they are not
cow'ed out during the relocation, like if we fail the relocation with ENOSPC and
then just drop the reloc tree.  Then when we go to cow the block again we won't
lookup the extent flags because we won't think there has been a snapshot
recently which means we will do our normal ref drop thing instead of adding back
a tree ref and dropping the shared ref.  This will cause btrfs_free_extent to
blow up because it can't find the ref we are trying to free.  This was found
with my ref verifying tool.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ba8b0289
  25. 11 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 29 1月, 2014 6 次提交
  29. 12 12月, 2013 3 次提交
  31. 12 11月, 2013 8 次提交
    • M
      Btrfs: rename btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes · 91aef86f
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its
name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always
used at the same place.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      91aef86f
    • M
      Btrfs: don't wait for the completion of all the ordered extents · b0244199
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem,
if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some
space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long
time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      b0244199
    • D
      btrfs: Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) · fae7f21c
      由 Dulshani Gunawardhana 提交于 
      Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.
Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      fae7f21c
    • W
      Btrfs: use 'u64' rather than 'int' to get extent's generation · 7fdf4b60
      由 Wang Shilong 提交于 
      We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      7fdf4b60
    • J
      Btrfs: stop committing the transaction so much during relocate · 9e6a0c52
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      I noticed with my horrible snapshot excercisor that we were taking forever to
relocate the larger the file system got.  This appeared to be because we were
committing the transaction _constantly_.  There were a few places where we do
braindead things with metadata reservation, like start a transaction and then
try to refill the block rsv, which not only keeps us from committing a
transaction during the enospc stuff, but keeps us from doing some of the harder
flushing work which will make us more likely to need to commit the transaction.
We also were checking the block rsv and committing the transaction if the block
rsv was below a certain threshold, but we were doing this in a place where we
don't actually keep anything in the block rsv so this was always ending up false
so we always committed the transaction in this case.  I tested this to make sure
it didn't break anything, but it takes about 10 hours to get the box to this
state so I don't know how much of an impact it will really make.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      9e6a0c52
    • J
      Btrfs: return an error from btrfs_wait_ordered_range · 0ef8b726
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it's data it
won't actually error out, it will just carry on.  This is because it doesn't
check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn't actually return
anything.  So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look
valid when it really isnt.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      0ef8b726
    • M
      Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() casued by the reserved space migration · 20dd2cbf
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      When we did space balance and snapshot creation at the same time, we might
meet the following oops:
 kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3038!
 [SNIP]
 Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa0411ec7>] btrfs_orphan_cleanup+0x293/0x407 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa042dc45>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.28+0x259/0x373 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa042de85>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x126/0x156 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa042dff1>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xd0/0x121 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0430b2c>] btrfs_ioctl+0x414/0x1854 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff813b60b7>] ? __do_page_fault+0x305/0x379
 [<ffffffff811215a9>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39
 [<ffffffff81121d7c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2
 [<ffffffff81057fe7>] ? finish_task_switch+0x80/0xb8
 [<ffffffff81121e88>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83
 [<ffffffff813b39ff>] ? do_device_not_available+0x12/0x14
 [<ffffffff813b99c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
 [SNIP]
 RIP  [<ffffffffa040da40>] btrfs_orphan_add+0xc3/0x126 [btrfs]

The reason of the problem is that the relocation root creation stole
the reserved space, which was reserved for orphan item deletion.

There are several ways to fix this problem, one is to increasing
the reserved space size of the space balace, and then we can use
that space to create the relocation tree for each fs/file trees.
But it is hard to calculate the suitable size because we doesn't
know how many fs/file trees we need relocate.

We fixed this problem by reserving the space for relocation root creation
actively since the space it need is very small (one tree block, used for
root node copy), then we use that reserved space to create the
relocation tree. If we don't reserve space for relocation tree creation,
we will use the reserved space of the balance.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      20dd2cbf
    • J
      Btrfs: relocate csums properly with prealloc extents · 4577b014
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      A user reported a problem where they were getting csum errors when running a
balance and running systemd's journal.  This is because systemd is awesome and
fallocate()'s its log space and writes into it.  Unfortunately we assume that
when we read in all the csums for an extent that they are sequential starting at
the bytenr we care about.  This obviously isn't the case for prealloc extents,
where we could have written to the middle of the prealloc extent only, which
means the csum would be for the bytenr in the middle of our range and not the
front of our range.  Fix this by offsetting the new bytenr we are logging to
based on the original bytenr the csum was for.  With this patch I no longer see
the csum errors I was seeing.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: NChris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      4577b014