This patch adds support cpufreq for EXYNOS4X12 SoCs. Basically,
the exynos-cpufreq.c is used commonly and exynos4x12-cpufreq.c
is used for EXYNOS4212(two Cortex-A9 cores) and EXYNOS4412(four
Cortex-A9 cores) SoCs.
Signed-off-by: NJaecheol Lee <jc.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

The S3C2416/S3C2450 SoCs support two sources for the armclk.

The first source is the so called armdiv which divides the msysclk down
to provide necessary cpu rates. In this mode the core voltage must be
always at 1.3V. The frequency from the armdiv is not allowed to be
lower than the hclk frequency.

In the second mode the armclk can be sourced directly from the hclk in
the so called "dynamic voltags scaling" (dvs) mode. Here the armdiv
isn't used at all. Also in this mode the core voltage may be lowered.
Existing hardware and tests with it suggest 1.0V as sufficient.

When changing the clock source to the armdiv from the hclk, the SoC
shows stability issues if the new frequency is higher than the current
hclk frequency. Hence the driver always forces the armdiv to the hclk
frequency before the source change and lets the cpufreq issue another
set_target call for higher frequencies.

To mark the hclk frequency as lower as the corresponding armdiv
frequency it is set 1MHz below the real frequency. This lets the cpufreq
framework change between 133MHz based on hclk and 133MHz based on armdiv
at will.
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: NAndrey Gusakov <dron0gus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

To support various EXYNOS series SoCs commonly,
added exynos common structure.
exynos-cpufreq.c => EXYNOS series common cpufreq driver
exynos4210-cpufreq.c => EXYNOS4210 support cpufreq driver
Signed-off-by: NJaecheol Lee <jc.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

Move OMAP cpufreq driver from arch/arm/mach-omap2 into
drivers/cpufreq, along with a few cleanups:

- generalize support for better handling of different SoCs in the OMAP
- use OPP layer instead of OMAP clock internals for frequency table init
Signed-off-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
[khilman@ti.com: move to drivers]
Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
applied.
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

According to discussion of the ARM arch subsystem migration,
ARM cpufreq drivers move to drivers/cpufreq. So this patch
adds Kconfig.arm for ARM like x86 and adds Samsung S5PV210
and EXYNOS4210 cpufreq driver compile in there.
As a note, otherw will be moved.

Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

This is a straight code motion patch, there are no changes to the driver
itself. The Kconfig is left untouched as the ARM CPUfreq Kconfig is all
in one big block in arm/Kconfig and should be moved en masse rather than
being done piecemeal.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

Concluding interface update and movement of the driver by making
the DB8500 cpufreq driver compile in the cpufreq subsystem.

Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

A new cpufreq module, based on the ondemand one with my additional patches
just posted.  This one is more suitable for battery environments where its
probably more appealing to have the cpu freq gracefully increase and decrease
rather than flip between the min and max freq's.

N.B. Bruno Ducrot pointed out that the amd64's "do have unacceptable latency
between min and max freq transition, due to the step-by-step requirements
(200MHz IIRC)"; so AMD64 users would probably benefit from this too.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Clouter <alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!