Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 03 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 10 12月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 06 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 03 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 02 12月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      Bluetooth: Track both local and remote L2CAP fixed channel mask · 0bd49fc7
      由 Johan Hedberg 提交于 
      To pave the way for future fixed channels to be added easily we should
track both the local and remote mask on a per-L2CAP connection (struct
l2cap_conn) basis. So far the code has used a global variable in a racy
way which anyway needs fixing.

This patch renames the existing conn->fixed_chan_mask that tracked
the remote mask to conn->remote_fixed_chan and adds a new variable
conn->local_fixed_chan to track the local mask. Since the HS support
info is now available in the local mask we can remove the
conn->hs_enabled variable.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      0bd49fc7
  13. 27 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 15 11月, 2014 4 次提交
  17. 13 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 29 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 25 10月, 2014 2 次提交
  23. 02 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      Bluetooth: Fix lockdep warning with l2cap_chan_connect · 02e246ae
      由 Johan Hedberg 提交于 
      The L2CAP connection's channel list lock (conn->chan_lock) must never be
taken while already holding a channel lock (chan->lock) in order to
avoid lock-inversion and lockdep warnings. So far the l2cap_chan_connect
function has acquired the chan->lock early in the function and then
later called l2cap_chan_add(conn, chan) which will try to take the
conn->chan_lock. This violates the correct order of taking the locks and
may lead to the following type of lockdep warnings:

-> #1 (&conn->chan_lock){+.+...}:
       [<c109324d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x140
       [<c188459c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x420
       [<d0aab48e>] l2cap_chan_add+0x1e/0x40 [bluetooth]
       [<d0aac618>] l2cap_chan_connect+0x348/0x8f0 [bluetooth]
       [<d0cc9a91>] lowpan_control_write+0x221/0x2d0 [bluetooth_6lowpan]
-> #0 (&chan->lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<c10928d8>] __lock_acquire+0x1a18/0x1d20
       [<c109324d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x140
       [<c188459c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x420
       [<d0ab05fd>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x1dd/0x3f0 [bluetooth]
       [<d0a909c4>] hci_le_meta_evt+0x11a4/0x1260 [bluetooth]
       [<d0a910eb>] hci_event_packet+0x3ab/0x3120 [bluetooth]
       [<d0a7cb08>] hci_rx_work+0x208/0x4a0 [bluetooth]

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&conn->chan_lock);
                               lock(&chan->lock);
                               lock(&conn->chan_lock);
  lock(&chan->lock);

Before calling l2cap_chan_add() the channel is not part of the
conn->chan_l list, and can therefore only be accessed by the L2CAP user
(such as l2cap_sock.c). We can therefore assume that it is the
responsibility of the user to handle mutual exclusion until this point
(which we can see is already true in l2cap_sock.c by it in many places
touching chan members without holding chan->lock).

Since the hci_conn and by exctension l2cap_conn creation in the
l2cap_chan_connect() function depend on chan details we cannot simply
add a mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock) in the beginning of the function
(since the conn object doesn't yet exist there). What we can do however
is move the chan->lock taking later into the function where we already
have the conn object and can that way take conn->chan_lock first.

This patch implements the above strategy and does some other necessary
changes such as using __l2cap_chan_add() which assumes conn->chan_lock
is held, as well as adding a second needed label so the unlocking
happens as it should.
Reported-by: NJukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Tested-by: NJukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NJukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      02e246ae
  25. 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      Bluetooth: Fix L2CAP information request handling for fixed channels · aeaeb4bb
      由 Johan Hedberg 提交于 
      Even if we have no connection-oriented channels we should perform the
L2CAP Information Request procedures before notifying L2CAP channels of
the connection. This is so that the L2CAP channel implementations can
perform checks on what the remote side supports (e.g. does it support
the fixed channel in question).

So far the code has relied on the l2cap_do_start() function to initiate
the Information Request, however l2cap_do_start() is used on a
per-channel basis and only for connection-oriented channels. This means
that if there are no connection-oriented channels on the system we would
never start the Information Request procedure.

This patch creates a new l2cap_request_info() helper function to
initiate the Information Request procedure, and ensures that it is
called whenever a BR/EDR connection has been established. The patch also
updates fixed channels to be notified of connection readiness only once
the Information Request procedure has completed.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      aeaeb4bb
  27. 09 9月, 2014 8 次提交
  29. 14 8月, 2014 13 次提交