1. 23 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  2. 01 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 04 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 22 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 11 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  6. 10 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 03 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  8. 01 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 19 1月, 2017 1 次提交
  10. 20 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 15 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • V
      drm: Nuke fb->pixel_format · 438b74a5
      Ville Syrjälä 提交于
      Replace uses of fb->pixel_format with fb->format->format.
      Less duplicated information is a good thing.
      
      Note that coccinelle failed to eliminate the
      "/* fourcc format */" comment from drm_framebuffer.h, so I had
      to do that part manually.
      
      @@
      struct drm_framebuffer *FB;
      expression E;
      @@
       drm_helper_mode_fill_fb_struct(...) {
      	...
      -	FB->pixel_format = E;
      	...
       }
      
      @@
      struct drm_framebuffer *FB;
      expression E;
      @@
       i9xx_get_initial_plane_config(...) {
      	...
      -	FB->pixel_format = E;
      	...
       }
      
      @@
      struct drm_framebuffer *FB;
      expression E;
      @@
       ironlake_get_initial_plane_config(...) {
      	...
      -	FB->pixel_format = E;
      	...
       }
      
      @@
      struct drm_framebuffer *FB;
      expression E;
      @@
       skylake_get_initial_plane_config(...) {
      	...
      -	FB->pixel_format = E;
      	...
       }
      
      @@
      struct drm_framebuffer *a;
      struct drm_framebuffer b;
      @@
      (
      - a->pixel_format
      + a->format->format
      |
      - b.pixel_format
      + b.format->format
      )
      
      @@
      struct drm_plane_state *a;
      struct drm_plane_state b;
      @@
      (
      - a->fb->pixel_format
      + a->fb->format->format
      |
      - b.fb->pixel_format
      + b.fb->format->format
      )
      
      @@
      struct drm_crtc *CRTC;
      @@
      (
      - CRTC->primary->fb->pixel_format
      + CRTC->primary->fb->format->format
      |
      - CRTC->primary->state->fb->pixel_format
      + CRTC->primary->state->fb->format->format
      )
      
      @@
      struct drm_mode_set *set;
      @@
      (
      - set->fb->pixel_format
      + set->fb->format->format
      |
      - set->crtc->primary->fb->pixel_format
      + set->crtc->primary->fb->format->format
      )
      
      @@
      @@
       struct drm_framebuffer {
      	 ...
      -	 uint32_t pixel_format;
      	 ...
       };
      
      v2: Fix commit message (Laurent)
          Rebase due to earlier removal of many fb->pixel_format uses,
          including the 'fb->format = drm_format_info(fb->format->format);'
          snafu
      v3: Adjusted the semantic patch a bit and regenerated due to code
          changes
      
      Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (v1)
      Reviewed-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1481751175-18463-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
      438b74a5
  12. 17 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 15 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 12 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 29 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Move GEM activity tracking into a common struct reservation_object · d07f0e59
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      In preparation to support many distinct timelines, we need to expand the
      activity tracking on the GEM object to handle more than just a request
      per engine. We already use the struct reservation_object on the dma-buf
      to handle many fence contexts, so integrating that into the GEM object
      itself is the preferred solution. (For example, we can now share the same
      reservation_object between every consumer/producer using this buffer and
      skip the manual import/export via dma-buf.)
      
      v2: Reimplement busy-ioctl (by walking the reservation object), postpone
      the ABI change for another day. Similarly use the reservation object to
      find the last_write request (if active and from i915) for choosing
      display CS flips.
      
      Caveats:
      
       * busy-ioctl: busy-ioctl only reports on the native fences, it will not
      warn of stalls (in set-domain-ioctl, pread/pwrite etc) if the object is
      being rendered to by external fences. It also will not report the same
      busy state as wait-ioctl (or polling on the dma-buf) in the same
      circumstances. On the plus side, it does retain reporting of which
      *i915* engines are engaged with this object.
      
       * non-blocking atomic modesets take a step backwards as the wait for
      render completion blocks the ioctl. This is fixed in a subsequent
      patch to use a fence instead for awaiting on the rendering, see
      "drm/i915: Restore nonblocking awaits for modesetting"
      
       * dynamic array manipulation for shared-fences in reservation is slower
      than the previous lockless static assignment (e.g. gem_exec_lut_handle
      runtime on ivb goes from 42s to 66s), mainly due to atomic operations
      (maintaining the fence refcounts).
      
       * loss of object-level retirement callbacks, emulated by VMA retirement
      tracking.
      
       * minor loss of object-level last activity information from debugfs,
      could be replaced with per-vma information if desired
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-21-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      d07f0e59
  16. 22 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 16 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  18. 15 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 09 8月, 2016 3 次提交
  20. 01 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · e42aeef1
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This reverts the following patches:
      
      d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
      15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
      95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
      03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
      2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
      ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
      2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
      b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
      8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
      143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
      84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
      6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
      aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
      afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      
      "drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
      split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
      the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.
      
      "drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
      updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
      caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
      have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.
      
      Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
      came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
      removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
      Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(
      
      There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
      serious.
      
      Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
      since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
      breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
      (especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
      hard to revert things cleanly.
      
      Lessons learned:
      - Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
        the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.
      
      - Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
        patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
        mix up different things in one patch.
      
      - Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
        doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
        tricky core code.
      
      - Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
        bisect breakage is not a good idea.
      
      - I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
        postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
        there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
        have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.
      
      (cherry picked from commit 5a21b665
      from drm-intel-next-queeud)
      
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      e42aeef1
  21. 25 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Revert async unpin and nonblocking atomic commit · 5a21b665
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This reverts the following patches:
      
      d55dbd06 drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips.
      15c86bdb drm/i915: Check for unpin correctness.
      95c2ccdc Reapply "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      a6747b73 drm/i915: Make unpin async.
      03f476e1 drm/i915: Prepare connectors for nonblocking checks.
      2099deff drm/i915: Pass atomic states to fbc update functions.
      ee7171af drm/i915: Remove reset_counter from intel_crtc.
      2ee004f7 drm/i915: Remove queue_flip pointer.
      b8d2afae drm/i915: Remove use_mmio_flip kernel parameter.
      8dd634d9 drm/i915: Remove cs based page flip support.
      143f73b3 drm/i915: Rework intel_crtc_page_flip to be almost atomic, v3.
      84fc494b drm/i915: Add the exclusive fence to plane_state.
      6885843a drm/i915: Convert flip_work to a list.
      aa420ddd drm/i915: Allow mmio updates on all platforms, v2.
      afee4d87 Revert "drm/i915: Avoid stalling on pending flips for legacy cursor updates"
      
      "drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips" should have been
      split up, misses a proper commit message and seems to cause issues in
      the legacy page_flip path as demonstrated by kms_flip.
      
      "drm/i915: Make unpin async" doesn't handle the unthrottled cursor
      updates correctly, leading to an apparent pin count leak. This is
      caught by the WARN_ON in i915_gem_object_do_pin which screams if we
      have more than DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT pins.
      
      Unfortuantely we can't just revert these two because this patch series
      came with a built-in bisect breakage in the form of temporarily
      removing the unthrottled cursor update hack for legacy cursor ioctl.
      Therefore there's no other option than to revert the entire pile :(
      
      There's one tiny conflict in intel_drv.h due to other patches, nothing
      serious.
      
      Normally I'd wait a bit longer with doing a maintainer revert, but
      since the minimal set of patches we need to revert (due to the bisect
      breakage) is so big, time is running out fast. And very soon
      (especially after a few attempts at fixing issues) it'll be really
      hard to revert things cleanly.
      
      Lessons learned:
      - Not a good idea to rush the review (done by someone fairly new to
        the area) and not make sure domain experts had a chance to read it.
      
      - Patches should be properly split up. I only looked at the two
        patches that should be reverted in detail, but both look like the
        mix up different things in one patch.
      
      - Patches really should have proper commit messages. Especially when
        doing more than one thing, and especially when touching critical and
        tricky core code.
      
      - Building a patch series and r-b stamping it when it has a built-in
        bisect breakage is not a good idea.
      
      - I also think we need to stop building up technical debt by
        postponing atomic igt testcases even longer. I think it's clear that
        there's enough corner cases in this beast that we really need to
        have the testcases _before_ the next step lands.
      
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Acked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      5a21b665
  22. 19 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 10 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  24. 07 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  25. 22 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  26. 02 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  27. 11 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  28. 22 6月, 2015 4 次提交
  29. 08 5月, 2015 2 次提交
  30. 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 10 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  32. 10 3月, 2015 1 次提交